0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
43 просмотров34 страницы
A summary of Globalization and Culture course focusing on the globalization of education. It's drawn from 5 readings, 3 are taken from The Economist, 1 is taken from the Globalization Reader (v.4), and the other one is taken from the NY times' article.
A summary of Globalization and Culture course focusing on the globalization of education. It's drawn from 5 readings, 3 are taken from The Economist, 1 is taken from the Globalization Reader (v.4), and the other one is taken from the NY times' article.
A summary of Globalization and Culture course focusing on the globalization of education. It's drawn from 5 readings, 3 are taken from The Economist, 1 is taken from the Globalization Reader (v.4), and the other one is taken from the NY times' article.
1. The globalization reader chapter 32: mass schooling (Yoonseo) 2. Economist One Shot exam SK (Stella) 3. Economist Global Campus (Kamila) 4. Alternative View: Economists MOOCs (Tina) 5. Group Opinion 6. Discussion Questions
The Globalization Reader About The Authors
Dr. David P. Baker is the Professor of Education and Sociology at the Pennsylvania State University. His research focuses on the impact of education on individuals and societies, international comparisons of school organization, academic outcomes, and educational policy. His most recent book is National Differences, Global Similarities: World Culture and the Future of Mass Schooling, co-written with Gerald K. LeTendre. About The Authors
Dr. Gerald K. LeTendre, Professor of Education and International Affairs, is chair of the Educational Policy Studies Department at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also an associate editor of The American Journal of Education. His most recent books includes National Differences, Global Similarities: World Culture and Current and Future Institutional Trends in Mass Schooling, co-written with David P. Baker.
Priority on passing on national uniqueness and heritage & meeting technical needs of their labor market Schooling would be limited to the nations need, and not expand unless necessary Hierarchal schooling: more resources allocated to the best
However this is not the case. Education as an institution has become a global enterprise: people all over the world are being educated according to the same patterns Current image of national schooling: would be organized in accordance to the nations future welfare
Subplot One: The Worldwide Success of Mass Schooling
The rise of state-sponsored mass schooling: Public schooling which follows a singular model of education, available to large masses of children.
In the past: education was specialized; reserved for the elite Mass schooling -> Mass enrollment (primary and secondary) -> Mass literacy -> Growth of Higher Education Current model: education available to the masses; standardized Subplot Two: Schooling is an Institution
The spread of mass schooling is based on the idea that: an academic education is beneficial to all children all children should be educated differences such as race, gender, religion, or language should not be a barrier it is in the nations interest to allow this to be achieved.
Education is an institution: it may differ from nation to nation, but it is reflective of certain ideas about what education is and how schools should operate. Conclusion Schooling has become a global institution. -> Reflective of a world culture? December 17 th 2011 ROAD OF SUCCESS (Korean Societys viewpoint)
HIGH SCORES IN EXAM = GET INTO THE BEST UNIVERSITIES = GET STABLE JOBS FROM THE BEST COMPANIES Suneung Siheom, or can be known as Koreans SAT a test that final year high school students have to take in order to be admitted to any university. it covers everything theyve learned in high school.
9 HOURS identifies the intelligent and diligent, poor can rise to the top by studying really hard! MERISTOCRATIC Both students and parents pay attention to education! BENEFITS EDUCATION = ECONOMIC GROWTH 100 % Parents want their kids to go to university
63% People age 25-34 are college graduates (Poll by CLSA, highest in OECD countries)
Economic growth since 1960, last year increase by 6.2% despite global slowdown. South Korea a full sized country is 4 th in OECDs scoring system after big cities which are Shanghai, Singapore, ad Hongkong. Parents send their kids for tutors and hagwon to score better in thte exam DRAWBACKS HELL IN HIGHSCHOOL HIGH SUICIDE RATES Education cost > Job Income COMPANY Classes lasted from 7 am - 4pm, then study until midnight in library. Study 7 days/week Students are less free to pursue what they really want to do SOCIAL PRESSURE: NO DEGREE NO JOB Age 15-24 years) 15/100.0000 Compared to 10 American, 7 Chinese, 5 Briton A survey in August found that , four months after leaving university 40% of graduates x find jobs. In 2009, 202 people tragically commited to suicide Families in Seoul spend 16% of their income for private tuition. Chaebol only employ 10% of the workforce, recruiting only from prestigious university. Pensioned off Older people (even though still have much to offer) Koreans are dissatisfied with the companies they work at. Only 48% feel they receive suitable recognition, Chinas worker 68% Low birth rate: (6 in 1960, 1.15 in 2009) No workforce for future WHY? Unfriendly policy for women in workplace After pregnancy :drop fast track or work long inflexible hours (juggle between working and raising kids Education is expensive: hagwon/private institutions, college entrance fee
Employee to hire non graduates (high school graduates) and give them trainings.
Companies to accept not only by merit background, but also experience.
Limit hagwon fees and hours (currently there are still 100,000 hagwon) Young workers dont want to be chained in the same desk for the next 30 years Part time jobs instead of secure jobs (8% in 2000, 23% in 2010) Workers under 25 on temporary contract leapt from ZERO to 28%.
Bright and less beholden to tradition Korean graduates from abroad are challenging the system Looked into market potential->start new business (Ex: Richard Chois story) Some locally educated Koreans also do the same (Ex: Charles Pyo won a place at Yonsei because he set up his own business) Allow many routes to success Korea is rich, so it can no longer grow fast by copying others. It cannot remain dynamic with an aging, shrinking workforce. It cannot become creative with a school system that stresses rote learning above thinking. And its people cannot realize their full potential in a society where they get only one shot at doing well in life, and it comes when they are still teenagers. To remain what one writer called The Land of Miracles, Korea will have to loosen up, and. THE GLOBAL CAMPUS THE ECONOMIST JANUARY 20 TH 2011 POPULAR DESTINATIONS FOR STUDYING ABROAD America accounts for 19% of the worlds most mobile students.
In France, most foreign students come from Europe or former colonies in Africa. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Receives large research funds from companies.
Founded more than 25,800 companies.
Staff and students collaborate with established firms.
Receives buckets of cash from the government and private companies.
Funding for new research initiatives. Collaboration across disciplines provoke inventions.
[PROJECT #1] nanoparticles that destroy cancer cells.
[PROJECT #2] GM viruses that saves energy. MIT GENERATES AND SPREADS KNOWLEDGE ADVICES THE WHITE HOUSE POSTS COURSE MATERIALS ON THE INTERNET PROMOTES COLLABORATION ACROSS BORDERS Internships abroad for students. Joint ventures. China & India. [AT HARVARD] hear a range of views on appropriate relationships between governments, markets, and citizens.
Students are exposed to arguments FOR and AGAINST democracy.
See problems associated with quick election cycles and extreme partisanship. TRAINING STUDENTS FOR POTENTIAL LEADERSHIP RECRUIT FROM A GLOBAL POOL OF TALENT Alumni becomes part of a global network.
17/20 of the worlds leading universities are American.
Enhances academic firepower. SAMUEL HUNTINGTON Growing influence of global elites ALARMING.
Globocrats have little need for national loyalty.
See national government as relics whose useful function is to facilitate the elites global operations.
Alternative Views Graduated from Columbia University with a masters in science of journalism Previously a food critic for New York Times
Government funding for public university is going down while tuition fees are just getting higher and higher. (Student Debt) College is presented to us as a definite bridge through the middle class. The idea of college being a social mobility is going down. Although more kids are going to college, its still not at the ideal state yet Racial Money and social class High school rankings
massive open online courses free education made available online Through readings, videos, and problems http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/ massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a- rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://www.psmag.com/navigation/books-and- culture/creating-content-many-access-mooc- value-education-76008/#PSMag.com Udacity Coursera edX Advantage Free/cheap (to an extent) Pay for your master degrees or certificate of completion to show to jobs Go on your own pace Disadvantage Interaction with professors and other students What about networking Jobs going down for professors Commitment from student to material Technology based (what about people without technology) A real time great lecture motivates Stella: Traditional Education as to receive a higher education is important only that Im not fond of the rote learning style that is emphasized in Koreans education system.
Kamila: Receiving traditional education still beats virtual education especially if students are to learn the skills of becoming a global leader. Yoonseo: While globalization has made education more widely available, I feel that the current higher education system fails to take into account certain inequalities and therefore fails to be truly meritocratic. MOOCs could be a possible solution as it allows students to bypass this system.
Does the globalization of education diminish inequality?
Is higher education (and Western education) necessary in order to succeed?
Does Globalization really help bringing education for everyone?