R1 Swap Benchmark

Technology QOS & CEM

Benchmark analysis conducted on R1 commercial region N1, N2, N3, C1 ,C4 & C5-R1 based on the major service KPIs.
R2 region swap is in progress, hence cannot be analyzed under current circumstances.
Inferences over R1 swap analysis are quite satisfactory in almost all service KPIs.
Tech Region Total Swap Planned Sites Sites Swapped So Far
North 1454 1428
Central-1 584 584
Total 2038 2012
Swap for R1 has almost been completed with the current status as below.
Major City & Surroundings Commercial Region Percentage Completion
1-Sahiwal Central-5 [R1]
Already Huawei
(8 Zones)
2-Okara, 3-Shahdara, 4-Lahore, 5-Lahore, 6-Lahore Central-1
13-Rawalpindi, 14-Islamabad North-1
7-Sheikhupura, 8-Gujranwala, 9-Wazirabad, 10-Gujrat Central-4
100%
(7 Zones)
11-Gojar Khan North-1
15-Taxila North-3
19-Skardu North-2
12-KotliRural North-3 98.00%
16-Bajaur Agency North-2 99.60%
17-Khyber Agency North-2 96.50%
18-Peshawar North-2 98.00%
NAR has improved for all the regions as compared to the previous values
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
C1 98.9% 99.1%
0.2%
C4 98.4% 99.3%
0.9%
C5 [R1] 97.5% [Jul] 99.0% 1.5%
98.9%
99.1%
98.4%
99.3%
97.5%
99.0%
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
3
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
4
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
5
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
6
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
7
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
8
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
9
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
4
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
3
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
4
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
5
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
6
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
7
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
8
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
9
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
4
7
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
8
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
9
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
/
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
4
C1 C4 C5 (R1)
Network Availability Central 1 [R1]
C4 CSSR IMRPOVED with the SWAP
C1 & C5 [R1] remained Stable although Blocking Increased in the Regions due to
increase in Traffic
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
C1 96.6% 96.2%
-0.4%
C4 92.8% 95.0%
2.2%
C5 [R1] 94.9% 94.4% -0.5%
96.6
96.2
92.8
95.0
94.9
94.4
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
C1 C4 C5[R1]
C
S

T
C
H

B
l
o
c
k
i
n
g

R
a
t
e

C
a
l
l

S
e
t
u
p

S
u
c
c
e
s
s

R
a
t
e

Regional CSSR Central 1 Trend Monthly
Max of CSSR Max of CS Blck
CSSR IMPROVED for all the regions after the SWAP although there was a Traffic rise
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
N1 94.2% 96.8%
2.6%
N2 86.7% 90.3%
3.6%
N3 92.3% 96.0% 3.7%
94.2
96.8
86.7
90.3
92.3
96.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
75
80
85
90
95
100
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
N1 N2 N3
C
S

T
C
H

B
l
o
c
k
i
n
g

R
a
t
e

C
a
l
l

S
e
t
u
p

S
u
c
c
e
s
s

R
a
t
e

Regional CSSR NORTH Trend Monthly
Max of CSSR Max of CS Blck
Drop Call Rate reported IMPROVED for C4 & C5[R1] Region as depicted by the Graph
Drop Call Rate reported STABLE for C1 Region
C4 Reports the HIGHEST improvement because it is the only region that was SWAPPED
[C1 & C5[R1]] were already HUAWEI & therefore no SWAP]
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
C1 0.9% 0.91%
0%
C4 1.6% 1.1%
0.5%
C5 [R1] 1.5% [Mar] 1.4% 0.1%
0.9 0.9
1.6
1.1
1.5
1.4
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
C1 C4 C5[R1]
T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
r
r
i
e
d

[
E
r
l
a
n
g
]

D
r
o
p

C
a
l
l

R
a
t
e

Regional DCR Central 1 Trend Monthly
Max of DCR Max of Traffic
Drop Call Rate slightly increased for N1 & N2 Regions. For N1 DCR increased after June
2013 [cells of N3 separated from N1 Changed the Set for calculation of DCR Low
Traffic carried by N3 cells Low DCR Overall Regional DCR low].
DCR for N2 remained stable although there was substantial Traffic rise.
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
N1 1.1% 1.1%
0.0
N2 1.3% 1.3%
0.0
N3 1.0% 1.0% 0.0%
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
a
n
-
1
3
F
e
b
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
N1 N2 N3
T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
r
r
i
e
d

[
E
r
l
a
n
g
]

D
r
o
p

C
a
l
l

R
a
t
e

Regional DCR North Trend Monthly
Max of DCR Max of Traffic
Downlink TBF SR IMPROVED for C4 despite a substantial rise in Payload
Downlink TBF SR remained STABLE for C1 and C5[R1] for a rise in Payload for both the
Regions
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
C1 98.9% 98.3%
-0.6%
C4 95.4% 97.5%
2.1%
C5 [R1] 98.6% 98.5% -0.1%
98.9 98.3
95.4
97.5
98.6 98.5
0
50000000
100000000
150000000
200000000
250000000
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
C1 C4 C5 [R1]
P
a
y
l
o
a
d

[
K
i
l
o
b
y
t
e
s
]

T
B
F

S
u
c
c
e
s
s

R
a
t
e

Regional DL TBF SR Central 1 Trend Monthly
Max of DL TBF SR Max of Payload
DL TBF SR IMPROVED for N1 and N3 despite a substantial increase in the Payload
carried per day
DL TBF SR remained STABLE for N2 following an increase in the Payload carried per day
Region Jan-2013 Jan-2014 %age
N1 97.5% 98.6%
1.1%
N2 97% 96.6%
-0.4%
N3 94.5% 97.6% 3.1%
97.5
98.6
97.0
96.6
94.5
97.6
0
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
120000000
140000000
160000000
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
M
a
r
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
3
M
a
y
-
1
3
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
J
u
n
-
1
3
J
u
l
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
J
a
n
-
1
4
N1 N2 N3
P
a
y
l
o
a
d

[
K
i
l
o
b
y
t
e
s
]

T
B
F

S
u
c
c
e
s
s

R
a
t
e

Regional DL TBF SR North Trend Monthly
Max of DL TBF SR Max of Payload
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17
Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-
09
Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16
R1
M
e
a
n

O
p
i
n
i
o
n

S
c
o
r
e

[
M
O
S
]

Mean Opinion Score [Pre-Post] Comparison
Max of MOS Pre Swap Max of MOS Post Swap
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17
Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-
09
Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16
R1
%
a
g
e

i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t

i
n

M
O
S

%age Improvement in MOS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17 19 20 21 18 24
Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-
09
Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16 Zone-18
R1
T
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t

k
b
p
s

Throughput [kbps] [Pre-Post] Comparison
Max of Post-Swap Max of Pre-Swap
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
700%
800%
900%
1000%
47 48 49 45 46 38 12 39 4 6 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 1 2 3 5 7 16 17 19 20 21 18 24
Zone-07 Zone-08 Zone-
09
Zone-10 Zone-11 Zone-12 Zone-15 Zone-16 Zone-18
R1
%age Improvement in Throughput [kbps]
All zones with post
swap benchmark show
improvement