0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
2K просмотров28 страниц
Fiscal Policy Reforms in india since 1991 Presented by Dr. Tarun das Professor, IILM Fiscal Policy Reforms. Motivation for Fiscal Reforms Large fiscal deficits and automatic monetization of deficits leading to high inflation and high interest rates. Low buoyancy and elasticity of both direct and indirect taxes. Complicated tax structure, legal laws, rules and procedures. Low compliance rate, high degree of tax evasion, low administrative efficiency.
Fiscal Policy Reforms in india since 1991 Presented by Dr. Tarun das Professor, IILM Fiscal Policy Reforms. Motivation for Fiscal Reforms Large fiscal deficits and automatic monetization of deficits leading to high inflation and high interest rates. Low buoyancy and elasticity of both direct and indirect taxes. Complicated tax structure, legal laws, rules and procedures. Low compliance rate, high degree of tax evasion, low administrative efficiency.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PPT, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Fiscal Policy Reforms in india since 1991 Presented by Dr. Tarun das Professor, IILM Fiscal Policy Reforms. Motivation for Fiscal Reforms Large fiscal deficits and automatic monetization of deficits leading to high inflation and high interest rates. Low buoyancy and elasticity of both direct and indirect taxes. Complicated tax structure, legal laws, rules and procedures. Low compliance rate, high degree of tax evasion, low administrative efficiency.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PPT, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
1. Characteristics of Reforms •Gradual and Step by Step Approach not a Big Bang or Shock Therapy Approach •Democratic and political constraint •Strong emphasis on “human face” •Least sacrifice made by people •No write-off or rescheduling of external debt •Agency constraint and No backtracking •Nationality constraint •Ownership of reforms Fiscal Policy Reforms 2 2.1 Motivation for Fiscal Reforms • Large fiscal deficits and automatic monetization of deficits leading to high inflation and high interest rates and crowding out private investment. • High and irrational tax rates, high tariff walls led to industrial inefficiency, lack of competitiveness, high cost economy and non-optimal allocation of resources. • Large variance and multiplicity of tax rates on the basis of end-uses led to complicated and weak tax administration and rent seeking. Fiscal Policy Reforms 3 2.2 Motivation for Fiscal Reforms
• Low buoyancy and elasticity of both
direct and indirect taxes. • Complicated tax structure, legal laws, rules and procedures. • Low compliance rate, high degree of tax evasion, low administrative efficiency. • Narrow tax base and greater dependence on indirect taxes leading to inequity • Change in the role of the government from operator to regulator, supplier of Fiscal Policy Reforms 4 goods and services to facilitator. 2.3 Motivation for Fiscal Reforms • Liberalization of trade, industry, investment • Emphasis of social services and safety net in the context of so-called LPG (liberalization, privatization and globalization). • Public sector enterprises reforms and disinvestment of government equity. • Integration of monetary, exchange rate, regulatory and other policies. • Globalization and Regionalization of economic activities. • Impact of WTO, SAARC, BTAs and FTAs.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 5
2.4 Motivation for Fiscal Reforms • Demographic change (social security and health care for senior citizens and reforms in pensions, provident and insurance funds). • Fiscal federalism, Centre-state relations, decentralization, grass root planning, Panchayati Raj. • To tackle environment degradation through filth tax /environment tax. • IMF/ World Bank/ ADB conditionalities for reforms and fiscal sustainability. Fiscal Policy Reforms 6 3.1 Major Fiscal Reforms • Reduction of fiscal deficit • Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act 2003 • Simplifying rules and procedures • Strengthening tax administration • Widening tax base & enhancing buoyancy • Rationalisation and Reduction of both direct and indirect tax rates
Fiscal Policy Reforms 7
3.2 Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act 2003 • FRBM Act 2003 and FRBM Rules 2004 came into force w.e.f. 5 July 2004. • The Act mandates the Central govt to eliminate revenue deficit by March 2009 and to reduce fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP by March 2008. • Under section 7 of the Act, the central govt is required to lay before both houses of Parliament Medium Term Fiscal Policy Statement, Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement and Macro Economic Framework Statement along with the Annual Financial Statement and Demand for Grants.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 8
3.3 FRBM Rules 2004
• Reduction of revenue deficit by 0.5% of GDP
or more every year. • Reduction of gross fiscal deficit by 0.3% of GDP or more every year. • No assumption of additional debt exceeding 9% of GDP for 2004-05 and progressive reduction of this limit by at least one percentage point of GDP in each subsequent year.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 9
3.4 FRBM Rules 2004 • No guarantee in excess of 0.5% of GDP in any financial year. • Four fiscal indicators to be projected for the medium term. These include revenue deficit, fiscal deficit, tax revenue and total debt as % of GDP. • Greater transparency in the budgetary process, rules, accounting standards and policies having bearing on fiscal indicators. • Quarterly review of the fiscal situation.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 10
3.5 FRBM Rules 2004 • The rules mandate the Central Government to take appropriate collective action in the case of revenue and fiscal deficits exceeding 45% of the budget estimates, or total non-debt receipts falling short of 40% of the budget estimates at the end of half year of the financial year. • The rules also prescribe the formats for the mandatory statements.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 11
3.6 Macro-economic Background for Budget 2006-07 Major macro-economic 2005- 2006-07 variables 06 Projected
3.7 Medium Term Fiscal Indicators Items 2005-06 2006- 2007- 2008- RE 07 BE 08 Tar 09 Tar 1.Revenue Deficit as 2.6 2.1 1.0 0.0 % of GDP 2.Fiscal Deficit 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.0 as % of GDP 3.Gross tax rev. 10.5 11.2 11.5 11.8 as % of GDP 4.Year-end debt 65.7 65.7 64.4 63.1 stock (% of GDP) Fiscal Policy Reforms 13 3.8 Recommendations of the Twelfth Finance Commission (1) Fiscal deficit to GDP for the Centre and States be targeted at 3%. Revenue deficit f the Centre and States be reduced to zero by 2008-09. State’s recruitment policy must ensure that salary bill as % of revenue exp, net of interest payments, is within 35%. Each State must enact Fiscal Responsibility bill to reduce fiscal deficit to SDP ratio to 3% and revenue deficit to zero by 2008-09.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 14
3.9 Recommendations of the Twelfth Finance Commission (2) States’ share in net proceeds of shareable central taxes be increased from 29.5% to 30.5%. Indicative amount of overall transfers to States be fixed at 38% of the Centre’s gross revenue receipts. A grant of Rs.20,000 crore for Panchayati Raj Institutions and Rs.5,000 crore for urban local bodies to be given to States for the period 2005-2010.
Fiscal Policy Reforms 15
4.1 Progress of Fiscal Reforms Status in June 1991 Status in January 2007 (a)Budget support to (a) Support reduced to PSEs: 1.5% of GDP 0.5% of GDP (b) Price and purchase (b)No price preference, preference for PSEs but purchase (c )Preferential treatment preference exists for bank credits (c )No preferential treat- (d) No hard budget ment for bank credits constraints for PSEs (d) MOUs strengthened (e) No disinvestment (e) Divestment allowed (f)SICA does not include (f)SICA applicable for sick PSUs PSUs Fiscal Policy Reforms 16 4.2 Fiscal Deficit (as % of GDP) Status in 2005-06 Status in 1990-91 Central Govt Central Govt Fiscal Deficit 6.6% Fiscal Deficit 4.1% Revenue deficit 3.3% Revenue deficit 2.6% Primary deficit 2.8% Primary deficit 0.5% State governments State governments Fiscal Deficit 3.3% Fiscal Deficit 3.3% Revenue deficit 0.9% Revenue deficit 0.5% Primary deficit 1.8% Primary deficit 0.7%
Fiscal Policy Reforms 17
4.3 Fiscal Deficit as % of GDP Status in 1990-91 Status in 2005-06 General government General government Fiscal Deficit 9.4% Fiscal Deficit 7.3% Revenue deficit 3.3% Revenue deficit 3.1% Primary deficit 2.8% Primary deficit 1.2% • Monetization of budget • No automatic deficit monetization • Control on interest rate • Govt securities are on government auctioned and sold at securities market prices
Fiscal Policy Reforms 18
4.4 Progress of Fiscal Reforms Status in June 1991 Status in March 2006 • Public debt as • Public debt as percentage of GDP percentage of GDP (a) Central govt 61% (a) Central govt 66% - Internal 50% - Internal 60% - External 12% - External 6% (b) States 19% (b) States 33% - Internal 19% - Internal 33% (c )General govt 68% (c )General govt 99% - Internal 56% - Internal 93% - External 12% - External 6% Fiscal Policy Reforms 19 4.5 Progress of Fiscal Reforms Status in January 2007 Status in June 1991 Fiscal Deficit was (a) Ad hocs replaced by WMAs at market rate financed by: (b) SLR reduced to 25% (a) RBI Ad Hoc TBs at and CRR 5% 4.6% interest (c)Govt. securities are sold (b) Banks through SLR at market rates holdings at 38.5% (d) Reduction of interest and CRR 25% rates for public funds (c ) Market borrowings (e) Less dependence on External debt (d) Public funds (e) External debt Fiscal Policy Reforms 20 4.6 Progress of Fiscal Reforms Status in January 2007 Status in June 1991 Duties & taxes reduced High duty & tax rates Maximum rates Maximum rates Excise duty 16% Cenvat + 16% Excise duty 110% SED Import duty 12.5% Import duty 400% Income tax 30% Income tax 54% Corporate taxes: Corporate taxes: Domestic COs. 30% + 10% surcharge Domestic COs. 49% Foreign COs. 40%+2.5% and 54% surcharge Foreign COs. 65% Fiscal Policy Reforms 21 4.7 Progress of Fiscal Status in June 1991 Reforms Status in January 2007 • No service tax • Service tax @12% • MAT introduced • No MinAlternativeTax • Trans. tax @0.02%+25% • No transactions tax increase in 2006-07 • No tariff value • Tariff value introduced • Dividend tax on both • Dividend tax on only individuals & Cos. companies • Existence of gift tax • Gift tax abolished Tax holidays widened to • Limited cases of tax- • many infrastructure holidays • FBT imposed • No fringe benefit tax (FBT)
Fiscal Policy Reforms 22
4.8 Progress of Fiscal Reforms Status in January 2007 Status in June 1991 • No MRP linked • Concept of MRP introduced for consumer goods excise duties • Estimated income scheme introduced for retail traders. • No estimated • Presumptive income tax income scheme for scheme introduced retail traders • State level VAT introduced • No presumptive tax wef April 05
• No state level VAT
Fiscal Policy Reforms 23
4.9 Related Financial Reforms Status in June 1991 Status in January 2007 • CRR 25% • CRR 5% • SLR 38.5% • SLR 25% • Bank Rate 12% • Bank rate 6% • PLR 11% to 11.5% • PLR above 21% • Deposit and interest • Deposit and interest rates are liberalised rates are controlled • The office of CCI • Capital issues and abolished and SEBI prices determined by established the CCI in MOF
Fiscal Policy Reforms 24
4.10 Related Financial Reforms Status in January 2007 Status in June 1991 • Indian firms not • Indian firms allowed to raise foreign funds by allowed to raise funds GDR, ADR, FCCBs & from foreign stock offshore funds exchanges • FIIs, NRIs and OCBs • Portfolio investment allowed to buy stocks in by foreign investors in Indian markets s.t. Indian companies not overall limit of 49% allowed • FIIs/ NRIs/ OCBs allowed • Foreigners not to buy G-secs allowed to buy G-secs Fiscal Policy Reforms 25 5.1 Second Generation Fiscal Reforms Coordinating state level reforms Accelerated privatisation Development of debt and bond markets Reforms in Insurance, Provident and Pension funds Thrust on state provision of basic needs Rationalisation of user charges for public utilities Rationalisation of subsidies
Fiscal Policy Reforms 26
6. Concluding Remarks Transparency and accountability of budget formulation Multi-year budget and macro-economic forecast Adequacy and sustainability of policies Willingness to pay by stakeholders Strengthening institutional set up
United States v. Vincent Gigante, Vittorio Amuso, Venero Mangano, Benedetto Aloi, Peter Gotti, Dominic Canterino, Peter Chiodo, Joseph Zito, Dennis Delucia, Caesar Gurino, Vincent Ricciardo, Joseph Marion, John Morrissey, Thomas McGowan Victor Sololewski, Anthony B. Laino, Gerald Costabile, Andre Campanella, Michael Realmuto, Richard Pagliarulo, Michael Desantis, Michael Spinelli, Thomas Carew, Corrado Marino, Anthony Casso, 187 F.3d 261, 2d Cir. (1999)