THE ANALYSIS IMPLICATURE of

CHARACTER MR FREDICKSEN
ON UP MOVIE
BACKGROUND of THE STUDY
PURPOSES of THE STUDY
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
Statement of The Problem
What are the implicatures in the UP
Movie character Mr. Fredicksen
dialogue?

BACKGROUND of THE STUDY
WHAT??
WHY??
WHO??
HOW??
BACKGROUND of THE STUDY
WHAT??
The writer wants to analyze the implication
according Kevin Lanos semantics approach
theory in the UP Movies main character MR
FRDICKSEN dialogue.

BACKGROUND of THE STUDY
WHY??
the writer examines UP Movie especially about the form
of implicature that found on the dialogues of the main
character MR FRDICKSEN. In this study, the writer
focuses on the main character in the UP Movie MR
FRDICKSEN. Because MR FRDICKSEN character is
more dominant in the story line of UP Movie, so the
writer puts more emphasis on the main character than
the other figures.
BACKGROUND of THE STUDY
HOW??
For collecting the data, the writer analyzed by
selecting dialogues of the main character in UP movie
MR FRDICKSEN. The writer selects the dialogues
which are related and support problems. In this case,
the dialogues must have the most implication then the
other do and the writer chooses dialogue that uses
both formal and informal language that have
implication in them. Therefore, it is suitable to analyze
implications.
BACKGROUND of THE STUDY
WHO??
The writer focuses on the main character in the UP
Movie MR FRDICKSEN. Because MR FRDICKSEN
character is more dominant in the story line of UP
Movie. MR FRDICKSEN Character is the main
character who has variety ways of speak and
languages. Because of it, the writer chose the main
character dialogue as the object of research.

THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
In order to know about implication, the writer
wants to give some definition about them
taken from some reference book and internet
access.
DEFINITION of IMPLICATION
KINDS of IMPLICATION
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
According Grice in Daviess book, it was the first to
systematically study cases in which speaker meaning
differs from sentence meaning. He introduced the
verb implicate and the cognate noun implicature as
technical terms denoting "the act of meaning or
implying something by saying something else.

DEFINITION of IMPLICATION
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
implications are not stated actually but they are
naturally drawn as result of some process (Grice
1975 : 44). There are two kinds of implication (Grice
1975 : 44) :

-Conversational Implicature

-Conventional implicature

KINDS of IMPLICATION
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
-Conversational Implicature
The basic assumption in conversation is that, unless
otherwise indicated, the participate are adhering to
the cooperative principle and the maxims. It is
important to note that is speakers who communicate
meaning via implications and its listeners who
recognize those communicated meanings via
interence
KINDS of IMPLICATION
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
-Conventional Implicature
In contrast to all the conventional implication
discussed, conventional implication is not based on
the cooperative principle or the maxims. it does not
have to occur in conversation, and it does not depend
on special context for their interpretation.
conventional implicature is associated with specific
words and result in additional conveyed meanings
when those words are used.
KINDS of IMPLICATION