Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Group Members:
Ankit Gupta (10)
Rashmi Wadha (20)
Ishita Dhingra (30)
Mayank Bansal (40)
Sumit Bedi (50)
Siddharth Sud (60)
SEBI
Setting up of SEBI
1988- SEBI established by the Government of
India
One Chairman
Introduced
• comprehensive regulatory measures
• prescribed registration norms
• code of obligations and the code of conduct for different intermediaries like,
bankers to issue, merchant bankers, brokers and sub-brokers, registrars,
portfolio managers
Made dealing in securities both safe and transparent to the end investor
FUNCTIONS OF SEBI
Section 11 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act.
Portfolio Managers
Portfolio managers
These intermediaries manage the portfolio of securities
on behalf of the clients and provide various portfolio
managers , and a registration certificate. Provide a
high standard of diligent ,careful and professionally
independent service to their clients.
VETTING BY SEBI
A company cannot come out with public issue unless Draft Prospectus is
filed with SEBI. Prospectus is a document by way of which the investor
gets all the information pertaining to the company in which they are
going to invest. It gives the detailed information about the Company,
Promoter / Directors, group companies, Capital Structure, Terms of the
present issue etc.
The company can come out with a public issue any time within 180 days
from the date of the letter from SEBI or if no letter is received from SEBI,
within 180 days from the date of expiry of 21 days of submission of
prospectus with SEBI
If the issue size is upto Rs. 20 crores then the merchant bankers are
required to file prospectus with the regional office of SEBI falling under
the jurisdiction in which registered office of the company is situated.
Broker’s Code
The four-part model, which was recommended by the M R
Mayya committee
The offer price shall have a floor price, which will be the average
of 26 weeks traded price preceding the date of the public
announcement. The final offer price shall be determined as the
price at which maximum number of shares has been offered.
Further, the number of bidding centres shall not be less than 30,
including all the stock exchange centres, which should have at
least one electronically-linked computer terminal each.
In case the promoter does not accept the above price, he should
not make an application to the exchange for delisting of the
securities, as per the guidelines. Instead, he shall ensure that the
public shareholding is brought up to the minimum limits specified
under the listing conditions within six months.
companies should lay down a code of conduct for all the board
members and the senior management of company.
21[3A. No company shall deal in the securities of another company or associate of that
other company while in possession of any unpublished price sensitive information.]
22[Regulation 3A not to apply in certain cases.
(c) it had in operation at that time, arrangements that could reasonably be expected to
ensure that the information was not communicated to the person or persons who
made the decision and that no advice with respect to the transactions or agreement
was given to that person or any of those persons by that officer or employee; and
(d) the information was not so communicated and no such advice was so given.
4A. (1) If the Board suspects that any person has violated any provision of these
regulations, it may make inquiries with such persons or any other person as mentioned in
clause (i) of sub-section (2) of section 11 as deemed fit, to form a prima facie opinion as
to whether there is any violation of these regulations.
(2) The Board may appoint one or more officers to inspect the books and records of
insider(s) or any other persons as mentioned in clause (i) of sub-section (2) of section 11
for the purpose of sub-regulation (1).]
RATIO
The main issue in this case was whether the membership of the stock exchange was an asset of the member of the exchange after the
member commits a default.
Key points
• The appellant in this appeal had dealings in sale and purchase of shares
with Yogesh Mehta, who was a member of Bombay Stock Exchange until he
was declared a defaulter by the said Exchange.
• A bare perusal of the Rules made under SEBI Act clearly shows that the said
rules provide that the membership of the Exchange constitutes a personal
permission from the Exchange to exercise the rights and privileges attached
thereto subject to the Rule, Bye- laws and Regulations of the Exchange.
• Every contract notice issued to a constituent contains a specific provision
that "the contract is made subject to the Rule, Bye-laws and Regulations
and usages of the Stock Exchange, Bombay".
• The members of the Stock Exchange, namely, the stock brokers are
permitted to buy and sell the shares for their clients like the appellant. To
secure due performance of his obligations the Exchange takes security from
each members upon which it has a lien as provided by Rule 43.
• A member is declared a defaulter if he fails to meet his obligation and the
Rules further show that thereafter his right of membership and nomination
ceases and vests in the Exchange and belongs to the Exchange.
• The vacancy thus created by the termination of the membership is filled by
the admission of another person, who generally is a person who offers to
pay the highest amount.
Decision
Once a defaulting member ceases to
be a member of the Stock Exchange
no interest in his card remains and
the same cannot be regarded as his
asset.
Case
RATIO
The main issue in this case was whether SEBI can charge
any fees. If yes, then to what extent.
Key points
• On 10th of April, 1992 on behalf of the Board, a letter was addressed to the
Presidents and Executive Directors of all the recognized Stock Exchanges whereby
the members, stock brokers of all the recognized Stock Exchanges in India were
called upon to submit their applications to the Board for the purpose of registration in
accordance with Section 12(1) of the Act.
• The said letter which enclosed a pro forma of the application for registration of stock
brokers required fees to be paid by applicants for registration.
• Section 11 of the Act defines the powers and functions of the Board which mandates
that it shall be the duty of the Board to protect the interests of investors in securities
and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market, by such
measures as it thinks fit.
• Section 11(2)(k) of the Act empowers the Board to levy fees or other charges for
carrying out the purposes enumerated in Section 11 of the Act.
• Section 12 requires the stock brokers, share transfer agents, bankers to an issue,
trustee of trust deed, Registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio
managers, investment advisors and such other intermediaries who may be
associated with securities market to get themselves registered and obtain a
certificate of registration from the Board in accordance with the Regulations made
under this Act.
• Section 12(2) empowers the Board to collect such fees as may be determined by the
Regulations from the applicants who seek registration.
Contd..
• Section 12 requires the stock brokers, share transfer
agents, bankers to an issue, trustee of trust deed,
Registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter,
portfolio managers, investment advisors and such other
intermediaries who may be associated with securities
market to get themselves registered and obtain a
certificate of registration from the Board in accordance
with the Regulations made under this Act.
• Section 12(2) empowers the Board to collect such fees as
may be determined by the Regulations from the
applicants who seek registration.
Decision
The Board is empowered to collect
two types of fees, namely, the fee
under Section 11(2)(k) for carrying
out the purposes of Section 11 and
a fee for the purpose of registering
the applicants under Section 12(2)
of the Act.
THANK YOU
Make the securities market as
safe for practitioners as for
investors.