Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
+|1
, |1
are
any two orthonormal vectors (e.g. the orthonormal
bases of any two subspaces) in any vector space
(e.g. Hilbert space, Euclidean space, etc.)
Quantum Turing tape
Furthermore, Hilbert space can be represented as a
tape of qubits: Given any point in (complex)
Hilbert space as a vector
1
,
2
,
,
+1
, ,
one can replace any successive couple of its
components such as (
1
,
2
,
2
,
3
,
1
,
,
+1
, + such that:
(+)
2
+
+1
2
;
+1
(+)
2
+
+1
2
if
,
+1
are not both 0. However if both are 0 one
needs to add conventionally the center (
= 0,
..
..
.(+).
..
""
Bit and qubit
Then if any bit is an elementary binary choice
between two disjunctive options usually
designated by 0 and 1, any qubit is a
choice between a continuum of disjunctive
options as many (or much) as the points of
the surface of the unit ball:
Indeed a qubit is equivalently representable as
a unit ball in Euclidean space and two points,
the one chosen within the ball, and the other
on its surface, i.e. as a mapping of a unit ball
onto its surface (or any other unit sphere)
|
and |
=
|
, are two complex numbers:
|
, |
..
..
.(+).
..
""
Physical processes as quantum
computations
Different ways to represent a physical process
as different, but equivalent changes
Of wave functions:
Of values of quantum information:
Of transfinite ordinal numbers:
Thus as a quantum computation
Physical states and quantities
in terms of Hilbert space
Quantum mechanics states that any physical state
or its change is a self-adjoint operator in Hilbert
space as any physical system can be considered as
a quantum one
Consequently the states can be interpreted as the
quantities to the state of absolute rest
Then the boundary between quantum states
and quantum quantities is relative:
Indeed any point in Hilbert space can be
interpreted as the relevant operator transforming
the zero point into the point in question
The temporal interpretation of the definition
of physical quantity (A) in quantum mechanics
*(x)
(x)
The physical
processes
in space-time
Computations
of a quantum
computer
Physical processes as changes of
information
Consequently all physical processes are
informational in fact:
The boundary between the physical and the
informational can be represented temporally:
The physical is all till now: This is the current
computational result as well all previous results
constituting a well-ordering
The informational includes the physical: However it
includes the future as a single coherent state as well
as its gradual transformation in the present and
past of the physical:
Time and entanglement
A coherent
state
A few entangled
states
A few well-ordered series in time
Quantum mechanics as a universal
doctrine
All is quantum information because:
Quantum mechanics offers
an universal scientific theory:
Any physical item and process
are quantum in final analysis
Thus all should be quantum
information and/ or its processing
Quantum processes in terms of
quantum information
Any quantum process is informational in terms of a
generalized kind of information: quantum
information
The course of time implies this:
The absolutely coherent future containing all
possibilities of development is being transformed
into the well-ordered series of events in the past by
mediation of the present, within which the choice
necessary for that transformation is being
accomplished
The principles of least action and most probability:
1
st
stage:
2
nd
stage:
Physical motion: A leap from past
into future
A choice of a smooth
trajectory from future
to past, from the end
to the beginning
Quantum information as the base
Quantum information is the real fundament of the
world
If the time is what creates the world, the quantum
information is what builds the world
Indeed the world in all variety needs freedom and
choice to be able to be created:
It is impossible both in the absolutely rigorously
ordered and thus lifeless past and in the quite
chaotic and elemental future:
The world is possible only in the thin strip, the
precinct or the phase transition between them: the
present
All wave functions
as values of quantum information
The quantum quantities as the
changes of quantum information
All physical quantities in the world are
a certain kind of changes of wave functions
and thus of quantum information
Thus they can be as interpreted as a
distraction of transfinite ordinal numbers
If that difference is a finite, the information is
classical
If that difference is transfinite, the information
is quantum: There is some physical change
1 +n
Bits Qubits
n 0
n
Quantum information =
a physical change
Classical information =
an ideal change
Staff Energy
Matter
Information
Ideality
Reality
Time
Being
A local viewpoint A global viewpoint
The philosophical map of concepts
Quantum information and matter
Quantum information is the substance of the physical
world, its matter
However quantum information being a generalization
of classical information and therefore including it as
the particular case as to finite sets underlies also the
abstract or ideal world
Thus quantum information underlies both the
material and ideal world, i.e. anything existing
Indeed anything, which is being now, requires or make
some choices, the corresponding quantity of which is
that of information
Staff Energy
Matter
Quantum information
Ideality
Reality
The choices of time
Another map of concepts
Classical information
Information and the unity of physics
and mathematics
Staff Energy
Matter
Quantum information
Mathematics Physics
The choices of time
The union of physics and mathematics
Classical information
Quantum information and the unity of
the material and ideal world
As information is a dimensionless quantity equally
well referring both to a physical entity or to a
mathematical class, it can serve as a bridge:
Between physics and mathematics
And thus a bridge between the material and ideal
world
A bridge between the concrete and abstract objects
This bridge connects the areas of infinity and
finiteness over the gap of ... complementarity
The bridge over the gap
Information and
quantum information
Mathematics Physics
The material world The ideal world
Abstract objects Concrete objects
... of complementarity
Finiteness Infinity
Finite sets Infinite sets
Classical
information
Quantum
information
Conclusions:
What is is being now
Thus all which is is in time
The fundamental structure of all is defined
between the relation between the future and
the past in the present by means of choices
Choice is the only way for the unorderable
future to be transformed into the well-
ordered past
Choice can happen only at the boundary of
the future and the past, i.e. the present
More conclusions:
Further conclusions:
The unit of classical information, i.e. a bit,
means the elementary choice between two
equiprobable alternatives
Analogically, the unit of quantum information,
i.e a quantum bit (a qubit) means the
elementary choice between an infinite set of
alternatives
Quantum information is equivalent to Hilbert
space. Any point in it, i.e. a wave function, is a
value of quantum information
References I:
Aspect, Alain & Grangier, Philippe & Roger, Grard (1981) Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories
via Bells Theorem, Physical Review Letters 47(7): 460-463.
Aspect, Alain & Grangier, Philippe & Roger, Grard (1982) Experimental Realization of Einstein-
Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedanken Experiment: A New Violation of Bells Inequalities, Physical Review
Letters 49(2): 91-94.
Banach, Stefan and Alfred Tarski (1924) Sur la decomposition des ensembles de points en parties
respectivement congruentes, Fundamenta Mathematicae 6, (1): 244-277.
Bell, John (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics (New York) 1(3): 195-200.
Boolos, George (1987) The Consistency of Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic, in: Thomson, J. (ed.) On
Beings and Sayings: Essays in Honor of Richard Cartwright. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3-20.
Broglie, Louis de (1925) Recherches sur la thorie des quanta, Annales de Physique (Paris, 10-me
srie) 3: 22-128.
Cantor, Georg (1897) Beitrage zur Begrundung der transfiniten Mengenlehre (Zweiter Artikel),
Mathematische Annalen 49(2): 207-246.
Deutsch, David (1985) Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum
computer, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 400: 97-117.
Deutsch, David (1989) Quantum computational networks, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,
Volume A 425: 73-90.
Einstein, Albert & Podolsky, Boris & Rosen, Nathan (1935) Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of
Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10): 777-780.
Gdel, Kurt (1931) ber formal unentscheidbare Stze der Principia mathematica und verwandter
Systeme I, Monatshefte der Mathematik und Physik 38(1): 173-198.
Heidegger, Martin (1927) Sein und Zeit. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Kochen, Simon and Specker, Ernst (1968) The problem of hidden variables in quantum
mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17(1): 59-87.
References II:
Linnebo, ystein (2010) Pluralities and Sets, Journal of Philosophy 107(3): 144-164.
Neumann, Johan von (1923) Zur Einfhrung der trasfiniten Zahlen, Acta litterarum ac scientiarum
Ragiae Universitatis Hungaricae Francisco-Josephinae, Sectio scientiarum mathematicarum 1(4): 199
208.
Neumann, Johan. von (1932) Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer, pp.
167-173 (Chapter IV.2).
Popper, Karl. (1935) Logik der forschung: zur erkenntnistheorie der modernen naturwissenschaft. Wien:
Springer.
Schrdinger, E (1935) Die gegenwrtige situation in der Quantenmechanik, Die Naturwissenschaften
23(48), 807-812; 23(49), 823-828, 23(50), 844-849.
Skolem, Thoralf (1922) Einige Bemerkungen zur axiomatischen Begrndung der Mengenlehre. In: T.
Skolem, in Selected works in logic (ed. E. Fenstad), Oslo: Univforlaget (1970).
Turing, Allen (1937) On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem,
Proceedings of London Mathematical Society, series 2 42(1): 230-265.
Whitehead, Alfred North and Russell, Bertrand. (any edition) Principia Mathematica, Vol. 2(*153), Vol.
3(*251).
Yao, Andrew (1993). Quantum circuit complexity, in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Symposium on
Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 352361
Zermelo, Ernst (1904) Beweis, dass jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann, Mathematische Annalen
59(4): 51416.
Zermelo, Ernst (1908) Untersuchungen ber die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre I, Mathematische
Annalen 65(2): 261-281.
Muito
obrigado
pela sua
ateno!
Congratulamo-nos
com suas
perguntas e
comentrios!