Zhi Hua Ran () Gastric Cancer Epidemiology Forth common types of cancer Second most common cancer related death Geographic variations (ten times) Continuing decline Primarily a decline of distal GC
(2000) (2000) Geographic variations Geographic distribution of mortality rates for gastric cancer in males in China Gastric Cancer Environmental factors H. pylori Genetic factors Etiological Factors of Gastric Cancer Precancerous changes The role of H. Pylori infection in gastric carcinogensis Type I carcinogen 1994 by IARC Epidemiological studies Animal modes (Mongolian gerbil) Gastric Cancer Attributable risk 50%~73% Honda et al . 1998 Watanabe et al. 1998 RF: 2.8~6 folds Environmental factors Environmental factors are involved Japanese immigrants in US: 25% Second generation: >50% Subsequent generations: comparable to General US population Environmental factors Lower socioeconomic status Tobacco/alcohol Fresh vegetable/fruits /Micronutrition Poor food storage Eating salted/ Smoked food Mucosal damage Pro-carcinogen/ Carcinogen Lack of antioxidant GC Genetic factors The majority of gastric tumor are sporadic in nature
There are rare inherited gastric cancer predisposition traits such as germline p53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) E-cadherin (CDH1) alterations in diffuse gastric cancers Precancerous changes Precancerous lesions Precancerous conditions Precancerous lesions Defined as those pathological changes predisposed to gastric cancer dysplasia
10% of patients may progress in severity majority of patients either regress or remain stable High-grade dysplasia may be only a transient phase in the progression to gastric cancer occurs in atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia Nature history of gastric dysplasia No Dysplasia Mild Dysplasia Moderate Dysplasia High-grade Dysplasia Gastric adenocarcinoma 5 years 5 years 5 years 3 months-2 years 10% 10% 50%-90% 60% 60% 10% Precancerous condition Defined as those clinical setting with higher risk of developing gastric cancer
Postulated sequence of histologic events in the progression to gastric adenocarcinoma and potential contributory factors H. Pylori Other factors Chronic Superficial Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia Atrophic Gastritis Dysplasia FAP or Adenomas Gastric Adenocarcinoma Other factors Association Strong Association Correa hypothesis Pathology Stages Morphology Pathohistologic classification Metastasis Stages Early stage limited in the mucosa and submucosa layers, no matter with or without lymph node metastasis Classified by the Japanese Society for Gastric Cancer <1cm <0.5cm
Advanced stage invaded over submucosa According to Bormann classification TNM classification (UICC) 0 Tis N 0 M 0 III A T 2 N 2 M 0
Intestinal type associated with most environmental risk factors carries a better prognosis shows no familial history
Diffuse type consists of scattered cell clusters with poor prognosis
Growth pattern (Ming)
Expanding type grew en mass and by expansion resulting in the formation of discrete tumor nodules with relatively good prognosis
Infiltrative type invaded individually with poor prognosis Metastasis Direct invasion Lymph node dissemination Blood spread Intraperitoneal colonization Special term Blumer shelf A shelf palpable by reactal examination, due to metastatic tumor cells gravitating from an abdominal cancer and growing in the rectovesical or rectouterine pouch
Krukenberg tumor A tumor in the ovary by the spread of stomach cancer Clinical manifestation Signs and Symptoms Early Gastric Cancer Asymptomatic or silent 80% Peptic ulcer symptoms 10% Nausea or vomiting 8% Anorexia 8% Early satiety 5% Abdominal pain 2% Gastrointestinal blood loss <2% Weight loss <2% Dysphagia <1% Signs and Symptoms
Advanced Gastric Cancer Weight loss 60% Abdominal pain 50% Nausea or vomiting 30% Anorexia 30% Dysphagia 25% Gastrointestinal blood loss 20% Early satiety 20% Peptic ulcer symptoms 20% Abdominal mass or fullness 5% Asymptomatic or silent <5% Duration of symptoms Less than 3 month 40% 3-12 months 40% Longer than 12 month 20% Special signs & terms Linitis plastica: diffusely infiltrating with a rigid stomach
Sister Mary Josephs node: umbilical lymphadenopathy Sister Mary Josephs node Laboratory tests
Iron deficiency anemia Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) Tumor markers (CEA, Ca19-9) Diagnosis
Endoscopic diagnosis --- biopsy needed for definitive diagnosis
Radiologic diagnosis
Detection of early gastric cancer Endoscopic diagnosis In patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of GC, and/or with compatible risk factors or paraneoplastic conditions, the diagnostic procedure of choice could be an endoscopic examination
The diagnostic criteria for early or advanced gastric cancer under endoscopy are based on the JRSGC and Bormanns classification Endoscopic features of gastric cancer Radiologic diagnosis For reasons of cost and availability, radiography may sometimes be the first diagnostic procedure performed
Classic radiography signs of malignant gastric ulcer asymmetric/distorted ulcer crater ulcer on the irregular mass irregular/distorted mucosal folds adjacent mucosa with obliterated /distorted area gastricae nodularity, mass effect, or loss of distensibility Radiologic diagnosis Distal GC Proximal GC Linitis plastica Detection of early gastric cancer Endoscopic screening general population or high risk persons
Careful observation
Japan is the only country that had conducted large nationwide mass population screening of asymptomatic individuals for gastric malignancy Differential diagnosis Gastric Cancer Gastric Ulcer Complications GI bleeding 5%
Pylorus/cardia obstruction
Perforation ulcer type Treatment Surgical resection EMR Adjuvant therapy Palliative therapy Endoscopic mucosal resection Gastric cancer lesion confined to mucosa layer Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is helpful in stageing GC Endoscopic mucosal resection Endoscopic mucosal resection Chemotherapy Adjuvant chemotherapy may increase 5 years survival rates and decrease the relapse rates
Combination chemotherapy are recommended Tumor Cell Kinetics S G2 G1 M G0 Death Temporally non-dividing cells (souse of tumor recurrence) Proliferating cells (tumor growth) Non-proliferative cells hs~ds 2~30h 2h 1~2h Classification of anti-tumor agents Traditional classification
Classification based on cell kinitics
Traditional classification Alkylating agents(): They counteract cancerous cell division by cross-linking the two DNA strands in the double helix so that they cannot separate. Such as chlorambucil( , cyclophosphamide,() ,thiotepa(), and busulfan ().
Alkylating agent Traditional classification Antimetabolites() hey replace natural substances as building blocks in DNA molecules, thereby altering the function of enzymes required for cell metabolism and protein synthesis.
Including: purine antagonists (6-) pyrimidine antagonists (5-5-) folate antagonists () Traditional classification Antitumor antibiotic()They act by binding with DNA and preventing RNA (ribonucleic acid) synthesis, a key step in the creation of proteins, which are necessary for cell survival.
Doxorubicin () Mitomycine () Bleomycin () Traditional classification Plant alkaloids()They are antitumor agents derived from plants. These drugs act specifically by blocking the ability of a cancer cell to divide and become two cells. Although they act throughout the cell cycle, some are more effective during the S- and M- phases, making these drugs cell cycle specific.
May affect predominantly on one specific cell cycle
Dose dependant effects
Administrated intermittently with large dose Cell cycle specific agents May kill the proliferative cells, G 0 cells not sensitive
Of proliferative cells, cells in S phase and M phase may more susceptitable
Including Antimetabolites (S phase) and Plant alkaloids (M phase)
Time dependent effects
Administrated continuously with lower dose Principles of Combination Chemotherapy Only those agents proven effective should be used Each agent used should have a different mechanism of action Each drug should have a different spectrum of toxicity Each drug should be used at maximum dose Agents with similar dose-limiting toxicities can be combined safely only by reducing doses, resulting in decreased effects Component of chemotherapeutic regime of advanced gastric cancer -Fu based regime ---predominant LV/5F-u, 5-Fu CIV) derivative new drugs (CAPE,S-1)
-FuPts() are the basis of combination therapy for AGC
Triple regime containing anthracene Evaluation of -Fu treatment during past four decades -FuAGC
5Fu 5Fu I.V.Drip 5Fu b. LV/5Fu CIV FP+EPI,Taxanes,CPTs RR% 15% 30% 40% >50% FT-207 UFT,5-DFUR S-1, CAPE FP: 5-FU+CDDP, b(bolus), CIV(continuous intravenous infusion) Latest advancement of 5-Fu application LV bio-regulation: exogenous LV may enhance the inhibitory effect of 5-Fu TS Administration of LV/5-Fu: LV first, followed by 5-Fu Standard (Mayo Clinic) LV 20mg/m 2 b. 5-Fu 425 mg/m 2 b. LV 200mg/m 2 I.V. 2h, 5-Fu 370 mg/m 2 b. CIV: CIV enhance the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU 600~1500mg/m2 CIV 24h x 2d,q2w 300~800mg/m2 CIV 24h x 5d, q3w Capecitabine (Xeloda) 5-Fu+Pts combination regime
5-Fu + CDDP (HD,LD) both are effective HD CDDP --- cytotoxic effect LD CDDP --- bio-regulation effect HD vs LD CDDP to treat AGC: same RR% LD CDDP + 5-Fu: conductive to adding third drug
The recommondated dose: HD CDDP 50~100mg/m 2 I.V. 4h,q3w LD CDDP 15~20mg/m 2 I.V. 2h, x5d q3w
Oxaliplatin is more commomly employed in combination regime
Chemotherapy Regimen Approximate Survival Response rate Benefit Fluorouracil +doxorubicin 30% No + mitomycin (FAM) Fluorouracil + doxorubicin 30% No Semustine (FAMe) Fluorouracil + doxorubicin 30% No + cisplatin (FAP) Etoposide + doxorubicin 40% No + cisplatin (EAP) Etoposide + leucovorin 30% No + fluorouracil (ELF) Fluorouracil +doxorubicin 40% Unconfirmed + methotrexate (FAMTX) AIM OF COMBINATION THERAPY I NCREASED EFFI CACY Different mechanisms of action Compatible side effects Different mechanisms of resistance ACTIVITY SAFETY Side effects of chemotherapy Mucositis
Phlebitis Metal stent Prognosis The TNM classification/staging of gastric cancer is the best prognostic indicator
The 5 years survival rate depends on the depth of gastric cancer invasion
Patients in whom tumors are resectable for cure also have good prognosis
Prevention Eradication of H. Pylori infection in those high risk population family history of gastric cancer chronic gastritis with apparent abnormality (atrophy, IM) post early gastric cancer resection gastric ulcer
Management of dietary risk factor intake adequate amount of fruits, vegetables minimize their intake of salty/smoked foods
Prevention Tightly follow up those with precancerous condition