0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
31 просмотров20 страниц
IDA is Most common nutritional deficiency in pregnant women in India. Prevalence of IDA is 35-75 % in developing countries &18 % in developed countries. Iron absorbed increases with: - high erythropoiesis - low iron stores - Gastric acid - Vitamin C Inhibited - inflammation - tea - phytates.
IDA is Most common nutritional deficiency in pregnant women in India. Prevalence of IDA is 35-75 % in developing countries &18 % in developed countries. Iron absorbed increases with: - high erythropoiesis - low iron stores - Gastric acid - Vitamin C Inhibited - inflammation - tea - phytates.
IDA is Most common nutritional deficiency in pregnant women in India. Prevalence of IDA is 35-75 % in developing countries &18 % in developed countries. Iron absorbed increases with: - high erythropoiesis - low iron stores - Gastric acid - Vitamin C Inhibited - inflammation - tea - phytates.
IN PREGNANCY. DR. ABHA SINGH HEAD OF DEPARTMENT (OBS & GYNAE) LHMC& SSKH , DELHI
Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) Most common nutritional deficiency in pregnant women in India. Prevalence of IDA is 35-75 % in developing countries &18 % in developed countries. (WHO) Prevalence of anaemia is highest among pregnant women in INDIA-50-90%. (Planning Commission. Government of India. Tenth Five-5. Year Plan 2002-2007.) IRON LOSSES Men Women Obligatory losses 1.0 mg/d 1.0 mg/d Menstruation - 0.5 mg/d Total losses 1.0 mg/d 1.5 mg/d
Iron absorbed 1.0 mg/d 1.5 mg/d Iron Transport into Plasma Ferroportin 1 Macrophages Fe +2 Ferro- portin 1 Macrophage Fe +2 Senescent RBC Hb Fe Fe +3 Tf Cerulo- plasmin Ferroportin 1 Duodenal cytochrome b Ferroportin 1 Duodenal cytochrome b Adapted from Andrews, NEJ M 1999;341:1986 Iron Absorption 1. Heme iron (meats) absorbed better than non-heme iron (grains). 2. Gastric acid keeps Fe reduced to Fe ++ form that is absorbed. 3. Occurs in proximal small bowel-duodenum (major) Iron Absorption Increases with: high erythropoiesis low iron stores Gastric acid Vitamin C Inhibited inflammation tea phytates WHO CLASSIFICATION OF ANEMIA classification Non Anaemia Mild Moderate
Severe haemoglobin level(g/L)
120 or higher 110-119 80-109 lower than 80
Treatment :options Oral iron therapy Parenteral therapy Packed red cell transfusion ORAL IRON ADVANTAGES least invasive, cheap and safe Disadvantages Increased failure of treatment : dietary inhibitors GI intolerance poor compliance Parenteral Iron Therapy Indications Intolerance to oral form iron loss exceeds oral iron replacement Inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease Malabsorption Chronic, renal disease ,Dialysis patients Anemic cancer patients
Bencaiova G, von Mandach U, Zimmermann R. Iron prophylaxis in pregnancy: Intravenous route versus oral route. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 : 135-9.
Parenteral Iron Therapy Parenteral iron bypasses the gut and circumvents the natural regulatory mechanism to deliver non-protein-bound iron. Parenteral: Intramuscular Iron therapy Iron dextran Iron-Sorbitol-Citric Acid Complex (Jectofer) Parenteral: Intramuscular Iron therapy : Why skepticism?? Test dose required Systemic: Anaphylaxis Most dangerous Local : Pain, muscle necrosis, phlebitis Slow iron mobilization and occasionally incomplete.
Fishbane S1, Kowalski EA.The comparative safety of intravenous iron dextran, iron saccharate, and sodium ferric gluconate. Semin Dial. 2000 Nov-Dec;13(6):381-4. Silverstein SB, Rodgers GM. Parenteral iron therapy options. Am J Hematol 2004; 76 : 74-8.
Intravenous Iron Sucrose Brown, sterile, aqueous complex of polynuclear iron hydroxide in sucrose containing 20mg elemental iron per ml. No preservatives.
DOSE Required iron dose (mg) = (2.4 x (target Hb-actual Hb) x pre-pregnancy weight (kg)) + 1000 mg for replenishment of stores Adamson JW. Iron deficiency and other hypoproliferative anemias. In: Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, editors. Harrisons textbook of internal medicine, 17th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008. p. 628-33. WHY I/V SUCROSE :SAFETY Best safety profile. < 0.5% minor side effects. Safer than intramuscular & iron gluconate preparation
Sane R, Baribeault D, Rosenberg CL.Safe administration of iron sucrose in a patient with a previous hypersensitivity reaction to ferricgluconate.Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Apr;27(4):613- 5. Van Wyck D22. B, Cavallo G, Spinowitz BS, Adhikarla R, Gagnon S, Charytan C, et al. Safety and efficacy of iron sucrose in patients sensitive to iron dextran: North American clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36 : 88-97.
WHY I/V SUCROSE Higher increase in values for hemoglobin , hematocrit, transferrin saturation, and ferritin at 4 weeks. (Perewusnyk G Etal) Significant decrease in need for blood transfusion
Breymann C. The use of iron sucrose complex for anemia in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Semin Hematol 2006; 43 : S28-S31. Litton etal.Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron therapy in reducing requirement for allogeneic blood transfusion: systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Aug 15;347:f4822. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4822.
WHY I/V SUCROSE Accumulation of Fesucrose in parenchyma of organs is low compared with Fedextrans or Fegluconate Incorporation into the bone marrow for erythropoiesis is considerably faster.
Perewusnyk G, Huch R, Huch A, Breymann C. Parenteral iron therapy in obstetrics: 8 years experience with iron-sucrose complex. Br J Nutr 2002; 88 : 3-10. (switzerland)
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron sucrose appears to have the potential for eradicating IDA because it overcomes the problems of compliance and absorption and has an excellent safety record.