Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2
) - V(r)
Lagranges Eqtn for r:
(L/r) - (d/dt)[(L/r)]= 0
m(r - r
2
) = -(V/r) = f(r) = -mg(r)
Equivalent to the radial part of Newtons 2
nd
Law
(polar coordinates)
Dividing by m, this is: r - r
2
= -g(r) (1)
Angular momentum conservation: = mr
2
= const
(1) becomes: r - [(
2
)/(m
2
r
3
)] = -g(r) (2)
Suppose the particle of mass m is initially in a
circular orbit of radius . Suppose, due to some
perturbation, the orbit radius is changed from to
r = + x , where x <<
= constant r = x & (2) becomes:
x - [(
2
)/(m
2
3
)][1+(x/)]
-3
= -g( + x) (3)
Since x << , expand the left & right sides of (3) in
a Taylors series about r = & keep only up through
linear terms in x:
[1+(x/)]
-3
~ 1 - 3(x/) + ...
g( + x) ~ g() + x(dg/dr)|
r =
+
(3) becomes:
x - [(
2
)/(m
2
3
)][1- 3(x/)] ~ -[g() + x(dg/dr)|
r =
] (4)
Assumption: Initially, a circular orbit at r = (2)
evaluated at r = ( = constant, r = = 0 in (2)):
g() = [(
2
)/(m
2
3
)] > 0 (5)
x + [3(g()/) + (dg/dr)|
r =
]x ~ 0
Rewrite (defining frequency
0
): x + (
0
)
2
x = 0 (6)
with (
0
)
2
[3(g()/) + (dg/dr)|
r =
]
(6) is diff eqtn for simple harmonic oscillator, freq.
0
!
Solution to (6), for (
0
)
2
> 0 (
0
= real):
x(t) = A exp(i
0
t) + B exp(-i
0
t)
or x(t) = X sin(
0
t + )
The orbit radius oscillates harmonically about r =
r = is a stable circular orbit!
Solution to (6), for (
0
)
2
< 0 (
0
= imaginary):
x(t) = C exp(|
0
|t) + D exp(-|
0
|t)
The orbit radius increases exponentially from r =
r = is an unstable circular orbit.
The condition for oscillation is thus
Condition for stability of a circular orbit. This is:
(
0
)
2
[3(g()/) + (dg/dr)|
r =
] > 0
Divide by g(): Condition for stability of a
circular orbit is [(dg/dr)|
r =
]/g() +(3/) > 0
Note that g(r) = -f(r)/m
General condition for stability of circular
orbit of radius with a central force:
[(df/dr)|
r =
]/f() +(3/) > 0 (same as before)
Evaluate this for a power law force f(r) = - kr
n
, get
(3+n)(1/) > 0 or n > - 3, same as before!
SUMMARY: General condition for stability of a
circular orbit of radius with a central force f(r):
[(df/dr)|
r =
]/f() +(3/) > 0
For an orbit which is perturbed slightly away from
circular, r = + x , where x << :
If the original circular orbit was stable, there will be
harmonic oscillations about r = . That is:
x(t) = X sin(
0
t + )
If the original circular orbit was unstable, the radius will
increase exponentially from r = . That is:
x(t) = C exp(|
0
|t) + D exp(-|
0
|t)
In both cases, m(
0
)
2
[3(f()/() + (df/dr)|
r =
]
Example
Investigate the stability
of circular orbits in a force
field described by the
potential function:
V(r) = -(k/r)e
-(r/a)
Screened Coulomb
Potential (in E&M)
Yukawa Potential
(in nuclear Physics)
Using the criteria just
discussed, we find stable
circular orbits for < ~ 1.62a. See figure.
Eq. (3.45)
Use a very similar approach to get Eq. (3.45) of
Goldstein. This Eq: For small deviations from circular
orbit of radius , the orbit has the form:
u() = [1/r()] = u
0
+ a cos()
where u
0
= [1/]. , a are to be determined.
u = (1/r) undergoes simple harmonic motion about the
circular orbit value u
0
. The derivation is tedious! Almost like doing
the previous calculation over again except for u = 1/r instead of r itself.
Also for r() instead of for r(t).
Frequency : From a Taylors series expansion of the force
law f(r) about the circular orbit radius .
Amplitude a : Depends on the deviation of the energy E
from its value at the circular orbit of radius radius .
u() = [1/r()] = u
0
+ a cos() (3.45)
Manipulation gives:
2
~ 3 + [/f()][df/dr]|
r =
= 3 + (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)])|
r =
If
2
> 0, a cos() (& thus u()) is oscillatory
(harmonic). Corresponds to the stable circular orbit
result from before: (df/dr)|
r =
< - 3f()/
Or: (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)])|
r =
< - 3
If
2
< 0, a cos() a cosh() (& thus u()) is an
exponentially increasing function of . Corresponds
to the unstable circular orbit result from before:
(df/dr)|
r =
> - 3f()/
Or: (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)])|
r =
> - 3
u() = [1/r()] = u
0
+ a cos() (3.45)
2
~ 3 + [/f()][df/dr]|
r =
= 3 + (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)])|
r =
Consider the stable circular orbit case, so
2
> 0.
As the radius vector r sweeps around the plane, u goes through
cycles of oscillation. See fig. If = q/p with, q, p integers,
(so is a rational number) then after q revs of the radius vector, the
orbit retraces itself. The orbit is closed
Open & Closed Circular Orbits
Closed, Almost Circular Orbits
Consider an almost circular orbit:
u() = [1/r()] = u
0
+ a cos() (3.45)
2
~ 3 + [/f()][df/dr]|
r =
= 3 + (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)])|
r =
Stable initial circular orbit, so
2
> 0, and
(df/dr)|
r =
< - 3f()/ Or: (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)])|
r =
< - 3
At each value of r = for which this stability
criterion is met, can, by definition, get a stable
circular orbit.
Question: What are the conditions on the
force law f(r) which will lead to closed almost
circular orbits?
Goldsteins reasoning: If the circular orbit is stable
& the almost circular orbit is closed, = q/p (=
rational number), where q, p are integers. He argues that
(even though
2
~ 3 + [/f()][df/dr]|
r =
& should thus be
dependent), if the orbit is closed, MUST be the same
rational number for all possible . That is =
constant, independent of the radius of the original
circular orbit!. See text for further discussion.
By this reasoning, ( = constant), the expression
2
~ 3 + [/f()][df/dr]|
r =
becomes a differential
equation for the force law f(r).
Under the specific conditions just described, we have
2
~ 3 + [/f()][df/dr]|
r =
2
3 + [r/f(r)][df/dr] = const
(A differential equation for the force law f(r)!)
Rewrite this as: (d[ln(f)]/d[ln(r)]) =
2
- 3
Integrating this gives a force law:
f(r) = -(k/r
), with 3 -
2
All force laws of this form(with a rational
number) lead to closed, stable, almost circular
orbits.
Weve shown that closed, stable, almost circular
orbits result from all force laws of the form ( a
rational number)
f(r) = -(k/r
), with 3 -
2
Examples:
= 1 f(r) = -(k/r
2
) (Inverse r squared law!)
= 2 f(r) = -kr (Isotropic harmonic oscillator!)
= q/p (q, p integers)
f(r) = -(k/r
), with = 3 - (q/p)
2
Bertrands Theorem
If initial conditions are such that the perturbed
circular orbit is not close to those required for
circular orbit (the orbit is not almost circular!), will the
same type of force law ( a rational number)
f(r) = -(k/r
), with 3 -
2
still give closed orbits?
Answer: Keep additional terms in Taylors series expansion
(to compute
2
) & solve orbit equation.
Solved by J. Bertrand (1873). Proved that in such cases,
the orbits are closed ONLY for:
= 1 f(r) = -(k/r
2
) (Inverse r squared law!)
= 2 f(r) = -kr (Hookes Law:
Isotropic harmonic oscillator!)
Bertrands Theorem: The only central
forces that result in bound, closed orbits for
all particles are the inverse-square law and
Hookes law.
A very important result! For example, bound
celestial objects (planets, stars, etc.) all are
OBSERVED to have orbits that are ~ closed.
Deviations are from perturbations due to other
bodies
Ruling out the (unphysical at large r) Hookes law
force, this The force (gravitational) holding the
objects in their orbits varies as r
-2
!
Using only celestial observations PLUS
Bertrands theorem, one can conclude that
the gravitational force f
g
(r) varies as r
-2
.
That is, f
g
(r) -kr
-2
.
Observations + Bertrands Theorem REQUI RE
the gravitational force to have the r dependence
given by Newtons Law of Gravitation!
The observed character of the orbits (closed) fixes
the form of the force law!