Basel Ii It Advisory (En)

Basel II Technology Enablement
IT Advisory Services
February 9, 2009
IT Advisory Services, FSO, FEA Page 2
Business Challenges
Strategic
Become Basel II compliant by 2010 at advanced level (reporting
RWA using IRB*) under enormous pressure from government
Improve risk management rigor in a fluctuating market
Become compliant for fund raising capability in foreign capital
market
Reduce minimal capital requirement and free up more earning asset
Tactical
Hard to map and translate Basel II required data to source system
data
Insufficient, missing, inconsistent, and inaccurate historical data
Tedious data collection from different line of business for operating
risk reporting
Decentralized and non-standardized source systems and data
Substantial amount of report generation and validation effort
Prohibitive IT infrastructure costs to support Basel II reporting
Strong project management office and data management group,
with rigorous change management
Prioritization of Basel II scoping by portfolios and source
systems, using Pareto analysis, and mixing basic standard and
advanced approaches
Deploying resources knowledgeable in both Basel II and
business intelligence for report definition
Historical data conversion by phases
Implementing multidimensional data model with efficient
reporting tools
Design (or optimize) data extract, transform, load (ETL) process
Challenges Short-Term Quick Wins
Strong project management office and data management group,
with rigorous change management and IT governance
Implementing (or enhancing) credit workflow system, collateral
management system, treasury system, and customer
relationship management
Implementing enterprise data warehouse (EDW) with single
view of customer (SVC)
Long-Term Solution
* RWA: Risk Weigh Asset; IRB: Internal Rating Based
Basel II Requirement
Pillar 1
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Pillar 2
Supervisory
Review
Pillar 3
Market
Discipline
Credit Risk
Operational Risk
Market Risk
Internal Capital Adequacy
Appraisal Process (ICAAP)
Supervisory Review & Evaluation
Process (SREP)
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Standardized Foundational IRB Advanced IRB
Basic
Alternate Standardized
Approach (ASA)
Advanced Measurement
Approach (AMA)
Basic Standardized Internal Model
Loss Event Capturing Line of Business Alignment
Loan Categorization (RWA,
from LGD, EAD, PD*)
Credit Scorecard & S&P/TU**
Required
Historical Loss Recovery
Required
Treasury Portfolio
Categorization
Value at Risk (VaR) Required
Risk Management Reporting (Liquidity, Interest Rate, Concentration, etc.)
Economic Capital, Stress Test, Exposure Aggregation
Scope, Capital Structure, Capital Adequacy, Equity, Securitization,
Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Reconciliation,
Interest Rate Risk in Banking Book (IRRBB)
Disclosure
3-Year Application of Rating
System
5-Year of Historical Data for
PD, LGD, EAD
5-Year of PD
Retail: 5-Year of LGD, EAD
Non-Retail: 7-Year of LGD, EAD
* LGD: Loss Given Default; EAD: Exposure At Default. ** S&P: Standard & Poors Rating; TU: Trade Union (Credit Bureau).
Technology Challenge
Data Management
Collection of all needed information required by
Basel II for all transactions
Lack of change control during report development
Mapping of complex structures (client, collateral)
Collect enterprise wide operational risk data, such
as loss event value and incident reporting
RWA Calculation Process
Ability of daily valuation of the banks total balance
Analysis of complex contractual relationships
Optimization of the collateral allocation
Splitting of derivative instruments
Storage of Results / Historical Time Series
Saving parameters of internal models for the
estimation of PDs, CCFs, LGDs
Disclosure Reporting
Flexible design in order to fulfill both external
disclosure requirements as well as internal
reporting requirements
Efficient report generation and nightly batch jobs
Data Management
Source Data Analysis
Data Quality Analysis & Cleansing
Data Gap Assessment
Data Collection Portal (e.g. Operational Risk)
Ongoing Data Governance
RWA Calculation Process
Risk Engine Implementation
ETL Design (e.g. Single View of Customer)
Package Selection
Storage of Result / Historical Time Series
Data Model Design
Metadata Management
Data Retention Policy
Data Access & Security
Disclosure Reporting
Report Design
Report Development (e.g. Supervisory Report)
Report Logic Validation
Dashboard of Key Risk Indicators
Credit Risk Technology Enablement
Project Management
Project Charter
Scope (Pillar I, II, or
III; Credit,
Operational, or
Market Risk)
Target Approach
(Standardized,
Foundation, or
Advanced;
Qualitative or
Quantitative)
Country Specific
Approach
Regulatory Schedule
Budget
Team Organization
Data Governance
Diagnosis Design Sustain Identify Deliver
Application Inventory
Infrastructure
Assessment
Data Dictionary
Data Quality Report
Project Formation
Report Definition
Report Definition (with
Calculation Logic)
Interface Specification
for Risk Engines
Data Modelling
Operational Data
Store Schema
Logical Credit
Risk Data Mart
(CRDM) Schema
Basel Rating Model
Retail Rating
Modeling
Non-Retail Rating
Model
Business Definition
Product Mapping
Line of Business
Alignment
Portfolio Inventory
Data Management Group Formation
Meta Data Management (Process, Specification, Tool)
Transformation Logic
ETL Design
Specification
Report Design
Report Specification
Risk Engine
Implementation
Report
Development
Risk Engine
Engine Configuration
Package Selection
ETL
Development
Physical Data
Model
Implementation
Source Data Dictionary
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n

Data Cleansing
Vendor Short List
Selection Criteria
Vendor Rating
Report
Template
Report
Population
Coding
Report
Population
Scheduling
BAS/TSRS
Vendor
FSRM
Operational Risk Technology Enablement
Project Management
Project Charter
III; Credit,
Operational, or
Market Risk)
Target Approach
(Standardized,
Foundation, or
Advanced;
Qualitative or
Quantitative)
Country Specific
Approach
Regulatory Schedule
Budget
Team Organization
Data Governance
Data Definition
Loss Event & Value
Capture Requirement
Loss Incident Record
Requirement
Project Formation
Report Definition
Report Definition
Economic Capital
Model
Scenario Analysis
Requirement
Data Modelling
Incident Data
Model Schema
Portal Design
Intranet Portal
Design (for Data
Capture)
Business Definition
Line of Business
Mapping
Report Design
Risk Engine
Implementation
Report
Development
Risk Engine
Economic Capital Model
Scenario Analysis
Package Selection
Physical Data
Model
Implementation
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n

Vendor Short List
Selection Criteria
Vendor Rating
Report
Template
Report
Population
Coding
Report
Population
Scheduling
BAS/TSRS
Vendor
FSRM
User Interface
Development
Portal
Development
Market Risk Technology Enablement
Project Management
Project Charter
III; Credit,
Operational, or
Market Risk)
Target Approach
(Standardized,
Foundation, or
Advanced;
Qualitative or
Quantitative)
Country Specific
Approach
Regulatory Schedule
Budget
Team Organization
Data Governance
Data Definition
Market Data
Position Data
Time Series Data
Project Formation
Report Definition
VaR Report
Individual Desk
Traffic Light System
Limit Utilization
Data Modelling
Data Model
Schema
Model Definition
VaR Model
Pricing
Report Design
Risk Engine
Implementation
Report
Development
Risk Engine
Pricing Engine
VaR Model
Model Test
Stress Test
Package Selection
Physical Data Model
Implementation
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n

Vendor Short List
Selection Criteria
Vendor Rating
Report
Template
Report
Population
Coding
Report
Population
Scheduling
BAS/TSRS
Vendor
FSRM
Supervisory Report Technology Enablement
Project Management
Project Charter
III; Credit,
Operational, or
Market Risk)
Target Approach
(Standardized,
Foundation, or
Advanced;
Qualitative or
Quantitative)
Country Specific
Approach
Regulatory Schedule
Budget
Team Organization
Data Governance
Credit Risk Data Mart
Risk Engine Result
Data Dictionary
Project Formation
Report Design
Dashboard
Design
Logic Definition
Business Definition
Key Risk Indicators
Meta Data Management (Report Definition)
Report
Development
Package Selection
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n

Vendor Short List
Selection Criteria
Vendor Rating
Report
Template
Report
Population
Coding
Report
Population
Scheduling
Visualization
Tool Installed
Tool
Configuration
User Training
BAS/TSRS
Vendor
FSRM
Technology Architecture
Architecture Principle
Business Driver
Operational Data Management
Enable the organization to collect
the right data at the right level of
granularity
Effective Data Analysis
Manage data processing and
reporting
Compliance Demonstration
Demonstrate compliance to the
regulator
Technical Driver
Right mix of centralization and
decentralization
Extensibility and scalability to support
evolving requirement
Workflow process management
Source data analysis and collection process
Data transformation logic
Data quality assurance and data cleansing
Enforceable consistency, quality, validation,
and auditability of data
Basel II Technology Architecture
Data Store
Extraction
Transformation
& Calculation
Reporting
Operational Systems
Data Sources
Data Marts

Credit Risk
Product Systems & Corporate Data
Core Banking Products Credit Collateral
Regulatory Reporting
Basel II Reporting
(Credit, Op. Risk, Interest)
Customer
Internal Reporting
Market Risk Operational Risk
Historic Data Store
Extraction, Transformation, Validation, Loading
BII Operational
Risk Engine
Rating
Engine
Basel II Credit
Risk Engine
Market
Risk Engine
Internal Credit
Risk Engine
Loss Data Store
Result Data Result Data Result Data Result Data
PD
Engine
LGD
Engine
CCF
Engine
Centralized Data Store
Solution Interface
Enterprise
Resource
Planning
Data Management System
Risk Weighed Asset Calculator
Reporting
SAP
PeopleSoft
Centerprise
SunGard
Teradata SAS
IBM Oracle
Hyperion Reveleus
SAP Bank Analyzer Fermat
FinArch SAS
Algorithmics (Algo)
Reveleus
SunGard
Kamakura
FinArch
BusinessObjects
Cognos
Crystal Report
Major Risk Management Solution
Data Mapping &
Standardization
Counterparty
Risk Types
Maturities
Ratings
Collateral
Valuations
Data Store
(Warehouse)
Risk History
Loss History
Rating History
Transactions
Positions
Calculation (Risk Engine)
PD, EAD, LAD, M
Capital Allocation
P1: RWAs
P2: Stress Testing
Reporting
Basel II P3
Value At Risk
Local Regulatory
Large Exposures
Economic Capital
Performance
Measurement
Financials
Data Collection
Transaction
Counter-Party
Ratings
Market Data
Default Data
Collateral
Credit Risk
Mitigation
Oracle
SAP
SAS
Sungard
Moodys KMV
Standard & Poors
Cognos
Informatica
Metamatrix
Fitch
SAP
SAS
Oracle
Sungard
Fitch / Algo
Metamatrix
Moodys KMV
Almonde
Cognos
FTI
IBM
Informatica
Fermat
FinArch
SAP
SAS
Oracle
Sungard
Cognos
FTI
IBM
Informatica
Metamatrix
Trillium
Fermat
Algorithmics
FinArch
Kamakura
SAP
SAS
Oracle
Whitelight
FTI
Almonde
Reuters
Misys
Reuters
Reveleus
SAS
Fitch / Algo
FinArch
Sungard
Oracle
Kamakura
Metamatrix
Reuters
Almonde
BusinessObjects
Cognos
FRS
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t

K
e
y

V
e
n
d
o
r

Solution Selection
Risk Weighed Asset (RWA) Asset Liability Management (ALM)
Credit Risk Technology
Legend
Credit Data Requirement
Borrower
Basel II Derived Data
Supporting Raw Data
Rating (with History)
Quantitative Borrower Data
Qualitative Borrower Data
General Information

Grade
Exposure Type
Transaction
Instrument
Collateral
Securities, Guarantees
Netting

EAD
LGD
M
Borrower
Legal Data
Data Pool
Interest & Exchange Rate
Rating Statistics
Counterparty Clustering
External Rating
Model Specific Market Data

Grade
PD Map
Portfolio & Control
Limit
By Business Line
By Location
By Customer
By Industry
By Country

Portfolio Structure
Internal & External
Organizational Data
Aggregation & Report
Aggregated Risk Figure
By Borrower
By Exposure Class
By Business Unit
Granularity Adjusted Risk
Risk Weighted Asset
Report Data

Optional & Control Data
Important Reference Link
Data Gap Analysis
Credit Risk Data Mart Model Data Gap Analysis Summary
Gap Analysis Approach
Gap Analysis
& Action Planning
Data Assessment Portfolio Input Product Mapping
Systems/Products Inventory
Inventories bank systems that contain
products subject to Basel II
For each system, inventory banks
products and map them to Basel II
categories
Portfolio Characteristics
Inventories banks portfolios
Automatically links Basel II data
requirements to portfolios and systems.
Enable structured assessment of data
availability in targeted segments
Data Assessment
Performs gap analysis to compare
available client data against Basel II
credit data requirements
Maintains remediation plans
Treasury
Portfolio Monitoring & Reporting
Portfolio Management
Disbursement Underwriting Credit Application
Credit Management
Payment
Tracking
&
Follow
Up
Concentration
& Ratings
Monitoring
Reporting
Collateral
Tracking
Revaluation
Portfolio
Visualization
Reporting &
Drill-Down
NPL
Tracking &
Reporting
Customer,
Account,
Product
Trending
Analysis
Portfolio
Quantification
Marginal
Pricing
Risk-
Based
Pricing
Quantitative
Limit
Management
& Treasury
Integration
Credit
Derivative &
Credit
Securitization
Basel II
Compliant
Financial
& Ratings
Advanced
Financial &
Comparative
Analysis
PD
Modeling
Back Office
Settlement
Accounting
Profit & Loss
Revaluation
Middle Office
VaR
Stress Testing
Front Office
Pricing
Hedging
Limit
Limit
Rate &
Curve
Analytic
Library
Commercial Lending
Back Office
Settlement
Accounting
Front Office
Pricing
Sanction
Limit
Limit
Rate &
Curve
Retail Lending
Collection
Arrear
Loss & Recovery
Front Office
Credit Approval
Document
Management
Account
Interest
Repayment
Schedule
Group Reference
Data
Group
Transaction Data
Group Limit Data
Market Time
Series Data
Data Collection
Exposure
Characteristic time to maturity
Currency of exposure
Product type
Rating
Allocation of collateral
Exposure amount (basic credit line)
Seniority
Characteristic revocability
Characteristic delinquency status
Expected Loss
Risk segment
Characteristic regional financing
Allocation of guarantees
Risk weight category
Specific provision
Characteristic interruption of payments
Characteristic netting category
Collateral
Type of collateral
Value of the collateral (C)
Currency of the collateral
Characteristic recognized
Date at which collateral must be pledged
Date of last valuation
Characteristic re-margining
Guarantee
Time to maturity
Value of the guarantee (G)
Seniority
Materiality thresholds
Credit Derivative

Borrower
Rating
Sovereign of incorporation
Industry
Guarantor
Rating
Rating
Credit risk measurement
Rating
Date of ratings
Term
Type of Security
Issues assessment
Seniority
Comparable rating
Characteristic main index
Characteristic traded on a recognized exchange
Characteristic UCITS recognized
Market inputs
PD, LGD, CCF
Currency rates
Security prices
Interest rate curve
Volatility of foreign currencies, securities, interest rates
Process
Valuation approach
Data use
Process
Market Inputs
Borrower
Guarantor
Collateral
Issuer
Exposure
Guarantee
Rating
Credit Derivative
Type of Security
Collateral Provider
Time Series Data
Source
Financial Data Store
Manual Tracking
External Data Provider
Internal Systems
Business Partner Data
Partner ID
Industry Type
Customer Group
Rating
Rating
Date
Default
Default Event
Date
Risk Drivers
Rating System/Method
Balance Sheet
Loss Data
Provision
Recovery
Contract Data
Facility Type
Outstanding
Migration Matrix
Default Rate
t
PD
t
LGD
t
CCF
t
Credit Risk Data Mart (CRDM) Model
Report Definition
Logical Data Model
Physical Data Model
Data Transformation Logic
Determining Risk Weight
Determining the Basel II risk class of
the borrower
Determining master rating category
Determining the master rating
applicable to the approach
Determining the risk weight (r)

Determining Exposure at Default (EAD)
Determining credit conversion factor
(CCF)
Determining market value /
assessment base /add on-risk driver
Determining exposure at default (EAD)
Balance sheet positions
Book value (after provisions)
Amount after on-balance-sheet-
netting
Off-balance sheet positions
Open bank line * CCF
Amount after (Repo-Lending-)Netting
Derivatives
MTM + regulatory add-on factor
Amount after netting
Determining Risk Weighed Assets (RWA)
Determining eligibility of collaterals by
means of quantitative and qualitative criteria
Determining currency mismatch
Determining maturity mismatch
Determining haircut factors
Determining the adjusted risk weight (r)
Determining probability of default (PD, IRB)
Determining loss given default (LGD, IRB)
Determining the adjusted value of the
collateral (C
A
)
Determining the adjusted value of the
guarantee (G
A
)
Optimized distribution of collateral and
guarantees
Determining regulatory capital requirement
The challenge here is in particular the
distribution of assessed collateral on
individual transactions
Stress Testing
Scenarios on market data
Interest rate curve, exchange rates,
security prices
Scenarios on determining rating categories
Ability of determining a systematic inferior
rating
Pre-Processing Functions
Determining Exposure at Default (EAD)
Determining Risk Weight
Determining Risk Weighed Assets (RWA)
Stress Testing
Pre-Processing Functions
Selecting relevant data
Currency conversion
Offsetting of accounts (complex structure)
Distributing basic credit line
Determining undrawn amount (complex
structure)
Determining the approach for the calculation
process
Determining original maturity
Determining time to maturity
Determining period of market value

A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

Data Flow
Rating Assignment Scorecard
Wholesale &
Purchased
Receivables
Securitization Equities Derivative Retail
Wholesale Servicing
System
Retail Servicing
System
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

D
a
t
a

S
t
o
r
e

Wholesale Exposure by Risk
Rating & Maturity
Retail Exposure
VaR
Modeling
Defaults
Exposure
Recovery
Risk
Driver
Defaults
Exposure
Recovery
Risk
Driver
Rating Quantification &
Validation
Pool Risk Parameter
Quantification
Aggregation Engine
Wholesale Parameters
(PD, LGD, UGD)
Retail Parameters by Pool
(PD, LGD, UGD)
Counterparty Roll-up
Parent/Child
Industry/Geography
Identify
Facilities by
Obligor
C
a
p
i
t
a
l

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

P
i
l
l
a
r

1

Regulatory Minimum Capital
P
i
l
l
a
r

2

Economic Capital
Concentration Risk, Stress Testing, Limit
Financial Systems
R
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

P
i
l
l
a
r

3

Disclosure
Internal Management & Board Reporting
Rating Model Development
Independence of rating approvers from sales and marketing
Use of ratings in risk management
Independent review of ratings consistency/accuracy
Independent quantification validation
Board and Senior Management oversight
Reference data sets for parameter estimation
Application of statistical techniques to the
reference data set to establish PD, LGD, and
EAD
Linkage of portfolio data to reference data
based on common characteristics
Application of loss parameters to actual
portfolio data
Validation and annual update of quantification
estimates
Data Maintenance
Maintain essential data for obligors and facilities throughout the life and disposition of
the credit exposure, including inputs to ratings assignments
Maintained in controlled environment
Support ratings monitoring, parameter quantification, capital calculations, reporting
Two-dimensional rating system
Universal rating scale
Product/industry specific methods
Consistent rank ordering of risk
Meaningful differentiation by grade
Consistency in ratings assignment
Ratings assignment transparency
Calibration of obligor grades to actual
long run default frequencies and
LGDs to realized loss rates
Economic
Capital
Credit Limits
and Reporting
Regulatory
Capital
Control & Oversight
Rating Assignment Quantification
Data Maintenance
Operational Risk Technology
Legend
Operational Risk Management Framework
Strategic Decision
Business Initiative
Risk Measurement
Local Standards / Basel II
SOX
Basel II Specific
Business Value
Operational Risk Foundation
Vision, Guiding Principles, Risk Strategy, Risk Appetite, Organisation Structure, Risk Glossary
Risk Identification & Assessment
Regulatory and Economic Capital Model
Risk Reporting
Risk Monitoring
Risk & Control
Assessments (RCA)
Loss Data Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)
Loss Data
Identifying and agreeing on the true short term and long-term objectives
Capturing loss events
Sourcing
Frequency
Completeness
Accuracy
Value vs. Effort
Workflow of Process and developing the front-end
Multiple data sources
Making the capture process less painful (data trees)
Life cycle of a loss event
Non static nature of data
Developing the data map
Categorization along multiple dimensions
Many data elements
Mapping and enrichment of existing data sources
Inherent challenges in the environment
Inconsistent use of general ledger accounts that do not map well to Basel
Inherent conflict of interest, incentives, and motivation
Deployment, training and integration into business processes
Linkage to other risk and business processes
Loss Data Infrastructure
Operational Risk Incident Database
Data Capture
General Ledger
Operational System
Business Internal Loss
External Loss
Identification of Potential SOX Issue
Alignment with SOX Action Plan
Economic and regulatory capital models
Back-Testing of KRIs
Risk & Control Assessment Validation
Root Cause and Scenario Analysis
Loss Distribution
When
Occurrence Date
Discovery Date
Resolution Date (Target)
Resolution Date (Actual)
Recovery Date
Write-Off Date
Where
Location of Occurrence
Responsible Entity
Loss Booking Cost Center
Why
Loss Description & Cause
Control Failure
Remediation Work
Discovery
Description
Market/Credit
Risk Flag
How Much
Gross Loss Amount
(Estimated)
Gross Loss Amount (Actual)
Recovery Amount
Net Loss
Which
Loss/Incident Type
Account Write Off
Information Source
Level 1 Risk Category
Level 2 Risk Category
Recovery Type
Who
Action Owner
Market Risk Technology
Market Risk Management
Commodity Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Counterparty Risk
Market Risk Management Framework

Assumption
Volatilities
Correlations
Higher Moments
Pricing Engine
Market Data
Position Data
VaR Model
Analytic
Simulation
Model Testing
Back Testing
Stress Testing
Reporting
Daily & Monthly VaR
Individual Desks
Breach & Traffic Light System
Limit Utilization
IT System (Data Flow, Performance)
Control (Change, Security)
Process (Monitoring, Reporting, Risk Assessment)
Counterparty Risk Framework
Internal Rating System
Trading Book
Collateral System
LGD System
(Type / Facility)
Default Event
Risk Engine
Counterparty Credit Limit System
Rating
Netting Agreement
Counterparty Hierarchy
Economic Sector
Geographical Area
Limits
Guarantees
CSA
Collatera Calls
Scenario Engine
Market Data
Static Data
Economic Capital
Exposures (Daily Batch)
Static Data
Static Data
Intra-Day Transaction
M
a
r
k
e
t

T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n

(
D
a
i
l
y

B
a
t
c
h
)

C
o
l
l
a
t
e
r
a
l

Transaction PV
P
D

L
G
D

R
i
s
k

F
a
c
t
o
r
s

Supervisory Reporting Tool
KRI Reporting & Dashboard
Implementation Approach
Basel II Themes
Program Management
Pillar I - Minimum Capital Requirement
Methodology &
Quantification
Data &
Infrastructure
Control &
Oversight
Ratings Process / Credit
Policies & Procedures
Ratings System Review / Internal Audit / Validation
Board & Senior Management Approval and Oversight
Pillar III - RWA
Calculator
& Reporting
Regulatory
Reporting
Requirements
- Qualitative and
quantitative

disclosures
- Legal entity
aggregation
RWA Calculator
- Input requirements
- Calculation engine
Reconciliation
Organizational
Roles &
Responsibilities
- Calculation
components
- Review and
signoff
Economic Capital
Stress Testing
Concentration
Analysis
Board and Senior
Management
Oversight
Pillar II -
Supervisory
Review
Unique ratings assignment
- Counterparty/obligor
exposure
identification
Quantification/Validation
- PD/LGD statistical analysis
- Reporting
Ratings Module
- Data capture
- Workflow functionality
Reference Data Maintenance
- Risk rating criteria
- Default incidents & recoveries
Collateral &
Documentation
- Risk mitigant
recognition
Transaction
System Extracts
PFE Calculator
- Analytics
- Reporting
Counterparty
Referential Data
Collateral &
Documentation
- Enforceability
recognition
Reconciliation
Data Management Standards
Market / Time
Series Data
Retail Capital Methodology
- Definition of default
- Segmentation Framework
Regulatory
Dialogue
Quantitative Impact
Studies (QIS)
Ratings Framework Methodology
Obligor
Ratings & PD
Quantification
Facility
Ratings &
LGD
Quantification
Wholesale
(A-IRB Ratings System)
Retail
(Pool Segmentation)
Securitization
Repo-style
Transactions
Equities
PFE Model
- Simulation
- Backtesting
- Valuation
models
Approach
- Grandfathering
- Materiality
Use Test
VaR Calculator
- Analytics
- Reporting
VaR Model
- Simulation
- Stress tests
- Valuation
models
Valuation / Time
Series Data
Exposure
Classification
A-IRB inputs for
K-IRB
- PD & LGD
- EAD
- EL
External Rating
or Inferred Rating
Risk Transference
Measures
L - Enhancement
T - Thickness
N - Effective
Number
Ratings Based
Approach (RBA)
- External Rating
- Inferred Rating
IAA for ABCP
Exposures
Supervisory
Formula
Qualified Legal
Opinion to confirm
- Risk Transference
- Enforceability of
Assets in Synthetic
Securitizations
Independent Model Validation
Reference Data Maintenance
- Segmentation risk factors
- Default incidents & recoveries
PD , LGD, & EAD
Quantification
for each Pool
Quantification/Validation
- PD/LGD statistical analysis
- Reporting
Segmentation Process
- Data capture
Retail Capital Process /
Credit Policies & Procedures
Exposure at Default
Basel II Streams
Overall Project Approach
Detailed Data Gap Analysis
Data Quality Assessment
Data Gap Closure
Flow data into relevant systems for credit management reporting
and capital calculations
Capture or migration of loss, default data
Credit System Interface Enhancement
Sourcing of risk factors data
Feed to servicing and downstream systems including credit risk
data mart
Retirement of End User Computing (EUC) platforms
Data Management Framework Development
Policies
Processes
Tools
Risk Scorecard Platform Implementation
RWA Calculator Implementation
Buy vs. Build Decision
System Selection or In-house Development
End-to-End Testing
Reporting and Analytic
Platform Implementation
Credit Risk Management
Concentration Analysis
Limit Reporting
Economic Capital
Framework
System Selection or In-
house Development
Credit Risk Data Mart
Operation
Regulatory Reporting
Data Mart
Implementation
Pillar 1 Pillar 2 Pillar 3
Data Governance
Data Governance Value Proposition
Common Current State
Lack of trusted data sources
Duplication of data across systems, no
central repository
Critical data populated incorrectly or
does not exist
Inconsistent data structures,
definitions, and usage
Limited standardization of business
rules
Loss of data across systems
Difficulty reconciling data between
business functions and systems
IT and business resources manually
cleaning data
Lack of processes for keeping data
clean
Data quality issues
Desired Future State
Trusted single source of truth
Critical data synchronized and reconciled
across the organization
Integrated view of master reference data
Planned redundancy of data
IT and business analyzing data - not
cleansing it
Quantitative metrics to measure data
quality
Increased accuracy, consistency, and
confidence in underlying data
Data treated and managed as a valued
enterprise asset
Data is transformed into information and
ultimately becomes insight
Data Governance Framework
Data governance is about developing data standards & policies that will be monitored
and enforced by the organization through agreed upon processes & procedures.
The goal of data governance is to institute appropriate guidance catered for the
enterprise leading to quality information and usage.
Organization Model: Structure for making data-related decisions which
defines roles/responsibilities, stewardship/ownership, and handles
communication of data governance
Standards & Policies: Defines data definition/taxonomies, enterprise data
models, and data usage patterns
Processes & Procedures: Defines monitoring methods, handles change
management, defines rules of engagement between initiatives and
governance body, and provides guidance on data usage
Enablement: Describes enabling data governance through technology
Organizational
Model
Standards &
Policies
Processes &
Procedures
Enablement
P
r
o
v
i
d
e

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y

D
a
t
a

Data Governance Approach
Review existing
governance
structure, data
standards, policies,
processes,
procedures, data
administration (e.g.
metadata)
Review data quality
pain points
Identify
stakeholders and
form working group
Achieve buy-in on
governance
framework
Current state
assessment of each
component of the
data governance
framework
Data quality
challenges and
improvement needs
Current Governance
Program
(Establish Baseline)
Define new governance
structure including
roles, responsibilities,
activities and time
commitments
Define data standards &
policies
Define data processes
& procedures
Define data quality
scorecard
Conduct group sessions
to review desired
processes
Design administration
and support capabilities
New data governance
structure
Data standards/policies
and processes/
procedures
Data administration
and support strategy
Data quality scorecard
Defining Future State
Governance Program
Review new
governance program
with key
stakeholder/working
groups
Develop transition plan
Consider training needs
on new processes and
procedures for the
governance team
Develop communication
plan to include
messages around the
new governance
structure and impact to
supported initiatives
(e.g. DW)
Plan communication
method & target
audience
Transition Plan
Communication Plan
Planning &
Managing
Expectation
Identify data
quality initiatives
aligned to new
data
governance
program
Prioritize
initiatives
according to
returned
benefits and
data quality
scorecard
Initiate data
quality initiatives
Data quality
execution plan
Enabling Quality
Information & Usage
Assess
Current State
Define
Future State
Plan &
Communicate
Execute & Manage
Quality Data
Activities
Profiling & Controls
Cleansing &
Enrichment
Ongoing
Sustainability
Work Products
Data quality report and prioritized
list of data cleansing initiatives
Data Dictionary listing critical data
fields to be cleansed with
corresponding standard
definitions, domain values,
usage, sources of truth, and
transformation rules
Repeatable data
cleansing/exception handling
controls & processes
Profile underlying data sources to
identify data quality issues,
determine root causes, and
prioritize cleansing efforts
Validate data cleansing scope,
approach, and activities
Create Data Dictionary to enforce
consistent/standard terms,
definitions, domain values,
usage, sources of truth, and
transformation rules
Identify critical data fields
Document repeatable data
cleansing/exception handling
controls & processes
Cleansing document listing
cleansing activities and
results
Controls and processes in
place to manage data
quality on an ongoing basis
Cleansed dataset
Obtain list of all known
changes to underlying data
that occurred during interim
period since last data
cleansing
Reconcile/Consolidate all
changes to underlying data
and create dataset to be
cleansed
Apply standards, controls,
and processes identified
during Profiling to create
cleansed dataset
Review/update data
cleansing results and
address identified
exceptions
Profiling and
cleansing work
products for a
specified dataset
that can be
leveraged for all
enterprise
datasets
Business case for
data governance
Sustain ongoing
data quality by
implementing data
governance
Leverage data
standards,
controls, and
processes defined
for profiled &
cleansed dataset
Increase scope as
necessary to
cover all aspects
of business data
Team Experience
Project Management Office
Basel II Engagement
PAS
Report Definition
FSRM
Deliverable:
Data Requirement
Specification

Deliverable:
Project Plan
Project Status Report
...
TSRS, BAS
Deliverable:
Process-Data
Dictionary
Data Gap Analysis
Report
Data Quality Analysis
TSRS
Deliverable:
Domain Value Report (Level 1)
Referential Integrity Report (Level 2)
Logic Integrity Report (Level 3)
...
Data Modelling
BAS
Deliverable:
Operational Data
Store Specification
Dimensional Data
Store Specification
Data Governance
TSRS
Deliverable:
Metadata Management Process
Data Management Group Initiation

Data Transformation
FSRM, BAS, TSRS
Deliverable:
Data Mapping
Specification
High-Level ETL
Design Specification
Infrastructure Design
TSRS, BAS
Deliverable:
Infrastructure
Specification
(Architecture, Sizing)
Report Generation
TSRS, BAS
Deliverable:
KRI Dashboard
Risk Convergence
Reports
Business Consulting
Implemented regional imaging, workflow, credit analysis, enterprise application integration, and
decision support systems for financial services
Optimized the global performance management and operational risk process for a major
investment bank across Asia Pacific
Designed and implemented corporate wide business intelligence solutions from data modeling,
data quality, ETL development, metadata, and infrastructure architecting, rendering enterprise
performance management (EPM), credit risk management (CRM), financial regulatory reporting,
and customer relationship management (CRM) analytics
Architected and implemented a 3-tier core banking transformation project for a global bank;
platform hosted centrally in Singapore, supporting business in Asia, Europe, and South America;
lead the subsequent change management effort
Provided strategic IT consulting on e-business and mobile computing initiatives, for financial
services, supply chains, as well as the public sector
Financial Services IT Operation
Defined and executed regional centralization strategy to enhance productivity, achieve platform
synergy, and leverage low-cost country outsourcing strategy
Set up regional Project Management Office and define IT governance for technology investment
Advise on regional IT due diligence, post-merger and acquisition integration, and forge joint
venture and minority equity partnership in Greater China and across Asia through setting up
shared service centers
Paul Sin
Associate Director, IT Advisory Services, Business Advisory Services
Direct Tel: +852 2846 8737
Direct Fax: +852 3753 8667
Mobile: +852 9625 2427
E-mail: paul.sin@hk.ey.com
Paul is the Associate Director of IT Advisory
Service, Business Advisory Services, Far East
Asia, Ernst & Young
Paul has over 12 years of information
technology experience, served two major
business consulting firms (PwC/IBM), as well as
the financial arm of a global conglomerate as a
regional IT leader (GE Capital).
Ph.D. Candidate in Organizational Psychology
(2009), Walden University, Minnesota, US
MBA, Chinese University of Hong Kong
B.Sc. (Hons) Computer Science Information
Systems, University of Hong Kong
Project Management Professional Certification
Six Sigma Blackbelt Certification
Language: English, Chinese (Cantonese,
Mandarin), Some Japanese, Some Thai
Background Experience
Qualification & Skills
Team CVs
Methodology
IT Advisory Services Offering
IT Strategic Planning & Requirement Analysis (ITSP)
The methodology for IT Strategic Planning and Requirements Analysis covers an extensive scope of
internal and external analyses, developing the optimal business case and implementation
framework (Identify, Diagnose and Design). It does not cover actual implementation of the
proposed operating model (Deliver, Sustain), but can include Strategy Testing (Validate).
All IT Strategic Planning and Requirements Analysis projects adhere to the overall monitoring level
of Quality and Risk Management (Q&RM), as well as Project Management.
Change Management and Benefit Management approaches will vary depending on the nature of the
particular IT Strategic Planning projects.
Relevant Phases
Package Selection
Candidate List and
View Criteria
Decision Framework Analysis Findings Final Report

Deliverable
Framework to filter the
candidate solutions
Decision framework to
record evaluations
Consolidation of
evaluations
Board summary of the
recommendations
Purpose
To formally agree the
candidate list of solution
providers
Agreement on filter criteria
Formal record of solutions
which have been discarded
and supporting rationale
KSCs defined by
underpinning capabilities
and requirements
Record the weighting
criteria
Baseline the scoring criteria
Key detail findings are
consolidated from all areas
of the investigation
Key input into the final
challenge stakeholders
Input to participants review
To gain formal agreement
from the board to enter into
commercial negotiations
Contents
Profile of candidate
solutions
Stakeholder review criteria
High level weighting
Spreadsheets
Each short-listed solution is
evaluated
Sensitivity analysis
All key areas results and
commentary
Map to benefits case,
demonstrated, evidence
and subject to
enhancements
Executive report
Steering committee
presentation
KSCs
TCO
Supplier
Capacity
Strategic
Alignment
Functionality
Ability to
Deliver
Technical
Alignment
Commercial
Terms
Risk
Claims Notification
XXXXsolution can meet 51% of policy search/match, FNOL data capture and
claim creation requirements through the core offering
Of the remaining 49%, majority scored require low effort (1-5 man days), and
simple Business Rules Framework (BRF) configuration, Structured Facts
Capture (SFC) configuration, or product configuration to meet LTSBI business
model.
Increased effort required to configure interfaces to XXX for policy snapshot and
automated validation checks, and OCIS for customer data. 44% 56%
80
76
94
93
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fit
Effort
Existing
New
Requirements split %
Fit/ Effort Scoring Breakdown
Setup & Coverage
Supplier and Loss Adjuster Assignment
73%
21%
New
Existing
68
72
85
85
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fit
Effort
Existing
New
New Existing
87%
94%
100%
New 0
0
95
95
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fit
Effort
Existing
New
Solution delivers good initial validation of cover through simple configuration of
BRF to enable automated system validation checks and user alerts, which will
support prompt and accurate declinature of claims.
Standard task management functionality is delivered through configuration of
workflow module to control referrals (e.g. coverage referrals).
Key contributor to lower fit/effort scores for both new and existing requirements
is the inability to interface to CUE, and undertake any automated processing
based on CUE matches.
XXXXsolution is capable of meeting 75% of supplier and loss adjuster
requirements around selection, delegated authority limits and payment
through the core product offering (all other supply chain processing will be
carried out through supply chain tool).
25% of requirements will require simple BRF/BRD configuration effort (2-5
man days) to enable the automatic prioritisation and presentation of a list
of suitable suppliers/LAs (based on geocentric factors only).
A more complex supplier/ LA selection model (e.g. factoring-in SLA or
capacity considerations) will require more moderate BRF configuration.
+
+
+
+
+
_
_
_
+
Claims Notification
XXXXsolution can meet 51% of policy search/match, FNOL data capture and
claim creation requirements through the core offering
Of the remaining 49%, majority scored require low effort (1-5 man days), and
simple Business Rules Framework (BRF) configuration, Structured Facts
Capture (SFC) configuration, or product configuration to meet LTSBI business
model.
Increased effort required to configure interfaces to XXX for policy snapshot and
automated validation checks, and OCIS for customer data. 44% 56%
80
76
94
93
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fit
Effort
Existing
New
Setup & Coverage
Supplier and Loss Adjuster Assignment
73%
21%
New
Existing
68
72
85
85
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fit
Effort
Existing
New
New Existing
87%
94%
100%
New 0
0
95
95
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fit
Effort
Existing
New
Solution delivers good initial validation of cover through simple configuration of
BRF to enable automated system validation checks and user alerts, which will
support prompt and accurate declinature of claims.
Standard task management functionality is delivered through configuration of
workflow module to control referrals (e.g. coverage referrals).
Key contributor to lower fit/effort scores for both new and existing requirements
is the inability to interface to CUE, and undertake any automated processing
based on CUE matches.
XXXXsolution is capable of meeting 75% of supplier and loss adjuster
requirements around selection, delegated authority limits and payment
through the core product offering (all other supply chain processing will be
carried out through supply chain tool).
25% of requirements will require simple BRF/BRD configuration effort (2-5
man days) to enable the automatic prioritisation and presentation of a list
of suitable suppliers/LAs (based on geocentric factors only).
A more complex supplier/ LA selection model (e.g. factoring-in SLA or
capacity considerations) will require more moderate BRF configuration.
+
+
+
+
+
_
_
_
+
Evaluat ed
Assessed
Ident ified
Comprehensive analysis
and assessment of
candidat e providers
Recorded in Decision
Framework
Pricing Model
Recent UK sales
IT st rat egic direct ion/ fit
46 GI Packages
High level capabilit ies
IT Guiding Principles
6 6
3 3
10 10
Recommended
Pinnacle t o recommend
t he preferred candidat e
t o t he Board.
Short -list ed
Pinnacle t o recommend
t he preferred candidat e
t o t he Board.
1 1
Internal
Build
Internal
Build
Vendor 1 Analysis
Vendor 2 Analysis
Exec Summary
Overall
Score
Recommendations
Options and Next Steps
Transition Planning
Information Management Framework
Data Model
Conceptual Logical Physical
Data Management
Metadata Management Reference Data Management Data Protection
Operational Data Stores Data Warehouse / Data Mart System of Records
Master Data Management
Data Movement (ETL/EAI/EII)
Data Governance
Standards & Policies Processes & Procedures Organizational Model Enablement
Data Quality
Profiling / Analysis Cleansing Controls
Data Usage
Management Reporting Analytics (OLAP) Data Mining
Scorecard / Dashboards Quantitative Analysis Alerts / Notifications
Architecture
Physical / Technical Logical Conceptual
Standards Services Design Patterns
Enrichment / Enhancement
Process Analytics (PA)
Deep business insights help organizations improve their ability to make timely and
accurate business decisions and meet business objectives.
Determine
what could
happen
Prediction
Statistical, econometric, scenario-
based
Analysis and Monitoring
Root cause, modeling and validation,
multidimensional analysis
Measurement and Reporting
Forensic evidence, queries, profiling,
data/text mining, benchmarking
Determine
why it
happened

Determine
what
happened
Business Benefits Analytic Capabilities
Process Analytics
Information Management
Data
Information
Management
Quality
Data/Information
Analysis
Business
Insights
Competitive
Advantage /
Shareholder
Value
`
`
Reliability
of data
Information Management
Data governance, data quality,
data conversion, data warehousing
To make smart and accurate decisions, organizations need to transform data into information and actionable insights.
Objective
Data that meets the
needs of the business
Sustainable data quality
Make better business
decisions
Improve key processes
Create competitive
advantage
Enhance revenue
Improve shareholder
value
Improve risk
management
Reduce risk of fraud
Just-in-time control
monitoring
Reduce working
capital
Organization
Information Management Advisory Service (IMAS)
Policies & Procedures Standards
Governance Framework
Business requirements
Definition, format. and rules
Data design
Classification
Data collection
Meta data management
Test data management
Data change management
Master data management
System performance measurement
Data security
Extract, transform & load
Data quality assessment
Storage
Business continuity planning
Backup and retrieval
Data protection
Monitoring
Consumption (analysis, reporting
and manipulation)
Master data management
Data resilience
Tracking and notification
Media management
Disposal
Governance
Data Quality
Data
Conversion
Data
Warehouse
Metadata
Management
Data
Reconciliation
Accessibility
Auditability
Availability
Compliance
Consistency
Integrity
Define & Design
D
i
s
p
o
s
e

Increased
Market Share
Dependable
Competitive
Intelligence
Liquidity
& Solvency
Heightened
Regulatory &
Reporting
Compliance
Improved
Stakeholder
Confidence
Data Management Activities Data Life Cycle
Information
Management
Data Objectives
Business
Objectives

Basel Ii It Advisory (En)

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Basel Ii It Advisory (En)

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Basel II Technology Enablement

Вам также может понравиться