150 Years of Archaeology in SA

Hilary John Deacon

hjdeacon@iafrica.com
Discovering the past
A lecture to the Western Cape Branch
of the South African Archaeological
Society in 2009
A Ladys Tale
She says driving Land Rovers, smoking cigars and making
discoveries is what attracted her to archaeology.
It is her efforts and the efforts of many others that contribute to
150 years of progress in South African archaeology.
These slides are some benchmarks of that progress.
Now an eminent historical archaeologist, Janette Deacon rarely
gets a lift in a Land Rover and does not smoke but she does
make discoveries. Her discoveries are small things forgotten,
like porcelain fragments and clay pipe stems, but they tell an
intriguing story of colonial times. That is what archaeology is
about.
Benchmark 1: Recognition of Ancient Artefacts
1858 TH Bowker
collects stone artefacts
from the Fish River area
in the Eastern Cape. They
are deeply buried and
therefore very old.
Victorian collectors find
stone artefacts in
abundance. Curiosity
about stone artefacts
drives the development
of archaeology.
Benchmark 2: Bushman Implements, 1858-1900
All finds are attributed to
the Bushmen/San, who are
recognised as the ancient
inhabitants of the area.
Beginnings of interest in
San ethnography and
linguistics.
1870 Archaeology is
recognised as a field of
study by Langham Dale.
First prehistories are written
search for explanations.
Benchmark 3: Antiquity of Man, c.1905
Louis Peringuey recognises Acheulian
artefacts in the vineyards around
Stellenbosch as being like those in France
that were considered most ancient.
Acheulian artefacts
Benchmark 4: Early Researchers, c.1900-1923
Many of the early researchers in South Africa were museum-
based scientists who undertook excavations, built up collections
and published their findings. Some were motivated by the search
for fossil human ancestors, like the Neanderthals of Europe.
John Hewitt, the Director of Grahamstowns Albany Museum
from 1910-1958, was a zoologist and authority on reptiles and
amphibians who did archaeological fieldwork in his vacations.
He excavated the type sites of Wilton and Howiesons Poort and
other sites near Grahamstown.
Benchmark 5: First Professional Archaeologist
1923 Astley John Hilary
Goodwin is appointed to sort
out the museum collections.
1929 Publishes The Stone
Age Cultures of SA with
Clarence van Riet Lowe.
Clarence van
Riet Lowe
Astley John Hilary
Goodwin, 1900-1959
Goodwins Three Age Scheme
With additions and dates
Framework for South African archaeology developed by Goodwin and Van Riet Lowe
Benchmark 6: Another Major Contribution
by Goodwin
1945 Goodwin founds the
South African Archaeological
Society; he starts and becomes
editor of the South African
Archaeological Bulletin.
Goodwin was a journalist at
heart his publications helped
the growth of archaeology in
South Africa.
Benchmark 7: Discovery of Australopithecus
1925 Raymond Dart
describes the first fossil
australopithecine pre-
human ancestor, the skull
of a child from Taung, in
the Northern Cape.
1936 Robert Broom finds
more australopithecines at
Sterkfontein and Swartkrans,
near Johannesburg.
These fossils showed that
pre-human ancestors evolved
in Africa, not in Europe.
Raymond Dart, Robert Broom, Abbe Henri
Breuil, Clarence van Riet Lowe
Cradle of Humankind
Ron Clark at Sterkfontein
CK Bob Brain at Swartkrans
Predation hypothesis
Benchmark 8: True Humans Modern Ancestors
not only were people some 100 000 years ago anatomically modern but
they were also behaviorally modern. HJ Deacon, 1989
In the 1980s, the out-of-Africa hypothesis
and the study of the emergence of modern
humans created new interest in Stone Age
archaeology and, in particular, Goodwins
Middle Stone Age (MSA).
Klasies River
Sibudu
Blombos
MSA people were modern and cannibals
Sibudu stone artefact with
ochre stain from hafting
Relative dating means a is older than b.
1950s Radiocarbon chronometric dating revolutionised the
understanding of the past 40 000 years.
The first radiocarbon-dated site in SA was
Matjes River, near Plettenberg Bay. The
11 000-year-old shell midden was much
older than expected.
CSIR Laboratory,
Pretoria
Benchmark 9: Dating: Science in Archaeology
Radiocarbon is now routinely used along with
other methods, such as Optically Stimulated
Luminescence (OSL) dating, which can be
used for samples older than 40 000 years.
Chronometric dating gives the age in years before the present (BP).
John Vogel
Dating and Stable Isotopes
Cango Caves stalagmite analysed by John Vogel carries a record
of temperature changes in the caves over the past 30 000 years.
Inside Cango
1700s and 1800s Early travellers find and copy rock
paintings. More than 15 000 rock art sites are now on record.
Rock art is to archaeology as birding is to zoology:
it popularises and informs on the subject.
Rock paintings from the Cederberg
Benchmark 10: Rock Art
Pat Vinnicombe
Interpreting Rock Art
People of the Eland, 1976, Patricia Vinnicombe
Believing and Seeing, 1981, David Lewis-Williams
Beyond the narrative explanations
Rock art is religious and shamanistic.
Oldest dated rock
painting in southern
Africa 27 500
years old
Most famous
Seminal publications:
David Lewis-Williams
Rock art interpretations have drawn on San ethnography.
1870s Records from these
/Xam San prisoners at the
Breakwater in Cape Town
were compiled by Wilhelm
Bleek and Lucy Lloyd.
1950s-1990s Information
from contemporary San was
compiled by anthropologists.
These records also contribute
to Later Stone Age studies.
Benchmark 11: Who were the Khoekhoen?
1970 Frank Schweitzer recovers sheep bones
and pottery from Die Kelders, showing that
Khoekhoe herders lived there 2 000 years ago.
1488-1650s Historical records by European
sailors to the Cape illustrate Khoekhoe people
herding sheep and cattle and living in matjes
huts.
People in Namaqualand still live in matjes
huts, farm small stock and speak Nama, a
Khoekhoe click language.
Example: Mapungubwe, now a World Heritage Site, first excavated in the 1930s
Benchmark 12: Dispersal of Early Farmers
1952 The term Iron Age is adopted to describe the cultural
changes brought to SA by Bantu-speaking peoples who migrated
southwards from central and eastern Africa about 2 000 years ago.
Iron Age people introduced mining and metal working, livestock
such as cattle, sheep and goats, and crops such as sorghum and
millet. They also introduced modern social structures.

The distribution of Iron Age sites around Mapungubwe and the Limpopo River
The main access to Mapungubwe Hill
was via this narrow cleft
Mapungubwe period stone walling on the
Southern Terrace
Glass beads brought to Mapungubwe from
India through trade on the eastern coast of
Africa were melted down and made into
larger beads using baked clay moulds.
Fragments of Chinese celadon from
the Sung Dynasty (960-1279 AD)
were found at Mapungubwe. They are
placed here next to a whole celadon
wine kettle from a museum.
Gold from
Mapungubwe
Rhino
Beads
Bowl
Iron Age people at Mapungubwe exported gold and ivory and imported glass beads,
celadon and cotton in the Indian Ocean trade network
Significance of Mapungubwe
The Mapungubwe Cultural Landscape was the centre of the first
kingdom in southern Africa established by the cultural ancestors
of the present-day Shona and Venda.
This period laid the foundation for a new type of social
organisation in Southern Africa.
It includes more than 400 archaeological sites and the three
successive capitals of Schroda, K2 and Mapungubwe, occupied
between 900 and 1300 AD.
Achievements after 150 years
Archaeology has branched out into many different areas of
special interest.
There is growing public interest in archaeology.
Archaeologists have achieved professional status.
The results of archaeological research have become an integral
part of the education system.
Archaeology is a recognised component of national heritage.
Archaeological sites are the focus of tourism initiatives.
There are increased funding and job opportunities (mostly in the
applied field of heritage impact assessments conducted ahead of
development).
Some Aspirations and Needs
Growth of organisations like the South African Archaeology
Society.
Strengthening of heritage organisations involved in the
protection and curation of archaeological data, sites and
collections.
Attraction of nationally representative practitioners to the
field.
Planning for future growth.