A Framework for Your Pipeline

Integrity Program

A Few Thoughts Before Beginning

This rule is new to the pipeline industry although

many of the concepts are not
Many have struggled though the rules
development

A consistent approach can help

Why an Industry Standard?

A systematic approach -

focuses on risk reduction as a goal

is more effective

is called for by the rule

Provides a framework

for operators in developing their programs

for inspectors in auditing integrity programs

Provides additional meat

API 1160, Managing System Integrity

for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines

Developed under ANSI consensus procedures

Work group included -

Pipeline operators

OPS regulatory and enforcement

Inspection service providers

Metallurgists, engineers, corrosion specialists,

and more

API 1160 -- The Process

Drafted by Work Group

Reviewed by peers

Pipeline operators

ASME B31.4 members

Pipeline safety advocates

Environmental interest groups

Comments resolved

Aligned with Final Rule on integrity management

API 1160 -- Scope

Hazardous liquid pipelines

Not limited to pipelines regulated in Part 195

Not limited to pipelines in high consequence

areas

Not limited to line pipe

PROVEN INDUSTRY PRACTICES

API 1160 -- Contents

Intro, Scope, References, Definitions

Integrity Management Programs -- Overview

High Consequence Areas

Identification

Using HCA info

Affecting HCAs

Documenting HCA info

API 1160 -- Contents

Data Gathering, Review and Integration

Risk Assessment Implementation

Initial Baseline Plan Development and

Implementation

Mitigation Options

Revision of the Plan

Pump Stations and Terminals

Program Evaluation

Managing Change

API 1160 -- Appendixes

Anomaly Types, Causes and Concerns

Repair Strategies

Standard Data Fields

For tracking release information

For tracking system information

What the standard is NOT -

A cookbook for compliance with the rules

A simplified approach to risk or integrity

management

10

What the standard IS -

An aid in developing the framework for your

integrity management program

Guidance on the aspects of integrity management

you need to be thinking about

A means to make your program comparable to

other company programs

A set of standardized measures allowing you to

compare your performance with your peers, if you
choose to

AND MORE

11

Highlights -- Identifying HCAs

Its the first thing you have to do

You are partially dependent on OPS but there are
some caveats

Population -- Straightforward

Navigable waters -- Straightforward

USAs -- Not so simple

Timing may become an issue

Some guidance in the standard

12

Highlights -- Data

Identifying data sources (lots of examples)

Identifying data needs (different from what you

have maybe)

Establishing a common reference system -- THE

key to integration

13

Highlights --Risk Assessment

A primer that is specific to the pipeline industry

Defines the characteristics of a sound approach

Structure

Adequacy of resources

Experience-based

Predictive

Uses appropriate data

Importance of feeback mechanisms

14

Highlights -- Baseline Assessment

A tutorial on ILI -

Anomalies and defects

Internal inspection and testing technologies

Tools

Intervals

A tutorial on hydrostatic testing

Value and limitations

Intervals

15

Highlights -- Baseline Assessment

What should you do with what you find?

What will be your strategy for responding to

anomalies identified

Repair overview

Mitigation options -- lots of them

16

Highlights -- Program Evaluation

Recommends specific performance measures

Defines a way to look at the value and utility of

performance measures, i.e. methodology

Comparisons

Internal

External

Audits

17

Final Thoughts

The Standard

The standard is not typical

The standard significantly raises the

expectation bar, probably more then the rule
itself does

The Rule

Requires leak detection capability in the rules

for the first time

Is tough

18

To Get Your Copy of the Current

Draft --

http://www.api.org/pipelineintegrity/

19