Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
wherein
aggregate
macroeconomic
Introduction
Self-Adjustment or Instability focus on the adjustment
process how markets respond to an undesirable
equilibrium:
Why does anyone think the market might self-adjust
(returning to a desired equilibrium)?
Why might markets not self-adjust?
Could
market
outcomes?
responses
actually
worsen
macro
national income(NI).
Leakages
Leakage: Income not spent
directly
on
domestic
market
but
example,
taxes
Injection
Injection: An addition of spending to
the circular flow of income. For
example,
exports
from
the
1- Taxes
In reference to taxes paid to the government:
a)Sales taxes are taken out of the circular flow in product
markets.
b)Payroll taxes and income taxes are taken out of
paychecks, so households dont spend that income.
Ta x e s ( c o n )
however, this enables the government to provide public goods or quasi
for the nation to prosper and are contribute to the national output of
the nation (GDP), hence these are considered injections into the CFI.
2- Imports
In reference to imports (income not spent directly on domestic output in the
national product market) , the domestic households buy imports from foreign
countries, which are considered to be leakages from the CFI because money is
being allocated towards the purchase of goods and services from foreign
product markets.
national
output.
3 - Saving
In reference to savings:
a) Households savings (disposable income household
consumption)
b) Firms savings (Depreciation allowances and retained
earnings)
They are considered as a leakage from the CFI because this
money is not used and is not put directly into the product
market.
Saving (con)
However, this capital that is saved is now available to the
Government spending
Exports
Investment
Product
market
Households
(disposable
income)
Business Firms
Factor
market
Saving
Imports
Household
taxes
LEAKAGES
Business
taxes
Business
saving
Macro Equilibrium
Injections
of
investment,
government
LEAKAGES
INJECTIONS
Consumer saving
Business saving
Taxes
Imports
Investment
Government spending
Exports
Self-Adjustment?
Classical economists believed that (1) flexible interest
rates and (2) flexible prices equalize injections and
leakages. Consequently, this flexibility would lead to a
macroeconomic equilibrium.
2- Flexible Prices
Classical economists believed that If demand for output falls
Prices will decline Consumers will buy more output
Macroeconomic equilibrium will return.
plans.
the same thing will happen when that person spends his
money -- the person he paid the money to will turn around
and spend some it, too. The chain of spending continues
until there's nothing left to spend.
T h e M u l t i p l i e r P ro c e s s ( c o n )
This multiplier process works both ways, (1) A drop in consumer
spending (2) An increase in unsold inventories firms will react
by (3) Reducing prices and (4) Cutting back the production
(investment spending) which will leads to (5) A reduction in wages
(household incomes) and (6) An increase in unemployment rate
(7) More lost income (8) Even less consumption.
Accordingly, what started off as a relatively small spending shortfall
escalated quickly into a much larger problem.
1
Multiplier
1- MPC
1
Total change
initial change
in spending
in spending
1- MPC
Hypothetical Example# 1
First off, suppose everyone has the same MPC = (0.75)
- I withdraw $100 from my savings account and spend it all on a leather
jacket.
- Biff, the leather jacket salesman, since he has MPC = 0.75, spends (0.75)*
$100 = $75 (on a hat).
- Cheryl, the hat salesperson, spends (0.75)*$75 = $56 (on a puppy).
- Ralph, the dog breeder, spends (0.75)*$56 = $42 (on a haircut)
- Olga, the hairstylist, spends (0.75)*$42 = $32 (on food).
- and so on.
Note that each subsequent amount spent is 75% of the previous amount.
After many more iterations the amount spent will be so tiny (75% of a
fractional cent) that we can forget about it. But by then the total increase in
spending will have been quite large ( spending = [1 /(1-MPC)] * 100 =
$400).
Hypothetical Example # 2
4. Income reduced by $100 billion
8. Income reduced by
$75 billion more
9. Consumption reduced
by $56.25 billion more
1. Investment drops
by $100 billion
Factor
markets
10. And so on
7. Further cutbacks in
employment or wages
Business
firms
3. Cutbacks in employment
or wages
Product
markets
First cycle
Second cycle
Third cycle
Fourth cycle
Fifth cycle
Sixth cycle
Nth cycle
Change in
Spending During
Cycle
Cumulative
decrease in
Spending
$100.00
75.00
56.25
42.19
31.64
23.73
$100.00
175.00
231.25
273.44
305.08
328.81
400.00
10-31
in spending
in spending
1- MPC
1
$100 billion
1- 0.75
4 $100 billion
$400 billion
level or output.
decline
(or
increase)
in
Conclusions of Keynes
The basic conclusion of Keynesian analysis is
that the economy is vulnerable to changes in
spending behavior and wont self-adjust to a
desired macro equilibrium.
The responses of market participants are
likely to worsen rather than improve market
outcomes.
C a bYD
Where:
C = Consumer spending
a = Autonomous consumption, or the level of consumption
that would still exist even if income was $0.
b = Marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which is the
ratio of consumption changes to income changes.
YD = Real disposable income.
Consumer Confidence