Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
time
Event 1A
= add cell 2
Event 1C
= replace cell1 with cell 3
Event 1B
= remove c
Case Description
Parameter
Setting Before Optimization
Handover threshold
2dB
Event 1A
Time to Trigger
640ms
Handover threshold
5dB
Event 1B
Time to Trigger
640ms
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
Case Description
As the UE moves on, the main serving cell changes to the third
cell (SC48) of site BKC0044U, its Ec/Io is -10.31dB. Cell SC53
of site BKC0074U is removed from the active set and enters
the monitoring set.
After 1s, the signal quality of cell SC53 of site BKC0074U is stronger
than cell SC48 of site BKC0044U, and the Ec/Io of SC48 reaches 2.39dB. Cell SC48 reports to Event 1A and tries to enter the active set
again. At this moment, the pilot quality of the cell SC48 of site
BKC0044U is very bad, with its Ec/Io down to -21.05dB. The UE reports
to Event 1A, but cannot receive the handover command, then the call
drops.
Optimization Solution
In the end, the main serving cell of the UE changes back to cell SC53
as shown in the following figure, and no call-drop happens.
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
Rs Qmeas,s + Qhysts
Rn Qmeas,nQoffsets,n
Case Description
Wide coverage of 2G network: Frequent 2G/3G Ping-pong
handovers occur at the boundary of the 3G coverage area.
Case Study
Check all parameters of the 2G network. For all GSM cells
configured with 3G neighbor cells, set their Qsearch_I
parameters to 7, FDD_Qmin to 0, and FDD_Qoffset to 0.
Qsearch_I=7 means that the inter-RAT measurement is
performed unconditionally. FDD_Qmin represents the signal
quality of WCDMA cell, and works as one of the judging criteria
for cell reselection. For FDD_Qmin=0, 0 is a logic value, and
the corresponding absolute value is Ec/N0=-20dB.
In the 3G network, Qqualmin=-18, SsearchRAT=2, and
Qqualmin+ SsearchRAT=-16dB.
Severe Ping-pong handovers exist within the GSM network,
the signals jitter greatly.
For 2G/3G co-site and co-antenna, the cell edges of 2G and
3G cells overlap.
Solution
Set FDD_Qmin of the corresponding 2G cells to 7, and the
corresponding absolute value is -12dB. Then the ping-pong
effect is solved.
Optimization Criteria
The cell reselection criterion at the 2G side must ensure that
when the UE is handed over to the 3G network, the signal
quality of the 3G cells can support the UE. In this case, the cell
reselection criterion is set to -12dB.
In the 3G network, Qqualmin=-18, SsearchRAT=2, and
Qqualmin+ SsearchRAT=-16dB. This setting ensures that the
UE remains in the 3G network when 3G cells are available.
The reselection criterion changes the serving radius of the cell
to a certain degree. Thus, this parameter must be set
reasonably.
Certain margin must be reserved for the bi-directional
reselection threshold to avoid the ping-pong effect. (In this
case, the margin is 4dB.)
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
Case Description
Case Study
Cell radius
Cell radius
Cell radius
Cell radius
TTI=20ms
Message
Pp-m
Block Size=1*168
Block Size=1*360
-2
-2
Dual-antenna
-24
-21
Single-antenna
-21
-18
TTI=10ms
Message
Dual-antenna
Single-antenna
-24
-21
-21
-18
TTI=20ms
Message
Dual-antenna
-23
-20
-2
Single-antenna
-20
-17
-2
TTI=10ms
Message
Dual-antenna
Single-antenna
-23
-20
-20
-17
TTI=20ms
Message
Dual-antenna
-23
-20
-2
Single-antenna
-20
-17
-2
TTI=10ms
Message
Dual-antenna
Single-antenna
-23
-20
-20
-17
TTI=20ms
Message
Dual-antenna
-21.5
-19
-2
Single-antenna
-18.5
-16
-2
Dual-antenna
Single-antenna
-21.5
-18.5
-19
-16
TTI=10ms
Message
Note: Change the preamble detection threshold and initial TX power of the UE accordingly when changing the cell radius.
Begin time
2009-4-5
2009-4-12
2009-4-19
2009-4-26
2009-5-3
Time
Granularity
1 Week
1 Week
1 Week
1 Week
1 Week
Cell Name
PHGV_Cell1
PHGV_Cell1
PHGV_Cell1
PHGV_Cell1
PHGV_Cell1
Cell ID
15401
15401
15401
15401
15401
RRC
Establishment
Success Rate
(Service)
56.66%
38.91%
99.43%
99.81%
94.77%
Radio
Access
Success
Rate
56.54%
38.89%
99.40%
99.80%
93.79%
Experiences
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
MPO Description
Parameter name
Abbreviated name
MeasPwrOffset
Description
Unit
dB
Default Value
After
Cum_Number
50
4500
4000
40
3500
3000
30
2500
2000
20
Before
1000
10
500
0
Percent(%)
Cum_Number
50
[-60, -70)
[-70, -80)
[-80, -90)
[-90, -105)
[-105, -INF)
Percent(%)
26.15
43.37
23.98
6.29
0.21
Cum_Number
2444
4054
2241
588
20
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
40
30
20
10
(+INF, 60.00)
[-60, -70)
[-70, -80)
[-80, -90)
[-90, -105)
[-105, -INF)
Percent(%)
20.82
45.01
27.85
5.95
0.37
Cum_Number
1984
4291
2654
567
35
(+INF, 60.00)
1500
After
After
Percent(%)
Cum_Number
45
4000
40
3500
35
3000
30
2500
25
2000
20
Before
1500
15
10
1000
500
0
Percent(%)
Cum_Number
(+INF, 6.00)
[-6, -8)
[-8, -10)
[-10, -12)
[-12, -14)
[-14, -INF)
40
3500
Percent(%)
18.46
21.5
40.56
16.15
2.6
0.73
35
3000Cum_Number
1725
2010
3791
1510
243
68
30
2500
25
2000
20
1500
15
1000
10
500
5
0
(+INF, 6.00)
[-6, -8)
[-8, -10)
[-10, -12)
[-12, -14)
[-14, -INF)
Percent(%)
27.9
30.12
33.37
6.98
1.24
0.39
Cum_Number
2659
2871
3181
665
118
37
After
Before
Cum_Number
60
6000
50
5000
40
4000
30
3000
20
2000
10
1000
Average CQI
Percent(%)
Cum_Number
60
6000
50
40
Percent(%)
5000
Cum_Number
4000
30
3000
20
2000
10
1000
(+INF,
25.00)
[25, 21)
[21, 17)
[17, 13)
[13, 9)
[9, -INF)
Percent(%)
5.94
53.99
31.65
6.77
1.4
0.25
Cum_Number
560
5089
2984
638
132
24
(+INF,
25.00)
[25, 21)
[21, 17)
[17, 13)
[13, 9)
[9, -INF)
21.05
54.35
19.01
4.36
0.99
0.24
1912
4936
1727
396
90
22
After
After
Percent(%)
Before
40
4000
35
3500
30
3000
25
2500
20
2000
15
1500
10
1000
500
HSDPA Throughput
Percent(%)
Number
30
3000 Percent(%)
25
2500
20
2000
15
1500
10
1000
500
Number
(-INF, 1000] (1000, 2000] (2000, 3500] (3500, 5000] (5000, 6000] (6000, +INF)
Percent(%)
25.08
12.51
23.88
27.16
11.06
0.31
Number
2364
1179
2251
2561
1043
29
Number
(-INF, 1000] (1000, 2000] (2000, 3500] (3500, 5000] (5000, 6000] (6000, +INF)
12.53
8.51
21
38.05
19.32
0.59
1138
773
1907
3456
1755
54
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
Target
Node B
Serving
Node B
Serving
RNC
1.Measurement Report
1D
2.Decide to
Change Serving
HS-DSCH Cell
3.Radio Link Reconfiguration
Prepare
NBAP
NBAP
NBAP
NBAP
NBAP
RRC
RRC
RRC
RRC
Event 1D indicates that there is a cell outside the active set, which has
better quality than the cells in the active set, i.e., the best cell in the
band changes. Upon the receiving of Event 1D, soft handover (cell
outside the active set reports Event 1D and the link number in the
active set does not reach its maximum), soft replacement (cell outside
the active set reports Event 1D and the link number in the active set
reaches its maximum) will be triggered or the best serving cell will
change (for HS-DSCH/E-DCH channel). When the cell satisfies the
following formula, and Time to Trigger duration is long, UE will report
1D to RNC.
Handover punctuality
Handover frequency
Value
320ms
3
0ms
PS domain intra-frequency
measurement event 1D Time
320
320
320
320
320
to trigger
PS domain intra-frequency
measurement event 1D
hysteresis
Parameter Name
10
640
640
640
640
640
320
2
64
0
2
10
320
640
320
640
320
640
320
640
4298.
98
4400.
24
4484.
39
4369.
02
4376.
62
4371.
57
4352.
93
Average throughput
Rate of values lower than
8.16
1Mbps
104
Best cell change times
7.55
5.23
6.96
5.83
5.39
6.27
6.39
5.62
94
96
80
92
69
89
72
84
64
69.7
66.84 68.02
67.9
71.49
73.23
71.7
71.89
70.39
69.19
CQI
25
24.34 25.05
24.46
24.66
24.8
24.6
24.8
24.53
24.35
[3600, 2000)
16.26 19.11
21.63
18.75
17.39
16.53
16.99
15.85
17.9
17.81
[2000, 1024)
5.88
6.5
5.12
6.39
5.29
4.85
5.04
5.26
5.32
7.38
[1024, 0)
7.61
6.04
4.42
6.03
5.22
5.15
5.51
6.13
5.26
5.08
[0, -INF)
0.55
1.51
0.81
0.93
0.61
0.24
0.76
0.87
1.13
0.54
5100.00
104
90.00
5000.00
96
94
92
4900.00
89
84
Percent %
80.00
70.00
69.7
66.84
68.02
80
67.9
71.4969 73.23
71.7 72 71.89
60.00
50.00
4400.24
4341.48
4298.98
30.00
25.00 24.34 25.05
24.46 24.66
20.00
4197.46
10.00
8.16
7.55
0.00
2-320
2-640
4500.00
5.23
6.96
3-320
70.39 69.19
4700.00
64
4600.00
4484.39
4429.41
40.00
4800.00
5.83
5.39
6.27
7.00
6.39
5.62
7-320
7-640
4100.00
4000.00
Average Throughput
110.00
Parameter 4
320
640
Average throughout
4429.41
4298.98
5.23
6.96
96
80
68.02
67.9
CQI
25.05
24.46
PS service intra-frequency
measurement event 1D
Parameter Time to trigger
Modification PS service intra-frequency
measurement event 1D
Time hysteresis
HSDPA
When configuring parameter 4, handover number is 80, but CQI reported by UE is 24.46,
and throughput is 4.29mbps, which indicate that the handover is unpunctual, and the
primary serving cell is not the best cell. When configuring parameter 3, handover number
is 96, but CQI reported by UE is 25.05, which indicate that the handover is punctual, and
the primary serving cell is the best cell, and the rate is higher than that of parameter 4.
Parameter
modification
HSDPA
Parameter 1
Parameter 3
Parameter 6
320
320
640
4341.48
4429.41
4484.39
8.16
5.23
5.39
104
96
69
69.7
68.02
73.23
25.00
25.05
24.80
Keep the primary serving cell with good coverage, because frequent
handovers will affect the throughput. When CQI is relatively low, less
handover number will lead to a higher rate.
Left
Right
Hysteresis
Time To Trigger
640
320
Throughput
4.157Mbps
4.256Mbps
CQI
23.97
25.34
Para
If the parameter configuration is (4640ms), the test shows that it brings a good result,
but at crossroads, the testing result is not the best, and parameter configuration (3.
320ms) can bring good testing result.
Experiences
Content
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 1)
Optimization of Handover Parameters (Case 2)
Optimization of Cell Reselection Parameters
KPI
Maximum Cell TCP>95%
Average Cell TCP
Number of rejected services,
DCH downlink TCP limit
November 10
15
18.50%
1884
November, 20
28
19.50%
2709
Case Conclusion:
Suggestions: