Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Product Design
Lecture Outline
Design Process
Rapid Prototyping and Concurrent Design
Technology in Design
Design Quality Reviews
Design for Environment
Quality Function Deployment
Design for Robustness
4-2
Design Process
Effective design can provide a competitive edge
matches product or service characteristics with
customer requirements
ensures that customer requirements are met in the
simplest and least costly manner
reduces time required to design a new product or
service
minimizes revisions necessary to make a design
workable
4-3
Design Process
Product design
defines appearance of product
sets standards for performance
specifies which materials are to be used
determines dimensions and tolerances
4-4
Design Process
4-5
Idea Generation
Companys own R&D
department
Customer complaints
or suggestions
Marketing research
Suppliers
Salespersons in the
field
Factory workers
New technological
developments
Competitors
4-6
Idea Generation
Perceptual Maps
visual comparison of customer perceptions
Benchmarking
comparing product/process against best-in-class
Reverse engineering
dismantling competitors product to improve your
own product
4-7
4-8
Feasibility Study
Market analysis
Economic analysis
Technical/strategic analyses
Performance specifications
4-9
Test prototype
Revise design
Retest
4-10
Concurrent Design
4-11
Functional Design
how product will perform?
reliability
maintainability
usability
4-12
Computing Reliability
Components in series
0.90
0.90
4-13
Computing Reliability
Components in parallel
0.90
R2
0.95 + 0.90(1-0.95) = 0.995
0.95
R1
4-14
System Reliability
0.90
0.98
0.98
0.92
0.98
0.92+(1-0.92)(0.90)=0.99
0.98
4-15
SA =
MTBF
MTBF + MTTR
where:
MTBF = mean time between failures
MTTR = mean time to repair
4-16
System Availability
PROVIDER
MTBF (HR)
MTTR (HR)
A
B
C
60
36
24
4.0
2.0
1.0
4-17
Usability
Ease of use of a product or service
ease of learning
ease of use
ease of remembering how to use
frequency and severity of errors
user satisfaction with experience
4-18
Production Design
How the product will be made
Simplification
reducing number of parts, assemblies, or options in a
product
Standardization
using commonly available and interchangeable parts
Modular Design
combining standardized building blocks, or modules,
to create unique finished products
Design for Manufacture (DFM)
Designing a product so that it can be produced easily
and economically
4-19
Design Simplification
(a) Original design
Assembly using
common fasteners
4-20
4-21
Technology in Design
Computer Aided Design (CAD)
assists in creation, modification, and analysis of a
design
computer-aided engineering (CAE)
tests and analyzes designs on computer screen
4-22
4-23
4-24
Cause of
Effect of
Corrective
Mode
Failure
Failure
Action
Stale
Broken
Too Salty
tastes bad
wont crunch
add moisture
cure longer
poor packaging
thrown out
lost sales
too thin
too brittle
cant dip
poor display
change recipe
change process
rough handling
rough use
injures mouth
chocking
change packaging
poor packaging
perceived as old
lost sales
outdated receipt
process not in control
eat less
drink more
health hazard
uneven
distribution
Copyright 2011 John Wiley
& Sons,
Inc.
of salt
4-25
4-26
4-27
4-28
4-29
Green Areas
Green Sourcing
use less material
use recycled if possible
Green Manufacture
is energy from renewable sources
amount of waste produced
Green Consumption
products use of energy
is product recyclable and maintainable
Recycling and Re-Use
design products to be recycled or re-used
save energy and money
Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4-30
4-31
House of Quality
Importance
5
Trade-off matrix
3
Design
characteristics
4
1
Customer
requirements
Relationship
matrix
2
Competitive
assessment
Target values
4-32
Competitive Assessment of
Customer Requirements
Easy and
safe to use
Irons
well
Competitive Assessment
Customer Requirements
Presses quickly
Removes wrinkles
Doesnt stick to fabric
Provides enough steam
Doesnt spot fabric
Doesnt scorch fabric
Heats quickly
Automatic shut-off
Quick cool-down
Doesnt break when dropped
Doesnt burn when touched
Not too heavy
1
9
8
6
8
6
9
6
3
3
5
5
8
2
B A
AB
X
X
X
BA
AB
X AB
A XB
X
B
A
ABX
X
AB
AB X
X
A B
X
A
4-33
Easy and
safe to use
Irons
well
Automatic shutoff
Size of holes
Number of holes
Thickness of soleplate
Size of soleplate
Weight of iron
Customer Requirements
Presses quickly
Removes wrinkles
Doesnt stick to fabric
Provides enough steam
Doesnt spot fabric
Doesnt scorch fabric
Heats quickly
Automatic shut-off
Quick cool-down
Doesnt break when dropped
Doesnt burn when touched
Not too heavy
From Customer
Requirements
to Design
Characteristics
- + + +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+ +
+
+ + +
+ - - + +
+ - +
- +
+
- - +
+ + +
+
+ - - - +
+
+
+ + +
4-34
Automatic shutoff
Size of holes
Number of holes
Thickness of soleplate
Size of soleplate
Weight of iron
Tradeoff Matrix
+
4-35
Objective
measures
Units of measure
Iron A
Iron B
Our Iron (X)
Estimated impact
Estimated cost
Targets
Design changes
Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Automatic shutoff
Size of holes
Number of holes
Thickness of soleplate
Size of soleplate
Weight of iron
ft-lb
lb
in.
cm
ty
ea
1.4
8x4
SS
27
15
0.5
45
500
1.2
8x4
MG
27
15
0.3
35
350
1.7
9x5
35
15
0.7
50
600
1.2
8x5
SS
30
30
500
*
4-36
SS = Silverstone
MG = Mirorrglide
T = Titanium
4-37
Part
characteristics
A-2
Parts
deployment
A-3
Process
planning
Operations
Process
characteristics
House
of
quality
Process
characteristics
Part
characteristics
A-1
Product
characteristics
Customer
requirements
Product
characteristics
A-4
Operating
requirements
4-38
Benefits of QFD
Promotes better understanding of customer
demands
Promotes better understanding of design
interactions
Involves manufacturing in design process
Provides documentation of design process
4-39
Robust design
Controllable factors
Uncontrollable factors
4-40
Consistency
consistent errors are easier to correct than random
errors
parts within tolerances may yield assemblies that are
not within limits
consumers prefer product characteristics near their
ideal values
4-41
Quantifies customer
preferences toward
quality
Emphasizes that
customer preferences
are strongly oriented
toward consistently
Design for Six Sigma
(DFSS)
Quality Loss
Lower
tolerance
limit
Target
4-42
Upper
tolerance
limit
4-43