Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CERTIORARI,
PROHIBITION
AND
MANDAMUS
1
CERTIORARI
(supervisory or superintending writ)
This extraordinary remedy is availed of to
annul or modify the proceedings of a tribunal,
board or officer exercising judicial or quasijudicial functions which has acted without or
in excess of jurisdiction, or with grave abuse
of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction.
For this petition to prosper, it is necessary to
allege and show that there is no more appeal,
or any other plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy in the ordinary course of law.
2
CERTIORARI
(supervisory or superintending writ)
This extraordinary remedy is availed of to
annul or modify
the
proceedings
of
a
tribunal,
judicial or quasi-judicial
board or officer exercising judicial or extraexcess of
functions
judicial functions which
has acted without or
grave
abuse
of
jurisdiction
in excess of jurisdiction,
or with
grave abuse
discretion
of discretion amounting to
lack of jurisdiction.
For this petition to prosper, it is necessary to
allege and show that there is no more appeal,
or any other plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy in the ordinary course of law.
3
2. Excess of jurisdiction
That the act, though within the
general power of the tribunal, board
or officer, is not authorized and
invalid with respect to the particular
proceeding because the conditions
which alone authorize the exercise of
the general power in respect of it are
wanting.
NO
YES
Certiorari
is not
availabl
e
Certiorari
is
availabl
e
Appeal is
availabl
e
7
YES
NO
Certiorari
is not
availabl
e
Certiorari
is
availabl
e
Appeal is
availabl
e
If it is not
adequate,
speedy or
equally
beneficial as
certiorari
Appeal
Certiorari
the parties are the original parties it impleads the tribunal, court,
to the case
board or officer
11
17
297
SCRA 574
Exception (Pro Hac Vice)
Facts: The trial court indefinitely suspending the
proceedings in ejectment cases, thus contrary
to the purpose of the Rules on Summary
Procedure.
Held: The SC gave due course to the petition
because of the extraordinary circumstances of
the case. The court observed that allowing the
petition would avoid the mischiefs and sought
to be curbed by the Rules and would give spirit
and life to the Rules on Summary Procedure.
18
20
SC
SHALL BE FILED
IN THE
EXCLUSIVELY WITH
COMEL
EC
CA
SANDIGANBA
YAN
RT
C
(exercising
jurisdiction over the
territorial area)
25
Order to comment
1. Filed petition for
certiorari
Is it sufficient in both substance
and form?
YES
2. The
court shall
issue an
order to
comment
on the
petition
3. File
comment
or other
pleadings
NO
2. Outrightly
dismissed
1. If in SC and CA:
The respondent to be required
to file a comment to the
petition and not a motion to
dismiss
2. The court may require the
filing of a reply and such other
responsive or other pleadings
as it may deem necessary and
proper.
Certiorari under
Rule 65
Certiorari under
Rule 65
Certiorari under
Rule 65
PROHIBITION
An extraordinary writ commanding a
tribunal, corporation, board or person,
whether exercising functions that are
judicial, quasi-judicial or ministerial, to
desist from the further proceedings when
said proceedings are without or in excess of
its jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of
discretion, there being no appeal, or any
other plain, speedy and adequate remedy in
the ordinary course of law. (Sec. 2, Rule 65, rules of
Court)
31
Prohibition
35
Writ of
Prohibition
MANDAMUS
37