Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Price,
Cost,
Profit
Cost
Profit
Required
Benefits- FunctionsPerformance
Desired
100
0
(Value) Increasing
1st
Qtr
3rd
Qtr
East
We st
North
CVM Definitions
Value : is the customers perception of
benefits received in relation to the
competition
Price : total price perceived to be paid by the
customer in comparison to the competition.
Cost : total cost to company in comparison to
the competition.
5
Stage 1
Time
Effectiveness
Time
Conformance
Quality
Stage2
TQM
Stage 1
Conformance
Qlty.
Stage2
Customer
satisfaction
Time
Stage 3
Unanswered Questions ?
What are the key buying factors that
customers value when they choose among
our business and our toughest competition ?
How do customers rate our performance vs.
competition on each of the buying factors ?
What is the percentage importance of each of
these components of customer value ?
10
TQM
Conformance
Qlty.
Time
Customer
satisfaction Mkt-perceived Qlty & value
relative to competitors
Stage 4
11
Conformance
Qlty.
Stage2
Customer
satisfaction
Time
Quality key to
Mkt-perceived Qlty & value
CVM
relative to competitors
12
Perceived Quality
Quality means little in business unless
Customers perceive your quality as superior
to your competitions.
Knowing how to achieve this kind of quality
is all that matters.
13
What is CVM ?
How to identify attributes that are important to
customers ?
How to understand the importance customers
give to those attributes ?
How to analyse performance relative to
competitors on each attribute ?
How to use CVM as a Strategy to drive the
business ?
15
AT & T Story
Successful monopoly business spilt in early 1980s
Pioneer in Customer Satisfaction measurement
Excellent plus Good scores 90 % in Equipment,
Installation, Repair, Billing, Training, Marketing etc.
Mgt. target to maximize excellent plus good scores.
Data used for recognition & rewards program
Shortcomings :
Did not explain declining market share even with hi
scores
No correlation between satisfaction scores & Mkt share
Focussed on internal competition rather than external
Useless info to understand competitive position
16
AT & T Story
Ray Kordupleski & West Vogel Study Findings
1987
Customers willing to shop around increased
dramatically from 10 % to 40 % for Excellent
to Good category.
Company did nothing to convert good into
excellent
Low scores in What Worth Paid For (WWPF)
question even though overall scores of 95+.
17
WWPF
-
1987
1988
1989
CVM DQG
20
Conventional Surveys
Backward looking process
Non customers, Opinion/ Decision makers
often left out. Incomplete market opinion
Customer Service Deptt. is the owner
Tactical action (not strategic)
Does not explain why we win or lose
customers ?
Satisfaction scores lack co relation to Market
Share
21
23
24
20
7.5
100
150
120
240
240
180
180
240
210
- Shape
-Colour
-Glass Area
Engineering
-Power
30
- Maintenance
- Safety
Comfort
-Legroom
30
20
8.5
610
-Driving
- Options
Spares &
Services
Total
160
170
100
25
Co. B
Co. C
Value Score
680
800
610
Price $
10,000
11,000
9,500
Value-Price
0.068
0.073
0.064
Value-Price
Profile
Cost
1.063
1.141
8000
8100
7500
Value Cost
0.085
0.099
0.065
1.523
26
Style
Max C's
Poss Score
Score
200
120
A's
Score
B's
Score
C vs. A C Vs B
100
150
+20
-30
Engg.
300
180
240
240
-60
-60
Comfort
300
210
180
240
+30
-30
Spares &
Service
200
80
160
170
-60
-70
29
Higher
Price
Worse Value
DD
Price
Index
AA
1.0
BB
CC
Lower
Price
Better Value
Inferior
1.0
Value Index
Superior
30
Low
Power
Leg
Room
Shape
Costly
Spares
Poor
Servicing
**
After
Sales
Service
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
31
Wx P Max. Poss.
Gap
90
150
60
210
300
90
6
2
90
20
150
100
60
80
8
70
0
120
100
00
150
30
50
30
50
33
30
210
300
90
30
15
100
9
7
270
105
300
150
30
45
34
Benefits
Delighted Customers
Benchmarking against the competitors.
Identifying the right things.
Teamwork by committed employees.
Enhanced Market Share
Gaining Competitive Edge
Thank you
Questions & Answers Session
38