Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
) Plc 2005
Presented by Group 3
Overview
Introduction, overview, executive
summary
Why did the fraud occur?
What were its key features?
What could have been done to prevent it?
What sources have been used in the
research?
Introduction
EMERGING MARKETS
Executive Summary
Pressures to meet and exceed
internally predetermined goal targets
Overstatement of financial position
from 2002-2005
Sanctions and fines imposed on firm
and executives
Ayo Akadiri
PERSONALITY TRAIT
...As reported in the press, if profit was the most
crucial factor in the survey, Oni would not have ranked
that high, nor would his company. But, he is
acknowledged by peers as a CEO who would rather
make less profit than cut corners. In a country that has
been almost completely quartered by corner cutters,
Oni would rather see his company go through tedious
and complex litigation with local and state
governments than pay a simple bribe... ...We salute
the integrity, excellence, industry, innovativeness,
vision, and exemplary leadership of Oni, not only in
Cadbury, but also in the larger society where his
contributions have provided the needed light in the
tunnel...
OTHER ACCOMPLICE
Olusegun AinaSenior financial
Accountant/Head
of Accounts
Akinbode
Gbolahan-Sales
Operations and
development
controller
Tunde EgbeyemiHead of internal
audit
ORGANIZATIONALn STRETCH
GOALS
An organizational goal with an
objective probability of attainment
that may be desirable but is
seemingly impossible given current
capabilities.
DISADVANTAGES
Stretch goals can sometimes lead to
unethical behavior. People might feel under
pressure to do whatever it takes to achieve
the goal, even when their actions go
against the organization's values or
mission.
Team members might also feel pressured
to take excessive risks to meet the goal. In
jobs where mistakes can cause significant
damage, this can jeopardize the well-being
of people and organizations.
Efficiency improvement
agenda. 202
a. completely re-building and modernising an archaic
manual and inefficient manufacturing plant that had seen
no major investment for nearly 20 years,
b. rationalising the brand portfolio and constructing a new
brand architecture,
c. designing and implementing a new route to market
configuration and a new structure,
d. creating a new modern work environment, learning
centre and a fitness centre,
e. upgrading the quality of management and staff to raise
talent, as well as
f. building a commensurate IT-enabled business process
platform across the commercial, supply chain and
functional units.
CADBURY TODAY
Mondelez International has a majority
equity-interest of 74.97% in Cadbury
Nigeria through its holding in Cadbury
Schweppes Overseas Limited.
25.01% is held by indigenous
shareholders and publicly traded on
the Nigerian Stock Exchange.
Stock Buybacks
A stock buyback has an obvious effect on a
companys income statement, since it reduces its
outstanding shares. But it also impacts other
financial statements.
On the balance sheet, a share repurchase will reduce
the companys cash holdings, and consequently its
total assets base, by the amount of the cash
expended in the buyback.
The buyback will simultaneously also shrink
shareholders' equity on the liabilities side by the
same amount. As a result, performance metrics such
as return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE)
typically improve subsequent to a share buyback.
Stock Buybacks
Audit failure
Due Diligence
Failure to make proper recommendations
thereon to the Annual General Meeting
Failure to examine the auditors report to
review and make proper findings on
management matters in conjunction with
the External Auditors
Neglect to keep under review the
effectiveness of the companys internal
control system and accounting
COST DEFERALS
The genesis of the saga was the failed 4.8m continuous plant, designed by
Cadbury Schweppes UK engineers, which was to replace a particular 50-year old
manual operation. As the design errors surfaced one after the other during
commissioning, the UK engineers resorted to denials, and even intrigue
everything to avoid taking responsibility. The only official who dared to
acknowledge the design errors arose from Cadbury Schweppes would only
paraphrase for reasons of censorship. This left Cadbury Nigeria carrying the
can having already committed shareholders money to procure the kit. We
incurred huge additional costs in re-design, replacement plants, wastage of
materials, carrying the 300 people that should have been surplus if the new
plant had delivered its promise, and also trying to maintain the old kits that were
falling apart and for which spares were no longer available. We managed the
challenge by isolating the cost impact of the new plant failure and deferring the
costs momentarily in the expectation of full recovery when the plant came on
stream as assured by the engineers from both Cadbury Schweppes and Cadbury
Nigeria. The deferral was to shield the company and its shareholders from the
effect of this imposed challenge. As it turned out the verdict of the engineers
after 18 months of hard work was that the plant could never attain its rated
capacity economically. At this point it became clear that the cost recovery would
not happen in the time frame we anticipated, and was then reported.
References
www.nigeriaworld.com
www.ukessays.com
Okaro S.C. and Gloria O.O. (2011).
Creative accounting, corporate
governance watch dogs institutions
and systems- the case of Cadbury
(Nig.) Plc