Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
M.SAIT AKYUZ
AMINREZA SHIRI
MOHAMED HAMOUD
OUTLINE
Introduction
Decision (1): Railroad or Highway
Consistency Analysis
Decision (2): Where to Construct
Consistency Analysis
Conclusion
Introduction
TRNC: Growing population
Increasing residents
Decreasing average age
Introduction
Transportation importance: Not just a mean to get from a point to
another
Business facilitator
Goods
Services
crucial services :-
Services
Report scope
Comparing Alternative Destinations
From A Financial Feasibility Stand
Highways VS Railroads
Highways
Pros
Cheaper to construct
Less costly to maintain
Cons
Doesnt have a constant travel speed
Susceptible to peak hours congestion
Difficult to respond to demand changes
Highways VS Railroads
Railroads
Pros
Doesnt have a peak hours
Constant speed
Easy to respond to demand changes
Cons
Expensive to construct
Their maintenance cost a lot
Introduction
Benefits of well-developed
transportation systems:
Unemployment
Standard of living
Society welfare
Real state prices
High Diminishing Rate of Return
Economic benefits of tourism
1
3
5
7
9
=
=
=
=
=
Equally important
Weakly more important
Strongly more important
Very strongly more important
Extremly important
Specialist;
A.Emre KOSKA
Project Specialist in Construction
in ENKA
Environme
nt
Environme
nt
1
Cost
3
Cost
1/3
Safety
1/3
1/3
Speed
1/5
1/5
1/3
1/9
1/5
1/3
1/7
1/5
1/5
2,12
4,93
7,87
Destinatio
n
Const.Tim
e
Sum
Safety Speed
Safety
Highway
1/7
Railway
Highwa
y
Railway
0,125
0,875
Cost
Highwa Railwa
y
y
Highwa Railwa
y
y
1/5
Highway
Railway
1/7
0,166
0,833
Speed
Highway
Railwa
y
Const.
Time
0,875 0,125
Highwa Railwa
y
y
Highwa
y
Railway
Highway
1/3
Highway
1/9
Railway
Railway
1/9
0,9
0,1
0,25
0,75
0,9
0,1
0,594
Highways Score
(0,125 * 0,413)+(0,166 * 0,149)+(0,875 *
0,052)+
(0,9 * 0,251)+(0,25 * 0,097)+(0,9 *
0,035) =
0,405
Consistency Index
= (6,61- 6)/5 =
0,122
Environme
nt
Cost
0,41
0,75
0,45
0,49
0,48
0,14
0,25
0,45
0,49
0,14
0,08
0,15
0,08
0,05
0,05
0,06
Safety Speed
Destinati Const.Ti
on
me
Sum
Weights
0,25
2,83
6,83
0,26
0,18
1,77
7,03
0,29
0,16
0,18
1,00
6,69
0,05
0,10
0,26
0,11
0,65
6,67
0,05
0,05
0,02
0,05
0,11
0,32
6,14
0,05
0,03
0,03
0,02
0,04
0,22
6,35
Average
6,61888994
()
Consistency Ratio
n = 6 RI = 1,24
CR = = 0,098
The analysis is consistent since CR <
0,1
Decision : Where
Options :
1) Lefkoa Girne
2) Lefkoa Magosa
3) Lefkoa Guzelyurt
Attributes:
Environment
Population
Cost
Refilling
Work Places
Analysis
Environme
nt
Cost
Environme
nt
1
1/3
Cost
Populatio Refillin
n
g
1/3
1/3
0,1314
1/5
1/3
0,0718
Refilling
1/5
Work
Places
1/3
8,33
Weights
Population
Sum
Work
Places
13,00
2,07
13,00
3
1/5
1
4,87
0,4459
0,0823
0,2684
1
Analysis
Environment
Girne-Lefkoa
Lefkoa Magosa
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
Cost
Girne-Lefkoa
Lefkoa Magosa
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
Population
Girne-Lefkoa
Lefkoa Magosa
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
Refilling
Girne-Lefkoa
Lefkoa Magosa
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
Work Places
Girne-Lefkoa
Lefkoa Magosa
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
Girne-Lefkoa
1
1/3
5
6,33
Girne-Lefkoa
1
5
5
11,00
Girne-Lefkoa
1
5
1/3
6,33
Girne-Lefkoa
1
5
7
13,00
Girne-Lefkoa
1
3
1/5
4,20
Lefkoa-Magosa
3
1
7
11,00
Lefkoa-Magosa
1/5
1
1
2,20
Lefkoa-Magosa
1/5
1
1/9
1,31
Lefkoa-Magosa
1/5
1
3
4,20
Lefkoa-Magosa
1/3
1
1/9
1,44
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
1/5
1/7
1
1,34
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
1/5
1
1
2,20
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
3
9
1
13,00
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
1/7
1/3
1
1,48
Lefkoa-G.Yurt
5
9
1
15,00
Weights
0,19
0,08
0,72
1,00
Weights
0,09
0,45
0,45
1,00
Weights
0,18
0,75
0,07
1,00
Weights
0,07
0,28
0,64
1,00
Weights
0,27
0,67
0,06
1,00
Scores
Girne Lefkoa (0,19*0,13)+(0,09*0,07) +
(0,18*0,445)+(0,07*0,08)+(0,27*0,27) =
0,190
0,580
0,229
Consistency Index
=(5,26-5)/4 =
0,065
Environme
nt
Cost
Work
Places
Sum
Weight
s
Environmen
t
0,13
0,22
0,15
0,08
0,09
0,67
5,07
Cost
0,04
0,07
0,09
0,08
0,09
0,38
5,24
Population
0,39
0,36
0,45
0,41
0,81
2,42
5,41
Refilling
0,13
0,07
0,09
0,08
0,05
0,43
5,20
Work Places
0,39
0,22
0,15
0,41
0,27
1,44
5,35
Population Refilling
Average( 5,260633
)
Consistency Ratio
n= 5 RI = 1,12
CR = = 0,058
Conclusion
Environmental Sustainability
Economic Competitiveness
Destination
Construction of Railway
Population
Costs
Benefits
Between Lefkoa and Magosa