Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Selection
JPCP
3.7 to 6.1 m (typ.)
(12 to 20 ft)
Transverse Joints
(with or without dowels)
PLAN
VIEW
Longitudinal Joint
(with tiebars)
3
JPCP
JRCP
PLAN
VIEW
Welded Wire
Fabric Reinforcing
(0.15 to 0.25%)
Transverse Joints
(with dowels)
Longitudinal Joint
(with tiebars)
5
JRCP
CRCP
PLAN
VIEW
Continuous Longitudinal
Reinforcement
(Deformed Bars)
(0.6 to 0.8%)
CRCP
Pavement Characteristics
Pavement
Type
Advantages
Disadvantages
JPCP
Reliable design
Applicable in all
locations
JRCP
Fewer joints
Less concern about
random cracking
Joint deterioration
Crack deterioration
CRCP
No transverse joints
Smooth riding
Long service life
Low maintenance
Considerations in Selection
Traffic levels
Subgrade
Climate
Initial construction and life-cycle costs
Service life
Future maintenance/rehabilitation
Reliability
Contractor experience
Local experience/past performance
10
Doweled JPCP
Doweled JRCP
CRCP
1.5
Undoweled JPCP
10
15
ESALs, millions
20
11
Design Features
Design elements contributing to
performance, such as dowel bars,
drainage, edge support
Various studies have shown the positive
effect of design features
European experience
LTPP findings
12
European Experience
13
Increasing
Effect on
JPCP
Performance
14
Construction Factors
Doweled joints
Erosion-resistant bases
Positive drainage
PCC shoulders
PCC strength
ATB
Multiple base layers
Dowels on baskets
Coarse agg. content
15
Wet climates
16
17
Cost Effectiveness
Addition of design features may
increase performance, but also will
increase costs
Must consider COST EFFECTIVENESS of
design features
18