Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TeachingLearning
Process
40%
Expected
Outcome
(Objectives)
PERFORMAN
CE
INDICATOR
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
1.
Prepared
lesson plans
and daily logs
of activities
including
appropriate
adequate and
updated
instructional
materials
within the
rating period
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
lesson plans
and daily logs
of activities
including
appropriate
adequate and
updated
instructional
materials
within the
rating periods
were
prepared
2.
Facilitated
learning in
the school
through
functional
lesson plans,
daily logs and
innovative
teaching
strategies
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
learning in
the school
through
functional
lesson plans,
daily logs and
innovative
teaching
strategies
were
Actual
Result
RATING
SCORE
KRAs
Expected
Outcome
(Objectives)
PERFORMAN
CE
INDICATOR
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
3.
Initiated
discipline of
students
including
classroom
rules,
guidelines
and individual
and group
task with in
the rating
period
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
discipline of
students
including
classroom
rules,
guidelines
and individual
and group
task with in
the rating
period were
initiated
4.
Monitored
attendance,
diversity and
appreciation,
safe, positive
and
motivating
environment,
overall
physical
atmosphere,
cleanliness
and
orderliness of
classrooms
including
proper waste
disposal daily
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
attendance,
diversity and
appreciation,
safe, positive
and
motivating
environment,
overall
physical
atmosphere,
cleanliness
and
orderliness of
classrooms
including
proper waste
disposal daily
were
monitored
Actual
Result
RATING
SCORE
KRAs
Pupils/Stu
dent
Outcomes
35%
Expected
Outcome
(Objectives)
PERFORMAN
CE
INDICATOR
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
1.
Monitored
and
evaluated
and
maintained
pupils/studen
ts' progress
with in the
rating period
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
pupils/student
s' progress
with in the
rating period
were
monitored,
evaluated and
maintained
2.
Conducted
Remediation/
enrichment
programs to
improve
performance
indicators
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
Remediation/
enrichment
programs to
improve
performance
indicators
were
conducted
3.
Attained the
required GSA
for grade
level and
learning
areas
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
required GSA
for grade
level and
learning areas
were attained
Actual
Result
RATING
SCORE
KRAs
Expected
Outcome
(Objectives)
Communit
y
Involveme
nt
15%
PERFORMAN
CE
INDICATOR
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
1.
Conducted
periodic PTA
meetings/conf
erences
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
periodic PTA
meetings/conf
erences were
conducted
2.
Visited
parents of
students
needing
academic
monitoring/fol
low-up with in
the rating
period
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
parents of
students
needing
academic
monitoring/fol
low-up with in
the rating
period were
visited
3.
Undertaken/in
itiated
projects/event
s/activities
with external
funding/spons
orship within
the target
date
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
projects/event
s/activities
with external
funding/spons
orship within
the target
date were
undertaken/in
itiated
Actual
Result
RATING
SCORE
KRAs
Profession
al Growth
and
Developm
ent
10%
Expected
Outcome
(Objectives)
PERFORMAN
CE
INDICATOR
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
1.
Conducted
problem/class
room based
action
research
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
problem/class
room based
action
research was
conducted
2.
Produced
publications/
creative work
for school
paper/division
publication
with in the
target date
June 2015
March 2015
10%
100% of the
publications/
creative work
for school
paper/division
publication
with in the
target date
were
produced
Actual
Result
RATING
SCORE
Thank you.