Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
micropropagation
Soobedar
Yadav
Roll. No. 5004
Discipline
of
Horticulture
IARI, New Delhi
BIOREACTOR
Brief History..
Microbiology fermentation industry
Secondary metabolites
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF
BIOREACTOR
Applicatio
ns
Pharmaceutical industries
Biomedical applications
Micropropogation
A. Somatic embryogenesis
B. Organogenesis
C. Bud or Meristem Clusters
Sharp et al.,
BIOREACTOR PROCESS
STEPS
1
10
CIP Post-Use
CIP
2
Set Up
Recovery
8
Pressure Hold
Growth
7
Inoculation
SIP
6
5
Media
Equilibration
Fill
4
CLASSIFICATION OF
BIOREACTOR
A. MECHANICALLY AGITATED
.Stirred tank bioreactor
. Rotating drum bioreactor
.Spin filter bioreactor
BUBBLE-COLUMN REACTOR
Advantage
Enhance
mixing
dispersion
Low-Shear
Low power required
Disadvantage
Foaming
and
Plant
perform
acclimatization
better
during
the
Research1-5 L
Product development5-10L
Immersion time
Aeration and forced ventilation
Volume of liquid medium
Culture container volume
Commercial application in
plant propogation
Shoot cultures of Spathiphyllum cannifolium (Dewir et al., 2007)
Organ culture Stevia rebaudiana ( Sreedhar et al., 2008)
Sondhal et al.,2007
24 mM thidiazuron (TDZ)-containing
medium
After 4 week
Explants from each plate were transferred to a
temporary immersion bioreactor vessel [RITA
bioreactors
After 8 week
Shoot clumps developed
This study presents, for the first time, a protocol for adventitious
shoot regeneration, proliferation and rooting of strawberry using
a bioreactor system in a liquid medium combined with in vitro
culture on semisolid gelled medium
Samir et al.,2008
Debnath et al.,2011
1
2
Debnath et al.,2011
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
Results indicated that the deep flow technique (DFT ) culture led
to the greatest fresh weight, shoot length and leaf area, followed by
the ebb and flood culture
Plantlet
parameter
Gelled
culture
Liquid
culture
Fresh weight
(mg per
plantlet)
844 21
1986 226
Dry weight
(mg per
plantlet)
66 4
160 14
Shoot length
(cm)
4.8 0.1
8.3 0.4
No.
leaves/plantlet
11.2 0.2
8.3 0.4
Leaf area
(cm2 per
plantlet)
20.4 1.5
49.9 1.3
Number
of single
nodes
inoculate
d
Stem
length
(cm)
No.
branches
per
plantlet
Ex vitro
survival
(%)
20
23.4 2.3
8.33 1.5
100
40
26.7 1.5
6.61 0.8
100
60
26.9 2.4
6.58 1.0
100
80
28.3 2.0
4.52 0.9
100
CO2
Dry
Sugar
(mmo mass
(mg g21
l)
per
FW)
shoot (g)
Nitrate
(mg g21
FW)
Chloro
phyll
(mg
g21
FW)
Low PPF
2851
1.2777
16.8
0.04
0.17
High PPF
2113
1.2550
25.8
0.60
0.20
Conventional
micro propagation
Temporary
immersion
bioreactor
Low PPF
3372
1.5392
189.8
0.60
0.23
Escalona et al .,2003
Plantlet regeneration
Types of bioreactors
Biomass of PLBs
(fresh weight g 1)
94.6
93.9
Temporary immersion
type
87.9
Temporary immersion
type with charcoal
filter
attached
138.9
% of
regeneration
Fresh weight
of plantlets
(mg/plantlet
MS
22.6
73.1
Hyponex
83
207.4
Vacin and
Went
45.1
98.3
Knudson C
25.0
104.3
Lindemann
23.9
127.7
More time
less
more
less
Less
Hyperhydricty problem
less
ADVANTAGES
Short time large quantity plant production
Provision of adequate oxygen transfer
Less cost per unit plant production
Less labour requirement
Aautomated and mechanized
Reducing contamination
Automated control of environment
LIMITATIONS
High initial input and running costs of bioreactors
Hyperhydricity
Leakage of endogenous growth factors
Foam development
Airlift type bioreactors is the evaporation of
culture medium
Hyperhydricity
management
A. Use of temporary immersion
bioreactor (TIB)
CONCLUSION
Future Thrusts
More efficient designs with easy operation and change of
media and propagule harvest facilities
Problems of hyperhydricity is still a problem in several
plant species
Plantlet conversion ratio in some woody species is still a
challenge
Genetic stability or clonal fidelity of propagaules using
molecular marker techniques.
Cytogenetic abnormalities in long term culture - a concern
Synthetic seed production for in vitro genetic
conservation rare palms, orchids, etc.
t
s
n
o
i
e
i
t
u
s
e
Q & ugg
s
?
?
s
n
o