Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
11
Fracture Gradients
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 1
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 2
Well Planning
Safe drilling practices require that the
following be considered when
planning a well:
Pore pressure determination
Fracture gradient determination
Casing setting depth selection
Casing design
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 3
1.11- 4
S =S PP +
overburden
stress
Fracture Gradients
pore
= pressure
matrix
stress
1.11- 5
1.11- 6
S P
S P
or
D D D
S P
i.e.,
1.000 0.478
D D D
psi
psi/ft
psi / ft
/ D = 0.522 psi/ft
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 7
= 7,308 psi
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 8
1.11- 9
where
Fracture Gradients
Fmin
1
2P
1
3
D
Fmax
1
P
1
2
D
K i
P
F
D
D
where
1.11- 11
S P
F
*
D 1
where
= Poissons ratio
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 12
Example
A Texas Gulf Coast well has a pore pressure
gradient of 0.735 psi/ft. Well depth = 11,000 ft.
Calculate the fracture gradient in units of
lb/gal using each of the above three
methods.
Summarize the results in tabular form, showing
answers, in units of lb/gal and also in psi/ft.
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 13
Fmin
1
2P
1
3
D
P
psi
0.735
The pore pressure gradient,
D
ft
Fmin
1
psi
1 2 *0.735 0.823
3
ft
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 14
Fmin
0.823 psi/ft
psi/ft
0.052
lb/gal
1.11- 15
Fmax
1
1 0.735
2
= 0.8675 psi/ft
Fmax = 16.68 lb/gal
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 16
Example
P K i
2. Matthews & Kelly F
D
D
In this case P and D are known, may be
calculated, and K i is determined graphically.
(i) First, determine the pore pressure gradient.
P
0.735
D
Fracture Gradients
psi / ft
(given )
1.11- 17
S=P+
=S-P
= 1.00 * D - 0.735 * D
= 0.265 * D
= 0.265 * 11,000
= 2,915 psi
Fracture Gradients
S overburden, psi
matrix stress, psi
1.11- 18
n = normal
2,915
Di
5,449 ft
0.535
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 19
Di = 5,449 ft
For a south Texas
Gulf Coast well,
Ki = 0.685
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 20
K i
P
F
D
D
0.685 * 2,915
F
0.735
11,000
0.9165
psi / ft
0.9165
F
17.63
0.052
Fracture Gradients
lb / gal
1.11- 21
Depth, Di
5,449
Fracture Gradients
0.685
Ki
1.11- 22
Example
Ben Eaton:
S P
F
*
D 1
S
?
D
Fracture Gradients
?
1.11- 23
At 11,000 ft
S/D = 0.96 psi/ft
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 24
Fig. 5-5
At 11,000 ft
= 0.46
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 25
psi / ft;
P
D
0.46
0.46
F 0.96 0.735
0.735
1 0.46
F = 0.9267 psi/ft
= 17.82 lb/gal
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 26
Summary of Results
Fracture Gradient
psi.ft
lb/gal
0.823
15.83
0.868
16.68
0.917
17.63
Ben Eaton:
0.927
17.82
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 27
Summary of Results
Note that all the methods take into
consideration the pore pressure gradient.
As the pore pressure increases, so does
the fracture gradient.
In the above equations, Hubbert & Willis
apparently consider only the variation in
pore pressure gradient. Matthews &
Kelly also consider the changes in rock
matrix stress coefficient, and in the
matrix stress ( Ki and i ).
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 28
Summary of Results
Ben Eaton considers
variation in pore pressure gradient,
overburden stress and
Poissons ratio,
and is probably the most accurate of
the three methods. The last two
methods are actually quite similar, and
usually yield similar results.
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 29
Similarities
Ben Eaton:
S P
F
*
D 1
Ki
P
F
D
D
Matthews and Kelly:
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 30
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 31
Experimental Determination of
Fracture Gradient
The leak-off test
Run and cement casing
Drill out ~ 10 ft
below the casing seat
Close the BOPs
Pump slowly and
monitor the pressure
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 32
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 33
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 34
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 35
Fracture Gradients
1.11- 36