Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
to
Six Sigma
Genesis
Six Sigma:
Six Sigma:An
An overview
overview
What
is Sigma
and Six Sigma?
What
is Six
Sigma
Why Six Sigma?
Six Sigmafocus
Levels
Six Sigma
Six Sigma Methodology and
Six Sigma
Scale
Management
Key RolesCompanies
for Six Sigma
Six Sigma
Tools for Six Sigma
Trainingsand
Certifications
Six Sigma
The
statistical
Conclusion
background
DMAIC/DMADV
Benefits
GENESIS
Motorola in early 80s
Mikel Harry formalized the process for targeting the
inputs to the quality problems rather than the
outputs of the those problems
Input oriented approach leads to: A problem
solving methodology and a set of tools to manage
the problems
Adapted gradually by other Fortune 500 Co.
Another very famous proponent Jack Welch (GE)
Its had evolved to mean different things to different
people, sometimes any QI improvement process is
also termed as SS
Six Sigma
A term (Greek) used in statistics to represent
standard deviation from mean value, an indicator
of the degree of variation in a set of a process.
Six Sigma - A highly disciplined process that
enables organizations deliver nearly perfect
products and services.
A rigorous, data based problems solving
approach to improving the performance of an
organization
DMAIC / DMADV Cycle
Six Sigma
A performance goal, representing 3.4
defects for every million opportunities to
make one.
A series of tools and methods used to
improve or design products, processes,
and/or services.
A statistical measure indicating the
number of standard deviations within
customer expectations.
A disciplined, fact-based approach to
managing a business and its processes.
A means to promote greater awareness of
customer
needs,
performance
Six Sigma
Six Sigma can be defined as a specific methodology to
develop and implement quality improvements in an
organizations critical processes by rigorously measuring
and analyzing and identifying variations from customer
specifications in those processes and improving them or
designing entirely new processes to keep variations at an
acceptable level and sustaining and institutionalizing or
verifying the improvements for future as well.
Six Sigma
CTQ/CTC/CTD:
Attributes
which
are
important to customers
Defect: Failing to deliver what the
customers wants
Process Capability: What your process can
deliver
Variation: What the customers see and
feels
Stable Operations: Ensuring consistent,
stable processes
DFSS: Designing to meet customers needs
Sigma Scale
In a world at 6 Sigma
In a world at 3 Sigma
There are 964 U.S.
flight cancellations
per day.
The police make 7
false arrests every 4
minutes.
In MA, 5,390
newborns are
dropped each year.
In one hour, 47,283
international long
distance calls are
accidentally
1 U.S. flight is
cancelled every 3
weeks.
There are fewer than
4 false arrests per
month.
1 newborn is
dropped every 4
years in MA.
It would take more
than
2 years to see the
same number of
dropped
international calls.
Statistical Background
Some Key measure
Target =
Statistical Background
Control limits
Target =
Statistical Background
Required Tolerance
LSL
Target =
USL
Statistical Background
Tolerance
LSL
Target =
Six-Sigma
USL
Statistical Background
Tolerance
LSL
USL
1350
ppm
1350
ppm
Target =
Statistical Background
Tolerance
LSL
0.001
ppm
USL
1350
ppm
1350
ppm
Target =
0.001
ppm
Statistical Background
Tolerance
LSL
0 ppm
USL
3.4
ppm
66803
ppm
3.4
ppm
Statistical Background
Six-Sigma allows for un-foreseen
problems and longer term issues
when calculating failure error or rework rates
Allows for a process shift
So what constitutes an acceptable
level of quality for any business?
While a 4 sigma is acceptable for
restaurants but then for a hospital
medication process this seems to be
% Good % Bad
DPMO
30.9%
69.1%
691,462
69.1%
30.9%
308,538
93.3%
6.7%
66,807
99.38%
0.62%
6,210
99.977%
0.023%
233
99.9997% 0.00034%
3.4
Performance Standards
PPM
Yield
2
3
4
5
6
308537
66807
6210
233
3.4
69.1%
93.3%
99.38%
99.977%
99.9997%
Process
Process
performance
performance
Defects
Defectsper
per
million
million
Long
Longterm
term
yield
yield
Current
Currentstandard
standard
World
WorldClass
Class
WHAT IS DMAIC
Define,Measure,Analyse,Improve,Control
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
DMAIC
DMAIC
Define
Objective:
DEFINE the
opportunity
Objective:
Objective:
MEASURE current ANALYZE the
performance
root causes of
problems
Objective:
IMPROVE the
process to
eliminate root
causes
Objective:
CONTROL the
process
to sustain the gains.
Key Measure
Tools:
Critical to Quality
Requirements
(CTQs)
Sample Plan
Capability
Analysis
Failure Modes
and Effect
Analysis (FMEA)
Key Improve
Tools:
Solution
Selection Matrix
To-Be Process
Map(s)
Key Control
Tools:
Control Charts
Contingency
and/or Action
Plan(s)
Key Analyze
Tools:
Histograms,
Boxplots, MultiVari Charts, etc.
Hypothesis Tests
Regression
Analysis
Project
Charter
Cost of
Poor
Quality
S ta k e h o ld e r s
Voice of
the
Stakeholde
r
Six Sigma
What is the problem? The problem is the
Output
(a Y in a math equation Y =
f(x1,x2,x3) etc).
What is the cost of this problem
Who are the stake holders / decision makers
Align resources and expectations
Listening
Posts
Industry
Intel
SECONDARY RESEARCH
Market
Data
Customer
Service
Industry
Benchmarking
Customer
Correspondence
PRIMARY RESEARCH
Surve
ysSurve
ys
OTM
Focus Groups
Observations
Critical to Quality
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: 2003 Output
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
A-Squared:
P-Value:
10
20
30
40
50
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
23.1692
10.2152
104.349
0.238483
0.240771
100
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
0.2156
16.4134
23.1475
29.6100
55.2907
100
20.5
21.5
22.5
23.5
24.5
60
40
20
0
Defect
Count
Percent
Cum %
79
79.0
79.0
17
17.0
96.0
4
4.0
100.0
Percent
Count
80
50
25.5
26.5
25.1961
100
0.211
0.854
11.8667
26.0572
Six Sigma
100
60
40
Percent
Count
80
50
20
0
E x p e r im e n ta l D e s ig n
Defect
Count
Percent
Cum %
79
79.0
79.0
Data
Stratificatio
n
17
17.0
96.0
4
4.0
100.0
Regression
Analysis
15
60
10
40
5
20
0
Percent
Count
80
Process
Simulatio
n
Defect
Count
Percent
Cum %
12
70.6
70.6
3
17.6
88.2
2
11.8
100.0
Six Sigma
Clarify
Generat
e
Divergent | Convergent
Decision
Time
Solution
Sigma
Cost
Six Sigma
Implementation
Bad
Good
Solution
Right
Wrong
Nice
Try
Nice
Idea
Solution
Implementatio
n Plan
Time
CBA
Other
Score
35
UCL=33.48
Individual Value
25
Mean=24.35
LCL=15.21
15
0
10
20
Observation Number
30
Six Sigma
Six Sigma can be defined as a specific
methodology
to
develop
and
implement
level
and
sustaining
and
36
TOP
TOP: Total number Of Opportunity: In any given product
or service, this refers to the total number of defect
opportunities possible.
TOP = TOTAL NUMBER OF OPPORTUNITY = NUMBER OF
SAMPLE UNITS INSPECTED * OPPORTUNITY PER UNIT
For example: If there are 10 columns/spaces in a form to
be filled then, we can say in each form there the TOP =
10 per form, so if we are inspecting 100 forms then the
TOP = 10 * 100 = 1000 number of opportunities.
DPU
DPU: Defect Per Unit: Average number of defects
per unit. Numerically it is the ratio between the
total number of defects found in a sample to the
total number of samples inspected.
DPU = DEFECT PER UNIT = NUMBER OF DEFECTS
IN A SAMPLE / NUMBER OF SAMPLE INSPECTED
For example: If we had inspecting 100 forms and
found that there are 140 defects (mistakes) in all
the forms inspected then the
DPU = 140/100 = 1.4 defects per unit
DPO
DPO: Defect Per Opportunity: Average number of defects per opportunity.
This is the ratio of total number of defects found in a sample with the
total number of defect opportunities available in the sample.
DPO = DEFECT PER OPPORTUNITY = TOTAL NUMBER OF DEFECTS
DETECTED IN A SAMPLE / TOTAL NUMBER OF DEFECT OPPORTUNITIES IN
THE SAMPLE
DPO = TOTAL NUMBER OF DEFECTS DETECTED IN A SAMPLE / (SAMPLE
INSPECTED * NUMBER OF DEFECT OPPORTUNITIES PER UNIT IN THE
SAMPLE)
DPMO
PPM
PPM: Parts Per Million: The number of defective units in one
million units. Usually, preferred when the fraction defective
figures are too small to consider in normal circumstances.
(This pertains to defectives).
PPM = PARTS PER MILLION = TOTAL NUMBER OF DEFECTIVE
UNITS DETECTED IN SAMPLE * 10,00,000/ NUMBER OF
SAMPLES INSPECTED
For example: If we had inspected 100 forms and there was
100% inspection done and 25 forms were found to be
unacceptable, then the
PPM = 25 * 1000000 / 100 = 250000 parts per million
defective
RTY/FPY
For example: In a three step process, the yield rate of different step
is as: Step 1=0.97, Step 2=0.92 and Step 3=0.95. Then the RTY =
0.97 * 0.92 * 0.95 = 0.8478 It means that only 84.78% of the units
completed through all this three step process will make it through
without needing any repair work.
DPU
=e
- 0.01666667
= 0.9835 =
OPPO
RTUNI DPU
DEFE UNITS
TIES/
=
CTS
OF
UNIT DEFE
OR
PROD
OF
CTS
REJEC UCTIO
PROD PER
TS
N
UCTIO UNITS
N
10
200
15
50
10
80
50
DPO =
DEFECT
S/
(UNITS*
OPPORT
UNITY/U
NIT)
SIGM
A
DPM SHOR
O=
T
DPO TERM
=
*
MILLI ABS(
ON NORM
SINV(
DPO))
SIGM RTY =
A
E TO
LONG THE
TERM POWE
=
R
SSST MINU
+ 1.5 S DPU
DPU
FROM
RTY =
MINU
S LN
(RTY)
OPPO
RTUNI DPU
DEFE UNITS
TIES/
=
CTS
OF
UNIT DEFE
OR
PROD
OF
CTS
REJEC UCTIO
PROD PER
TS
N
UCTIO UNITS
N
DPO =
DEFECT
S/
(UNITS*
OPPORT
UNITY/U
NIT)
SIGM
A
DPM SHOR
O=
T
DPO TERM
=
*
MILLI ABS(
ON NORM
SINV(
DPO))
SIGM RTY =
A
E TO
LONG THE
TERM POWE
=
R
SSST MINU
+ 1.5 S DPU
DPU
FROM
RTY =
MINU
S LN
(RTY)
0.951
2
0.05
0.740
8
0.3
0.201
20000
0.841 2.341
0
8
1.6
10
200
0.05
0.01
15
50
10
0.3
0.03
80
50
1.6
0.2
THANK YOU