Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HISTORY OF PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
n
Management of Projects
More than $250 billion is spent in the US each year on
approximately 175,000 information technology projects.
Only 26 percent of these projects are completed on time and
within budget.
The average cost for a development project for a large company
is more than $2 million.
Project management is an $850 million industry and is expected
to grow by as much as 20 percent per year.
Bounds, Gene. The Last Word on Project
Management IIE Solutions, November, 1998.
PROJECTS VS OPERATIONS
Projects
Operations
temporary
ongoing
Unique + Specific
Not unique
Selling software
DelayedOpeningsareaFactofLifeintheFoodservice,
HospitalityIndustry
Disney'sshipbuilderwassixmonthslateindeliveringitsnewcruiseships,
andthousandsofcustomerswhohadpurchasedticketswerestranded.
Evenwiththatexperience,theirsecondshipwasalsodeliveredwellafter
thepublishedschedules.UniversalStudiosinOrlando,Fla.hadbeen
buildinganewrestaurantandentertainmentcomplexformorethantwo
years.TheyadvertisedaDecemberopening,onlytoannounceinlate
Novemberthatitwouldbetwoorthreemonthslate.
Evenwhenfacilitiesdoopenclosetoschedule,theyarerarelyfinished
completelyandareoftenmissingkeycomponents.Whydothosethings
happen?Withallofthesophisticatedcomputersandprojectmanagement
software,whyaren'tprojectscompletedonschedule?
Frable,F.Nation'sRestaurantNews(April12,1999)
Required Resources
Phase 1
Formation &
Selection
Phase 2
Planning
Phase 3
Scheduling &
Control
Phase 4
Evaluation &
Termination
Time
DESIGN
Target
M
TI
LE
U
D
E
CH
S
(
Due Date
Budget
Constraint
Optimal Time-Cost
Trade-off
COST
Pre-initiation
Initiation
Planning
Implementation
Monitoring +Closing
Management summary
A statement of the problem or opportunity that the project
addresses
A resume of the options considered
A statement showing what option has been recommended
and what business benefits are expected
Options available
List all options
List all sub options
OBJECTIVES
SCOPE
CONSTRAINTS
AUTHORITY
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
EXAMPLES OF OBJECTIVES
n
Business Objectives
u
u
Project Objectives
u
u
SCOPE
n
CONSTRAINTS
n
n
n
Time
resources
AUTHORITY
n
RESOURCES
n
n
n
n
PEOPLE
MONEY
EQUIPMENT
THE PM must ensure the amount of user an
customer involvement is required
SUMMARY SLIDE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
IMPORTANCE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
HISTORY OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS
WHAT DEFINES A PROJECT?
PROJECTS VS OPERATIONS
WHY DO PROJECTS FAIL?
NOT ALL PROJECTS ARE ALIKE
PROJECT LIFE CYCLE
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
EXAMPLES OF OBJECTIVES
SCOPE
CONSTRAINTS
AUTHORITY
RESOURCES
Top
Management
Project Manager
Subcontractors
Project Team
Regulating
Organizations
Functional
Managers
To the client
Communicate in timely and accurate manner
Provide information and control on changes/modifications
Maintain quality standards
To the subcontractors
Provide information on overall project status
PROJECT PLANNING
PROJECT SCOPE
PROJECT COST
PROJECT HUMAN RESOURCE
PROJECT TIME
PROJECT QUALITY
PROJECT RISK
Project Scope
Project Scope Statement
Project Justification
Product Description
Major Deliverables
Success Criteria
Time and Cost Estimates
Assumptions
Constraints
PROJECT
Imagine you are a project manager for a
wireless telecommunication carrier in charge of
a project for a new consumer product called
Voice Activated Dialing. The product is critical to
the corporate strategy to become one of the top
three carriers in the market where your company
offers wireless service.
MAJOR DELIVERABLES
Product requirements defined
System requirements defined
System requirements developed
Sales training developed
Customer services training developed
System enhancements implemented
VAD available in all markets
SUCCESS CRITERIA
The launch of the VAD will generate 2.5 million
in incremental annual revenue for the
corporation.
The additional training required for sales
consultants to be knowledgeable in offering the
VAD product will increase the total sales
consultant training by no more than two hours.
ASSUMPTIONS
IT has resources to implement system changes
within the six month time frame we needed to
start offering VAD
CONSTRAINTS
n
Design of a WBS
The usual mistake PMs make is to lay out too many tasks;
subdividing the major achievements into smaller and
smaller subtasks until the work breakdown structure
(WBS) is a to do list of one-hour chores. Its easy to get
caught up in the idea that a project plan should detail
everything everybody is going to do on the project. This
springs from the screwy logic that a project managers job
is to walk around with a checklist of 17,432 items and tick
each item off as people complete them.
The Hampton Group (1996)
Two-Level WBS
WBS level 1
WBS level 2
1.1Event
Planning
1.CharityAuction
1.2Item
Procurement
1.3Marketing
1.4.Corporate
Sponsorships
Three-Level WBS
1.CharityAuction
WBS level 1
WBS level 2
1.1Event
Planning
1.1.1HireAuctioneer
WBS level 3
1.2Item
Procurement
1.3Marketing
1.4Corporate
Sponsorships
1.2.1Silent
auctionitems
1.3.1Individual
ticketsales
1.2.2Liveauction
items
1.3.2Advertising
1.1.2.Rentspace
1.1.3Arrangefor
decorations
1.2.3Raffleitems
1.1.4Printcatalog
COST ESTIMATION
Includes the following processes to ensure that
the project is completed within budget
Resource Planning
Cost Estimation
Resource Planning
Determine the the resources the project needs
in terms of what the project needs
Use the WBS to plan resources
Type of Resources
Human Resources
Equipment
Materials
COST ESTIMATION
Analogous Estimating
Parametric Modeling
Definitive Estimates
Analogous Estimating
n
n
n
n
PARAMETRIC MODELING
DEFINITIVE ESTIMATES
Assigns a cost estimate to each work package
Also referred to as bottom up estimating
Start at the lowest level of activity and calculate
the cost of the entire package
RESOURCE
WORK
EFFORT
RATE
TOTAL
COST
TECH
WRITER
20 HRS
30
600
TESTERS
60 HRS
40
2400
MARKETING 100
PERSONNEL
100
10000
Project Budgeting
The budget is the link between the functional units and the project
Should be presented in terms of measurable outputs
Budgeted tasks should relate to work packages in WBS and
organizational units responsible for their execution
Should clearly indicate project milestones
Establishes goals, schedules, and assigns resources (workers,
organizational units, etc.)
Should be viewed as a communication device
Serves as a baseline for progress monitoring & control
May be prepared for different levels of aggregation
(strategic,
tactical, short-range)
and constraints
Project Manager
Role:
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Primary
Responsibilities
Identify any departmental project management standards
Lead team in all aspects of project planning
Manage the project team in the execution of the project work
Develop schedules and maintain updates on a weekly basis
Run weekly project team status meetings
Track assign and report progress on any project issue
Track implementation of contingency or mitigation plans
Provide a weekly status of critical issues to project sponsor
and key stakeholders
Prepare and present a formal monthly project status for the
stakeholders
Director of
Doctoral Program
Accounting
Department Chair
Larry
Zelda
Diane
Marketing
Department Chair
Curly
Bob
Barby
Finance Department
Chair
Moe
Gloria
Leslie
Became
Still
SUMMARY SLIDE
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
CONSTRAINTS
SCOPE MANAGEMENT PLAN
KEY ITEMS IN DEVELOPING A PLAN
SCOPE CHANGE PROCESS
IMPORTANCE OF PROJECT PLANNING
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS)
WORK PACKAGES/TASK DEFINITION
DESIGN OF A WBS
TWO-LEVEL WBS
THREE-LEVEL WBS
COST ESTIMATION
RESOURCE PLANNING
TYPE OF RESOURCES
COST ESTIMATION
ANALOGOUS ESTIMATING
n
n
n
n
n
n
PARAMETRIC MODELING
DEFINITIVE ESTIMATES
WORK EFFORT ESTIMATE
SAMPLE PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
HUMAN RESOURCE PLANNING
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
STAFFING MANAGEMENT PLAN
QUALITY PLANNING
satisfaction
Less rework
Lower overrall costs
BENCHMARKING
DATA FLOW
DIAGRAMS
Discreet chunks
COST OF QUALITY
Prevention Costs
Appraisal Costs
Activities that keep the product defects from reaching the clients
Failure Costs
Project Management
Integration
Management
Cost
Management
Communications
Management
Scope
Management
Quality
Management
Risk
Management
Time
Management
Human
Resource
Management
Procurement
Management
Project Management
Integration
Management
Cost
Management
Communications
Management
Scope
Management
Quality
Management
Risk
Management
Time
Management
Human
Resource
Management
Procurement
Management
Risk Management
n
Project Management
Integration
Management
Cost
Management
Communications
Management
Scope
Management
Quality
Management
Risk
Management
Time
Management
Human
Resource
Management
Procurement
Management
Risk Management
n
Project Management
Integration
Management
Cost
Management
Communications
Management
Scope
Management
Quality
Management
Risk
Management
Time
Management
Human
Resource
Management
Procurement
Management
Risk Management
n
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk Identification
n
Risk Identification
u
Risk Identification
n
Risk Identification
u
Identified risks
Potential responses
Updated RBS
Risk Identification
n
Risk Identification
u
Based on:
F
Scope statement
Budget
Schedule
Risk Identification
n
Assumption analysis.
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk Analysis
n
Risk Analysis
u
Risk Analysis
n
Risk Analysis
n
Risk Analysis
n
Risk matrix
u
Risk Matrix
Risk Analysis
n
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk Analysis
n
Probability distributions
F Expected value analysis
F Decision tree analysis
F
Risk Analysis
n
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
u
u
u
Avoid
Transfer
Mitigate
Acceptance
Risk Avoidance
u
u
Risk Transfer
u
u
Risk Mitigation
u
u
Alternative design
Demonstrations
Prototypes
Key performance parameters
Modeling and simulation
Using open systems
Risk Acceptance
u
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Identification
Qualitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk
Monitoring
and
Control
Risk
Response
Planning
Quantitative
Risk
Analysis
Risk Management
n
u
u
PROCUREMENT
Make or Buy Analysis
Equipment
Staff Augmentation
Other Goods and Services
Vendor Solicitation
n
Communication
n
STAKEHOLDER
OBJECTIVE
MEDIUM R FREQUE
E NCY
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
I
L
Y
PROJECT PLAN
n
TABLE OF CONTENTS
u EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
u REQUIREMNETS
u SCOPE
u STAKEHOLDERS
u RESOURCES
u ASSUMPTIONS
u CONSTRAINTS
u BUDGET
u RISK
u ISSUES
u COMMUNICATION
u IMPLEMENTATION
u TRAINING
PROJECT PLAN
n
n
PROJECT EXECUTION
Project Team
What is a project team?
A group of people committed to achieve a
common set of goals for which they hold
themselves mutually accountable
Diverse backgrounds/skills
Able to work together effectively/develop synergy
Usually small number of people
Have sense of accountability as a unit
STAGES OF TEAM
DEVELOPMENT
n
FORMING
STORMING
NORMING
PERFORMING
MONITORING TEAM
PERFORMANCE
Dealing with conflict
Training
Rewards and Recognition
STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIP
Frequent Communication
Team Building
Gaining Consensus
Timely Decision Making
Managing Expectations
Managing by Facts
PERFORM ACCORDING TO
PLAN
Collect Data
Progress Reports
Issues
TASK
HRS
WORKED
HOURS
LEFT
PERCENT N
COMPLET O
E
T
E
S
STATUS REPORTS
n
MONITOR PROGRESS
EVALUATE PROGRESS
YES
NO
INTEGRATED CHANGE
CONTROL
All aspects of the project plan are subject to
change as the project progresses
Look at the impact of the change across all
aspects of the plan.
SCHEDULE CONTROL
Schedule Updates
Corrective Action
Lessons Learnt
Contingency Planning
What will you do if an adverse event does occur?
Trigger point invokes contingency plan
Frequently requires additional costs
QUALITY CONTROL
Inspection
Module Testing
Unit Testing
System Testing
User Acceptance Testing
Site Acceptance Testing
Item
Defect
Frequency
Percent of Cumulat
Defects
ive
Defects
800
.33
.33
700
.29
.62
400
.17
.79
300
.13
.92
Flowcharting
n
Trend Analysis
n
PROJECT CLOSING
Project Archives
Formal Acceptance
Comprehensive Review
Release of Team Members
Planning
Organizing
Executing
Directing
Controlling
Budget
Beta Distribution
Probabilitydensity
function
Completiontimeoftaskj
Time
Beta Distribution
For each task j, we must make three estimates:
most optimistic time
most pessimistic time
most likely time
Idesignuserinterfacestopleaseanaudienceofone.
Iwritethemforme.IfImhappy,Iknowsomecool
peoplewilllikeit.Designinguserinterfacesby
committeedoesnotworkverywell;theyneedtobe
coherent.Asforschedule,Imnotinterestedin
schedules;didanyonecarewhenWarandPeacecame
out?
Developer,MicrosoftCorporation
AsreportedbyMacCormackandHerman,HBRCase9600097:
MicrosoftOffice2000
Intra-team Communication
M = Number of project team members
L = Number of links between pairs of team members
If M =2, then L = 1
If M =3, then L = 3
Importance of Communication
On the occasion of a migration from the east, men discovered a
plain in the land of Shinar, and said to one another, Come, let
us build ourselves a city with a tower whose top shall reach the
heavens. The Lord said, Come, let us go down, and there
make such a babble of their language that they will not
understand one anothers speech. Thus, the Lord dispersed
them from there all over the earth, so that they had to stop
building the city.
Genesis 11: 1-8
Group Harmony
Group Decision Making Effectiveness
Extent of Individuals Contributions to Group
Individual Attributes
*Brown, K., T.D. Klastorin, & J. Valluzzi. Project Management
Performance: A Comparison of Team Characteristics, IEEE Transactions on
Engineering Management, Vol 37, No. 2 (May, 1990), pp. 117-125.
Study Data
Classification of 547 respondents (64% response rate)
30% project managers or directors of project mgt programs
16% top management (president, vice president, etc.)
26% managers in functional areas (e.g., marketing)
18% specialists working on projects
Industries included in studies
14% pharmaceutical products
10% aerospace
10% computer and data processing products
others: telecommunications, medical instruments, glass products,
software development, petrochemical products, houseware goods
Organizational structures:
13% (71): Functional organizations
26% (142): Functional matrix
16.5% (90): Balanced matrix
28.5% (156): Project matrix
16% (87): Project team
Summary of Results
Project structure significantly related to project success
New development projects that used traditional functional organization
had lowest level of success in controlling cost, meeting schedule,
achieving technical performance, and overall results
Projects using either a functional organization or a functional matrix had
a significantly lower success rate than the other three structures
Projects using either a project matrix or a project team were more
successful in meeting their schedules than the balanced matrix
Project matrix was better able to control costs than project team
Overall, the most successful projects used a balanced matrix, project
team, or--especially--project matrix
WHAT a company
communicates.....
HOW a company
communicates.....
How is knowledge
transferred?
Personality Compatibility
Subcontractor
Personality
Corporate
Personality
Project
Individual
Personality
Subcontracting Issues
What part of project will be subcontracted?
n What type of bidding process will be used? What type of
contract?
n Should you use a separate RFB (Request for Bids) for
each task or use one RFB for all tasks?
n What is the impact on expected duration of project?
n Use a pre-qualification list?
n Incentives? Bonus for finishing early? Penalties for
finishing after stated due date?
What is impact of risk on expected project cost?
n
Client reimburses contractor for all audited costs of project (labor, plant,
& materials) plus additional fee (that may be fixed sum or percent of costs
incurred)
Units Contract
u
B=1
Firm 2
$5 M
$7 M
Project Cost
$105 M
$95 M
(inefficient producer)
What is result if Cost Plus Contract (B = 0) used?
n
n
n
WAC 236-48-093: A contract shall be awarded to the lowest responsible and responsive
bidder based upon, but not limited to, the following criteria where applicable and only
that which can be reasonably determined:
1) The price and effect of term discounts...price may be determined by life cycle costing if
so indicated in the invitation to bid
2) The conformity of the goods and/or services bid with invitation for bid or request for
quotation specifications depicting the quality and the purposes for which they are
required.
3) The ability, capacity, and skill of the bidder to perform the contract or provide the
services required.
4) The character, integrity, reputation, judgement, experience, and efficiency of the
bidder.
5) Whether the bidder can perform the contract with the time specified.
6) The quality of performance on previous contracts for purchased goods or services.
7) The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with the laws relating to the
contract for goods and services.
8) Servicing resources, capability, and capacity.
Precedence Networks
Networks represent immediate precedence relationships
among tasks (also known as work packages or activities)
and milestones identified by the WBS
Milestones (tasks that take no time and cost $0 but indicate
significant events in the life of the project)
Two types of networks: Activity-on-Node (AON)
Activity-on-Arc (AOA)
All networks: must have only one (1) starting and one (1)
ending point
Start
End
Precedence Diagramming
Standard precedence network (either AOA or AON) assumes that a successor
task cannot start until the predecessor(s) task(s) have been completed.
Alternative relationships can be specified in many software packages:
Finish-to-start (FS = ): Job B cannot start until days after Job A is
finished
Start-to-start (SS = ): Job B cannot start until days after Job A has
started
Finish-to-finish (FF = ): Job B cannot finish until days after Job A
is finished
Start-to-finish (SF = ): Job B cannot finish until days after Job A
has started
Task A
7 months
Task B
3 months
Start
End
Task C
11 months
ESB=7
LFB=11
Task A
7 months
Task B
3 months
ESEnd=11
LFEnd=11
Start
End
Task C
11 months
ESC=0
LFC=11
TaskA
14wks
ES B=
LFB=
START
TaskB
9wks
ES C=
LFC=
TaskC
20wks
ES F =
LFF =
ES D=
LFD=
TaskD
12wks
TaskF
9 wks
ES E=
LFE=
TaskE
6 wks
ES END=
LFEND=
END
= LFi - ESi - ti
= ESi,min - ESi - ti
= LFi - LFi,max - ti
Minimize END
subject to
STARTj FINISHi
STARTj 0
Gantt Chart
TaskA
14wks
ES B=0
LFB=14
START
TaskB
9wks
ES C=0
LFC=29
TaskC
20wks
ES F =26
LFF =35
ES D=14
LFD=26
TaskD
12wks
TaskF
9 wks
ES E =26
LFE=35
TaskE
6 wks
ES END=35
LFEND=35
END
Week
Cumulative Costs
Range of
feasible budgets
M1
TaskA
2mos
TaskD
8mos
Receive payment
of $3000
TaskC
4mos
START
END
TaskB
8mos
TaskE
3mos
M2
Receive payment
of $3000
TaskB
8wks
TaskC
5wks
2units
Start
TaskD
6wks
TaskE
2wks
30units
End
TaskF
3wks
Demand:
32
10
11
12
30
30
Choose the option that minimizes inventory cost = order cost + holding
cost of raw materials
Time-Cost Tradeoffs
Total Direct
Cost
Critical Path(s)
Task(s) Reduced
22
21
Start-A-C-End
$320
20
Start-A-C-End
$338
19
Start-A-C-End
$348
18
Start-A-C-End
A, B
$361
Start-A-C-End
Start-A-B-End
Start-A-B-End
Start-A-B-End
Start-A-B-End
$328
Crash
cost =
Normal
Point
Normal
cost =
Time
Crash time =
Normal time =
Total Cost
Indirect
(overhead)
Costs
Direct
Costs
Crash
Time
Minimum Cost
Solution
Normal Time
Project
Duration
and time
and time
END = Tmax
tj , Sj 0
+ I (END) + P L
where
I = indirect (overhead) cost/time period
P = penalty cost/time period if END is delayed beyond
deadline Tmax
L = number of time periods project is delayed beyond
deadline Tmax
QUESTION: HOW TO DEFINE L?
Datamation, Vol
n
n
Assume you want to develop program that will require (approximately) 50,000 lines of
PERL code
A typical programmer can write approximately 1500 lines of code per week
Coordination time is M (M-1)/2 weeks
Brooks Law
TraditionalMethod
Design follows a sequential pattern where
information about the new product is slowly
accumulated in consecutive stages
Stage0
Stage1
StageN
PERT Example #1
PERT Example #2
TaskA
A=4
2A=2
TaskC
C=10
C2=5
END
START
TaskB
TaskD
B=12
D=3
B2=4
2D=1
Example #3 (contd)
Example #3 (contd)
Criticality Indices
TaskB
Programming
TaskE
Implementation
Start
TaskA
requirements
analysis
TaskC
Hardware
acquisition
TaskF
Testing
Project
Buffer
TaskD
User
User
training
End
END
START
Task B
Start
Task 1
Task 2
End
E[T(D)] = 25 days
Procrastinating Worker
Set a deadline D = 24 days
E[T(D)] = E(T1) + E(T2) + E{max[0, D - T1 - E(T2)]}
Schoenbergers Hypothesis
An increase in the variability of task durations will
increase the expected project duration.
Risk Management
All projects involve some degree of risk
Need to identify all possible risks and outcomes
Need to identify person(s) responsible for managing
project risks
Identify actions to reduce likelihood that adverse
events will occur
Risk Analysis
Risk Exposure (RE) or Risk Impact =
(Probability of unexpected loss) x (size of loss)
Example: Additional features required by client
Loss: 3 weeks
Probability: 20 percent
Risk Exposure = (.20) (3 weeks) = .6 week
Tornado Diagram
Sensitivity Chart
Resource Leveling
6workers
TaskA
4 wks
TaskC
1 wk
TaskE
4 wks
START
TaskB
3 wks
TaskD
5 wks
5workers
8workers
7workers
END
denotes the
Feeding Buffers
Resource Buffers
resource type
Resource Buffers
Non-Renewable Resources
Start
End
B
Configuration #1
Bob and Barb work jointly on all four tasks; assume that they can complete each
task in one-half the time needed if either did the tasks individually
Configuration #2
Bob and Barb work independently. Bob is assigned to tasks A and C; Barb is
assigned to tasks B and D
Configuration #1
Bob and Barb work jointly on all four tasks.
What is the expected project makespan?
END
Task B
Status Reporting?
OnedaymyBossaskedmetosubmitastatus
reporttohimconcerningaprojectIwasworking
on.Iaskedhimiftomorrowwouldbesoonenough.
Hesaid,"IfIwantedittomorrow,Iwouldhave
waiteduntiltomorrowtoaskforit!"
Newbusinessmanager,HallmarkGreetingCards
1600 worker-hours
Worker-Hours
Present time
Planned Value
(BCWS)
Actual Cost
(ACWP)
BAC
Cost Variance
(CV)
Earned Value
(BCWP)
Schedule Variance
(SV)
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6
If SI = 1,
If SI > 1,
If SI < 1,
If CI = 1,
If CI > 1,
If CI < 1,
Example #2
Example #2 (contd)
Progress report at the end of week #5:
Cumulative Percent of Work Completed:
Example #2 (contd)
Progress report at the end of week #5:
Example #2 (contd)
A-1
B-1
Project B
A-2
B-2
A-3
B-3
A-4
B-4
Experimental Results
No one scheduling heuristic performs best across all due date
setting combinations
Mean completion times for all scheduling and due date rules not
significantly different
FCFS scheduling rules increase total tardiness
SPT-related rules do not work well in PM (SASP)
Best to use more detailed information to establish due dates
Ad-Hoc
chaotic. Systems and processes are not defined. Project success depends on individual effort.
Chronic cost and schedule problems.
2)
Abbreviated: Some project management processes are established to track cost, schedule,
and performance. Underlying disciplines, however, are not well understood or consistently
followed. Project success is largely unpredictable and cost and schedule problems are the norm.
3)
Organized: Project management processes and systems are documented, standardized, and
integrated into an end-to-end process for the company. Project success is more predictable.
Cost and schedule performance is improved.
4) Managed: Detailed measures of the effectiveness of project management are collected and used
by management. The process is understood and controlled. Project success is more uniform.
Cost and schedule performance conforms to plan.
5) Adaptive:
from the process and from piloting innovative ideas and technologies. Project success is the
norm. Cost and schedule performance is continuously improving.
* source: The Project Management Institute PM Network (July, 1997), Micro Frame Technologies, Inc. and
Project Management Technologies, Inc. (http://pm32.hypermart.net/)