Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Atanu Datta
Memory
Obje
ct
Touc
h
TIM
E
Spac
e
Odor
Previous Studies
Roden
ts
Primat
es
olfactory
temporal order
task
Visual
temporal order
task
CA1
hippocampal
cell
populations
code time, by
changes in
population
activity
Time cells
coded fo what
items and in
which
sequential
order.
AIM
To characterize incremental timing signals in
object place associative learning task.
Time
Spac
e
Objec
t
P1
O
2
P2
PARADIGM
Data Acquisition
Behavioral
Training
Specific OP
combination is learnt
if Pr(Correct
Response) > 0.95
Results
Agnostic ITCs: n=61/139 agnostic;
Increased FR n=9
Decreased FR n=7
16/61 ITCs
Release selective
ITCs
n=78/139, differentiated
between trial types
43/78 were release
selective early
(O1P1,O2P2) vs late
release (O2P1, O1P2)
trials.
n= 21/43 cells were ITCs.
n=10 FR Incremental
Rise in firing rate
n= 11 FR Incremental
Decrease in firing)g rate
Eg of early release
increasing FR and late
OP selective
ITCs
Zi = Z-
(Normalization)
Zi- Z score
Z- Raw firing rate
- Average firing rate
- Standard Deviation
Z score is a population representation of all
PSTH of all trial types.
r trial- Early release of bar in late release trial; Late release of bar in earl
Ag. ITC
OP ITC
y-=mx+c; m
=tan
Release selective ITCs
showed significantly
greater differences in
incremental tuning
when comparing correct
vs incorrect trials than
Summary
Studied delay activity of hippocampal ITCs in OP
learning task.
ITCs increased or decre3ased FR with passage of time.
Agnostic, Release Selective and OP selective ITCs were
characterized.
Release and OP selective integrated time and context.
RS and OP selective ITCs fired significantly more for
learning OP combinations than agnostic ITCs.
Thus, RS and OP ITCs are responsible for learning OP
combinations.
All three categories of ITCs showed decreased firing
rate in error trials than in correct trials.
Thus ITCs also code for task performance.
THANK YOU