Key Changes in

RPMS Guidelines

DETERMINING THE OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
RANGE

ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 5.000

Outstanding

3.500 4.499

Very Satisfactory

2.500 3.499

Satisfactory

1.500 2.499

Unsatisfactory

below 1.499

Poor

CSCs Revised Policies on the Strategic

Performance Management System (SPMS)
MC 6 s. 2012
NUMERICAL
RATING

ADJECTIVAL
RATING

Outstanding

Performance represents an extraordinary level of achievement and

commitment in terms of quality and time, technical skills and
knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and initiative. Employees at this
performance level should have demonstrated exceptional job
mastery in all major areas of responsibility. Employee achievement
and contributions to the organization are of marked excellence.

Very Satisfactory

Performance exceeded expectations. All goals, objectives and

targets were achieved above the established standards.

Satisfactory

Performance met expectations in terms of quality of work,

efficiency and timeliness. The most critical annual goals were met.

Unsatisfactory

Performance failed to meet expectations, and/or one or more of the

most critical goals were not met.

Poor

Performance was consistently below expectations, and/or

reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made.
Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.

DESCRIPTION OF MEANING OF RATING

From 130% to 100% Outstanding Rating

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

COMPUTING THE SCORE PER KRA

The score per KRA shall be computed using the

following formula:

Rating per KRA = Weight x Rating

Total/Final Rating = KRA1 + KRA2 + KRA3 + KRA 4
(Plus Factor)

OTHER CHANGES

Rationale

Maintained

Scope of Policy

Maintained

Definition of Terms and Acronyms

Enhanced

Policy Statement

Maintained

Performance Cycle Process

Maintained

Uses of Performance Ratings

Changed from 130% to 100%

Monitoring and Evaluation

Maintained

Repealing Clause

Changed (PMT & Grievance,

Disqualification, Sanction)

Forms

Changed

Effectivity

Moved to 2015

Guidelines approved by CSC on

December 2014.
DepEd Department Order No. 2,
series of 2015 signed February 6,
2015.
For 2014, the agency will still use PASAG to
evaluate performance.

Phase 1: Performance
Planning and
Commitment

What is the definition of KRAs?

KRAs define the areas in which an
employee is expected to focus his/her
efforts.

Always remember that KRAs have the

following characteristics:
1. Number between 3 to 5
2. Describe in few words
3. Within your influence
4. Support departmental goals
5. Similar for jobs that are similar
6. Does not change unless your job
changes

What is the definition of

Objectives?
Objectives are the specific things you need
to do, to achieve the results you want.

Performance Indicators
They are EXACT QUANTIFICATION OF OBJECTIVES.
It is an assessment tool that gauges whether a
performance is good or bad.
Agree on acceptable tracking sources

SMART CRITERIA FOR OBJECTIVES

3. Discuss Competencies Required

and Additional Competencies
Needed

Why do we have Competencies?

The RPMS looks not only at results,

but HOW they are accomplished.

Competencies help achieve results.

Competencies support and influence

the DepEds culture.

For DepEd, competencies will be

used for development purposes
(captured in the form).

Staff & Teaching-related Competencies

Core
Behavioral
Competencies
Self
Management
Professionalis
m and ethics
Results focus
Teamwork
Service
Orientation
Innovation

Staff Core
Skills
Oral
Communicati
on
Written
Communicati
on
Computer/IC
T Skills

4. Reaching Agreement
Once the form is completed :
KRAs + Objectives + Performance Indicators +
Competencies
1. Rater schedules a meeting with Ratee.
2. Agree on the listed KRAs, Objectives, Performance
Indicators and assigned Weight per KRA.
3. Where to focus on the Competencies

Rater and Ratee agree on

the Key Result Areas
(KRAs), Objectives,
Performance Indicators and
assign Weight Per KRA and
sign the Performance
Commitment and Review
Form (PCRF).

MFOs

KRAs

Provision of Quality Curriculum &

Basic Education
Learning
Services
Management

OBJECTIVES

To craft 3 localized
and indigenized
curricula and
instructions by15
December 2015.

TIMELINE

July
December
2015

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
Weight
(Quality,
per KRA
Efficiency,
Timeliness)
10%
Q = 3 curricula
and instructions
E = 3 drafts of
each proposed
curriculum and
instruction
T = 1st draft / 31
Aug 2015; 2nd
draft / 30 Oct
2015; 3rd and final
draft / 15 Dec
2015

, II, III

Teacher I, II, III

Teacher I, II, III

Major Final Outputs Key Result Areas
(MFOs)

Basic Education
Services

Objectives

Outputs

(KRAs)

1. Teaching-Learning

a.

Process

b.

c.

Prepared lesson plans and

a. Daily Lesson Plan and

daily logs of activities

Instructional materials

including appropriate,

adequate and updated

instructional materials

b. Functional lesson plans,

Facilitated learning in the

daily logs, teaching

elementary and secondary

strategies

schools through functional

lessons plans, daily logs

and innovative teaching

c. Class Rules and well-

strategies

behaved pupils

Initiated discipline of

students including

d. Positive/productive/safe

classroom rules, guidelines

learning environment

and individual and group

tasks
d.

Monitored attendance,
diversity appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall

Major Final Outputs Key Result Areas

(MFOs)

Objectives

Outputs

(KRAs)

1. Pupils/Students
Outcomes

a. Monitored and

a. Complete and

evaluated and

accurate class

maintained pupils/

record

students progress

b.

b. Conducted

Remediation/enrich

remediation/enrichm ment programs

ent programs to

conducted

improve

performance

c. Updated

indicators

pupils/students

c. Maintained updated school records

pupils/students

d. Students

school records

mastery of the

d. Attained the
required GSA for

required learning
ompetencies per

1. Community

a. Conducted

Involvement

a. PTA

regular/periodic PTA

meetings/conferences

meetings/conferences

organized

b. Visited parents of

b. Academic

students needing

monitoring/follow-up

academic

monitoring/follow-up

c.

c. Undertaken/initiated

Projects/events/activiti

projects/events/activitie es initiated/undertaken
s with external

1. Professional Growth

and Development

funding/sponsorship

a.

Participated in activities such

as teachers association, etc.

b.

membership and/or

work for school paper/division

community linkages

Received special
awards/citation/recognition for
exemplary performance

1. Action Research

b. Professional

Produced publications/creative
publication

c.

Conducted Action Research

c. Published work

a. Action research
Specific problems in

Master Teacher I, II, III

Head Teacher I - VI

Head Teacher I - VI