Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 58

Guide to TD-LTE Handover

Problem Analysis

Contents

Handover Procedure Description


Concept of Handover Optimization
Summary of Handover-Related Parameters
Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Handover Procedure Description


Measurement

Control is usually brought in the RRC Connection


Reconfigurationmessage for the random access procedure or last handover process.
Measurement Report:The UE reports the cells which RSRP reach the handover
threshold according the measurement control information of the current cell.
HO Request
After receiving a Measurement Report, Source eNodeB applies to Target eNodeB for
resources and configuration information .
HO Request Ack
Target eNodeB feeds back the information received by the UE and other configuration
information to Source eNodeB.
RRC Connection Reconfiguration
Source eNodeB transfers the information received by Target eNodeB and configuration
information to the UE and informs the UE that Target eNodeB is ready for UE access. The
RRC Connection Reconfiguration message contains Measurement Control.
SN Status Transfer
Source eNodeB transfers the cache of UE services to Target eNodeB.
Random Access Preamble
After receiving an RRC Connection Reconfiguration (handover command) in Step 5, the
UE gets connected to the eNodeB by using the information in the reconfiguration
message.
Random Access Response
Target eNodeB sends RRC connection reconfiguration complete to responds the UE
access. When the UE receives this command, the access process is complete.
Afterwards, the UE sends RRC Connection Reconfiguration Complete on the RRC layer
(Step 9).
RRC Connect Reconfiguration complete HO Confirm
The UE reports an RRC Connection Reconfiguration Complete. The handover is
complete.
Release Resource
After the UE successfully accesses to Target eNodeB, Target eNodeB informs Source
eNodeB to delete the context information of UE.

Handover Procedure Description


Handover categories

Intra-site handover

X2 interface handover

S1 interface handover

Handover Procedure Description


Handover CategoriesIntra-site Handover
Intra-site handover
procedure need not to apply
to the core network for
changing the data
transmission route.

Handover Procedure Description


Handover CategoriesX2 Interface Handover
Neighboring cells attributable to different eNBs,
and eNBs has been established X2 port link.
As shown in the figure on the right:
After receiving a Measurement Report,
Source eNodeB sends a X2AP Handover
Request to Target eNodeB through X2
interface (Step 3) . Target eNodeB feeds back
by returning a X2AP Handover Request
Acknowledge. After receiving the feedback
(Step 4), Source eNodeB sends a RRC
Connection Reconfiguration to the UE and
sends a SNStatus Transfer containing package
cache and package cache number information
to Target eNodeB.
After the UE accesses the target eNodeB,
Target eNodeB sends a Path Switch Request
to the core network to inform the network to
transfer the UE service to Target eNodeB. The
priority of X2 interface handover is higher than
that of X2 interface handover.

Handover Procedure Description


Handover CategoriesS1 Interface Handover
Neighboring cells attributable to
the different eNBs, but did not
establish the X2 port link.
The procedure of S1 interface
handover is almost the same as
the procedure of X2 interface
handover, except the interaction
signaling is transferred between
eNodeBs through the S1
interface of the core network
which has a longer delay than
that of X2 interface.

Handover Procedure Description


UE Measurement Mechanism

When the terminal


measurement results satisfy
the formula conditions and
the state continued for a
period of time,UE reports a
Measurement Report
Mn+Ofn+OcnHys>Ms+Ofs+Ocs+Off
the length of time:Time to
Trigger

Handover Procedure Description


Foreground Signaling Resolution

Handover Procedure Description

Foreground Signaling ResolutionMeasurement Control

Measurement control
information is contained in
reconfiguration messages
that are generally sent for
initial access and handover
commands.
Measurement control
information includes
neighboring cell list, event
judgment threshold, delay
and reporting interval.

Handover Procedure Description

Foreground Signaling ResolutionMeasurement Control

Measurement Report
reports to all cells that meet
event trigger conditions.

Handover Procedure Description

Foreground Signaling ResolutionHandover Command

Handover Procedure Description


Signaling Resolution-- MSG1

UE accesses the target


eNodeB by using the access
configuration carried in
handover commands sent by
the source eNodeB.

Foreground

Handover Procedure Description

Foreground Signaling Resolution--eNodeB Returning an


RAR Message

Handover Procedure Description

Foreground Signaling ResolutionUE Feeding Back a


Reconfiguration Complete Message

The reconfiguration complete


message is already
packetized when UE
receives a handover
command. Random access to
the target eNodeB can be
deemed as access initiated
by the reconfiguration
complete message contained
in MSG3.

Contents

Handover Procedure Description


Concept of Handover Optimization
Summary of Handover-Related Parameters
Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Concept of Handover Optimization


To analyze abnormal processes, first
check eNodeB, transmission and UE
statuses. If there are problems, solve
them before analysis. The analysis of
abnormal handover process include:

Check whether the UE receives a handover


command after sending a measurement report
(procedure 1).
Check whether the UE sends a MSG1 to the
target eNodeB after receiving a reconfiguration
command (procedure 2).
Check whether the UE receives a MSG2 after
sending the MSG1 (procedure 3).

Concept of Handover Optimization


Procedure 1

Concept of Handover Optimization


Procedure 2

Concept of Handover Optimization


Procedure 3

Contents

Handover Procedure Description


Concept of Handover Optimization
Summary of Handover-Related Parameters
Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Value Range

Parameter Name

Unit

Adjustment Step Length

Cell-specific reference signals


-60~50
power

dBm

0.1

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

12

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface: Serving Cell Configuration>Base Information>Cell-specific reference signals
power

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Value Range

Unit

The Offset
Between PDSCH
EPRE and Cellspecific RS
EPRE
(P_A_DTCH) of
center user

-6, -4.77, -3, -1.77, 0, 1, 2,


dB
3

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

ENB->UE

Cell

Adjustment
Length

Source
Parameter
3GPP

Step

of

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface: Serving Cell Configuration>MAC ALG C >The offset Between
PDSCH EPRE and Cell-specifc RS EPRE(P_A_DTCH) of centre user

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step
Length

Sel_Qrxlevmin

-140~-44

dBm

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

-128dBm

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface: Serving Cell Configuration>Cell Selection and Reselection >Sel_Qrxlevmin

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Unit

Adjustment Step
Length

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Parameter Name

Value Range

Filter Coefficient for RSRP

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15,


17, 19

Default Value

13
Configuration path

OMCR setting interface: Serving Cell Configuration >Parameters of Measurement Configuration > Filter
Coefficient for RSRP

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name
Event Identity

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step
Length

Scope

Source of Parameter

A1, A2, A3,A4,A5

Default Value
Events with
measurement
quantity of RSRP: A1,
A2, A3, A4 and A5
Cycles with
measurement
quantity of RSRP: Events with
ENB->UE
measurement
quantity of RSRQ:
A1, A2, A3,A4 and A5
Cycles with
measurement
quantity of RSRQ: -

Transfer Path

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface: Base Station Radio Resource Management>Measurement Configuration
>IntraFreq Measurement for Handover> Event Identity

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name
Cell individual offset

Value Range
-24 24

Unit

Adjustment Step
Length

dB

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

ENB->UE

CELL

3GPP

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface Serving Cell Configuration>ENodeB Neighbouring Relation > Cell
individual offset

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter
Name

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step
Length

0, 40, 64, 80, 100, 128,


160, 256, 320, 480, 512,
Time to Trigger
640, 1024, 1280, 2560,
5120

ms

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of
Parameter

256

ENB->UE

eNb

3GPP

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface: Base Station Radio Resource Management>Measurement
Configuration >IntraFreq Measurement for Handover> Time to Trigger

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter
Name

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step Length

Hysteresis

0, , 15

dB

0.5

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path

OMCR setting interface: Base Station Radio Resource Management>Measurement Configuration


>IntraFreq Measurement for Handover> Hysteresis

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Amount of Reporting
for event

Default Value
1

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step Length

Scope

Source of Parameter

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, Infinity

Transfer Path
ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path

OMCR setting interface Base Station Radio Resource Management>Measurement Configuration


>IntraFreq Measurement for Handover> Amount of Reporting for event

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter
Name

Value Range

Unit

Reporting
Interval for
Periodical

120, 240, 480, 640, 1024,


2048, 5120, 10240, 60000,
360000, 720000, 1800000,
3600000

ms

Default
Value

Transfer Path

Scope

1024

ENB->UE

Cell

Adjustment Step Length

Source of Parameter
3GPP

Configuration path
OMCR setting interface Base Station Radio Resource Management>Measurement
Configuration >IntraFreq Measurement for Handover> Reporting Interval for Periodical

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step Length

Maximum Cell Number


1, 2, , 8
reported

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path

OMCR setting interface Base Station Radio Resource Management>Measurement Configuration


>IntraFreq Measurement for Handover> Maximum Cell Number reported

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step
Length

Power Ramping Step


for PRACH

[0, 6]

dB

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Value Range

Max Transmit Number


for Prach

0: 3, 1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 6, 4: 7, 5: 8, 6:
10
7: 20, 8: 50, 9: 100, 10: 200

Default Value
5: 8
Configuration path

Unit

Adjustment Step Length

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Summary of Handover-Related Parameters


Parameter Name

Value Range

Unit

Adjustment Step Length

Initial Power for


Preamble of Prach

[-120, -90]

dBm

Default Value

Transfer Path

Scope

Source of Parameter

-100

ENB->UE

Cell

3GPP

Configuration path

Contents

Handover Procedure Description


Concept of Handover Optimization
Summary of Handover-Related Parameters

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Abnormalities Caused by Missing Configuration of Neighbor Cells

Multiple
No

measurement reports

response to measurement report

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Abnormalities Caused by Missing Configuration of
Neighbor Cells-- Multiple Measurement Reports
In a drive test shown in the figures
on the right, the first three
measurement reports target
PCI=28 (the same PCI, slightly
different RSRPs). The fourth
measurement report targets
PCI=28 and 19. The measurement
value of PCI=28 is 3dB higher than
that of PCI=19.UE receives a
handover command.
The handover command carrying
the PCI of the target cell is not 28
but 19, so PCI=28 is presumed to
be a missing configured neighbor
cell.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Abnormalities Caused by Missing Configuration of


Neighbor Cells-- No response to measurement report

The results of a drive


test shows the UE does
not receive a handover
command after sending
a measurement report.
The UE initiates a
reestablishment
procedure after the radio
link fails.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Abnormalities Caused by Missing Configuration of


Neighbor Cells-- Confirmation of Missing Configured
Neighbor Cells
You

can confirm whether the


neighbor cells are configured by
checking eNodeB configurations
on the background.

You

can also check the neighbor


cell information contained in
measurement control information
sent by the source eNodeB.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences-Problem Phenomenon
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6

KPI Type
Random Access Success[%]
RRC Connect Success[%]
Initial Access Success[%]
E-RAB Connect Success[%]
Call Drop[%]
HO Success[%]

Correspond

Attempt

Ratio

207

215

96.28 %

38

41

92.68 %

0.00 %

44

44

100.00 %

26
106

44
130

59.09 %
81.54 %

The test of Fukuoka


network indexes shows
access failure frequently
occurs and call dropping
phenomenon appears
after handover.
Accesses sometimes
succeed and sometimes
fail. There is no rule
about the phenomenon.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences--Problem Analysis

To analyze the problem, we select some cells and do tests at fixed points. We find the UE
cannot connect to the network and the status indicator on the Qualcomm UE sometimes
blinks red (abnormal) and sometimes blinks green. Our self-developed UE also cannot
connect to the network.

Qualcomm QXDM interface

Self-developed UE LMT interface

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences-Problem Analysis

We check the call drop procedure and reestablishment procedure on Qualcomm


QCAT, the Qualcomm analysis software.
UE triggers MSG1 because DCI0 does not arrive at rach reason=UL_DATA and
the SR transmission attempts reach the maximum. RRC reestablishment is
triggered after the MSG1 fails to be sent to the eNodeB in eight transmission
attempts.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences-Problem Analysis

To verify whether it is a regular problem, we carry out DT tests near the


sites. Test areas are shown in the following figure:
In the area enclosed by
blue ellipse, the success
rate of accesses and
handovers is relatively high.
Some sites in the area
enclosed by red ellipse are
difficult for UE to access.
RRC reestablishment fails
in the HO test. Then UE
access fails again after
RRC reestablishment is
once again rejected.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences-Problem Analysis
According to the above analysis, it is presumed
that the problem results from uplink data
abnormalities caused by interferences. Currently
Fukuoka site adopts GC office, namely, one BBU
with several RRUs forming a site. All sites in
Japan are omnidirectional sites. The site
distribution is shown in the figure: Call drops
concentrate in the area enclosed by red ellipse.
Currently tests are performed only in Ref area
(the area enclosed in blue ellipse) .We found call
drops have a certain relationship with BBUID.
Non-call drop areas belong to BBUID=400010
and call drop areas belong to BBUID=400011
and 400012, so we doubted there are some
problems in the correlation of BBUID=400010,
400011 and 400012.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences-Problem Analysis
We

checked the equipment alarms on the OMC based


on the previous analysis. We first check the GPS status
and found the GPS at 400011 site is unlocked.
The sites of 400011 and 400012 concentrates and the
400011 has no GPS lock, which may lead to GPS
interferences in the cells belonging to 400011 and
peripheral cells and uplink access failures. For cells
where UE handover fails, we query the uplink receive
power traced on the MTS, and find that the eNodeB
receive power is too high (normally about -96-99dbm)
and the receive power evaluation is about -80dbm.
According to the above analysis, the problem is
presumed to occur because GPS out-of-lock of
BBUID=400011 have impacts on other cells. We check
on the background and find the GPS of 400010 and
400012 is normal, but the GPS of 400011 is not powered
on by BBU. However, electrical signal are already sent
and have impacts on cells around. Afterwards we carry
out tests by blocking all the cells belonging to 400011
and did tests and found in some cells of 400010, UE
handover also fails. Then we query the uplink receive
power and find there are certain interferences.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Difficult Access to Target eNodeB Due to Uplink
Interferences--Solution and Verification

From the analysis of access methods for BBUs in Fukuoka


area connecting to each cell, it can be found that the sites in
Fukuoka area adopt GC office, that is ,a BBU manages all
cells belonging to it and every BBU shares a GPS signal
source. Although the GPS of the site(BBUID=400010) is
already powered on, sometimes GPS out-of-lock occurs and
the cells that near to the site(BBUID=400010) are affected.
Therefore, we block all the cells belonging to the BBUs of
400011 and 400012 and carry out tests, and finally find UE
handover in all the cells belonging to 400010 succeeds. The
problem is solved.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Handover Problems Caused by Complicated
Environments

Characteristics of the TI project network coverage:


All sites are omnidirectional.
All sites are densely distributed.
Radio propagation environment is complex
1) The engineering parameters cannot be adjusted because TDLTE eNodeBs are co-sited with existing PHS sites and using omnidirectional antennas.
2) The eNodeBs are densely deployed to ensure indoor
coverage.The urban environments environment is complicated,
resulting in preferable RSRP but poor SINRs.The pilot pollution is
particularly serious nearby the intersections.
The focus of our work is to optimize the failure of these business
areas.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Handover Problems Caused by Complicated
Environments Overall Problem Handling Concept

Avoid UE handovers at intersections: If a UE must be redirected to


another cell at an intersection, advance or postpone the handover
through adjustment or, if necessary, set the one-way neighbor
relationship. This approach is only used for routes where the KPI
problems cannot be resolved. Radio parameters must be adjusted
flexibly based on the alleviation of effects affecting other proper cells
during the handover optimization.
Reduce UE handovers brought about by the cross coverage by
means of coverage adjustment. If the adjustment fails, try to avoid
the UE from being redirected. If the problem still persists, add
neighbor cells and adjust the handover parameters.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Handover Problems Caused by Complicated
Environments Case 1
Normally, the UE moves along the blue line
and hands over from one cell with PCI=336
to another with PCI=83. However, when the
UE moved to the place marked by a red X,
the RSRP of the cell with PCI=4 increased
suddenly and when the UE handed over to
the cell with PCI=4, the RSRP of the cell
with PCI=4 dropped unexpectedly.
Consequently, the call was dropped
because the UE did not receive any
handover command.
To prevent the UE from redirection to cells
with PCI=336 and PCI=83 at the
intersection, we strengthened the RS power
of the cell with PCI=83 to keep the
handover point between cells with PCI=336
and PCI=83 away from the intersection.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Handover Problems Caused by Complicated
Environments Case 2
Normally, the UE moves along the blue
line and hands over from one cell with
PCI=45 to another with PCI=61.
However, as the intersection was covered
by the cell with PCI=34, the RSRP of the
cell with PCI=34 decreased unexpectedly
when the UE passed through this
intersection. Consequently, the call was
dropped because the UE did not receive
any handover command after sending a
measurement report.
We increased the CIOs of cells with
PCI=34 and PCI=61 with 3 dB, moved the
handover point towards the west, and
redirected the UE to the cell with PCI=61
in advance. As a result, the call drop
caused by rapid signal deterioration in the
cell with PCI=34 was avoided.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases


Handover Problems Caused by Complicated
Environments Case 3
Normally, the UE moves along the blue line and hands over
from one cell with PCI=45 to another with PCI=8. However, the
UE handed over to the cell with PCI=4 at the intersection
marked by a red X, and then the call was dropped when the UE
was switched back to the cell with PCI=45.

To prevent the UE from redirection to the cell with PCI=4,


we have successively attempted to lower the RS power
of the cell with PCI=4 and adjust the CIOs of cells with
PCI=45 and PCI=4. Nevertheless, the call drop persisted
while the RSRP of the cell with PCI=4 was 17 dB
stronger than that of the cell with PCI=45. We analyzed
the RSRP distribution of cells nearby the intersection,
only to find out that the northbound road was covered by
the cell with PCI=4 and the RSRP of the cell with PCI=7
approximated to that of the cell with PCI=4 near the
intersection.
A redirection to the cell with PCI=4 can be avoided on
this test route by deleting the one-way neighbor
relationship (from the cell with PCI=45 to the cell with
PCI=4). In this case, the UE moving towards the cell with
the PCI=4 from the intersection can be redirected to the
cell with PCI=7 first, and then to the cell with PCI=4.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Lessons Learnt on Dealing with Call Drops Caused by


UE Out-of-Sync Behaviors Problem Symptoms

During a test, the reestablishment of an RRC


connection was denied
when the UE moved to the
location marked with a
blue rectangle.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

Lessons Learnt on Dealing with Call Drops Caused by


UE Out-of-Sync Behaviors Problem Symptoms
According to the check results of
the Layer 3 signaling, the
measurement report was sent twice
before the re-establishment without
receiving any handover command,
which eventually led to the UE outof-sync and re-establishment
rejection.
According to the diagnosis
signaling, the UE had sent an SR
before sending the measurement
report, but no scheduling
information was returned by the
PDCCH. Namely, the SR failed.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

The experience to deal with Call Drops Caused by UE


Out-of-Sync Behaviors Symptom Analysis
When the delivery of SRs reached the upper limit,
the source cell initiated a random access
procedure.Queried the MAC RACH Trigger
signaling,the cause value of the delivery of random
access was UL data arrival namely, the random
access procedure was initiated to restore the uplink
services when both SR and MR delivery failed.

During the entire random access


procedure, no RAR was received
upon each delivery of MSG1 by the
source cell.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

The experience to deal with Call Drops Caused by UE


Out-of-Sync Symptom Analysis
When the delivery of MSG1s
reached the upper limit, the
attempt to restore uplink services
in the source UE failed and the
RRC connection was redirected
to the re-establishment
procedure because of a radio link
failure.

However, re-establishment
required cell selection and the
selected cell had no context of
that UE. Consequently, the reestablishment was denied and
the call was dropped.

Handover Optimization FAQs and Cases

The experience to deal with Call Drops Caused by UE


Out-of-Sync Behaviors Problem Resolution and
Verification

UL data arrival often occurred in weak fields of the


source cell. This problem can be addressed by
redirecting a UE to another cell with better signal
quality beforehand.
We checked changes in the RSRP of a trouble spot
only to find out that the signal strength of the source
cell dropped dramatically while that of the neighboring
cell increased sharply in a very short time. In this case,
we shortened the time-to-trigger of the current network
as the adjustment of cell migration produced no
obvious effect.
We attempted to change the "time to the trigger"
parameter from 320ms to 256ms, the aim is to shorten
A3 judgment time. After the modification, this problem
was resolved on the basis of multiple tests.

Вам также может понравиться