Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Presented by : Group 7
Tanay Chitre
G013
Spandana G
G019
Purva Ganediwal
G020
Ankur Gupta
G029
Himank Rathour
G047
Harsh Shah
G052
2
A more proactive approach
acknowledging the
problems that persisted
3
Discontinuing the
relationship with
Blackstone in entirety or at
least restructure
Continue with the relationship as it had become largest account with projected
revenues upto $400,000
Significant changes in the agreement: Interaction of CMR managers with other
subcontractors and homeowners because cabinetry is the framework for all other
elements
Re-examining InfoCentrals abilities to cater to residential accounts and suitably
incorporating appropriate features
Increased communication between CMR and Blackstones project managers
Fiscal Year 1998
Reven
Re-evaluating
resource allocation
for major
like Blackstone
This accounts
huge percentage
of 25.46% shows that
ue
Residential
$15960
00
Top 15 Residential
Accounts
$82600
0
Blackstone
$210,3
14
Profit generated
byBlackStone Account
7270000
1596000
89.75
81003
2471800
44.69
35713
414960
34%
2377961
1296045
6145805
26%
522039
571403
1508402
1124195
15%
16
2900000
Budgeted
87598
5%
Actual
Revenue
Revenue per Shop
Hour
Shop Hours
Material Cost
SG&A
Shop Cost
210314
210314
51.78
4062
54682
68792
64987
40.63
5176
54682
68792
82821
Total Cost
188461
206295
21853
10%
4019
2%
Profit
Profit Margin
Microsoft Office
Excel Worksheet
Shop rate($/hr)
SG&A for
Residential
16
522039
OR
CMR always targeted the large account and the huge volumes of sales order that came
along with it.
CMR when getting into a relationship with Blackstone, didnt account for a strategic fit
between the two organisations.
CMR was just trying to overcome competition and in that bid decided to enter into a
relationship with Blackstone
It didnt account for Blackstone's reputation of being hard on its Subs which through some
research and background check could have been easily established
CMR should have been cautious to avoid situations by defining terms beforehand which it
didnt put up any to please the big customer. The company should have clearly stated its
delivery capabilities and conditions in case there was change requests by Homeowners
Commercial
Residential
Name: Mikes Cabinets
Subcontracting
Residential
Home Owner
Primary target
Blackstone Homes
It is one of the largest homebuilders in the area
It was a company that started construction at open areas of land and developed communities
on them right from building streets to installing utilities
They made three types of homes for the consumer
Starter Homes - $120000
Family Homes - $150000-$200000
Luxury Homes - $200000
Key strategy to offer lowest price: Partner with subcontractors, and offer only these options to homeowners
Blackstone would specify only CMR cabinets in its homes and one project manager from CMR
would work with Blackstone
All residentials handled by Mikes Cabinets should be handled by CMR and only customers who
want bespoke cabinets should be sent to Mikes
Scrape the existing allowance scheme
Improving partnership between CMR and Blackstone:
Understanding the process at Blackstone and suggest ways to improve it
Explaining the reasons and the need for the price increase by CMR to Blackstone
Increased use of united information channels
Relationship manager only responsible for Blackstone account
Greater use of software for information sharing
Reworking the flow of information between CMR & Blackstone
Improving transparency and tractability
Updating the Info Central for all internal communications by the residential team for easy
analysis of customers and funds coming from customers