Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
IMPACT OF WTO
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
ON INDIAN ECONOMY
Submitted By
Group 8, Section B, PGDM 2014-16
Himanshu Mendiratta
Kapil Sharma
Kaushik Thangudu
Ridhima
Sreekanth
Sridatri Dutta
Geneva, Switzerland
1 January 1995
Uruguay Round Negotiations (1986-94)
162 countries (as on 30th Nov, 2015)
CHF 197 million (2014)
Director-General is Roberto Azevdo
600
162 Membe
22
rs
Observer
States
Ministerial
Highest
Institutional
Conference
Meets every 2 years
Body
General Council
Conducts organizations
business
Origin of WTO
1946
GATT
Jan 1st,
1995
WTO
Principles of WTO
1
NonNon-discrimination
has
discrimination
two major constituents for
Reciprocity
goods,
services
intellectual property:
and
The
most
favored
nation (MFN) rule : A
WTO
member
must
apply
the
same
conditions with other
WTO members on all
trade
A
ceiling bindings- commitments made by
WTO
members
in
multilateral
trade
negotiations. Countries can change their
bindings, but only after negotiating with its
trading partners.
Governments are
also allowed to
restrict
trade
under
specific
circumstances
such
as
to
protect
environment,
public health etc.
The
national
treatment policy that
treats
imported
and
domestic goods without
any biases
Function of WTO
Co-operation
Organization
with
other
International
Indian Economy
Agriculture
Services
Industry
Positive Impacts
Increase in export
earnings
Growth in Merchandise exports
Impact on the tarif and non-tarif
trade barriers
Growth in service exports
General Agreement on Trade In
Services (GATS)
Agricultural exports
Curbing of trade barriers and
domestic subsidies elevated the
cost of agricultural products
Positive
Impacts
Textile Market
Foreign Direct
Investment
The quotas limiting the trade of
textile products have increased a
lot owing to the dissolution of
MFA (Multi-Fiber Arrangements)
Negative Impacts
GATS (General
Agreement in Trade
and Services)
Insurance, banking,
communication,
transport
Inequality within
structure of WTO
LDC exports
Ina
inf deq
ur rast uate
se e an ruct
rvi d
ce
s
GDP Breakup
Sm
du all l
e
a
cei to la nd
lin
g a nd
ct
Dis Famil
pu y
tes
ma Over
nn e
s
ho ma d
ldi
ng ll
s
Ins
uf
Fin cient
an
ce
Illit
era
cy
I
cosncrea
ts, sed
pri
ce
Int risks
e
in rven
lan tio
da n
lab nd
or
C
Ma redi
rke t
ts
Ov
tio erre
ag n of gula
r ic
ul t
ur
e
Agriculture
Others
Domestic Support in
India:
Domestic Support
Market Access
Tarifcation
Long Term
Developing countries have been given the
freedom to implement such policies
Imports to India would not be attractive in the
case of rice, tea, sunflower oil and cotton
Through proper Tarifcation, however, we will
have to strike a balance between the
competing interest of 10% farmers who
generate marketable surpluses and
consumers belonging to the economically
poor sections of the society
encourage investment in the resource scarce
agricultural sector
The rise in domestic prices would put pressure
on the public distribution system and
accentuate the problem of food subsidy
Trims
Agreement relates to investments
originating from one country to another
It favours national treatment of foreign
investment
Investment to be freely allowed within
domestic borders without any maximum
cap on it
Requires that there should not be any
domestic content requirement on foreign
firms operating and manufacturing in
other countries
Effects
Trips
Creator of the intangible is protected
from illegal use of his creation
The agreement stipulated some basic
uniformity of law among all trading
partners
Required suitable amendment in the
domestic IPR laws of each country
New investment in fresh research is
required
The technology transfer from abroad is
expected to become costly and difcult
Aoa
Agreement on agreement deals with
market access, Export subsidies and
government subsidies
Subsidy given to Indian farmers are much
below the acceptable levels and therefore
need not be changed
Concern is on the competitiveness and
sustainability that the Indian farmer would
be able to prove in the long run once the
markets open up
THANK YOU