Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Entrepreneurs' nightmare.
INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS IN KERALA
TEA PLANTATIONS
TEAM
Ajay Kumar
S 002
Sunil Mathews N
065
Prakash
N 073
LABOUR EMPLOYMENT
Plantations are in geographically isolated
areas & Labour problems due to less
population.
Dependency on the migrant labour
Initial recruitment was family based,
helped in permanent settlement of labour
force and ensured the future labour supply
Also helped in employing women by
projecting the nature of job as women
oriented
Enabled the employer to keep the wages
EMPLOYEE BUYOUT
Lower price of tea and high production
cost made it financially not viable option.
Mgmt wanted to quit or reduce their
burden.
Nearly 50% of Ownership was allocated
to workers.
This ensured availability of laborers for less
wages and prevented them from looking for
alternate options.
Mgmt retained 50% shares and control.
TRADE UNIONS
The remote locations & ignorance of
the migrant population prevented the
formation of trade union in tea industry.
Workers did not have bargaining
power.
Leaders from other TUs started
educating the tea workers.
TU started in Kerala tea industry in
1940s.
Mgmt tried to suppress the
TRADE UNIONS
TU awakening and strikes compelled
Govt to form an enquiry commission in
1948.
As per the recommendation of this
the Plantation Labour Act (PLA) came
into force.
This act stipulated provisions of
welfare schemes, housing etc.
It also facilitated the establishment of
TRADE UNIONS
TU helped in setting up a uniform
min daily wage in 1952 ie. Rs 1.6 (0.94
basic + 0.66 DA)
(In 2002 it was set at Rs 77.26/-)
After repeated strikes a uniform
wage for men & women workers
established through the equal
remuneration Act in 1976.
ROLE OF TUs
ROLE OF TUs
Workers began to know their rights.
Competition between Mgmt & TUs in
shaping Identity of Tea Workers.
Elevation of Socio-poilitcal life of
workers.
Role shaded by financial gains
obtained by workers.
LABOUR STRIKES
Strike in Sept 2015
Strike by 7000 women employees of
KDHP.
It was also an agitation against the
inability of TU.
Boycotted all Trade Unions.
LABOUR STRIKES
What Prompted the Employees ?
PLC decides the salary of plantation
laborers.
PLC comprises of Mgmt, TU leaders,
Govt Reps.
Previous revision was in 2011, and
the term of the revised wage was for 3
years.
Revision was overdue for more than a
year.
No initiative or pressure form TUs or
KDHP STRIKE
Agitation
Started on 06 Sep 15, by 7000
women workers under the banner
Pempilai Orumai a women workers
collective, with no specific leader.
Plantation works stopped.
Blocked roads, resulting in traffic
blocks.
Politicians, TU leaders kept away.
Held senior official of KDHP as
KDHP STRIKE
Management s View
Tea industry passing through a severe
crisis due to Low prices in Mkt, high
production cost, adverse weather, labour
problems, pest attack etc.
Forced to reduce the bonus from 20%
to 10%.
Decision was taken after approval of
TU leaders
KDHP STRIKE
Outcomes
Attacks on the protesters by TU
members.
Allegation by a TU leaders that Tamil
Extremist groups were behind the
agitation.
Strike put the mainstream TUs on the
defensive.
After Govt mediation, Mgmt agreed to
give 20% bonus and consider the wage
KDHP STRIKE
The Aftermath
TUs called for an indefinite strike prior
to PLC, demanding 20% bonus and a min
wage of Rs 500.
About 3 Lakhs Plantation workers
joined strike.
KDHP women employees stayed away.
PLC meeting convened by Govt.
KDHP women representatives not
allowed in PLC
Present State
Minimum wage of Rs 301/implemented.
Pempilai Orumai has not accepted
this, and continuing their peaceful
representations.
The strength of Pempilai Orumai.. ie
Unity, has been weakened by separating
key members.
Political parties & Trade unions have
THANK YOU