Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rahul Sheth 62
Kunal Shinde 63
Advait Soni 64
Chaitanya Sudrik 65
Venting
devices
Valves-PRVs, PSVs
-conventional , balanced
Rupture disks, Breaking Pins
Pressure Vacuum Vents
Sizing of Relief Valves
2
k k 1 r
F2
r
1 r
k 1
k 1
k
Critical
flow
Pcf 2
P1 k 1
W
520 K d P1K b
W
735 K d F2
k
k 1
TZ(k - 1)
2 Mk
TZ
MP1 (P1 P2 )
Relief
headers
Worst case scenarios
Standard pressure drop calculations
Disposal
Systems
Quenching, Chilling
Separation of vapors and liquids
Flares- ground, elevated
5
No
Pf
Pi Vo
ZRT
Pi
P
M c
1 f
Mi
Pi
Process considerations
1)Valve malfunction, equipment failure
2) Sudden rise in feed inlet pressure
3) Runaway exothermic reactions
4) Process gas exceeding explosion limits
5) Dust explosion
Fire considerations
1) External fire adjacent to pressurized
vessels
2) External Ignition
K-
factor Method
RUST
Vent
Method
Ratio Method
Nomograph
Factor
For
Max.
Av
Pmax
F
Av
K
F
Av
K 0.8 40Pred
Vessel
L/D
Does
12
detergent industries
Rust equation
propogation
in soap and
2
3
0.5
Pred
dt
The
max
bc
C 0.65 2
a
1
3
D
C 0.76
L
2
3
13
Limited
L/D
Does
14
Put
Vent
Volume of
vessel for sizing of vents
Simplest method
15
Vent
Vent
The
Vent Ratio
(1/m)
<345
1/6.1
<690
1/4.6
>690
1/3.1
17
Modification
30-300
300-600
1/9.2
>700
1/3.1
19
Method
Based
(dP/dt)max
V ^ (-1/3)
20
Nomographs
vent size
21
Lowest
Vessel
The
23
Weak
Low
Turbulent
method
24
Vessel
For
25
Thank You
26