Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 19

IMPLEMENTATION OF DRY WALL

TOILET MODULE

CONTENTS
Introduction
Why ?
Design, Comments and Review
Sequence
Cost Comparison
Productivity Comparison
Difficulties
2

(Attribution Analysis of Toilet Work)

Environment All of you sum


Slow Schedule.
up
the
All to
of delay
you sum
Quality.
.
project
constructionup to delay the
Inspection
project
Curing for
procedure at site block & plaster
Dirty
work
work, Chipping
Workplace
Delay in
for MEP
Not proper Cohanding over
services
ordination with
in project
MEP cause
chipping and
repairing work.
Poor workman
Wastage of
ship for tiling
material.
work.

Manpower.

Material.

Attribution Analysis of Dry wall Toilet Module


Environment All of you sum
Slow Schedule.
up
the
All to
of delay
you sum
Quality.
.
project
constructionup to delay the
project
Curing for
Site Coblock & plaster
Dirty
ordination
work, Chipping
Workplace
Delay in
for MEP
Not proper Cohanding over
services
ordination with
in project
MEP cause
chipping and
repairing work.
Poor workman
Wastage of
ship for tiling
material.
work.

Manpower.

Material.

INTRODUCTION

It is Predesigned and Prefabricated plumbing arrangement in Steel


frame.
It can be used in dry wall toilet concept for fast installation for better
productivity
5

PDCA CYCLE
PLAN :- To complete the toilet in speedier way.
Why? & How?.
DO

:- Drawing preparation , Finalize schedule.

CHECK :- Material Availability, Construction method, Factory


inspection To Check Quality Assessment Standard.
ACT :- Actual usable toilet construction for site office

PLAN
WHY ?
Fast installation method.
Minimization of overlapping work.
Ease of repairing and dismantling.
Recyclable material can be used.
Minimization of civil work helps to maintain clean work area.

DO
DESIGN, COMMENTS AND REVIEW

UG Piping

Module Layout
8

CHECK

Frame
Height
Revised to
match
EWC flush
Tank
height

Comment

Review
9

DRAWING APPROVAL

10

ACT
WORK EXECUTION SEQUENCE

UG Piping

Pipe connection to the module

Module Frame Installation

Sanitary ware installation


11

SEQUENCE

Steel base frame fabrication

Module inside pipe work

Steel frame fabrication and checking

Pressure testing at vendor place


12

SEQUENCE CONT..

Fabrication Checking

Plywood Fixing

Sanitary-ware Installation on Module

13

SEQUENCE CONT..

Inspection by Shimizu
14

COST COMPARISON (cost/unit module)


Material
MS structure (25x25x3mm Holllow
section)
PVC pipe (6kg/cm2-Pressure Rating)
50mm
110mm
PVC fittings
PPR Pipe
PPR Fittings

Qty.

Cost Comparison
Unit module (Outsourcing)
Material
Unit Fabrication
Unit Unit cost
cost
cost

Fabrication cost

30

Rmt

390

11700

60

1800

1
3
6
2
5

Rmt
Rmt
Nos.
Rmt
Nos.

620
1200
257
310
42

620
3600
1540
620
210
18290

100
430
110
50
20

100
1075
240
100
100
3415
(Material+Fabrication) Cost
Installation Cost
Total Cost

Material
MS structure (25x25x3mm Holllow
section)
PVC pipe (6kg/cm2-Pressure Rating)
50mm
110mm
PVC fittings
PPR Pipe
PPR Fittings

Qty.

On site Fabrication and installation


Material
Unit Fabrication
Unit Unit cost
cost
cost

21705
1700
23405

Fabrication cost

30

Rmt

215

6450

65

1950

1
3
6
2
5

Rmt
Rmt
Nos.
Rmt
Nos.

200
510
215
310
37

200
1530
1290
620
185
10275

125
250
85
180
14

125
750
510
360
70
3765
Total Cost
(Material+Fabrication)

14040

15

Productivity Comparison
Productivity Comparison
Material
MS structure (25x25x3mm Holllow section)
PVC pipe (6kg/cm2-Pressure Rating)
50mm
110mm
PVC fittings
PPR Pipe
PPR Fittings

Module Manhours
Qty.
30
1
3
6
2
5

Unit
Rmt
Rmt
Rmt
Nos.
Rmt
Nos.

On site fabrication and Installation


Material
Qty.
Unit
MS structure (25x25x3mm Holllow section)
30
Rmt
Frame painting
30
Rmt
PVC pipe (6kg/cm2-Pressure Rating)
50mm
1
Rmt
110mm
3
Rmt
PVC fittings
6
Nos.
PPR Pipe
2
Rmt
PPR Fittings
5
Nos.
Testing

Manpower

hrs.

Man hours

16

Total Manhours

16

Manpower
3
1

hrs.
6
1

Man hours
18
1

2
4
Total Manhours

8
31

16

Comparison of Cost and Productivity


Cost of Module (Outsourcing) > Cost of Onsite Fabrication and Installation
= 66.7 % Extra Cost
BUT
Man-hours of module (Outsourcing) < Man-hours of on site Fabrication and
Installation
= 52% more Productivity in Module (Outsourcing).

17

DIFFICULTIES

Higher Cost.
Higher accuracy require in installation.
Sudden drawing revisions can not be implemented.
Site modification can affect installation productivity.

18

THANK YOU

19

Вам также может понравиться