Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Responsibility
CSR
corporate responsibility,
corporate citizenship,
Responsible business
shifted to
Customers
suppliers
employees
Shareholders
communities
environment.
society at large.
In other words:
ethical
society friendly.
???
e.g. Shell Foundation involvement in the Flower Valley in South Africa and
Marks and Spencer in Africa: The 540-hectare farm is home to many critically
endangered lowland fynbos species. It has been cleared of all invasive alien
plants, which is followed up regularly.
TOT & MNCs that give concerns on CSR and communities in the host countries
flow of human resources;
Hence:
going green
We green the earth --- MNCs in Malaysia who own large golf areas within
the vicinity of residential areas
Friends of the Earth who highlights the environmental impact of some MNCs
and campaign for stronger laws on environmental responsibility
ensure that markets, commerce, technology and finance advance in ways that
benefit economies and societies everywhere
Through this collaboration it may trigger other corporations to help the nation
in its effort to alleviate poverty and, hence, in developing communities.
While improving the quality of life of its workforce and family members, as well as the
local community and society at large. .
Specific skills for CSR managers are very hard to clarify due to the diverse
roles and range of disciplines involved
1.
2.
building capacity
3.
4.
stakeholder relations,
5.
6.
Harnessing diversity.
Hmm !
voluntary basis
All companies are bound by the laws of the country in which they operate.
At the heart of CSR is the idea that companies, on their own, can be trusted
to fill this regulatory gap and address any problems their operations may
cause.
E.g. The UK : Stephen Timms , the minister for CSR within the Department of
Trade and Industry (DTI). His view is that the role of governments is to work
with the corporate sector to facilitate this type of involvement, rather than
looking to regulatory measures or new laws.
Can safeguarding the social and environmental rights of poor people as they
come into contact with multinational corporations cannot be left solely to the
discretion of those corporations????
Historical background:
During the 1980s, the United Nations grappled with the international Code of
Conduct on Transnational (multinational) Corporations, covering areas such as
labor standards,
consumers rights,
womens rights,
the environment,
corruption and
Modern CSR was born during the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, as an
explicit endorsement of voluntary approaches rather than mandatory
regulation.
Home country
Host country
International law
Where the necessary laws do exist, many host countries do not have the
political will or technical know-how to enforce them.
In the UK, companies are bound by laws protecting labour rights, the
environment and consumers.
US Alien Torts Claims Act (ATCA) has been used with some success to hold US
companies to account for their activities overseas
It gives district courts in the US the power to hear foreign citizens claims for
injuries in violation of the law of nations.
Cases under ATCA have proved extremely time-consuming, costly and complex
But its use against multinationals has increased considerably over the past
decade
brick kiln owners are flouting the law by polluting the environment in
Haripur district, which ranks amongst the most polluted areas of the
province, owing to unchecked discharge of effluents in streams and
emissions from industries in Hattar.
bronchitis and asthma, chemicals attack the bodys immune system, lung
cancer
vomiting, diarrhoea, eye irritation, nausea, and disorientation, liver and renal
diseases
Not a single Environment Protection Order has ever been issued to local brick
kiln owners since the agency is not serious about controlling pollution.
In Shehla Zia vs Wapda (1994), the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared that a
clean and healthy environment was the fundamental right of every citizen of
Pakistan by reading the right to a clean and healthy environment into the
Fundamental Right to Life protected by Article 9 of the Constitution.
Pakistan Environmental Protection Act of 1997, but the government never made
it functional
Fabric industry:
current process used about 100 litres of water to dye one kilo of fabric,
meaning a million litres for a tonne of fabric.
60 per cent more energy efficient, used 60 per cent less water, and took a
third of the time of the process currently in use.
We cannot put the burden of polluting industrialists on the tax payer. can
we???