Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Hydraulic Testing
Well Hydraulics
A water well is a hydraulic structure that is
designed and constructed to permit economic
withdrawal of water from an aquifer
Water well construction includes:
Selection of appropriate drilling methods
Selection of appropriate completion materials
Analysis and interpretation of well and aquifer
performance
ho
h
Cone of Depression
High Kh aquifer
Low Kh aquifer
Kh Kv
Aquifer Characteristics
Pump tests allow estimation of transmission and
storage characteristics of aquifers
Transmissivity (T = Kb) is the rate of flow through a
vertical strip of aquifer (thickness b) of unit width
under a unit hydraulic gradient
Storage Coefficient (S = Sy + Ssb) is storage change
per unit volume of aquifer per unit change in head
Radius of Influence (R) for a well is the maximum
horizontal extent of the cone of depression when the
well is in equilibrium with inflows
s
h
ho
Assumptions
Isotropic, homogeneous,
infinite aquifer, 2-D radial flow
Initial Conditions
h(r,0) = ho for all r
Boundary Conditions
h(R,t) = ho for all t
s
h
ho
Assumptions
Isotropic, homogeneous,
infinite aquifer, 2-D radial flow
Initial Conditions
h(r,0) = ho for all r
Boundary Conditions
h(R,t) = ho for all t
Specific Capacity
For a confined well producing at a steady rate (Q) the specific capacity is
given by:
Q = 2Kb
sw ln(rw/R)
This means that for a confined well producing at a steady rate (Q) the
specific capacity is constant.
The equation for unconfined flow can be rearranged:
Q = K (ho + hw)
sw ln(rw/R)
Writing hw = ho - sw gives:
Q = - K (sw + 2ho)
sw
ln(rw/R)
For an unconfined well producing at a steady rate (Q) the specific capacity
reduces with increasing drawdown. The maximum specific capacity for an
unconfined well is given by:
Q = 2Kho
sw ln(rw/R)
s
h
ho
PDE 1 (rh ) = S h
r r r
T t
Solution is more complex than
steady-state
Change the dependent
variable by letting u = r2S
4Tt
Assumptions
Isotropic, homogeneous,
infinite aquifer, 2-D radial flow
Initial Conditions
h(r,0) = ho for all r
Boundary Conditions
h(,t) = ho for all t
Theis Integration
Recall h = dh/du
dh = -Q exp(-u).du
4T u
Integrating:
h = -Q exp(-u) du + C
4Tu u
Finally, using h(,t) = ho to
eliminate C:
ho - h = Q exp(-u) du
4Tu u
The integral is called the
exponential integral but is often
written as the Theis well function
W(u)
s = ho - h = Q W(u)
4T
W(u)
1.0
0.1
0.0
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1/u
1.E+02
1.E+03
Drawdown (m)
10.0
1.0
0.1
0.0
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
10.0
s=0.17m
1.0
0.1
0.0
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
[1,1]
Type
Curve
t=51s
1.E+04
1.E+05
Theis Analysis
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Cooper-Jacob
Cooper and Jacob (1946) pointed out that the series expansion
of the exponential integral or W(u) is:
W(u) = - ln(u) + u - u2 + u3 - u4 + ..
1.1! 2.2! 3.3! 4.4!
where is Eulers constant (0.5772)
For u<< 1 , say u < 0.05 the series can be truncated:
W(u) ln(e - ln(u) = - ln(eu) = -ln(1.78u)
Thus: s = ho - h = - Q ln(1.78u) = - Q ln(1.78r2S) = Q ln( 4Tt )
4T
4T
4Tt
4T 1.78r2S
s = ho - h = Q ln( 2.25Tt ) = 2.3 Q log( 2.25Tt )
4T
r 2S
4T
r 2S
The Cooper-Jacob simplification expresses drawdown (s) as a
linear function of ln(t) or log(t).
Drawdown (m)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
0.0
0.1
0.2
Drawdown (m)
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
s =0.39 m
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
Cooper-Jacob Analysis
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Theis-Cooper-Jacob Assumptions
Real aquifers rarely conform to the assumptions made for
Theis-Cooper-Jacob non-equilibrium analysis
The failure of some or all of these assumptions leads to nonideal behaviour and deviations from the Theis and CooperJacob analytical solutions for radial unsteady flow
Drawdown (m)
20
25
30
35
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
Recharge causes the slope of the log(time) vs drawdown curve to flatten as the
recharge in the zone of influence of the well matches the discharge. The gradient
and intercept can still be used to estimate the aquifer characteristics (T,S).
Drawdown (m)
20
25
30
35
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
Sources of Recharge
Drawdown (m)
20
High Leakage
25
Low Leakage
30
35
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
10.0
0.5
Theis Curve
1.0
W(u,r/B)
1.0
2.0
0.1
0.0
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1/u
Data are fitted in a manner similar to the Theis curve. The parameter
r/B = r( {Kv / b} / {Khb} ) increases with the amount of leakage.
Drawdown (m)
20
25
30
35
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
Casing Storage
It has been known for many decades that early time data
can give erroneous results because of removal of water
stored in the well casing.
When pumping begins, this water is removed and the
amount drawn from the aquifer is consequently reduced.
The true aquifer response is masked until the casing
storage is exhausted.
Analytical solutions accounting for casing storage were
developed by Papadopulos and Cooper (1967) and
Ramey et al (1973)
Unfortunately, these solutions require prior knowledge of
well efficiencies and aquifer characteristics
Casing Storage
Q
s
dp
dc
Distance-Drawdown
Simultaneous drawdown data from at least three
observation wells, each at different radial distances,
can be used to plot a log(distance)-drawdown graph.
The Cooper-Jacob equation, for fixed t, has the form:
s = 2.3 Q log( 2.25Tt ) = 2.3 Q log( 2.25Tt ) 4.6Q log(r)
4T
r 2S
4T
S
4T
So the log(distance)-drawdown curve can be used to
estimate aquifer characteristics by measuring s for
one log-cycle and the ro intercept on the distance-axis.
T = 4.6Q and S = 2.25Tt
4s
r o2
Distance-Drawdown Graph
ro = 126 m
Drawdown (m)
s = 3.8 m
3
5
1
10
Distance (m)
100
1000
Aquifer Characteristics
For the example: t = 0.35 days and Q = 1100 m 3/d
T = 0.366 x 1100 / 3.8 = 106 m 2/d
S = 2.25 x 106 x 0.35 / (126 x 126) = 5.3 x 10-3
The estimates of T and S from log(time)-drawdown
and log(distance)-drawdown plots are independent of
one another and so are recommended as a check for
consistency in data derived from pump tests.
Ideally 4 or 5 observation wells are needed for the
distance-drawdown graph and it is recommended
that T and S are computed for several different times.
Well Efficiency
The efficiency of a pumped well can be evaluated using
distance-drawdown graphs.
The distance-drawdown graph is extended to the outer
radius of the pumped well (including any filter pack) to
estimate the theoretical drawdown for a 100% efficient well.
This analysis assumes the well is fully-penetrating and the
entire saturated thickness is screened.
The theoretical drawdown (estimated) divided by the actual
well drawdown (observed) is a measure of well efficiency.
A correction is necessary for unconfined wells to allow for
the reduction in saturated thickness as a result of
drawdown.
dw = 100 mm
dw = 150 mm
dw = 300 mm
6
8
10
Drawdown (m)
Drawdown (m)
12
14
16
4
6
8
10
12
14
18
16
0
20
0.01
10
20
30
40
50
60
Distance (m)
0.1
1 Distance (m) 10
100
1000
Construction factors
Inadequate development, residual drilling fluids
Improper placement of screen relative to aquifer interval
Radius of Influence
The radius of influence of a well can be determined from a
distance-drawdown plot.
For all practical purposes, a useful comparative index is the
intercept of the distance-drawdown graph on the distance axis.
Radius of influence can be used as a guide for well spacing to
avoid interference.
Since radius of influence depends on the balance between
aquifer recharge and well discharge, the radius may vary from
year to year.
For unconfined wells in productive aquifers, the radius of
influence is typically a few hundred metres.
For confined wells may have a radius of influence extending
several kilometres.
Determining ro
ro = 126 m
ro = 4.1 km
Unconfined Well
Confined Well
4
5
Drawdown (m)
Drawdown (m)
7
8
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Distance (m)
10
1
10
100
Distance (m)
1000
10000
Unconfined Aquifers
Most analytical solutions assume isotropic,
homogeneous, confined aquifers or assume
drawdowns are small for the unconfined case.
There are three distinct parts to the time drawdown
curve in an unconfined aquifer:
early time response follows Theis equation with the confined
elastic storage corresponding to storativity (bS s)
intermediate times respond as a leaky aquifer with vertical
flow in the vicinity of the pumped well with storage release
controlled by the aquifer K h/Kv ratio
late time response follows Theis equation with gravity
drainage providing storage corresponding to the specific yield
(Sy)
Delayed-Yield Response
uB
uA
Unconfined response
is complex with theory
developed by
Boulton, Dagan,
Steltsova, Rushton
and Neuman.
10.0
0.002
0.01
0.04
0.25
1.0
W(uA,uB,)
1.0
4.0
0.1
0.0
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1/u
The Neuman type curves are fitted to data in a manner similar to that for
Theis curves. Higher values of indicate more rapid gravity drainage.
Partial Penetration
Screen Design
300 mm dia.
well with single
screened
interval of 15 m
in aquifer of
thickness 30 m.
L/b = 0.5 and 2L/r = 200
F = 0.5 x {1 + 7 x cos(0.5/2)
(1/200)} = 0.67
300 mm dia.
well with 5 x 3 m
solid sections
alternating with
5 x 3m
screened
sections, in an
aquifer of thickness 30 m.
There effectively are five
aquifers.
L/b = 0.5 and 2L/r = 40
F = 0.5 x {1 + 7 x cos(0.5/2)
(1/40)} = 0.89
This is clearly a much more
efficient well completion.
Recovery Data
When pumping is halted, water levels rise towards their
pre-pumping levels.
The rate of recovery provides a second method for
calculating aquifer characteristics.
Monitoring recovery heads is an important part of the welltesting process.
Observation well data (from multiple wells) is preferable to
that gathered from pumped wells.
Pumped well recovery records are less useful but can be
used in a more limited way to provide information on
aquifer properties.
Recovery Curve
0
Drawdown (m)
2
4
Drawdown 10 m
6
Recovery 10 m
Pumping
Stopped
8
10
12
-6
12
18
24
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
Time (hrs)
Superposition
The drawdown (s) for a well pumping at a constant rate (Q) for a
period (t) is given by:
s = ho - h = Q W(u) where u = r2S
4T
4Tt
The effects of well recovery can be calculated by adding the
effects of a pumping well to those of a recharge well using the
superposition theorem.
The drawdown (sr) for a well recharged at a constant rate (-Q) for
a period (t = t - tr) starting at time tr is given by:
sr = - Q W(u) where u = r2S
4T
The total drawdown for t > tr is:
4Tt
s = s + sr = Q (W(u) - W(u))
4T
Time-Recovery Graph
Est. recovery, s - s' (m)
0.00
2.00
4.00
to = 0.12 hrs
6.00
sr = 4.6 m
8.00
10.00
12.00
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
Time-Recovery Analysis
For a constant rate of pumping (Q), the recovery any time (t) after
pumping stops:
T=
Q
= -Q = Q
4(s - s)
- 4sr 4sr
For the example, sr = 4.6 m and Q = 1100 m 3/d so:
T = 1100 / (12.56 x 4.6) = 19 m 2/d
The storage coefficient can be estimated for an observation well (r = 30
m) using:
S = 4Tto
r2
For the example, to = 0.12 and Q = 1100 m 3/d so:
S = 4 x 19 x 0.12 / (24 x 30 x 30) = 4.3 x 10 -4
It is necessary to use an observation well for this calculation because well
bore storage effects render any calculation based on r w potentially subject
to huge errors.
0
2
4
6
s = 5.2 m
8
10
12
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+01
1.E+02
Theoretical intercept is 1
>> 1 indicates a recharge effect
>1 may indicate greater S for pumping than recovery ?consolidation
< 1 indicates incomplete recovery of initial head - finite aquifer volume
<< 1 indicates incomplete recovery of initial head - small aquifer volume
DST
Drill
Stem
Valve
Packer
Perforated
Section
Packer
Gauge
DST Analysis
Recall that the final form of the recovery equation is:
ho - h = s = 2.3Q log(t)
4T
t
For a DST, the pressure (rather than head) is measured
po - p = 2.3Q log(t)
4kb
t
Remembering that p = h,T = Kb and K = k/
po
p (kPa)
100
1
10
t / t
Slug Test
Displacer
Displaced
Head
Initial
Head
Slug Analysis
Tube or
Casing
2ra
ra
is access tube internal radius
rw is perforated section external radius
L
is length of perforated section
ho is initial head, t = to
h(t) is head after recovery time t
A
is the tube or casing csa = ra2
F
is a shape factor = 2L / ln(L/rw)
Analysis methods include:
Hvorslev (1951)
Cooper et al (1967)
2rw
Hvorslev Analysis
Tube or
Casing
2ra
K=
2rw
To
Time, t - to
Bounded Aquifers
Superposition was used to calculate well recovery by
adding the effects of a pumping and recharge well
starting at different times.
Superposition can also be used to simulate the effects of
aquifer boundaries by adding wells at different
positions.
For boundaries, the wells that create the same effect as
a boundary are called image wells.
This relatively simple application of superposition for
analysis of aquifer boundaries was for described by
Ferris (1959)
Image Wells
Recharge boundaries at
distance (r) are simulated by
a recharge image well at an
equal distance (r) across the
boundary.
Barrier boundaries at
distance (r) are simulated by
a pumping image well at an
equal distance (r) across the
boundary.
General Solution
ri
rp
Specific Solutions
Using the Cooper-Jacob approximation is only possible for large values of to ensure that u < 0.05 for all r so the
Theis well function is used: s = Q [W(u) W(ri2u)] = Q [W(u) W(u)]
4T
r p2
4T
Multiple Boundaries
r2
r1
r2
r1
Parallel Boundaries
A parallel recharge boundary and a barrier boundary (or any pattern with
parallel boundaries) requires an infinite array of image wells.
r1
r2
Boundary Location
s
t1
s
t2
Pumping Wells
The drawdown observed in a pumping well has two
component parts:
aquifer loss
drawdown due to laminar flow in the aquifer
well loss
drawdown due to turbulent flow in the immediate
vicinity of the well through the screen and/or gravel
pack
Well loss is usually assumed to be proportional to the
square of the pumping rate:
sw = CQ2
Well Efficiency
The total drawdown at a pumping well is given by:
st = s + sw = Q W(u) + CQ2 = BQ + CQ2
4T
The ratio of the aquifer loss and total drawdown (s/s t) is known
as the well efficiency.
s=
W(u)
=
B .
st W(u) + 4TCQ B + CQ
Mogg (1968) defines well efficiency at a fixed time (t = 24 hrs).
Thus, writing W(u) as the Cooper-Jacob approximation gives:
s=
1
=
1
.
st 1 + 4TCQ / [ln (2.25Tt /S) - 2 ln(rw)]
1 + CQ/B(rw)
Written in this form it is clear that well efficiency reduces with
pumping rate (Q) and increases with well radius (r w), where B is
inversely related to well radius.
The specific capacity is given by: Q =
1 .
st B + CQ
Step-Drawdown Test
s1
Drawdown, s
s2
s3
s4
s5
Time, t
s/Q (m/m3/d)
C
B
Q (L/s)
Well Yield
Well yield
US gpm
< 100
< 170
< 350
< 700
< 1000
< 1800
< 3000
< 3800
< 6000
L/s
<6.4
<11
<22
<44
<64
<110
<190
<240
<380
in
4
5
6
8
10
12
14
16
20
mm
100
130
150
200
250
300
360
410
510
in
6
8
10
12
14
16
20
24
30
mm
150
200
250
300
360
410
510
610
760
in
5
6
8
10
12
14
16
20
24
mm
130
150
200
250
300
360
410
510
610
The chart is used to select casing sizes for a particular yield. The main constraint is
pumping equipment.
For example, if the well is designed to deliver 4,000 m3/d, the optimum casing dia. is 360
mm (2 nom. sizes > pump dia.) and the minimum 300 mm.
The drilled well diameter would have to be 410 to 510 mm to provide at least a 50 mm
grout/cement annulus.
Higher rates
Measuring Drawdown
Pumped wells
heads are hard to measure due to turbulence and pulsing.
data cannot reliably estimate storage.
Observation wells
smallest possible diameter involves least time lag
screens usually 1-2 m; longer is better but not critical should
be at same depth as centre of production section
if too close (< 3 to 5 x aquifer thickness) can be strongly
influenced by anisotropy (stratification)
if too far away (>200 m unconfined) h(t) increases with time
so a longer test is required boundary and other effects can
swamp aquifer response
Drawdown Instrumentation
Dipmeters
let cable hang to remove kinks
rely on light or buzzer, have spare batteries
Steel tapes
read wetted part for water level (chalking helps)
hard to use where high-frequency readings are needed
Pressure gauges
measure head above reference point
need drawdown estimates to set gauge depth