Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BY:
SATYA R. JOSHI
KATHMANDU UNIVERSITY
7/5/16
7/5/16
REFERENCES
WHAT IS FEDERALISM?
7/5/16
Centralized
Fiscal
Federalism
Decision on
Fed. Taxes
Decision on
most Taxes
Fed
Province
Local
Budget
Budget contr.
No autonomy
Income
Expenditures
No autonomy
Income
Expenditures
Decentralized
Vertical
Equalization
Horizontal
Vertical
Equalizat.
Horizontal
Equaliz.
Fed. Budget
Autonomy Income
Autonomy Budget
Autonomy Income
Autonomy Budget
CHAPTER-I
RATIONALE- KNOWING DIFFERENTLY: SETTING THE SCENE
7/5/16
RESEARCH INTRODUCTION:
Going beyond the history of Nepal, decentralization has been a
key policy for every government since 1950s and it has been
taken as a strong policy tool for equitable resource allocation and
poverty reduction ambition (NPC report, 2013).
Formally the constitution of Nepal (2015) declare the clear
provision towards federalized structure of nation. i.e. Article
56(2) declares ; The State powers of Nepal shall be used by the
federal, provincial and the local level in accordance with this
constitution.
Under this scenario, this investigation attempts to identify the
major determinants of fiscal federalism amendment in Nepal
within present geopolitical strata and macro economic
6
frameworks.
7/5/16
7/5/16
7/5/16
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
7/5/16
CHAPTER TWO
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
Third eye review: Thematic vs. Theoretical
review
Thematic
Review
Theoretical
Review
Third-wave
Review
Literature Review
Second generation
theory of fiscal
Federalism
ASSUMPTIO
NS
7/5/16
ALIGNMENT
ASSUMPTION
S
Ideology gap
Perception gap
Political belief and
demands gap
Vertical and
horizontal gap
Resources
utilization gap
Normative and
empirical gap
11
Federal
Authority
province
province
Horizontal
province
Vertical
ra
nt
s
province
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4 criteria of Research
Design
1.
2.
3.
4.
Orientation,
Strength,
Depth and
Richness (Van
Manen, 1988)
Source
Paradigm
Goal
Research
Auto/ethnography is a legitimate way of establishing intersubjectivity that escapes the false dichotomy opposing
subjectivism and objectivism. (Luitel, et. all, 2009).
Autoethnographic research method is an insiders methodology in
which my personal and professional experiences become the key basis
for this inquiry (Ellis, 2009, p. 35).
Autoethnography combines ethnographic and autobiographic
14
perspective to direct the researcher's heartfelt inquiry into the historical
roots of his/her own cultural identity (Joshi, 2013).
7/5/16
AUTOETHNOGRAPHIC INTROSPECTION IN MY
RESEARCH: A METHOD OF INQUIRY
Knowledge = self + culture (practices) and vice-versa.
Universal Paradigm
Auto
Based on researchers
Graphy
Autoethnography
Action (sometime quantitative
as well)
Ethno
7/5/16
In the process of data analysis and data plot, data are presented with
the help of tables, bar diagrams, pie chart, figures and other diagrams
and analyzed in descriptive manner according to the requirement of
the study. The description is given the table so that it will be easy to
understand.
Phenomenology: Investigation of phenomenon practiced and purposed in
Nepalese context.
MY DATA SOURCES
Who?
What ?
Why?
Why not?
When ?
How ?
16
7/5/16
Integralism
Quality standards:
Transparency and openness
regarding the aims and
processes of the research
Processes are derived from
comparable research schemes,
i.e. articulated, context based
research, and methods drawn
from grounded theory.
Postmodernism
By using most recent global perspectives of
reality towards research rigor
Interpretivism
-Inter/subjectivity
-Focus on Researchers Action
7/5/16
Criticalism
Emancipation/critical self-empowerment
Why/what/Who/How???
transformative ontology of critical selfhood
CHAPTER-IV
WHERE WE STAND ACTUALLY? FACES BEHIND FISCAL
FEDERALISM IN NEPAL
7/5/16
Subsidiarity
Fiscal Equivalence
Direct democracy
Elections
Voting
Peoples initiatives
Referendums
Petitions
19
Strong
points
relatively low
tax burden in LGs
Good identity of the
citizens with their
provinces
Strong natural
resources capacity
between the Provinces
Differences in the
geographic and ethnoidentity
Weak points
Slow
and unclear
political system
Tax burden between the
provinces differs to
much
Many inefficiencies, due
to wrong incentives in
the transfer system
Creeping centralization
Differences in the
service level
Vague horizontal and
vertical fiscal gap exist
20
Seems
Some Issues
Lower expenditure: Average
spending in 3 years does not
reach 80% of allocation
70.7% in FY 2012/13
82.6% in FY 2013/14
86.1% in FY 2014/15 (projection
based on Government GFS Data
expenditure)
Capital expenditure skewed
towards end of FY
Out of total capital
expenditure, 73% in FY 2011/12
and 75% in FY 2012/13 made in
last trimester of the Fiscal Year
21
Fiscal Year Tax revenue -GDP Non Tax revenue GDP Revenue
Ratio
ratio
change
2.8
22.7
2009/2010 10.4
2.7
33.3
2010/2011 11.8
1.5
27.2
2011/2012 11.4
1.5
23.1
2012/2013 13.0
2.1
21.2
2013/2014 13.9
2.2
22.3
2014/2015 15.3
1.1
(19.4)
2015/2016 12.4
Notes
1. The Table of FY 2014/15 is revised, FY 2015/16 is just preliminary and
remaining is actual.
2. Source: Economic Survey of various fiscal years, Government of Nepal,
Ministry of Finance
22
Service
Responsibility
Provision of Service
Comments
Defence
International trade
Environment
Internal commerce
Immigration
Airways/railways
Education
F,P,L
P,L
Transfers in kind
Health
F,P, L
P,L
Transfers in kind
Social welfare
F,P,L
P,L
Transfers in kind
Police
F,P, L
P,L
Highways
F,P,L
P,L
Natural resources
F,P, L
P,L
7/5/16
Foreign affair
23
Collection
Retention
Import duties
Federal
Federal
Federation account
Excise duties
Federal
Federal
Federation account
Export duties
Federal
Federal
Federation account
Federal
Federal
Federation account
Federal
Federal
Federation account
Federal
Province
Province
Federal
Federal
Federal account
Personal income tax: armed & police forces, external affairs officers, non-residents
Province
Province
Province
Province
Province
Province
Federal
Federal/Province
Federal/Province
Company tax
Federal
Federal
Federal
Province
Province-Local
Province-Local
Stamp duties
Federal
Province
Province
Gift tax
Federal
Province
Province
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Local
Motor vehicle
Province
Local
Local
Entertainment tax
Province
Local
Local
Federal
Province
Local
Province
Local
Local
Tourism Charge
Province
Province
Province
Province
Province
Province
Entertainment tax
Province
Local
Local
7/5/16
Scenery of Taxation
24
7/5/16
Equalization
Federal
Issue regards Administrative
government
and Executive Capacity
Lack of Technical Knowledge
and Technical Overheads
Treatment of Natural
Stage
2
Provence
Resources and issue of
Sustainability
Lack of Facilitating
Infrastructure
Intergovernmental Fund
Transfer Mechanism
Other Problems with Fiscal
Local government
Federalism
Stage
1
Stage
3
25
Other problem
7/5/16
26
Income
Mandates
Taxes
Loan
Transfer
State
Budget
Funds
Legislation
Services
Investments
Grants
Debts
Equalization
Deficiencies
of resources
Cost
Compensation
Geographic
28
Spillovers
Additional goods and
services
no compensation
excessive
cost
cost compensation
threshold value
resource equalization
CHAPTER-VII
CONCLUDING MY RESEARCH LANDSCHAPS WITH A NEW VISTA
Research Conclusion
Cont....
7/5/16
MAJOR FINDING
7/5/16
Our findings have shown that while there are in fact serious disagreements on
the subject, they are solvable if only there is adequate political will to do so. This
means that the largest problem lies in the ideological differences and
understanding of democratic structures and the parties struggles for power.
What seems to be motivating the politicians to delay federalism is that they fear
they might lose their power and privilege and it has become evident that for
their motivations to change something radical must happen.
32
Contd.....
7/5/16
RECOMMENDATION
Need for Highest Level Political and Administrative Unity & Support
Minimize vertical and horizontal gap is strongly recommended.
Focus on What Unites Us All, Not What Divides Us
Capacity Development
Need for Clear Expenditure and Revenues Assignments (Framework
building)
Need for Transparent and Equitable Intergovernmental Transfer
System
Institutional Reform Recommendations (i.e. a National Federalism
Financial Taskforce Regulation Committee (NFFTRC hereafter)
Constitutional reform (somewhere)
The need to reduce the necessity for frequent intergovernmental
transfers that causes disruption in the fiscal system is strongly
recommended.
The need to diversify and strengthen the fiscal base of subnational
governments is recommended. To this end, local tax administration
should be improved, unproductive local taxes eliminated, and untapped
tax potentials identified.
CONT...
Progressive and redistributive taxes should be centralized, such as
personal income tax and corporate income tax;
taxes suitable for economic stabilization, such as import duties,
should also be centralized;
taxes on mobile factors of production such as gains taxes should be
centralized;
residence-based taxes, such as sales/excise and retail taxes are
best suited for Provinces;
benefit taxes/user charges are usually assigned to the LGs that
provides the services such as toll gate levies, hospital and
education fees, and motor licences;
taxes on immobile factors of production, such as land and
buildings (property taxes) are assigned to local governments; and
taxes on natural resources should be assigned to the central
government, for the sake of administrative efficiency and uniform
35
practice since the major projects in this field often involve big
transnational corporations.
7/5/16
RECOMMENDATION MODULES
The Production Function Approach (Roy, 2005)
i.e. InY=lnA+alnN +(l-a)lnK+lnE..........................................................(2.3)
Or,
y=a+an+(1-a)k+e ......................................................................(2.4)
where Y is output, N is labour, K is capital, E is total factor productivity and a is the intensity of labour
vis-a.-vis capital. In order to implement the PF approach it is necessary to have accurate measures (or
estimates) of all factors of production
2. A legislative Bargaining Model of Fiscal Federalism (purposed by (Bahl and Martinez-Vasquez,
2006; Hindrisk and Lockwood, 2009).
3. Fiscal Federalism and Economic Growth Model
Y = f (L, KP , KG ) ..........................................................................(3.1)
Where, the subscripts denote sectoral inputs:
KP = Private capital per labor
KG = Public capital per labor
The production functions of the respective sectors are thus:
YP = P(LP, KP, G).....................................................................................(3.2)
YG = G(LG, KG )
Total inputs are given as:
LT = LP + LG ..............................................................................................(3.4)
KT = KP + KG .............................................................................................(3.5)
Total output Y is given as the sum of sectoral output or a function of sectoral inputs:
Y = YP + YG ..................................................................................................(3.6)
The model further assumes that the public sector comprises of three subsectors and, by extension, that
public spending is carried out by three levels of government: federal (f), Provence (s), and local (m). Thus:
36
Y = a0 +LT + KT + GT + ...........................................................................(3.7)
7/5/16
CONT....
For Reader
Socio-political
Educational
7/5/16
Academic
REFERENCES
Al-Hadi Abdal Samad, Intergovernmental Relationships in the Sudan Federal System: Cooperation, Conflict or Covariance? in Salih, Hassan M. et.al., (eds.), Federalism in the
Sudan, Khartoum University press, 1995.
Bhurtel , Bhim Prasad, The Political Economy of Federalism in Nepal, Nepal South Asia
Centre (Kathmandu, 2009).
Bird, R. M and Ebel, R.D. (2001), Fiscal Federalism and National Unity, available at
http://www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/1000803.pdf
Eisner, E. W. (2008). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of
the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issue (pp.3-12).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hatlebak M. and Ringdal, C. (2013). The economic and social basis for state-restructuring in
Nepal. CMI report.
Oates, W. E. (2006), On the Theory and Practice of Fiscal Decentralization. In: The Tiebout
Model at Fifty, ed. William A. Fischel. Cambridge, M. A: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy,
1-32.
38
THANK YOU
39
7/5/16