Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
STEP 1
INTERNAL VALIDITY
Ans: YES
In this prospective randomized clinical trial study
a total of 100 women with SUI who were treated
with TVT (n 50) or TOT procedure (n 50)
were included prospectively randomized by a
predetermined computer-generated
randomization code
Ans: Yes
The patients were followed and assessed at 1,
3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after the
intervention. At the end of the 1st month,
complete transvaginal examination, cough test,
and upper urinary tract ultrasonography were
performed in all patients and ICIQ-UI and ICIQQOL were filled
Ans: YES
The study population included 100 patients, 50
patients in the TVT and 50 in the TOT groups
All patients follow up data still recorded until the last
30 months follow up
Ans: OBJECTIVE
All patients were able to read and understand,
and willing to sign the informed consent form for
the study
STEP 2
RESULT OF THE STUDY
STEP 3
EXTERNAL VALIDITY
1. Is my patient so different to those in the study that the results cannot apply?
Ans: NO
Not different because the subject of this study are the women with stress urinary
incontinence. The subjects are asian
2. Is the treatment feasible in my setting?
Ans: YES
There is no specific instrument or medicine needed to reproduce this study that not
available in my setting.
3. Will the potential benefits of treatment outweigh the potential harms of treatment for my
patient?
Ans: YES
Our study results showed that TVT and TOT methods have similar efficacy and safety
for SUI, although the catheter indwelling time was significantly longer in the TVT group