Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2016 in Malaysia
http://youtu.be/ps79fVZ9uk8
Accident
Crisis
communication
Contents
After accident
1, Crisis communication (Nagasaki Uni)
2, Activities of National research institute (JAEA)
-Radiation measurement support
-Risk communication
3, Publication of supplemental material for
learning about Radiation for school- students and teachers,
(MEXT)
JAEAs
Researcher
s
K-49 1.461MeV
Over
12
*Only conducted by
JAEA(NEAT
13
Answer
No problem, to prevent
humidity and heat
stroke, please well ventilated. But if windy, its
preferable not to so.
If it is not extracting outside air, no
problem.
It is better to wear a mask in windy day
No problem
No problem
To wear a mask and rubber gloves(if watering),
not scraping whole surface area from the
beginning, try a small area and compare
results at before and after.
It is safer, if covering by a sheet and putting in
plastic bags
By the end of August, after it will be revised
No problem
14
Cont.
2. Radiation effects on Human body (infant, child and
pregnant women.)
Question
I have a 7month old baby, recently had chest
x-ray twice. Is it ok?
Is breast feeding ok?
If I become pregnant, is there any effect on
baby?
and Is breast feeding ok?
I am pregnant, is it ok to open windows?
Do elderly people have less radiation effects?
Answer
From X-ray exposure
is 50-100Sv/time, there
is no problem with compare to the natural
radiation (1.5mSv/y)
No problem
Both are no problem
It is OK.
To compare with children, adult have a low
sensitivity to radiation
Answer
If no distribution
restriction, it is
ok to eat.
Just in case, wash before eating
Vegetables growing from now is
eatable.
Cabbage is restricted to eat, so
better to not eat.
If no restriction around your area,
no problem. If you are still
worried, check at the local
government.
15
Cont.
4. Measurements (Survey .. )
Question
I was at Town close to NPP when the accident
occurred, and worried about internal exposure.
People in evacuation area should be checked
by WBC. As measurements are not conducted,
waiting the reduction of internal radiation level?
I am worried about internal exposure, is any
place to check? And I did not have any
activities to get internal exposure.
As each monitoring post has a different level of
dose rate, I am worried so I want to measure by
myself. Is it possible to borrow the dose mater?
Answer
I will pass on this enquire to
MEXT
There is no place to check internal exposure who
are possibly not affected by. Explain there is no
need to worry too much, obtain understanding.
Renting the dose meter is not available now.
Answer
Cont.
6. Monitoring
Question
Answer
Question
Answer
The annual guideline
is 100mSv. Damage from
radiation will be recovered with time so
exposing to 100mSv for 10 years will not
directly lead to developing illness.
No problem, just in case, explained to take
caution for internal exposure.
Current dose is from the initial release of
accident, so it is not continued to be released
from
(afterNPP
researching) regarding rice fields, a
company conducted independently, so cannot
provide detailed data.
As EPA, the measured value of U and Pu is
certainly greater than before the accident,17but
below the detection limit in most measurement,
Cont.
8. Questions to the government and the local government
Question
1. I have 2 children, as high dose rate, is it any
problem to go outside? And as each expert
explains with diffident views, I dont know
what I should believe?
2. National standards is vary. Individual
sensitivity to radiation is also vary, so I am
worried about future effects in 10-20 years.
3. Dividing evacuation zone and the 20mSv
guideline are unclear.
4. I dont understand to apply the same limit
dose rate to TEPCO female staff and children
How much percent of dose rate is in inside
against outside? Does Follow-up survey (longterm radiation damage) need? If so will the
government conduct it?
How to measure internal exposure? Where
should I ask?
My children and parent have done X-ray many
times, is there any exposure limit?
When Fukushima accident is settle down, will
the government issue declaration of safety?
Replacing surface to ground soil at playground,
is any impact on groundwater? As there is any
information, I am worried to use the water. Not
disagree to replacement, just want
announcement of effects on water in order to
decide to use the groundwater or not.
When I go to such as Tokyo, am discriminated
just as from Fukushima, report only correct
information on the media
Answer
1. Currently, no problem. Need to wait
results from surveys and researches to
find accurate future effects 10-20 years.
2~4. I will pass on this enquire to MEXT
It is 40%.
Request to the Government to do so
Explain body waste measurements such as
urine test and introduce National Institute for
Radiation
X-ray is 50-100 Sv/time, a few times is not a
problem.
Think that the Government will take some
actions
Measurements on groundwater and well water
havent been conducted enough, as iodine was
high in tab water, but cesium was low, so
assume cesium will not exceed the limit level,
but no supporting data. I will pass on this
enquire
to on
MEXT
I will pass
this enquire to MEXT
18
Radiation and
Its Effects on Human Health
MILK
10Bq (200ml)
BEER
5Bq (500ml)
BANANA 13Bq
(120g)
DRIED MUSHROOM
14Bq (20g)
Source: Nuclear Publication 2003-2004
MEAT
20Bq (200g)
BREAD 4.2 Bq
(140g)
SEAWEED
20Bq (10g)
RICE
6Bq (200g)
FISH
10Bq (100g)
Crisps 36Bq
(90g)
SWEET POTATO
13.8Bq (100g)
22
4,000
Bq
Carbon-14
2,500 Bq
Rubidium-87
500 Bq
Lead-210
&
Polonium-210
20 Bq
Natural radioactivity
in human body and foods
Potassium-40
40
Chips
Milk 50
Bread
30
400
Spinach
Rice 30
200
Beef 100
Beer 10
Fish
100
Source: Nuclear Safety Research Association Research on environmental radiation data (1983)
14
Radioactivity
Absorbed Dose
Number of Punch /s
1mSv = 1000Sv
24
It will be injured
Fall gradually
for 1 hour
25
Source: National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Japan Health Physics Society (JHPS)
26
Main Worries
Multiple Choice choice up to 2
0%
20%
40%
Helath Effedts
Air Monitoring Results
60%
80%
65.6
24.0
20.3
16.4
37.4
25.1
Others 2.5
No Answer 2.5
N=2764
Free description
28
3, Publication of supplemental
material for
learning about Radiation for
school students and teachers,
(MEXT)
Publication of Supplemental Material for Learning about Radiation, not only for students
but also for teacher
Elem
l
c hoo
s
y
r
enta
High
scho
ol
Secondary school
Contents is in Japanese
31
What is this ?
40
Ra 218Po(Polonium) +
heavy metal +
222
Ra
Po
Air
(Radon)
1.26
222
218
Ra
Po
Non-Natural
Radiation
Natural Radiation
100Gy
Cancer
treatment
(Affected parts)
(mSv)
10Gy
1Gy
0.1Gy
Annual limited dose (Radiation
worker)
CT/once
PET/once
Annual limited dose
(General public)
X-ray
photograph
(Stomach)
X-ray photograph (chest)
Cataract
Temporary hair loss
1000mSv
Sterility
Cloudiness of eye lens
Depression of blood
forming
100mSv
0.1mSv
0.01mSv
Dental photograph
Millisievert (mSv)
15
Food 0.3
Risk factor
Cancer Risk
1.8 times
Smoking
Drinking (540cc of Japanese
sake /day)
1.6 times
Underweight
1.29 times
Overweight
1.22 times
1.19 times
1.15 ~ 1.19
times
Lack of exercise
High salt intake
1.11 ~ 1.15
Source: Japan Radioisotope Association Radiations ABC(2011) and others
times
Reference
[ Relative risk of cancer by radiation and lifestyle ]
The table below is the survey result published by National Cancer Center in Japan. The table indicates that how many times cancer risks increase (relative risk) by
comparing between a target group and a control group (e.g. smokers and non-smokers).
16
JAEA-Review 2014-044
38
39
Natural
radiation
2.4mSv/year
Several
41
42
76km
Damaged
154km
43
259km
Pacific coast of Tohoku EPCs business area is famous for Rias (Saw tooth)
coast line where tsunami becomes high
The company had been familiar with ancient tradition or legend about
disasters caused by huge magnitude of tsunami.
The stone tablet standing on a
forested hillside with the
stark warning carved on its
weathered face: Do not build
your houses below this point!
The waves stopped just a few
meter below the stone on
Mach 11..
Hundreds of so-called tsunami
stones, some more than six
centuries old are warnings
across generations, telling
descendants to avoid the same
suffering of their ancestors,
Conclusion
Pre education for radiation
is the most important for
good risk communication
Screening
Nuclear
Thermal
52
53
Control of neutron
Uranium ore
Yellow cake
UF6
UO2
Fuel pellet
54