Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HNS)
resident
ENT-HN Studies
Maharajgunj
Dr.Ramesh Parajuli
MS(ORL1styear
GMSMA of
TUTH, IOM,
Doctor must :
Past:
Reading few journals every month
Occasional conferences
Present:
Internet
Informations- available to everyone
Journal Article
Rigid structure
Extracting information easier
Format:
1.Abstract
2.Intorduction
3.Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.Conclusion
1.Abstractoverview of
2.Introduction
3.Method:
4.Result :
Describe the result found
5.Discussion:
What the results actually mean
6.Conclusion:
Results of several experiments presented and
discussed, Implications of the research
Recommendations about further research or
policy and practice in the relevant area
Critical Reading:
Suspending the Judgment on a text until
1.Have understood the message being put forward
2.Evaluated the evidence supporting that message
3.Evaluated the writers perspective
Critical Thinking/Critical
Analysis:
the intellectually disciplined process of actively and
summary of a text
descriptive comment on the text
rehash of the theory learnt in a class
statement of ones own unsupported views
CONSCIENTIOUS
- To do more good than harm
- To do right things in right way
- Carefulness and attention
EXPLICIT
- Openness and transparency
-To evaluate and criticize
the methods used
- Doctor- Patient relationship
JUDICIOUS
- To evaluate and weigh
the evidence of the work
-To consider Benefit &
balance it against harm
Current Best Evidence
Purpose of EBM
1.Retrieve
2.Review
3.Reject
4.Read
Secondary Survey:
1.Introduction :
Method design
2.Methods:
Research design-descriptive or comparative study
Single or multicenter
3. Study Sample:
How were the subjects and controls selected?
Are the inclusion & and exclusion criteria sufficiently
clear to describe the target population?
4.Treatment Allocation:
Randomization
Masking (blinding)
5.Outcomes:
primary outcome-all studies
6.Statistical Analysis:
Statistical Tests
7.Results:
Tables and
How many
How many
How many
Figures,
pts eligible for the study?
enrolled?
completed?
8.Discussion :
9.Conclusion:
Must consistent with the study objective
Justified by the study results
Shouldnt over generalize the results of the study
Levels of
evidence
1b-Individual RCT
1c-All or None
Level 2 :2a-SR(with homogeneity) of Cohort studies
2b-Individual Cohort Study (including low
quality RCT; eg
<80% follow up)
2c-Outcomes research; ecological studies
Level 3 3a-SR(with homogeneity) of case control studies
3b-Individual case-control study
Level 4 - Case Series(& poor quality cohort & case
control studies)
Level 5 - Expert opinion
Grades of
Recommendation
Grade A- consistent level 1 studies
Grade B- consistent level 2 or 3 studies
or extrapolations from level 1 studies
Grade C- level 4 studies or
extrapolations from level 2 or 3 studies
Grade D- level 5 evidence or
troublingly inconsistent or inconclusive
studies of any level
1
------ARR
Was
REFERENCES:
1.Scott-Browns Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery(7 th edition)
2.Critical appraisal skills programme (CASP)-making sense of evidence
public health resource unit;england(2006)
3.Evaluating the literature (emedicine)
4.Unilearing-University of wollongong, australia
5.Evidence based medicine (EBM)-what, why and how(KUMJ 2003)
6CEBM-EBM tools
7.Assesing the medical literature: let the buyer beware
8.Knoweledge managemet:how to keep up with the literature
9.Literature review(st.kates libraries guides)
10.How to evaluate the literature(stanford university)
11.Guidelines for evaluating writing about literature
(john jay college of criminal justice)
12.Critical analysis-so what does that mean(university of bradford)
13.Evaluating the medical literature(clista clantin 2009)
14.Literature evaluation (hussain al awami)
15.Introduction to critical appraisal(jason curtis-NHS)
Thank you