Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
12
21
31
( ij )
N1
For i, j 1,....., N
...
13
23
32
...
...
N2
N3
...
1N
2 N
3 N
Introduction
Introduction (contd)
Introduction
Return
E ( R%
)
x
E
(
R
i i )
p
i 1
x
i 1
1
5
Variance
Introduction
Two-security case
Minimum variance portfolio
Correlation and risk reduction
The n-security case
Introduction
Introduction (contd)
xi x j ij i j
2
p
i 1 j 1
Two-Security Case
2p x A2 A2 xB2 B2 2 xA xB AB A B
Stock A
Stock B
.015
.050
.224
40%
.020
.060
.245
60%
.50
10
E ( R%
p ) xi E ( Ri )
i 1
A ) xB E ( R%
B )
x A E ( R%
0.4(0.015) 0.6(0.020)
0.018 1.80%
11
2p x A2 A2 xB2 B2 2 xA xB AB A B
(.4) (.05) (.6) (.06) 2(.4)(.6)(.5)(.224)(.245)
.0080 .0216 .0132
.0428
2
12
13
Minimum Variance
Portfolio (contd)
A B AB
xA 2
2
A B 2 A B AB
2
B
xB 1 x A
14
Minimum Variance
Portfolio (contd)
Example (contd)
Solution: The weights of the minimum variance portfolios
in the previous case are:
B2 A B AB
.06 (.224)(.245)(.5)
xA 2
59.07%
2
A B 2 A B AB .05 .06 2(.224)(.245)(.5)
xB 1 x A 1 .5907 40.93%
15
Minimum Variance
Portfolio (contd)
Example (contd)
1.2
Weight A
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Portfolio Variance
0.05
0.06
16
Correlation and
Risk Reduction
Portfolio risk decreases as the correlation
coefficient in the returns of two securities
decreases
Risk reduction is greatest when the
securities are perfectly negatively correlated
If the securities are perfectly positively
correlated, there is no risk reduction
17
xi x j ij i j
2
p
i 1 j 1
18
Example of Variance-Covariance
Matrix Computation in Excel
20
21
22
p2 w 'Vw
and
A2
AB
AB
B2
Hence:
2
AB wA
2
A
p w 'Vw wA wB
w
2
AB B B
p2 wA2 A2 wB2 B2 2wA wB AB
P1 , P2 w1 'Vw2 w2 'Vw1
(by symmetry)
25
Minimize w 'Vw
w
Subject to:
1' w 1
' w E ( R p )
defined as:
1
M
n
E ( R 1 )
E ( R n )
26
Lagrangian Method
1
Min L w 'Vw E ( R p ) w ' 1 w '
2
w
2
w
2
w
1
indicates the matrix 2
M
1
1
27
Taking Derivatives
1
0 w V ,
(1)
E ( R ),1 w ' ,1 0, 0
(2)
L
Vw ,
L
0
0
L
1'
1 0, 0
28
And so we have:
' 1
, E ( Rp ),1 V ,
In other words:
1'
1 ' 1
E ( R p )
V
1
Plugging the last expression back into (1) finally yields:
1
1 1 '
1
w
{
{
{
( n1)
( n n ) {
1 2 3 ( n n ) {
n2)
( n2)
(2n )
1 4
1 4 2 (43
4 4 2 4 4 43
( n2)
1 4 4 4 4 4 4 44(222)4 4 4 4 4
1
( n1)
E ( R p )
1
14 2 43
(21)
4 4 43
29
1 'V 1
E ( R p ),1 ,
2
p
E ( R p )
30
1'
V
1'V 1
1
2
*
1'V 1
1
with w*
1'V 1
V 1
33
34
35
Single-Index Model
Computational Advantages
Computational
Advantages (contd)
Beta of a portfolio:
n
p xi i
i 1
Variance of a portfolio:
2p p2 m2 ep2
p2 m2
40
Proof
Ri R f i ( Rm R f ) ei
n
R p xi Ri R f xi i ( Rm R f ) xi ei
i 1
i 1
i 1
1
4 2 43
1
23
p
ep
R p R f xi i Rm xi i R f xi ei
i 1
1
4 2 43
1i412 43
1i 12 3
p
xi i
i 1
1
4 2 43
p2
ep
41
2
i
2
i
2
m
2
ei
AB A B m2
42
Proof
Ri R f i Rm i R f ei
i2 i2 m2 ei2
A, B Cov( RA , RB ) Cov( R f A Rm A R f eA , R f B Rm B R f eB )
A, B Cov( A Rm eA , B Rm eB )
A, B Cov( A Rm , B Rm ) Cov(eA , B Rm ) Cov( A Rm , eB ) Cov(eA , eB )
A, B A B Cov( Rm , Rm ) A B m2
43
Multi-Index Model
I%
j return on an industry index
45