Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Vitae
Personal
Data
DR. Miswar Fattah, SSi, MSi
th June 1978
Makassar, 6th
Education
1997
2002
2006
2012
Current
position
1. Research & Esoteric laboratory Head, Prodia Clinical Laboratory
2. Vice President of The Indonesian Assoctioatin Medical
Laboratory Technologist
3. Scientific division of immunoassay & Molecular Diagnostic
(2011-20130, Reference interval & Decision limit (2013 Now)
Indonesian Association for Clinical Chemistry (IACC-HKKI)
4. Corresponding Members Scientific Committee Asia Pacific
Federation for Clinical Chemistry (APFCB) 2010 - Now
5. Council member of ASEANAssociation For Clinical Laboratory
Sciences 2010 2012
Preparation of Manuscript
for Publication
Seminar Publikasi
USU Medan April 22, 2015
Manuscript Deficiencies
57 articles evaluated to Emerg Med28 accepted, 29
rejected/pending, Of these 29:
Ambiguous methods
77%
Ambiguous results
68%
Conclusions not warranted by data
72%
Poor referencing
56%
Inadequate study design description
51%
Unclear tables
49%
Overly long discussion
49%
Inadequate definition of terms
49%
Deficiencies in manuscript preparation are more
frequent than mistakes in study design and execution.
Specific trainingin manuscript preparation is
indicated.
Manuscript Reviews
Peer Reviewers
No - DOA
Manuscript
Yes
Masked review
Journal
Decision Editor
Rejection - Outright
Revise-Acceptance ?
Receipt of
manuscript by
editorial asst
Appropriate
Appropriate to
to
journal?
journal?
Conform
Conform to
to
guidelines?
guidelines?
Editor
Title
Title &
& Abstract
Abstract
Headings
Headings
References
References
Tables/Figures
Tables/Figures
Read
Read Through
Through
Editor Reports
Summary
Summary of
of peer
peer reviews
reviews
Summary
Summary of
of editors
editors review
review
Revise-Accepted
Acceptance - Outright
Annesley, T.M., 2010. The Title Says It All. Clinical Chemistry 56, 357360. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2009.141523
Be Concise / short
Avoid using wasted words such as a study of,
Be Clear
H1N1 Virus Testing on Mice Using Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing of Mice for the H1N1 Virus
Be Informative
Learning Exercise
Development and Evaluation of a New ELISA for the
Improved Detection of Lupus-Specific Antinuclear
Antibodies
Revised title:
ELISA with Improved Detection of Lupus-Specific
Antinuclear Antibodies
A Validated Method for the Sensitive Quantification of
Sirolimus in Whole Blood by the Use of Online Extraction
Connected to Liquid ChromatographyMass
Spectrometry
Revised title:
Quantification of Whole-Blood Sirolimus by On-line
Extraction Liquid ChromatographyMass Spectrometry
Learning Exercise
Evaluation of siRNA Molecules Reveals Them to Be Sensitive
and Specific Biomarkers of Sepsis
Revised title:
Plasma siRNA Are Biomarkers of Sepsis
Reduction of Viral Load in Blood after Albinovir Treatment of
HIV-Infected Patients
Running title:
HIV Viral Load Reduction with Albinovir Treatment (49
characters)
Albinovir Treatment and HIV Viral Load (38 characters)
HIV Treatment with Albinovir (28 characters)
The Abstract
Background/Significance
Objective
Study design, method
Primary germane results
Principal conclusions, implications
Abstract
Structured Abstract
Structured Abstract
ContextSummarize the study rationale and provide
clinical (or other) reason for the study question.
ObjectiveState the purpose or question asked. If more
than one objective, state primary objective and key
secondary objectives.
DesignDescribe basic design, including relevant details.
SettingGeneral community, primary care, hospital, etc.
Patient or other populationdescribe demographics,
disorders, inclusion/exclusion criteria, etc.
Interventionsname, dose, dosage
Main outcome measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Characteristics of a well-written
abstract
Introduction
Why did you carry out this research? State the specific
purpose or rationale for the study.
Introduction
Introduction Structure
1.
2.
3.
Zinc plays a critical role in many biochemical functions, including nucleic acid
metabolism and is critical in early development.
To clarify the relationship between zinc levels in the mothers diet and
pregnancy outcomes, we undertook a randomized placebo-controlled
trial of zinc supplementation.
Our objective was to determine if zinc supplementation was associated with
higher birth weight.
Our findings will help to provide continuing nutritional guidelines in
pregnancy.
Introduction
Example
Transition Phrases
Occasionally
Frequently
Methods
Methods
Methods
MethodProcedures
ResultsThe Beginning
outline
Write the results
Use subheadings
Results determine
Whether youve answered your original
question(s)
Your direction for future studies
Both of which belong in the discussion
ResultsThe Beginning
results
Results
Results or Data?
Results
Mean translational movements in the X (left to
right), Y (back to front) and Z (bottom to top)
head directions were 0.10 0.11 mm, 0.16
0.03 mm, and 0.65 0.58 mm, respectively.
Mean rotational movements about the three axes
were 0.44 0.42 degrees, 0.24 0.26 degrees,
and 0.18 0.17 degrees, respectively. Movement
was not significantly correlated with age for
translation in the X (r = -0.09; p = 0.69), Y (r =
0.21; p = 0.35) or Z (r = -1.02; p = 0.64)
directions. Movement was not significantly
correlated with age for rotation in the X (r = 0.15;
p = 0.51), Y (r = -0.20; p = 0.35) or Z (r = 0.02; p
= 0.94) directions.
Results!
ResultsDont Regurgitate
Data
ResultsMajor Mistakes
Discussion Construction
DiscussionCommon Mistakes
1.
Unwarranted speculations
2.
3.
4.
Sections Unbalanced
Article 3650 words
Unambiguousimmediately clear
Tables
This requires a table!
Tables
This result does NOT require a table!
Table 3 shows the mean birth weight by the BMI categories recommended
by the NIH Institute of Medicine. The lower the BMI, the greater the
effect of zinc supplementation on birth weight.
Patient Disposition
(Results)
Complex
Study Design
Simplified
Simple Graph
Source: flickr/toennessen
Managing References
Subscriptio
n
Problem statement
Your topic:
article
article
article
article
Your paper
citations
book
book
conferenc
conferenc
conferenc
eepaper
epaper
paper
Lots of typing
Lost references
Mistakes
reference list/bibliography
Your article
citations
book
book
conference
conference
paper
conference
paper
paper
Zotero
reference list/bibliography
Avoid Repetition
table
Do not use tables for presenting simple lists
Journal Review
Full review and decision takes ~1 month
Editors make decision based on arguments; they dont
count votes from Peer Reviewers
Most papers undergo 2 rounds before publication
For borderline decisions, a goal is to avoid multiple rounds
of review
Pressure to publish quickly may lead to rejection if further
experiments are needed
What Doesnt?
My Suggestions
Writing Deficiencies
Most commonly cited by journal editors
Wordiness and
redundancies
Consult an editor
Excessive abstraction
Unnecessary complexity
Excessive compression
Unnecessary qualification
Byrne, D. Science Editor 23:2, 2000
Summary
Outline your paper
Start early as your data is being analyzed
Look at your data and decide how to organize and
present your results: tables, figures, text
Patterns and clues will emerge to guide your argument
Start with results then introduction and
discussion/conclusions
Write title and abstract last
Put it away, re-read, give to your colleagues to read
Revise, revise, and re-revise
Adhere to journal guidelines!
Critically evaluate your paper with an editors eye
Write clearly, logically, and simply!
Use tools loke zotero, medeley, etc
Thanks