Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
D M A I
Overview
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
ABC Incorporated (ABC) is not achieving Six Sigma quality levels for all critical
Body-Side Sub-Assembly dimensions as requested by their customers.
200000
50000
19786
ASM_9Y
3874
ASM_10Y
776
4
ASM_6Y
85824
ASM_3Y
ASM_10Y
ASM_8Y
ASM_9Y
172475
ASM_3Y
100000
ASM_7Y
ASM_6Y
DPM
150000
ASM_8Y
DPM
ASM_7Y
Dimension
Ensure that all critical body-side subassembly dimensions are within Six Sigma
quality levels of 3.4 DPM. Cp 2.0 and Cpk 1.67.
Determined the correlation between body side and assembly dimensions.
Evaluated the significance of Tonnage > 935 for ASM_7Y & ASM_8Y.
Conducted a DOE for Clamp position for ASM_9Y & ASM_10Y.
Change tonnage to > 935 to correct ASM_7Y and ASM_8Y
Set clamp position to location 2 for ASM_9Y and ASM_10Y
Re-machine A-pillar die to correct A_3Y and ASM_3Y
2
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
ABC Incorporateds customer wants ABC to apply Six Sigma problem solving
methodology to insure that the body side subassembly is achieving Six Sigma quality
levels of less than 3.4 defects per million for all critical body side subassembly
dimensions.
ABC needs an improvement strategy that minimizes the rework costs while achieving the
desired quality objective. ABCs goal is to produce module subassemblies that meet the
customer requirements and not necessarily to insure that every individual stamped
component within the assembly meets it original print specifications sub-system
optimizations vs. local optimization.
A-Pillar
Reinforcement
B-Pillar
Reinforcement
D M A I
Measure Phase
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Key Variables:
Assembly process variables:
Weld Pattern (density), Clamp Location, and Clamp Weld Pressure
Stamping process variables (body side):
Press Tonnage, Die Cushion Pressure, Material Thickness
172475
DPM
150000
100000
85824
50000
19786
3874
776
0
ASM_7Y
ASM_8Y
ASM_3Y
ASM_9Y
ASM_10Y
ASM_6Y
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
D M A I
Analyze Phase
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Environment
Quality
Component
Variability
Inspection
Process
Clamp Weld
Pressure
Methods
Clamp
Location
Material Thickness
Yield Strength
Humidity
Gage R&R
Weld Pattern
(density)
Inputs
Temperature
Yield
Strength
Material
Thickness
Elastic
Limit
Materials
Operator
Training
Body
Assembly
Die Cushion
Pressure
Machine
Press
Tonnage
Control Variables
Clamp Location Press Tonnage
Weld Density
Die Pressure
Clamp Pressure
Outputs
Body Side Sub-Assemblies at
Six Sigma quality levels
Noise Variables
Environment
Inherent Variation
Error
States
Dimensional
defects
6
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Conclusion:BS_7YandASM_7Yarefollowingasimilartrend.
Acorrelationcharttostudythisfurthershowshighcorrelation.
(Pearson correlation, R of 0.701).
7
D M A I
Analyze Phase
Capability of B_7Y
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Capability of BS_7Y
0DPM
698416DPM
Conclusion:B_7Yhas0ppmcomparedto~700K
DPMinBS_7Y.
Furthermore,BS_7Yshowsstrongcorrelationon
dimensionASM_7Y.(Pearson correlation, R of
0.786).
8
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Conclusion:Tonnagevaluesabove935greatlyimprovesBS_7Yandbringsit
closertothemean.LetsseewhatimpactthishasonASMdimensions7Y,8Y,9Y,
and10YbycreatingasubsetofthedatalookingonlyatTonnage>935.
9
D M A I
Analyze Phase
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
ImpactthishasonASMdimensions7Y,8Y,9Y&10YonTonnage
Capability Analysis of ASM_8Y at Tonnage > 935
Process Data
USL
Target
1.00
*
LSL
Mean
-1.00
0.09
Sample N
StDev (Within)
12
0.163174
StDev (Overall)
0.147855
USL
Within
Overall
Process Data
1.00000
USL
Target
LSL
*
-1.00000
Mean
Sample N
-0.12833
12
StDev (Within)
0.101825
StDev (Overall)
0.089161
CPU
1.86
Cp
CPU
3.27
3.69
CPL
Cpk
2.23
1.86
CPL
Cpk
2.85
2.85
Cpm
Pp
PPU
PPL
Ppk
2.25
2.05
2.46
2.05
Within
Overall
-1.0
-0.5
Observed Performance
PPM < LSL
0.00
PPM > USL
0.00
PPM Total
0.00
0.0
0.5
1.0
Cpm
*
Overall Capability
Pp
PPU
3.74
4.22
PPL
Ppk
3.26
3.26
-1.0
LSL
*
Overall Capability
Pp
PPU
PPL
Ppk
1.88
0.90
2.86
0.90
0.0
0.5
1.0
PPM Total
PPM Total
PPM Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
USL
Within
Overall
-0.5
Observed Performance
PPM < LSL
0.00
PPM > USL
0.00
USL
Overall Capability
LSL
Process Data
USL
1.00
Target
*
LSL
-1.00
Mean
0.39
Sample N
12
StDev (Within)
0.215541
StDev (Overall)
0.187663
LSL
USL
Within
Overall
-1.0
-0.5
Observed Performance
PPM < LSL
0.00
PPM > USL
0.00
PPM Total
0.00
0.0
0.5
1.0
Exp. "Overall" Performance
PPM < LSL
0.00
PPM > USL
3408.51
PPM Total
3408.51
Cpm
*
Overall Capability
Pp
PPU
PPL
Ppk
1.78
1.08
2.47
1.08
-1.0
-0.5
Observed Performance
PPM < LSL
0.00
PPM > USL
0.00
PPM Total
0.00
0.0
0.5
1.0
Exp. "Overall" Performance
PPM < LSL
0.00
PPM > USL
576.00
PPM Total
576.00
Conclusion: Setting Tonnage to greater than 935 resulted in ASM_7Y and ASM_8Y
meeting the goal of <3.4 DPM. ASM_9Y and ASM_10Y require further analysis.
10
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
but this appears to be a robust parameter, which could be changed for the benefit
of process without reducing quality if processing time or cost shows a benefit.
Optimizer recommends setting Clamp Pressure to 2100 psi (level 1), but this
appears to be a robust parameter, which could be changed for the benefit of process
without reducing quality if processing time or cost shows a benefit.
Run additional tests at recommended settings to confirm results
Weld Density and Clamp Pressure are robust parameters and can be set to optimize
the process capability to maximum level and lowest cost.
11
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
12
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
13
D M A I
Analyze Phase
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
LSL
Process Data
1
*
Within
LSL
-1
Overall
Mean
Sample N
0
36
3.91
3.91
Cpk
3.91
Cpm
*
Overall Capability
USL
USL
Target
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
Observed Performance
0.5
1.0
Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp
PPU
3.43
3.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PPL
Ppk
3.43
3.43
PPM Total
0.00
PPM Total
0.00
PPM Total
0.00
14
Analyze Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Conclusions
FromtheanalysisofASM_7YandASM_8Ywecanconcludethat:
Settingtonnage>935resultsinASM_7YandASM_8Ymeetingthegoal
AnalyzingASM_9YandASM_10Yhelpsdeterminethat:
Settingclamppositiontolocation2,welddensityto1weldevery1.33
andclamppressureto2000psihelpswithdimensionsASM_9Yand
ASM_10Y
AnalyzingASM_3Yhelpsusconcludethat:
RemachineAPillardietomoveA_3Ytonominalwhichcouldcause
BS_3YtoshifttowardsnominaleffectivelyshiftingASM_3Ytonominal
15
D M A I
Analyze Phase
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Withtherecommendedchangestheprocessperformancewillimprovesignificantly
Dimension Mean
StDev
Overall
Pp
Ppk
Cp
Cpk
ASM_1Y
-0.035
0.165
2.01
1.94
2.47
2.39
ASM_2Y
0.259
0.152
2.20
1.63
2.31
1.71
ASM_3Y
0.000
0.097
ASM_4Y
0.009
0.115
2.90
2.87
3.53
3.50
ASM_5Y
-0.330
0.145
2.30
1.54
3.72
2.50
ASM_6Y
-0.284
0.160
2.08
1.49
2.24
1.60
ASM_7Y
0.090
0.148
2.25
2.05
2.04
1.86
ASM_8Y
-0.128
0.089
3.74
3.26
3.27
2.85
ASM_9Y
0.521
0.180
ASM_10Y
0.395
0.191
16
Improve Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Implement the above recommendations and run additional samples to verify results.
17
Control Phase
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
Recommended controls :
Implement a gauge on the body side component press to monitor tonnage
Implement an alarm and shut-off feature on the body side press if tonnage
Position 2
Establish an affordable control plan for ongoing monitoring of the 10
18
Summary
D M A I
Define
Measure Analyze
Improve Control
ABC Incorporated is not achieving Six Sigma quality levels for all critical BodySide Sub-Assembly dimensions as requested by their customers. BBM needs to
apply Six Sigma problem solving methodology to establish an improvement strategy
that minimizes rework costs, yet achieves the desired quality objective.
Bring the key process output variables within Six Sigma quality level of 3.4 DPM.
Cp 2.0 and Cpk 1.67
Set Tonnage to above 935 to improve ASM_7Y & ASM_8Y
Set Clamp to Location 2 to improve ASM_9Y & ASM_10Y
Re-machine the A-Pillar die to move the mean of A_3Y to nominal
19