Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com
Group 6
Introduction
Samarasekera and Matt Cox
Founded the Shopster.com
Low Risk turnkey-commerce
service
First to market competitive
advantage
Network for drop
shipping supplier
and seller to
connect
Business solution
to start or expand
business online
2004
Started
with model
Aug 2005
Beta
testing
Jan 2006
Full
Operation
2007
Growing
100%
month over
month
22
employe
es, 20
countries
850000
products
Sales
increase
d 1000%
over
previous
yr
2007
Business Model
Shipping
Cost
Transection
cost
Payment
Order
Costs
Payment
Order
Virtual
Retailer
SHOPSTER
Supplie
r
Ship
Revenue:
Start up fee
Subscription
fee
Extra fee
for extra
feature
Custome
r
Ship
Business Model
Online shopper
makes purchase
at Rstore
websites
Shopster submits
PO to supplier
Shopster
informs
owner
product
fulfillment and
customer service
functions at
minimal costs
Shopster sends
payment to
supplier
Shopster remits
profit to Rstore
owner.
Rstore
owner
accesses sales
information
from
the
website
Customer/shopper Shopster
customer
service
operation
Expanding
the
Customer
Base
Affiliate marketing
Existing online retailers
to become Shopster
clients themselves
Manufacturers,
importers and wholesale
distributors
Handy sales outlet for
the large numbers of
small handicraft makers,
specialty artisans,
painters, sculptors and
hobbyists
Drop Shipping
Auction
Site
Client
Shopste
r
The selection of
carrier
Carrier costs
Time frame
Shipping table
Dispute resolution
Client
The products being sold on the site, the total sales, the product
returns, the profit earned
Sarath
Samarasekera
Matt Cox
Michael
Barrette
Founders
Initial Funding
Initial personal funding $40,000 2004
Used to develop
software and other
processes
Second
Round
funding $500,000
Investo
r
Funding
$500,00
0 -2005
August 2005
A store was created and
actual order placed.
Purchase was accepted but
product was not shipped
System failed very first test.
Early Challenges
The primary task was to generate interest among both suppliers and
retailers.
They needed the suppliers and manufacturers to showcase their
merchandise
and the retailers represented the other side of the coin
2005
o Persuading suppliers was a major
challenge
o Lack of sufficient retailers put of
many suppliers.
o Standardization required for Shopster
setup which was an upfront cost
hence several suppliers were
sceptical.
Full Launch
1
Resumed full
operation after
automating the
inadequate
manual
processes.
Clients gave :
Full margin and
Own shipping
cost
Still strong sales
growth was
experienced
January 2006
Reasons for
collapse
shopping
SeasonShopster
sytem
collapsed
due to high
volume
Christm
as
October
2005
Weak
Weak Order
Order
HandlingHandling- a
a no.
no. of
of
logistical
processes
logistical processes
being
being handled
handled
manually.
manually.
Maximum
Maximum Load
Load that
that
could
be
handled
could be handled was
was
only
only 50
50 items
items per
per
day
day
Subsidizing
Subsidizing salessalesShopster
Shopster Paid
Paid for
for
shipping
shipping unlike
unlike
amazon
amazon
No
No Credit
Credit charges
charges or
or
transaction
transaction feefeeWhole
Whole sale
sale price
price
from
suppliers
from suppliers
passed
passed directly
directly to
to
retailers
retailers
Enabled
Enabled shopster
shopster to
to
offer
lowest
offer lowest prices
prices
Would
Would merchandise
merchandise
still
still seel
seel if
if products
products
were
sold
were sold at
at full
full
margin?
margin?
MANAGEMENT
Michael Barrette:
Co-creator of a successful local film
Left the company in December 2006
Matt Cox:
Six years as a programmer analyst
Bachelor of science program
Little knowledge about business plan
Quit his job
Founder 2004
Matt Cox
President of
Technology
Sarath
Samarasekera
CEO
Michael Barrette
President of Marketing
Strategy
Sarath Samarasekera:
Experience in management
University of Calgary
President of student union
Universitys budget and finance committee
Technology consulting startup: part of management team
(project management, technology strategy, infrastructure & implementa
After London School of Economics: Consultant for Startups
COMPETITION
No full-service competitors
Only for different parts
Websites providing access to range of wholesalers
Building of internet websites and no full level of integration
Closest competitor: GetEstore
First-mover advantage
Switching Costs for Shopster Customers
Large community of retailers & suppliers (network effect)
Takes long for comptetitor to imitate
SHOPSTER ADVANTAGE
Provided e-commerce, product fulfilment and customer service
functions at minimal cost
Average annual cost of running an online business on ones own
was >$13,000; while through Shopster it was only $329.99
Retailers dint have the burden of tie up cash, inventory
management, returns or deal directly with customers (No
operational responsibility)
Clients website was optimized for search engine visibility
Retailers received the full credit for the sales as Shopster did
not use cookies
TECHNOLOGY
Relied heavily on communication systems that linked Shopster
to computers of retailers, wholesalers and shipping company
99.8% uptime for its servers with multiple power source
backups and advanced security monitoring
All transactions were made through in-house payment system,
Secure2u which used encryption technique to ensure privacy
Continuous investment in technology which led to reduced
checkout process time, higher efficiency of internal operations
and faster communication among stakeholders
CURRENT CHALLENGES
Complex revenue model involving transaction charges, credit
card costs, subscription fees, promotional costs
Operate frugally due to limited financial resources
Supply chain management, integration of backend infrastructure
and systems
Other challenges were recruiting new retailers, branding
expenses and lack of retail management expertise
Handling retailers request related to web enhancements and
offerings
Recommendation
Recommendation