Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Risiko
OLEH: HENDRA
Outline
1. Definition
2. Risk Management Process
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
Definisi
Risk = the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome that could range from minor
to severe.
Management = taking measures to minimize the unfavorable outcome or
accepting the unfavorable outcome.
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
10
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
11
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
12
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
13
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
14
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
15
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
16
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
17
Stressor Analysis
Past data
Audits
Even t trees
HAZOPS
Fault trees
FMEA
What If Analysis
Preliminary survey
Spot sampling
Employee notification
dll
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
18
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
19
Pengukuran
Untuk mengetahui besaran bahaya dan risiko tertentu diperlukan
pengukuran dengan menggunakan alat ukur menurut jenis bahaya
dan risiko yang ada
Contoh:
Tingkat kebisingan, getaran, radiasi, pencahayaan, temperatur
Konsentrasi gas/uap kimia di udara lingkungan kerja
dll
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
20
Risk Analysis
The purpose of risk analysis is to gain a better understanding of
risks so as to be able to reduce adverse consequences.
The magnitude of risk depends on the severity of an outcome and
the likelihood that the outcome will happen.
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
21
ANALYSE RISK
Determine Existing Controls
Determine
Likelihood
Determine
Consequences
Monito
r and
review
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
22
Types of analysis
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative analysis uses words to describe the magnitude of potential
consequences and the likelihood that those consequences will occur.
These scales can be adapted or adjusted to suit the circumstances, and
different descriptions may be used for different risks.
Qualitative analysis may be used:
as an initial screening activity to identify risks which require more detailed
analysis;
where this kind of analysis is appropriate for decisions; or
where the numerical data or resources are inadequate for a quantitative
analysis.
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
23
Types of analysis
Semi-quantitative analysis
The objective is to produce a more expanded ranking scale than
is usually achieved in qualitative analysis, not to suggest
realistic values for risk such as is attempted in quantitative
analysis.
Care must be taken with the use of semi-quantitative analysis
because the numbers chosen may not properly reflect
relativities and this can lead to inconsistent, anomalous or
inappropriate outcomes
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
24
Types of analysis
Quantitative analysis
Quantitative analysis uses numerical values (rather than the
descriptive scales used in qualitative and semi-quantitative
analysis) for both consequences and likelihood using data from
a variety of sources
The quality of the analysis depends on the accuracy and
completeness of the numerical values and the validity of the
models used
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
25
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
26
Severity Categories
Category
Degree
Description
Minor
II
Critical
III
Major
IV
Catastrophic
loss
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
27
Likelihood Categories
Level
Description
Frequent
Probable
Occasional
Remote
Improbable
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
28
Risk Chart
A
High Risk
Pro bability
Level
Priority 1
C
D
Medium
Risk
Low Risk
Priority 2
Priority 3
I
II
III
IV
Severity Category
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
29
Level
Descriptor
Description
Almost Certain
Likely
Moderate
Unlikely
Australian
Standard 4360 Risk Management
E
Rare
The event will only occur in unlikely
circumstances
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
30
Descriptor
Description
Insignificant
Minor
Moderate
Major
5
Catastrophic Death, toxic release off site, huge financial loss
Australian Standard 4360 Risk Management
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
31
Risk Chart
Australian Standard 4360 Risk Management
Consequences
Likelihood
H
S
M
L
=
=
=
=
Insignificant
1
Minor
2
Moderate
3
Major
4
Catastrophic
5
Almost Certain
Likely
Moderate
Unlikely
Rare
High Risk , detailed research and management planning required at senior level
Significant risk, Senior management attention needed
Moderate Risk, management responsibility must be specified
Low Risk, manage by routine procedures
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
32
Description
Ranking
Catastrophe
100
Disaster
50
Very Serious
25
Serious
15
Important
Noticeable
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
33
Description
Ranking
Continuously
Frequently
Occasionally
Infrequent
Rare
Very Rare
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
10
0,5
34
Description
Almost Certain
Likely
Ranking
10
6
3
Remotely Possible
A possible coincidence
Conceivable
0,5
Practically impossible
0,1
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
35
CxExL
Risk Level
Comment
> 350
Very High
180 350
Priority 1
70 180
Substantial
Correction required
20 70
Priority 3
Attention indicated
< 20
Acceptable
11/13/16
Action
Make as
practical
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
low
as
reasonable
36
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
37
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
38
Kriteria
Dalam melakukan evaluasi terhadap bahaya dan risiko diperlukan
kriteria untuk menentukan prioritas
Tingkat risiko yang bisa di terima (tolerable risk) merupakan salah
satu kriteria yang umum digunakan dalam mengevaluasi bahaya
dan risiko
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
39
The same risk may seem negligible to one person and very
high to another.
The criteria should therefore try to represent an objective
view, taking account of the needs of all those affected, and
also the people actually subjected to the risk.
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
40
Social Evaluation
Characterizing the social issues that reflect value judgments and societal
preference, as well as the factors that influence political perceptions of
equity and fairness
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
41
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
42
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
43
Risk Treatment
11/13/16
DASAR K3 - HENDRA
44
Terima Kasih