CASE ANALYSIS:

Being the Good Guy is not a Profession

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

Please do not record this presentation.

Todays contents should be kept secret because they are too useful :D

The Power of PowerPoint | thepopp.com

C A S E A N A LY S I S
The Good Deed
Understanding the need of awareness for
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Youth-friendly clinic Prevention, Testing
and Timely treatment.

The Mismanagement
The employment of people not in sync with
the common aim.
Indifferent behaviour

STI
Statistics in India:
Cases had jumped from one to
4.9 per cent over the past four
years.
Studies from Rohtak (North
India) and Ahmedabad
(Western India) showed a
prevalence of 1.02 and 1.98
per cent in paediatric STDs
during 2002-2005.
The WHO estimates that 150
million girls and 73 million boys
under 18 have experienced
forced sexual intercourse or
other sexual violence.

INITIAL STEPS by Petro

Ivanovich
1

Original Idea
Youth friendly
clinic

Vision

Statistics

Funding

Rightly identified
the need

Background
No background in
reproductive health.

Clear Vision of small

clinic with 4 doctors

Proactive promotion
of idea.

Responsibility
Inappropriate
characteristics

GOOD IDEAS are not enough!

For planning and executing a project
He should have a complete plan for how he should proceed once funding is received.
He should have consulted qualified doctors.

Motivations for appointment

of Mykita Vasylyovich
1

Former
classmate

5
Good personal
relations

Head of
Gynecology

Decision not
rational

Personal bias

No alternative
consideration

QUALIFICATIONS

PERSONAL TRAITS

NO CLEAR LEADER
OR FOLLOWER

Mykita hired on the

basis of professional
proficiencies

Did not look at

individual personality
traits

Such a situation ends

up in a Conflict

Suggested Course of action

1

Good Job
Performance
Eff ective
Leadership

Rational appointment
of head
Ensure his own
leadership

Clearly outline
groups goals

Provide venues
for
communication

Constant
feedback

STAGES OF GROUP
DEVELOPMENT

Stages of Group Development in

case

FORMING

No
leadership

STORMING

No
distribution
of power

More
importance
was given to
personal
ambitions and
power

Growing
dissatisfactio
n

No Progress
in work

Formation of
new leader

NO CLEAR VISION

NO INVOLVEMENT

CONFLICT
MANAGEMENT

HUMAN RESOURCE
COORDINATOR
L AW OF RECIPROCITY
NEED FOR GROUP
NORMS

Actions that a
manager should
take
PROVIDE GUIDANCE

01

INVOLVEMENT

02

03

04

MOTIVATION
FEEDBACK

THANK YOU!
ANY QUESTIONS?

BY GROUP 2