Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MATTE
140/85 mm Hg
+72%
+57%
For internal use
Challenge
n=919
ABPM recordings
T2DM patients with treated hypertension
2015
85%
41%
Despite this,
remained on unchanged
antihypertensive therapy
If
If 140
140 is
is your
your
goal,
goal, BiBipreterax
preterax is
is
your
your
BEST
BEST
Rapid BP Reduction
Perindopril / Indapamide
Effecti
Effective
ve
Blood Pressure Reduction
1.
2.
3.
4.
BiPreterax
Farsang C. In press.
Bi-Preterax
10 Patients
NORMALIZES 9 Out of
9/1
0
*Control rate for systolic (<140 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (<90 mm Hg)
1.
2.
3.
4.
24-H EFFICACY
1. Myers MG, et al. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:1191-1196. 2. Morgan T, Anderson A, et al. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1992;19:61-65. 3.
Mallion JM, Asmar R, Boutelant S, et al. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;32:673-678. 4. Perticone F, Pugliese F, Ceravolo R, Mattioli PL.
Cardiology.1994;85:36-46. 5. McCarron D, et al. Clin Cardiol.1991;14:737-742. 6. Zannad F, Matzinger A, Larch J. Am J Hypertens.
1996;9:633-643. 7. Lacourcire Y, Poirier L, Lefebvre J, et al. Am J Hypertens.1995;8:1154-1159. 8. Song JC, White CM.
Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20:130-139.
16
Clinical Drug Invest 2002: 22 (8): 553-560
HCTZ
SBP mm
Hg
CTD
54%
INDAPAMIDE
HCTZ =
Hydrochlorothiazide
CTD = Chlorthalidone
-5.1 mm Hg, (95% CI, 8.7 to 1.6), P=0.004
Effects on
Mortality
All cause
mortality
1
0
Placebo
Perindoprilindapamide
6 12 18
Relative risk
reduction
14%;
24 30 36p=0.025
42 48 54
60
Follow-up (months)
Cardiovascular
death
1
0
Placebo
Perindoprilindapamide
Relative risk
reduction
18%;
p=0.027
0
0
12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54
60
Follow-up (months)
Combined primary
outcome
Perindoprilbo
Indapamide
Percenta
ges
2
0
1
0
Relative risk
reduction 9%: 95%
CI: 0 to 17%
p=0.041
0 0
1
2
1
8
24
30
36
Follow-up
(months)
4
2
4
8
5
4
6
0
Summary-ADVANCE
Blood pressure lowering arm
Mortality
Cumulative
incidence (%)
(Overall follow-up)
HR 0.91 (0.84,
0.99); P=0.03
HR 0.88 (0.77,
0.99); P=0.04
Placebo
Perindo
prilIndapam
ide
All cause
mortality
Follow-up
(years)
Cardiovascular
death
IRMA 2
TRANSCE
ND
B
IR
N significant
TRANSCE
ND
TELMISARTAN
IR
D
C
Olmesartan
n
ta
ROADMAP
ar
es
TA
R
A
ES
M
IR
Losartan
b
Ir
N
ID
T However,
RENAAL
T
C
E
es
d
an
an
t
ar
Adapted from Garca-Donaire JA, Segura J, Cerezo C, Ruilope LM. Blood Pressure.
2011;20:322-334.
1. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, et al. Stroke. 2011;42;227-276. 2. MacMahon S, Neal B, Tzourio C, et al. Lancet. 2001;358:1033-1041.
3. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Dagenais G, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145-153. 4. Rashid P, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P. Stroke. 2003;34:27412749. 5. Yusuf S, Diener HC, Sacco RL, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1225-1237. 6. Schrader J, Lders S, Kulschewskiet A, et al. Stroke.
2005;36:1218-1224. 7. Algra A, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, et al. Stroke. 1993;24:543-548. 8. Lisheng L, Zhang LG, Peto R, et al. Chin Med
J. 1995;108:710-717.
SAFETY PROFILE
Perindopril/Indapamide
is highly appreciated
Tolerability rated
good or very
good by:
Patients: 98%
Doctors: 99%
Netchessova TA, Shepelkevich AP, Gorbat TV, Lazareva IV; NIKA Study Group. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. ePub ahead of print.
Perindopril/Indapamide Improves
the Patients Metabolic Profile
Indapamide:
The Diuretic Providing The Best
Protection
1. Ambrosioni E, Safar M, Degautec J-P, et al. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1677-1684. 2. Akram J, Sheikh UE, Mahmood M, et al. Curr
Med Res Opin. 2007;23:2929-2936. 3. Gaciong Z, Symonides B. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11:2579-2597. 4. Beckett NS,
Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1887-1898. 5. Gosse P, Sheridan DJ, Zannad F, et al. J Hypertens.
2000;18:1465-1475. 6. Marre M, Garcia J, Kokot F, et al. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1613-1622.
Effective
blood
pressure
reduction
Life-saving
benefits
Optimal
tolerability
profile
4 Endorsed By
guidelines
Conclusion
Bi preterax provides Powerful BP
reduction
-45/-21
mmHg SBP/DBP.
Rapid BP control.
Triple action at the renal level.
Cardio vascular protection.
Total mortality reduction.
ARBs are not equal to ACEi
Saves Lives
60