Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 67

OsakaUniversity

Recent Topics of Welding Metallurgy


Relating to Hot Cracking
and Embrittlement in Iron and
Nickel-base Alloys
Kazutoshi Nishimoto
Department of Manufacturing Science
Graduate School of Engineering
Osaka University

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Nieq %Ni 30%C 0.5%Mn

Prevalent problems in welds of iron-base and nickelbase alloys

OsakaUniversity

ferrite content

The use of
new alloys or new
welding processes

phase
embrittlement

Hot cracking

Cold cracking

Embrittlement by grain
coarsened
475 embrittlement

Need for researches


to understand their
response to these
problems.

Creq %Cr %Mo 0.5%Si 0.5%Nb


New welding processes such as laser welding may cause changes in a
susceptibility to weld cracking that requires further investigation.
Invar alloy which has recently become widely used in cryogenic plants, is found
sensitive to hot cracking, but its mechanism is not clarified yet.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Nieq %Ni 30%C 0.5%Mn

Prevalent problems in welds of iron-base and nickelbase alloys

OsakaUniversity

ferrite content

The use of
new alloys or new
welding processes

phase
embrittlement

Hot cracking

Cold cracking

Embrittlement by grain
coarsened
475 embrittlement

Need for researches


to understand their
response to these
problems.

Creq %Cr %Mo 0.5%Si 0.5%Nb


Embrittlement is also a serious problem in weldments of especially ferritic or

duplex stainless steels.


Although many investigations have been conducted into the material behavior
producing embrittlement, rather few of these are useful for predicting the degree of
alloys during welding and/or in post-heat

embrittlement of the
treatment.

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Spinodal Phase Decomposition in Chromium


Containing Iron base Alloys
OsakaUniversity

2G
2 0
C

(a)

C
C0
C

C
C0
C

(b)

Nucleationandgrowth

Spinodaldecomposition

Initial

Middle

Spinodal
decomposition

C C

(a)Freeenergycurve
(b)PhasediagramandSpinodalcurve

5nm

Final

When ferritic or
duplex stainless steels
containing more than
about 20 % Cr are
exposed to
temperatures of 673823K, they may suffer
from "475
embrittlement", which
somewhat limits the
operating temperatures
of their applications.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Theoretical Analysis of Spinodal Decomposition during


iso-thermal Process
OsakaUniversity

Cahn-Hilliard's non-linear
diffusion equation

c
D
x
c
=
t
x

Cr

Cr

K c
x
2
x
3

Cr
3

Fourier expression of
diffusion equation

Q(h)
2
= h { D0 + 2h 2 2 K0 Q(h) + 1 D1 R(h)
t
2
+ 1 D2S(h) + 1 D3T(h) + }
3
4
4
2h { K1U(h) + K2V(h) + K3W(h) + }

The Cahn-Hilliard non-linear


diffusion equation is one of the
most useful approaches to
spinodal phase decomposition.
Recently, Miyazaki proposed a
general formula with a Fourier
expression of this non-linear
diffusion equation. However,
these approaches are meant to
be used, for isothermal heattreatment, and cannot be
directly applied these to a
phenomenon during the welding
process.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

The Method of Analysis for Spinodal Decomposition


in thermal cycle process
OsakaUniversity

Cahn-Hilliard's non-linear
diffusion equation (extended)

D c
x
c
=
t
x

Cr

Cr

K c
x
2
x

Input of parameters
, cCr, thermal cycle
Input of initial composition-wave Q0(h)
Calculation of temp. &
material constants

Cr

Replacement of Fourier
waves for convolution

Fourier transformation FFT


Rf = QfQf, Sf = RfQf, Tf = SfQf
Uf = k3QfQf, Vf = UfQf, Wf = VfQf

Interdiffusion coefficient

2
2

D= M(Cr) 2 = M0c Fec Cr G


cCr
cCr2

Inverse Fourier transformation IFFT


Calculation of Q(h)/t
Q(h)t+t = Q(h)t + {Q(h)/t}tt

Gradient energy coefficient

K= 0 M(c Cr ) [(cCr ,T) + {(cCr ,T) /c Cr }cCr ]

Developed the method of analysis for the


decomposition in thermal cycle process by
extending the Cahn-Hilliard non-linear diffusion
equation to this processes and applied it to a
computer simulation of phase decomposition for

30Cr-2Mo steel.

Display?
YES

NO

Output of Q(h) & graphing


Completion of
thermal cycle?

NO
t = t + t

YES
End

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

OsakaUniversity

Two dimensional Evolution


the Cr-rich phase
induced by Spinodal
Decomposition in 30Cr2Mo steel

c
D
x
c
=
t
x

Cr

Cr

K c
x
2
x
3

Cr
3

In the early stage of decomposition ,until


the 2nd cycle, composition variations
develop monotonically with time; however,
they periodically fluctuate until the
spinodal decomposition has further
progressed.
On the basis of thus calculated results,
we tried to predict the degree of
embrittlement due to the spinodal
decomposition.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Theoretical approach for prediction of 475C


embrittlement in 30Cr-2Mo steel
OsakaUniversity

Relationship between Hv and vTE

Cut-through model
(Mott-Nabarro's equation)

V 4 / 3 N 1/ 6 3/ 2 1
HV
ln
10
V
3/ 2

1/ 2 4 / 3

KR V ln

3/ 2

Hv : Hardness increment, R : Radius of precipitates,


K : Constant, V : Volume fraction of precipitates,
: Stiffness, N : Numbers of dislocation,
: Misfit between matrix and precipitates
3 /2
1/ 2 4 / 3
E

vT KR V

1
ln
V

The change in hardness Hv due to the phase decomposition well agree with the
value of R1/2V4/3{ln(1/V)}3/2 which is a hardenability parameter derived from
Mott-Nabarro precipitation hardening theory.
This fact suggests that hardening in this case follows the theory proposed by
Mott-Nabarro.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Theoretical approach for prediction of 475C


embrittlement in 30Cr-2Mo steel
OsakaUniversity

Relationship between Hv and vTE

Cut-through model
(Mott-Nabarro's equation)

3/ 2

V 4 / 3 N 1/ 6 3/ 2 1
HV
ln
10
V
3/ 2
3/2
Relationship between R1/2V1/4/32 {ln(1/V)}
and

4 /3
vTE
KR V ln

Hv : Hardness increment, R : Radius of precipitates,


K : Constant, V : Volume fraction of precipitates,
: Stiffness, N : Numbers of dislocation,
: Misfit between matrix and precipitates
3 /2
1/ 2 4 / 3
E

vT KR V

On the other hand,


experimentally determined the
functional relationship between the
change in the transition
temperature of the Charpy impact
energy vTE, and that in the

Vickers hardness Hv.

1
ln
V

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

1st pass welding

OsakaUniversity

Example of the Calculated value of vTE in the triple


pass GTA weldment of 30Cr-2Mo steel

3rd pass welding

2nd pass welding

The high value ofvTE due to the


475 embrittlement can be clearly
recognized in the HAZ near the
bottom of the plate on the 2nd/3rd
pass welding, and it becomes
dominant as the weld pass
progresses.
It can be also seen that the
severely embrittled zone
corresponds to the a position that
has undergone triple heatings to
about 800K.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Embrittlement due to sigma phase Precipitation


OsakaUniversity

20

WT.%Cr

40

60

80

100
1500

Temperature ()

700

1400

Temperature ()

800

1300
1200

600

X X XX+

1100
1000

500

X X XX

900

800

400

X X XX

0.2

0.4

NCr

0.6

0.8

700
1.0

Sigma phase precipitation,


which degrades not only
mechanical properties but also
corrosion resistance in alloys, is
well known, but still a serious
problem in stainless steel
weldments.

Phase diagram of Iron-Chromium Alloy

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Microstructures of super duplex stainless steels


(heated at 1073 K for 1.8 ks)

OsakaUniversity

NAS64

SAF2507

DP3W

50m

M a te ria l

Si

M n

Ni

50m

Cr

M o

50m

Cu

S A F 2 5 0 7 0 .0 2 2 0 .3 6 0 .9 0 0 .0 2 1 0 .0 0 0 9 6 .8 6 2 5 .5 5 3 .8 2 0 .2 4 0 .0 9 5
D P 3W
N A S64

P R E /P R E W *
4 1 .9

0 .0 2 0 .3 2 0 .5 1 0 .0 2 3 0 .0 2 0 6 .8 5 2 5 .1 2 3 .1 7 2 .2 3 0 .4 6 0 .2 8 1

4 2 .7

0 .0 1 3 0 .9 0 0 .7 1 0 .0 2 6 0 .0 0 1 6 .4 5 2 4 .6 0 3 .2 8 0 .1 6

3 7 .9

The microstructures of the super duplex stainless steels heated at 1073 K


for 1.8ksec, which demonstrate sigma phase precipitation.
Sigma phase precipitated mainly at delta/gamma boundaries in these
steels.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Area fraction of phase (%)

OsakaUniversity

50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
101

Sigma phase precipitation Curves in super


duplex stainless steels
NAS64

Aging temperature
1073K
1123K
1173K
1223K

102
103
Aging time (s)

104

SAF2507

DP3W

102
103
104
Aging time (s)

103
104 105
Aging time (s)

Sigma phase precipitation phenomenon follows the Johnson-Mehl type of


kinetic equation in the case of weld metals of austenitic stainless steels.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Kinetics of Sigma Phase Precipitation


---Johnson-Mehl equation---

OsakaUniversity

1.0

Logln1/(1-y)

0.5
0

-0.5

1.0

NAS64

0.5

Aging temperature
1073K
1123K
1173K
1223K

SAF2507

n=1.32

-0.5

-1.0

-0.5

-1.5

-1.5
NAS64 base metal

102

103

Aging time (s)

-2.0

-2.5
104 101

y = 1 exp ( k t )
nn

n=1.62
SAF2507 base metal

102

103

Aging time (s)

DP3W

0.5

-1.0

-2.0
101

1.0

-1.0

-1.5
104 102

n=0.879
DP3W base metal

103

104

Aging time (s)

105

11

log
== nn log
log ln
ln
log tt ++ log
log kk
11 yy

A good linear relationship is found between the aging time and the fraction
precipitated, which indicates that the sigma phase precipitation in duplex stainless
steels also follows the Johnson-Mehl type kinetic equation.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

OsakaUniversity

Prediction of the Amount of Sigma Phase during


thermal cycle process by additivity rule
Based on the
isothermal kinetics of
the sigma phase
precipitation

Applying the

T1

T2

T2
T3

t1 t2 t3
time

f(t)=fmax(t){1exp(k(t)tn)}
Additivity
rule

T3

T1
t1

t2
time

t3

additivity rule and


assuming that the
saturated volume
fraction of the
sigma phase and
the rate constant k
vary with
temperature, we
can calculate the
amount of sigma
phase precipitated
during an arbitrary
thermal cycle with
this equation.

F fdt f sat 1 expktn dt


F=fmax(1){1exp(k(1)tn)}
+fmax(2){1exp(k(2)tn)} k k0 expQ RT
+fmax(3){1exp(k(3)tn)}
+

F Saturated
volume of precipitation
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

The amount of sigma phase precipitated in SAF2507


during two types of synthetic thermal cycles

Area fraction of phase (%)

T e m p e ra t ur e ( K )

OsakaUniversity

Cycle-1

900

Cycle-2

Cycle-1

Cycle-2

(G.C.)

373
R.T.

: Pa tternBB
Pattern

: Pa
ttern AA
Pattern

C.R. : 5K/s

1200

H.R. : 80K/s

Cycle-3

(G.C.)

60

120

180

240

Time (s)

The calculated curves agree


fairly well with the measured
results in both of the thermal
cycles.

SAF2507 base metal

,: Measured

This correspondence suggests


that sigma phase precipitation
in duplex stainless steels during
the thermal cycle process can
be predicted by this
computation.

3
Pattern B

2
1
0

Pattern A
0

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Number of thermal cycles

10

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Impact absorbed energy (J)

OsakaUniversity

80
70
60

Relationship between the amount of sigma phase and


the Charpy impact energy of duplex stainless steels
aged at 1173K
Aging temperature : 1173K
NAS64
SAF2507
DP3W

50
40
30
20
10
0

2 4
6 8 10 12 14 16
Area fraction of phase(%)

In each steel, the Charpy


impact energy decreases
drastically with increases in
the amount of sigma
phase.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Calculated amounts of the sigma phase and degree of


embrittlement due to sigma phase precipitation
OsakaUniversity

(a) Area fraction of sigma phase in multipass weldment

(Under the assumption)

(b) Decrement in impact absorbed energy in multipass weldment

(Under the assumption)

The most embrittled zone locates in HAZ parallel to the weld interface and the

level of the Charpy impact energy in this region is reduced by at most 17J from that

of the unaged base metal.


Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Reasons for this enhancement of hot cracking


susceptibility in laser welds
OsakaUniversity

Generally speaking, decreasing the welding heat input is one of the most
effective countermeasures for preventing hot cracking.
From this reason, laser welding is a preferable safeguard against this
problem, because it can provide a lower welding heat input.
However, hot cracking susceptibility may be enhanced in some cases of the laser
welding of stainless steels and nickel base alloys.

There are two reasons for this enhancement:


Due

to a characteristic shape of penetration in laser welds ; 'the key hole


type of penetration.
Due to the rapid solidification and cooling that takes place during welding
with an extremely low heat input.

Types and positions of hot cracking in laser welds


OsakaUniversity

ot cracking susceptibility may be enhanced


in laser welding
due to a characteristic shape of
penetration in laser welds.

Center-line crack
Solidification
crack at neck
Inter-granular
crack at well
In the case of the key hole type of
penetration of laser welds, various types of
cracking may be experienced.
These types of cracking is caused by the
strain concentration at the specific part in the

welds or in HAZ

Hole by
shrinking during
solidification at
bead center

Liquation crack
at neck in HAZ

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Mechanism of
solidification cracking

ot cracking susceptibility may be enhance


in laser welding
due to the rapid solidification
and cooling during welding .

OsakaUniversity

Strain

Solidification
brittleness
temperature
range (BTR)

TL

TS

(the second reason)

Local

In general, solidification
cracking will develop under
the condition that the
strain
thermal strain subjected to
the welds exceeds more
than the critical value that
(Cracking)
it can bear. That is,
solidification cracking will
occur when the strain
curve during cooling
(No cracking) intersect with the
solidification brittleness
Temperature temperature range ; BTR

Crack
Weld
metal

In laser welding with a


low heat input, the strain
rate during cooling will
increase, and consequently
may enhance the hot
cracking susceptibility.

Relationship between laser traveling velocity and total


crack length in laser welds (SUS316L (P+S:0.04%))
OsakaUniversity

60m

60m

Evidently, an increase in the laser traveling velocity produces a greater


susceptibility to hot cracking in laser welds.
In addition, note that as the laser traveling velocity rises, the location where hot
cracks occur changes from the dendrite boundaries to the center line of the welds.

Two major factors to influence hot cracking susceptibility


in laser welds
OsakaUniversity

BTR

Local strain
Strain

Theoretical
Theoreticalanalyses
analyses
of
ofthe
theliquidus
liquidus and
and
solidus
solidustemperatures
temperatures
during
duringlaser
laserwelding
welding

(Cracking )

Thermal
Thermal
elasticelasticplastic
plastic
analysis
analysis

(No cracking)
TL

Temperature

TS

The BTR in laser welds will vary because of changes in the liquidus and solidus
temperatures due to the rapid solidification.
The strain rate in laser
welds will also enhance due to rapid cooling.

Estimation of BTR in laser surface melted region


Effect of rapid
solidification

BTR

TL
Ts
Temperature

BTR

TL TL TsTs
Temperature

TL decreases due to supercooling

Laser
welding
Strain(%)

Arc welding

Strain(%)

Strain(%)

OsakaUniversity

BTR

TL Ts
Temperature

Ts varied by micro-segregation of

impurity elements

Determined the BTR in laser welds by theoretical analyses of the liquidus and
solidus temperaturesbased on the BTR for GTA welding obtained by the Varestraint
test.

Estimation of BTR in laser surface melted region


Effect of rapid
solidification

BTR

TL
Ts
Temperature

BTR

TL TL TsTs
Temperature

TL decreases due to supercooling

Laser
welding
Strain(%)

Arc welding

Strain(%)

Strain(%)

OsakaUniversity

BTR

TL Ts
Temperature

Ts varied by micro-segregation of

impurity elements
2
mC
1

0
C
V2 +
V + G= 0
P 2 D2
D 1 1 K Iv P modified KGT model

In order to estimate the liqudus temperature, we calculated the dendrite tip


temperature (T*), which corresponds to the liquidus temperature through calculation by

the modified KGT model.

Estimation of BTR in laser surface melted region


Effect of rapid
solidification

BTR

TL
Ts
Temperature

Laser
welding
Strain(%)

Arc welding

Strain(%)

Strain(%)

OsakaUniversity

BTR

TL TL TsTs
Temperature

decreasesdue
dueto
tosupercooling
supercooling
TTLLdecreases
To determine the solidus temperature, we
have conducted a theoretical analysis on the
effect of the micro-segregation of impurity
elements during welding on the solidus
temperature by using the data-base of

Thermo-calc.

BTR

TL Ts
Temperature

variedby
bymicro-segregation
micro-segregationof
of
TTssvaried
impurityelements
elements
impurity
S

C j k nesC j 1

C Ci
Ji = D i + 1
x

Thermo-Calc@

Theoretical model for calculation for impurity elements


segregation in solidification process
OsakaUniversity

N-1

Distribution of S
at liquid/solid boundary

i-1

L
CjS knesCj1

kes
knes
1

i+1

x
Rv
2DS

kes Equilibrium coefficient Rv Solidification speed


Ds Diffusion coefficient

Diffusion in solid

C Ci
Ji = D i + 1
x

2Dst
B
B
B
B
Ci
i
C

1
C

i1
i
i
i 1
x 2 2i 1

Cs
Sc
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

Non-equilibrium
coefficientKnes

12

L
S
S olidification

In this analysis,assumed the morphology of a dendrite to be a hexagonal column


and evaluated distribution of the solute concentration with a one-dimensional
diffusion model in which
the solute diffused in the direction
perpendicular to the grain
boundary

BTR calculated in laser welds of SUS316L


OsakaUniversity

1.0

LTV (mm/s)
20
40
60

0.6
0.4
0.2

P : 0.02%
1680

1640
1600
1560
Temperature (K)

1520

LTV (mm/s)
20
40
60

0.8
Strain (%)

Strain (%)

0.8

1.0

0.6
0.4
0.2
0

P : 0.03%
1680

1640
1600
1560
Temperature (K)

1520

The solidus temperature in the laser welds is found enhanced with a rise in the
laser traveling velocity due to the increase in the solidification rate.
On the other hand, the liqudus temperature in the laser welds decrease due to
supercooling in laser welds

OsakaUniversity

Direction of the the strain analyzed at the surface


of the welds
Laser traveling velocity : Increase

Analysis point and direction

=35

Calculated by Quick Therm

20mm/s

=50

40mm/s

=60

60mm/s

The thermal strain is another important factor to consider the occurrence of


cracking in welds
Used the 3-dimensional thermal elastic-plastic software package "Quick Therm" to
calculate the strain formed during welding in laser welds and analysed the strain
which is perpendicular not only to the center line of the weld but also dendrite
boundaries.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Local strain at the center perpendicular to laser


scanning direction
OsakaUniversity

Strain (%)

1.0

Center-line

1.2

LTV=60

1.0

0.8
0.6

LTV=40

0.4
LTV=20

0.2
0

1650
1600
Temperature (K)

1550

Strain (%)

1.2

LTV : Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)

Dendrite boundary

0.8
0.6

LTV=60
(=60)

0.4

LTV=40
(=50)

0.2

LTV=20
(=35)

1650
1600
Temperature (K)

1550

Examples of calculation which show that the change in the thermal strain
occurring during solidification increases with increasing laser traveling velocities.
In contrast, in the case of dendrite boundaries, the strain taking place with a laser
traveling velocity of 40mm/s is larger than that under other conditions.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Comparison between BTR and strain at the bead center


perpendicular to laser traveling direction
OsakaUniversity

Strain (%)

1.2

LTV = 40 mm/s

LTV = 20 mm/s

LTV = 60 mm/s

0.8
0.6
0.4

Cracking

Cracking

0.2
1650

1600

0.02 P+S
0.04
P+S

1550

1650

1600

1550

Temperature (K)

1650

1600

1550

SUS316L

LTV : Laser traveling velocity

Examine the possibility of solidification cracking in laser welds by


superimposing plots of the BTR and the strain produced during cooling in laser
welds.
When the laser traveling velocity is 40 or 60mm/s, the strain perpendicular to
the center line of the welds crosses to the BTR, which means that solidification
center of the welds in this laser traveling
cracks will occur at the
velocity range.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Comparison between BTR and strain perpendicular to


dendrite growth direction at dendrite boundaries
OsakaUniversity

Strain (%)

1.2
1

LTV = 40 mm/s

LTV = 20 mm/s

LTV = 60 mm/s

0.8
0.6
0.4

Cracking

0.2
0

1650

1600

0.02 P+S
0.04
P+S

1550

1650

1600

1550

Temperature (K)

1650

1600

1550

SUS316L

LTV : Laser traveling velocity

The strain curve estimated for dendrite boundaries crosses the BTR when the
laser traveling velocity equals 40mm/s.
This result suggests that solidification cracks will occur at the dendrite
boundaries in the welds in this laser traveling velocity range.

Comparison between measured and theoretically


calculated conditions to occur cracking
OsakaUniversity

P+S content (mass )

Cracking at dendrite boundary (Calculated)

Center-line cracking (Calculated)

0.04
Crack
Center-line

0.03

Crack
(Dendrite
boundary)

0.02

No crack

10

20
30
40
50
Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)

60

SUS316L

Good agreement between these two conditions determined by calculation and


experimentals.
These results suggest that the cause of solidification cracking in laser welds is
actually the increase in the strain rate during solidification,
in spite of the fact that the

BTR becomes narrower due to rapid solidification.

Enhanced susceptibility due to solidification mode shift


OsakaUniversity
J.C.Lippold, Weld. J., 73-6 (1994) 129s-139s

100

Austenite
(A)

0.1

F/MA
Ferrite
(F)

10
1
0.1

AF

FA
1.5

Creq/Nieq

S+P+B (mass%)

Solidification rate (mm/s)

1000

2.0

Arc welding

YAG welding
No crack

Crack

0.05

1.4

1.6

Cr/Ni-equivalent

1.8

There is another factor to be considered which may influence hot cracking


susceptibility in austenitic stainless steels in laser welding.
It is known that the solidification mode in austenitic stainless steel weld
metals shifts from primarily ferrite to primarily austenite when the solidification
rate becomes sufficiently high.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Enhanced susceptibility due to solidification mode shift


OsakaUniversity
J.C.Lippold, Weld. J., 73-6 (1994) 129s-139s

100

Austenite
(A)

0.1

F/MA
Ferrite
(F)

10
1
0.1

AF

FA
1.5

Creq/Nieq

S+P+B (mass%)

Solidification rate (mm/s)

1000

2.0

Arc welding

YAG welding
No crack

Crack

0.05

1.4

1.6

Cr/Ni-equivalent

1.8

Laser welding with a low heat input can provide in some cases such
solidification condition to cause solidification mode shift.
Alloys solidified in primarily austenite mode is more sensitive than ones in
primarily ferrite mode.
This is another reason for the increased hot cracking susceptibility of
stainless steels in laser
welding.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Condition for transition of solidification mode


OsakaUniversity

In the case of T*>T*

FA mode

In the case of T*>T*

T = T L + (mv ,iC m 0.iC0 ,i)


2
/ R V/ GD / V
*

*
i

AF mode

In general, the phase which has the higher dendrite tip temperature is more
likely to be the primary phase on solidification. Therefore the solidification mode
shift can be predicted if the dendrite tip temperature of each phase is known.

Theoretical model for dendrite growth


OsakaUniversity

T= m C0 C 1 + 2
R

2 V 2 + mC 0 1 K C V + G = 0
P 2 D2
D 1 1 K Iv P

R = 2

mC 0 1 K cV

G
D 1 1 K Iv P

Dendrite Tip Temperature T*

*
T
= T L + (m v ,iC *i m 0.iC0 ,i)
2
/ R V/ GD / V

(modified KGT model)


S.Fukumoto, W.Kurz, ISIJ Inter., 37-7 (1997) 677-684
S.Fukumoto, W.Kurz, ISIJ Inter., 38-1 (1998) 71-77
K Partition coefficient
R Dendrite tip radius
V Dendrite growth velocity
T Undercooling related to the tip radius
G Temperature gradient
D Liquid interdiffusion coefficient
P Peclet number
Iv(P) Ivantsov's solution
c Absolute stability coefficient
mv,i Velocity dependent liquidus slope
Gibbs-Thomson parameter

Used the modified Kurz-Giovanola-Trivedi (KGT) model, which was extended to


multicomponent alloys by Kurz in order to calculate the dendrite tip temperature.
According to the model, the dendrite tip radius, R, is expressed as a function of
dendrite growth velocity, V, as shown in this equation .
For multicomponent alloys, the dendrite tip temperature, T*, is given by this
equation.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Effect of dendrite growth velocity on dendrite tip


temperature of ferrite and austenite
OsakaUniversity

Dendrite tip temperature (K)

1750
1730
1710
1690

The dendrite tip

1670
1650
110-2

110-1

1100

1101

1102

temperature in austenite
rises above that in ferrite
at dendrite growth
velocities exceeding
0.9mm/s.

Dendrite growth velocity (mm/s)

23Cr-9Ni-0.34N steel

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Comparison of calculated solidification mode change with


experimental results in laser welds of stainless steel
OsakaUniversity

AF mode
FA mode

Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)

15

Bead center
AF

10

FA

5
Predicted condition
to yield crack

1.3

1.4
Creq/Nieq

23Cr-9Ni-0.34N steel

1.5

By using the above


mentioned results, you can
also predict the risk of hot
cracking by calculation
assuming that the
solidification mode change
from FA to AF will enhance
cracking susceptibility.
For instance, this figures
show the theoretically
predicted transition line from
FA to AF at the center part of
the weld metals for nitrogen
containing austenitic stainless
steels.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Comparison of calculated solidification mode change


with hot cracking susceptibility in laser welds of stainless
steel

OsakaUniversity

Crack
No crack

Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)

15

Bead center
AF

10

FA

5
Predicted condition
to yield crack

1.3

1.4
Creq/Nieq

23Cr-9Ni-0.34N steel

The condition to yield AF mode


coincide with the condition to
occur hot cracking.
It means you can predict the
risk of hot cracking through
calculation of the mode shift from
FA to AF even in laser weld.

1.5

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Mechanism of ductility-dip crack


OsakaUniversity

Strain

Ductility curve
BTR

Ductility-dip cracking can


occur in various alloys
which exhibit a loss of
ductility below the solidus
temperature, when they are
subjected to a strain
sufficient to produce
cracking during cooling in
welding.

DTR

3
2
1

A ductility-dip crack
formed in weld metals is
normally very small, and is
sometimes called a 'micro
fissuring'.

Ductility-dip cracking

Temperature

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Mechanism of ductility-dip crack


OsakaUniversity

Recently Invar alloy has


attracted special interest as
a suitable material for
cryogenic applications, such
as fuel transport pipes due
to its low thermal expansion
coefficient and good
toughness at low
temperatures.

Strain

Ductility curve
BTR

DTR

3
2

Invar alloy is however,


found to be very
susceptible to micro
fissuring in multi-pass welds
of heavy sectioned pipes.

1
Ductility-dip cracking

Temperature

But, the mechanism of


micro fissuring in the weld
metals of Invar alloys is still
uncertain.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Surface of weld metal of Invar alloy after triple bead


longitudinal Varestraint
OsakaUniversity

Many cracks in original weld


pass which was reheated by a
subsequent pass. Cracks
preferentially occurred along
the columnar grains and/or
around the center line of the
original weld bead.

Fe-36Ni alloy

Effect of weld thermal cycles on cracking susceptibility


Total crack length (mm)

OsakaUniversity

Double-bead
Triple-bead

1100

1200

1000

1100

900

1000

900

800

Peak temperature range in HAZ (K)

Fe-36Ni alloy (0.011%S)

The total lengths of the cracks in the triple-bead test were much greater than
those in the double-bead test. We can see that this tendency predominated in the
peak temperature range between 1000K and 1100K.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Effect of S on susceptibility to ductility-dip cracking


OsakaUniversity

Double-bead Varestraint test


Ductility-dip crack in first bead

80
Total crack length (mm)

Augmented strain

1.6%
2.4%

60
The total length of the cracks
grew as the sulfur content in the
samples increased.

40
20

Fe-36Ni alloy
0

0.010
0.005
S content (%)

This experimental result


demonstrate that sulfur is evidently
detrimental to cracking
susceptibility in the weld metal.

0.015

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

The result of Auger analysis conducted on the fractured


surface in the multi-pass weld metal
OsakaUniversity
800
600

Fe-36Ni alloy

AES spectrum

400
200

c/s

-200

-400
-600
-800
-1000
-1200

Ni

S
Fe

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Kinetic energy (eV)

Effect of thermal cycles at peak temperature of 1000K on S concentration

Twice Average 7% Three times Average 9%

Sulfur is segregated on its surface. Moreover, the amount of sulfur on the grain
boundary increase with increase of welding pass.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Method of calculation for S segregation at grain


boundary during multi-pass weld thermal cycles
OsakaUniversity

StageI:Solidificationprocess
Melting point

StageII:Coolingprocess(aftersolidification)
The concentration of sulfur at the grain boundary
was analyzed for two stages:

Melting point

That is,

Stage I: the solidification segregation during


welding, StageII: the grain boundary segregation
during the cooling and reheating by the subsequent
weld passes.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Method of calculation for S segregation at grain


boundary during multi-pass weld thermal cycles
OsakaUniversity

StageI:Solidificationprocess
Distribution of S at liquid/solid boundary
S
j

L
nes j1

C k C

kes
knes
1

Melting point

x
Rv
2DS

kes Equilibrium coefficient Rv Solidification speed


Ds Diffusion coefficient

Melting point

The same model as the one described in the

previous section was adopted for the


solidification segregation during welding.
thus, the concentration of sulfur after
completion of solidification was calculated by
this equation.

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Method of calculation for S segregation at grain


boundary during multi-pass weld thermal cycles
OsakaUniversity

As for the grain boundary segregation during the


cooling and reheating by subsequent weld passes, we
calculated the change in the sulfur concentration at
the grain boundary after solidification by the these
equations based on the equilibrium segregation
theory.

Melting point

StageII:Coolingprocess(aftersolidification)
Solute concentration change

CX

2DX t
B
B
B
B
i
C

1
C

C
X i X i 1
X i1
Xi
x 2 2i 1

Melting point

Boundary condition

2 Dst
4Dst
Csgb(t) Csgb (0)

1 exp 2 2 erfc
gb
gb
Cs () Cs (0)
1 d
1 d
C Concentration of solute, vacancy,

complex
k constant Ev Vacancy forming energy

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

The concentration of S at grain boundaries calculated


for multi-pass weld thermal cycles
P ea k tem p . of 2n d p ass = 10 00K P ea k tem p . of 2n d p ass = 80 0K

S concentration(%)

Temperature(K)

P ea k te m p . of 2n d pass = 12 00K
OsakaUniversity
1800
Temperature
1600
1400
1200K
1200
1000K
1000
800
600
400
4.0

1000K

1000K

C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)

3.0

Temperature

Temperature

1000K

800K

C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)

C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)

2.0

IN 4 (0.011% S )

1.0

IN 3 (0.004% S )

IN 3 (0.004% S )

IN 3 (0.004% S )

IN 0 (0.001% S )

IN 0 (0.001% S )

IN 0 (0.001% S )

0.0
0

20

40

60

80

Time(s)

0
100 120 140

IN 4 (0.011% S )

20

40

60

80

Time(s)

100 120 140


0

IN 4 (0.011% S )

20

40

60

80

100 120 140

Time(s)
[ P in
eakthe
tem liquid
p.of 3rd
pass =1000K
In the solidification process, the sulfur concentration
phase
rose as]

the solidification proceeded.


During cooling, the sulfur concentration at the grain boundaries first rapidly fell,
and then increased again with correspondent to the increase of its equilibrium
grain boundaries.

concentration at the

The concentration of S at grain boundaries calculated


for multi-pass weld thermal cycles
P eak tem p . of 2n d p ass = 1200K P ea k te m p . of 2n d p ass = 10 00K P eak te m p . of 2nd p ass = 800K

S concentration(%)

Temperature(K)

OsakaUniversity
1800
1600
1400
1200K
1200
1000
800
600
400
4.0

1000K

1000K

1000K

C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)

3.0

Temperature

Temperature

Temperature

1000K

800K

C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)

C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)

2.0

IN 4 (0.011% S )

1.0

IN 3 (0.004% S )

IN 3 (0.004% S )

IN 3 (0.004% S )

IN 0 (0.001% S )

IN 0 (0.001% S )

IN 0 (0.001% S )

0.0
0

20

40

60

80

Time(s)

0
100 120 140

IN 4 (0.011% S )

20

40

60

80

Time(s)

100 120 140


0

IN 4 (0.011% S )

20

40

60

80

100 120 140

Time(s)
[ P eak tem p.of
3rd pass =1000K
]
In the reheating process, the grain boundary sulfur concentrations
decreased
at

temperatures above about 1100 K, due to the reduced equilibrium concentration.


However, in the reheating process in which the peak temperature was less than 1000
K, the grain boundary concentration
of sulfur increased again
with elevations in its

equilibrium concentrations.

Mechanism of ductility-dip cracking in multi-pass weld


thermal cycles
OsakaUniversity

The theoretical analysis makes it clear;


1) the sulfur segregation at the grain
boundary in multi-pass welds was
enhanced by multi-pass weld
thermal cycles
2)

became dominant when a weld


metal was reheated twice at a
temperature range between 900
and 1100 K.
Varestraint test results have shown that this region
was the most susceptible to cracking.

1st pass

2nd pass

3rd pass
Grain boundary

Grain boundary
segregation of sulfur
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Mechanism of ductility-dip cracking in multi-pass weld


thermal cycles
OsakaUniversity

1st

These results suggest


that the cause of
cracking in the multi-pass
welds of Inver alloy can
be attributed to decrease
in the critical strain of
DTR caused by grain
boundary weakening due
to sulfur segregation

Strain

2nd

DTR

BTR

Ductility
curve

3rd
Strain
curve

which has been


accelerated by the multipass weld thermal cycles.

Ductility-dip cracking

1st

Temperature
2nd
3rd
Grain boundary

Grain boundary
segregation of sulfur
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Contents
OsakaUniversity

1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Summary
OsakaUniversity

Calculation codes

Development

Better
Better
performance
performance
of joint
joint
of

Quantitative prediction of microstructure and properties


Precise understanding of mechanism
In the last few decade,mathematical approaches using computer technologies in
the welding metallurgy have significantly contributed to its recent developments.
Such approaches have enabled a more precise understanding of welding
metallurgical phenomena and a more accurate comprehension of the mechanism for
weld defects, including weld cracking through a visualization of the results.
Moreover, mathematical approaches have provided important information to
control weld defects, which ensures better weldment performance and the reliability
of welded joints.
Further
development of mathematical

modeling should be more


encouraged.

OsakaUniversity

Thank you for kind your attention!

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

The method for examination of reheat cracking


susceptibility
OsakaUniversity

2-bead Varestraint test

1st bead

3-bead Varestraint test

2nd bead

3rd bead

2nd bead
1st bead

Test conditions

Welding current 150A


Welding voltage 13V
Welding speed
1.67mm/s
Augmented strain 1.6, 2.4,

3.6%
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

Surface appearance of laser surface melted regions


OsakaUniversity

1mm

1mm

60m

60m

Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess

LTV : Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)

1.2

LTV=60

Center element
QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB

Melted region

Lser scanning direction


Strain ( )

Osaka University

Local strain at the center perpendicular to


laser scanning direction

0.8
LTV=40

0.6
0.4

LTV=20

0.2
0
1690

1650
1610
1570
Temperature (K)
Temperature
(K)

1530

The increment of local strain at the center part in


laser surface melted region during solidification
increases with increasing laser traveling velocities.

Lab. of Material Joining Process

Perpendicular
to dendrite
growth direction

Laser scanning direction

Osaka University

Local strain at dendrite boundaries perpendicular


to dendrite growth direction

Laser traveling velocity : Increase


Element located at
0.3mm from center
QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB

Melted region

QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB

QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB

Lab. of Material Joining Process

Osaka University

Local strain at dendrite boundaries perpendicular


to dendrite growth direction (Calculated)

1.2
LTV : Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)

Laser traveling velocity : Increase

Strain ( )

1
0.8

LTV=40

0.6
0.4

LTV=20

0.2

LTV=60

0
1690

1650
1610
1570
Temperature (K)

Temperature (K)

1530

The increment of local strain in the condition of laser traveling velocity of 40mm/s is larger than the
strain in other conditions. That is, in this case, not only the laser traveling velocity but also the dendrite
growth direction affects the local strain at dendrite boundaries.

Lab. of Material Joining Process

Вам также может понравиться