Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
ferrite content
The use of
new alloys or new
welding processes
phase
embrittlement
Hot cracking
Cold cracking
Embrittlement by grain
coarsened
475 embrittlement
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
ferrite content
The use of
new alloys or new
welding processes
phase
embrittlement
Hot cracking
Cold cracking
Embrittlement by grain
coarsened
475 embrittlement
embrittlement of the
treatment.
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
2G
2 0
C
(a)
C
C0
C
C
C0
C
(b)
Nucleationandgrowth
Spinodaldecomposition
Initial
Middle
Spinodal
decomposition
C C
(a)Freeenergycurve
(b)PhasediagramandSpinodalcurve
5nm
Final
When ferritic or
duplex stainless steels
containing more than
about 20 % Cr are
exposed to
temperatures of 673823K, they may suffer
from "475
embrittlement", which
somewhat limits the
operating temperatures
of their applications.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Cahn-Hilliard's non-linear
diffusion equation
c
D
x
c
=
t
x
Cr
Cr
K c
x
2
x
3
Cr
3
Fourier expression of
diffusion equation
Q(h)
2
= h { D0 + 2h 2 2 K0 Q(h) + 1 D1 R(h)
t
2
+ 1 D2S(h) + 1 D3T(h) + }
3
4
4
2h { K1U(h) + K2V(h) + K3W(h) + }
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Cahn-Hilliard's non-linear
diffusion equation (extended)
D c
x
c
=
t
x
Cr
Cr
K c
x
2
x
Input of parameters
, cCr, thermal cycle
Input of initial composition-wave Q0(h)
Calculation of temp. &
material constants
Cr
Replacement of Fourier
waves for convolution
Interdiffusion coefficient
2
2
30Cr-2Mo steel.
Display?
YES
NO
NO
t = t + t
YES
End
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
c
D
x
c
=
t
x
Cr
Cr
K c
x
2
x
3
Cr
3
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Cut-through model
(Mott-Nabarro's equation)
V 4 / 3 N 1/ 6 3/ 2 1
HV
ln
10
V
3/ 2
1/ 2 4 / 3
KR V ln
3/ 2
vT KR V
1
ln
V
The change in hardness Hv due to the phase decomposition well agree with the
value of R1/2V4/3{ln(1/V)}3/2 which is a hardenability parameter derived from
Mott-Nabarro precipitation hardening theory.
This fact suggests that hardening in this case follows the theory proposed by
Mott-Nabarro.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Cut-through model
(Mott-Nabarro's equation)
3/ 2
V 4 / 3 N 1/ 6 3/ 2 1
HV
ln
10
V
3/ 2
3/2
Relationship between R1/2V1/4/32 {ln(1/V)}
and
4 /3
vTE
KR V ln
vT KR V
1
ln
V
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
20
WT.%Cr
40
60
80
100
1500
Temperature ()
700
1400
Temperature ()
800
1300
1200
600
X X XX+
1100
1000
500
X X XX
900
800
400
X X XX
0.2
0.4
NCr
0.6
0.8
700
1.0
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
NAS64
SAF2507
DP3W
50m
M a te ria l
Si
M n
Ni
50m
Cr
M o
50m
Cu
S A F 2 5 0 7 0 .0 2 2 0 .3 6 0 .9 0 0 .0 2 1 0 .0 0 0 9 6 .8 6 2 5 .5 5 3 .8 2 0 .2 4 0 .0 9 5
D P 3W
N A S64
P R E /P R E W *
4 1 .9
0 .0 2 0 .3 2 0 .5 1 0 .0 2 3 0 .0 2 0 6 .8 5 2 5 .1 2 3 .1 7 2 .2 3 0 .4 6 0 .2 8 1
4 2 .7
0 .0 1 3 0 .9 0 0 .7 1 0 .0 2 6 0 .0 0 1 6 .4 5 2 4 .6 0 3 .2 8 0 .1 6
3 7 .9
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
101
Aging temperature
1073K
1123K
1173K
1223K
102
103
Aging time (s)
104
SAF2507
DP3W
102
103
104
Aging time (s)
103
104 105
Aging time (s)
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
1.0
Logln1/(1-y)
0.5
0
-0.5
1.0
NAS64
0.5
Aging temperature
1073K
1123K
1173K
1223K
SAF2507
n=1.32
-0.5
-1.0
-0.5
-1.5
-1.5
NAS64 base metal
102
103
-2.0
-2.5
104 101
y = 1 exp ( k t )
nn
n=1.62
SAF2507 base metal
102
103
DP3W
0.5
-1.0
-2.0
101
1.0
-1.0
-1.5
104 102
n=0.879
DP3W base metal
103
104
105
11
log
== nn log
log ln
ln
log tt ++ log
log kk
11 yy
A good linear relationship is found between the aging time and the fraction
precipitated, which indicates that the sigma phase precipitation in duplex stainless
steels also follows the Johnson-Mehl type kinetic equation.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
OsakaUniversity
Applying the
T1
T2
T2
T3
t1 t2 t3
time
f(t)=fmax(t){1exp(k(t)tn)}
Additivity
rule
T3
T1
t1
t2
time
t3
F Saturated
volume of precipitation
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
T e m p e ra t ur e ( K )
OsakaUniversity
Cycle-1
900
Cycle-2
Cycle-1
Cycle-2
(G.C.)
373
R.T.
: Pa tternBB
Pattern
: Pa
ttern AA
Pattern
C.R. : 5K/s
1200
H.R. : 80K/s
Cycle-3
(G.C.)
60
120
180
240
Time (s)
,: Measured
3
Pattern B
2
1
0
Pattern A
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2 4
6 8 10 12 14 16
Area fraction of phase(%)
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
The most embrittled zone locates in HAZ parallel to the weld interface and the
level of the Charpy impact energy in this region is reduced by at most 17J from that
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Generally speaking, decreasing the welding heat input is one of the most
effective countermeasures for preventing hot cracking.
From this reason, laser welding is a preferable safeguard against this
problem, because it can provide a lower welding heat input.
However, hot cracking susceptibility may be enhanced in some cases of the laser
welding of stainless steels and nickel base alloys.
Center-line crack
Solidification
crack at neck
Inter-granular
crack at well
In the case of the key hole type of
penetration of laser welds, various types of
cracking may be experienced.
These types of cracking is caused by the
strain concentration at the specific part in the
welds or in HAZ
Hole by
shrinking during
solidification at
bead center
Liquation crack
at neck in HAZ
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Mechanism of
solidification cracking
OsakaUniversity
Strain
Solidification
brittleness
temperature
range (BTR)
TL
TS
Local
In general, solidification
cracking will develop under
the condition that the
strain
thermal strain subjected to
the welds exceeds more
than the critical value that
(Cracking)
it can bear. That is,
solidification cracking will
occur when the strain
curve during cooling
(No cracking) intersect with the
solidification brittleness
Temperature temperature range ; BTR
Crack
Weld
metal
60m
60m
BTR
Local strain
Strain
Theoretical
Theoreticalanalyses
analyses
of
ofthe
theliquidus
liquidus and
and
solidus
solidustemperatures
temperatures
during
duringlaser
laserwelding
welding
(Cracking )
Thermal
Thermal
elasticelasticplastic
plastic
analysis
analysis
(No cracking)
TL
Temperature
TS
The BTR in laser welds will vary because of changes in the liquidus and solidus
temperatures due to the rapid solidification.
The strain rate in laser
welds will also enhance due to rapid cooling.
BTR
TL
Ts
Temperature
BTR
TL TL TsTs
Temperature
Laser
welding
Strain(%)
Arc welding
Strain(%)
Strain(%)
OsakaUniversity
BTR
TL Ts
Temperature
Ts varied by micro-segregation of
impurity elements
Determined the BTR in laser welds by theoretical analyses of the liquidus and
solidus temperaturesbased on the BTR for GTA welding obtained by the Varestraint
test.
BTR
TL
Ts
Temperature
BTR
TL TL TsTs
Temperature
Laser
welding
Strain(%)
Arc welding
Strain(%)
Strain(%)
OsakaUniversity
BTR
TL Ts
Temperature
Ts varied by micro-segregation of
impurity elements
2
mC
1
0
C
V2 +
V + G= 0
P 2 D2
D 1 1 K Iv P modified KGT model
BTR
TL
Ts
Temperature
Laser
welding
Strain(%)
Arc welding
Strain(%)
Strain(%)
OsakaUniversity
BTR
TL TL TsTs
Temperature
decreasesdue
dueto
tosupercooling
supercooling
TTLLdecreases
To determine the solidus temperature, we
have conducted a theoretical analysis on the
effect of the micro-segregation of impurity
elements during welding on the solidus
temperature by using the data-base of
Thermo-calc.
BTR
TL Ts
Temperature
variedby
bymicro-segregation
micro-segregationof
of
TTssvaried
impurityelements
elements
impurity
S
C j k nesC j 1
C Ci
Ji = D i + 1
x
Thermo-Calc@
N-1
Distribution of S
at liquid/solid boundary
i-1
L
CjS knesCj1
kes
knes
1
i+1
x
Rv
2DS
Diffusion in solid
C Ci
Ji = D i + 1
x
2Dst
B
B
B
B
Ci
i
C
1
C
i1
i
i
i 1
x 2 2i 1
Cs
Sc
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Non-equilibrium
coefficientKnes
12
L
S
S olidification
1.0
LTV (mm/s)
20
40
60
0.6
0.4
0.2
P : 0.02%
1680
1640
1600
1560
Temperature (K)
1520
LTV (mm/s)
20
40
60
0.8
Strain (%)
Strain (%)
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
P : 0.03%
1680
1640
1600
1560
Temperature (K)
1520
The solidus temperature in the laser welds is found enhanced with a rise in the
laser traveling velocity due to the increase in the solidification rate.
On the other hand, the liqudus temperature in the laser welds decrease due to
supercooling in laser welds
OsakaUniversity
=35
20mm/s
=50
40mm/s
=60
60mm/s
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Strain (%)
1.0
Center-line
1.2
LTV=60
1.0
0.8
0.6
LTV=40
0.4
LTV=20
0.2
0
1650
1600
Temperature (K)
1550
Strain (%)
1.2
Dendrite boundary
0.8
0.6
LTV=60
(=60)
0.4
LTV=40
(=50)
0.2
LTV=20
(=35)
1650
1600
Temperature (K)
1550
Examples of calculation which show that the change in the thermal strain
occurring during solidification increases with increasing laser traveling velocities.
In contrast, in the case of dendrite boundaries, the strain taking place with a laser
traveling velocity of 40mm/s is larger than that under other conditions.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Strain (%)
1.2
LTV = 40 mm/s
LTV = 20 mm/s
LTV = 60 mm/s
0.8
0.6
0.4
Cracking
Cracking
0.2
1650
1600
0.02 P+S
0.04
P+S
1550
1650
1600
1550
Temperature (K)
1650
1600
1550
SUS316L
Strain (%)
1.2
1
LTV = 40 mm/s
LTV = 20 mm/s
LTV = 60 mm/s
0.8
0.6
0.4
Cracking
0.2
0
1650
1600
0.02 P+S
0.04
P+S
1550
1650
1600
1550
Temperature (K)
1650
1600
1550
SUS316L
The strain curve estimated for dendrite boundaries crosses the BTR when the
laser traveling velocity equals 40mm/s.
This result suggests that solidification cracks will occur at the dendrite
boundaries in the welds in this laser traveling velocity range.
0.04
Crack
Center-line
0.03
Crack
(Dendrite
boundary)
0.02
No crack
10
20
30
40
50
Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)
60
SUS316L
100
Austenite
(A)
0.1
F/MA
Ferrite
(F)
10
1
0.1
AF
FA
1.5
Creq/Nieq
S+P+B (mass%)
1000
2.0
Arc welding
YAG welding
No crack
Crack
0.05
1.4
1.6
Cr/Ni-equivalent
1.8
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
100
Austenite
(A)
0.1
F/MA
Ferrite
(F)
10
1
0.1
AF
FA
1.5
Creq/Nieq
S+P+B (mass%)
1000
2.0
Arc welding
YAG welding
No crack
Crack
0.05
1.4
1.6
Cr/Ni-equivalent
1.8
Laser welding with a low heat input can provide in some cases such
solidification condition to cause solidification mode shift.
Alloys solidified in primarily austenite mode is more sensitive than ones in
primarily ferrite mode.
This is another reason for the increased hot cracking susceptibility of
stainless steels in laser
welding.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
FA mode
*
i
AF mode
In general, the phase which has the higher dendrite tip temperature is more
likely to be the primary phase on solidification. Therefore the solidification mode
shift can be predicted if the dendrite tip temperature of each phase is known.
T= m C0 C 1 + 2
R
2 V 2 + mC 0 1 K C V + G = 0
P 2 D2
D 1 1 K Iv P
R = 2
mC 0 1 K cV
G
D 1 1 K Iv P
*
T
= T L + (m v ,iC *i m 0.iC0 ,i)
2
/ R V/ GD / V
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
1750
1730
1710
1690
1670
1650
110-2
110-1
1100
1101
1102
temperature in austenite
rises above that in ferrite
at dendrite growth
velocities exceeding
0.9mm/s.
23Cr-9Ni-0.34N steel
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
AF mode
FA mode
15
Bead center
AF
10
FA
5
Predicted condition
to yield crack
1.3
1.4
Creq/Nieq
23Cr-9Ni-0.34N steel
1.5
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
OsakaUniversity
Crack
No crack
15
Bead center
AF
10
FA
5
Predicted condition
to yield crack
1.3
1.4
Creq/Nieq
23Cr-9Ni-0.34N steel
1.5
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Strain
Ductility curve
BTR
DTR
3
2
1
A ductility-dip crack
formed in weld metals is
normally very small, and is
sometimes called a 'micro
fissuring'.
Ductility-dip cracking
Temperature
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Strain
Ductility curve
BTR
DTR
3
2
1
Ductility-dip cracking
Temperature
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Fe-36Ni alloy
OsakaUniversity
Double-bead
Triple-bead
1100
1200
1000
1100
900
1000
900
800
The total lengths of the cracks in the triple-bead test were much greater than
those in the double-bead test. We can see that this tendency predominated in the
peak temperature range between 1000K and 1100K.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
80
Total crack length (mm)
Augmented strain
1.6%
2.4%
60
The total length of the cracks
grew as the sulfur content in the
samples increased.
40
20
Fe-36Ni alloy
0
0.010
0.005
S content (%)
0.015
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Fe-36Ni alloy
AES spectrum
400
200
c/s
-200
-400
-600
-800
-1000
-1200
Ni
S
Fe
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Sulfur is segregated on its surface. Moreover, the amount of sulfur on the grain
boundary increase with increase of welding pass.
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
StageI:Solidificationprocess
Melting point
StageII:Coolingprocess(aftersolidification)
The concentration of sulfur at the grain boundary
was analyzed for two stages:
Melting point
That is,
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
StageI:Solidificationprocess
Distribution of S at liquid/solid boundary
S
j
L
nes j1
C k C
kes
knes
1
Melting point
x
Rv
2DS
Melting point
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Melting point
StageII:Coolingprocess(aftersolidification)
Solute concentration change
CX
2DX t
B
B
B
B
i
C
1
C
C
X i X i 1
X i1
Xi
x 2 2i 1
Melting point
Boundary condition
2 Dst
4Dst
Csgb(t) Csgb (0)
1 exp 2 2 erfc
gb
gb
Cs () Cs (0)
1 d
1 d
C Concentration of solute, vacancy,
complex
k constant Ev Vacancy forming energy
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
S concentration(%)
Temperature(K)
P ea k te m p . of 2n d pass = 12 00K
OsakaUniversity
1800
Temperature
1600
1400
1200K
1200
1000K
1000
800
600
400
4.0
1000K
1000K
C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)
3.0
Temperature
Temperature
1000K
800K
C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)
C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)
2.0
IN 4 (0.011% S )
1.0
IN 3 (0.004% S )
IN 3 (0.004% S )
IN 3 (0.004% S )
IN 0 (0.001% S )
IN 0 (0.001% S )
IN 0 (0.001% S )
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
Time(s)
0
100 120 140
IN 4 (0.011% S )
20
40
60
80
Time(s)
IN 4 (0.011% S )
20
40
60
80
Time(s)
[ P in
eakthe
tem liquid
p.of 3rd
pass =1000K
In the solidification process, the sulfur concentration
phase
rose as]
concentration at the
S concentration(%)
Temperature(K)
OsakaUniversity
1800
1600
1400
1200K
1200
1000
800
600
400
4.0
1000K
1000K
1000K
C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)
3.0
Temperature
Temperature
Temperature
1000K
800K
C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)
C gb i (IN 4)
C gb i (IN 3)
C gb i (IN 0)
2.0
IN 4 (0.011% S )
1.0
IN 3 (0.004% S )
IN 3 (0.004% S )
IN 3 (0.004% S )
IN 0 (0.001% S )
IN 0 (0.001% S )
IN 0 (0.001% S )
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
Time(s)
0
100 120 140
IN 4 (0.011% S )
20
40
60
80
Time(s)
IN 4 (0.011% S )
20
40
60
80
Time(s)
[ P eak tem p.of
3rd pass =1000K
]
In the reheating process, the grain boundary sulfur concentrations
decreased
at
equilibrium concentrations.
1st pass
2nd pass
3rd pass
Grain boundary
Grain boundary
segregation of sulfur
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
1st
Strain
2nd
DTR
BTR
Ductility
curve
3rd
Strain
curve
Ductility-dip cracking
1st
Temperature
2nd
3rd
Grain boundary
Grain boundary
segregation of sulfur
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Contents
OsakaUniversity
1. Background
2. Prediction of Degree of Embrittlement
475 Embrittlement
Sigma Phase Embrittlement
3. Mechanism of Weld Cracking
Solidification Cracking in Laser
Welding
Ductility-dip Cracking
4. Summary
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
Summary
OsakaUniversity
Calculation codes
Development
Better
Better
performance
performance
of joint
joint
of
OsakaUniversity
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
1st bead
2nd bead
3rd bead
2nd bead
1st bead
Test conditions
3.6%
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
1mm
1mm
60m
60m
Lab.MaterialJoiningProcess
1.2
LTV=60
Center element
QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB
Melted region
Osaka University
0.8
LTV=40
0.6
0.4
LTV=20
0.2
0
1690
1650
1610
1570
Temperature (K)
Temperature
(K)
1530
Perpendicular
to dendrite
growth direction
Osaka University
Melted region
QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB
QuickTime
tHg - JPEG LvO
sN`KvB
Osaka University
1.2
LTV : Laser traveling velocity (mm/s)
Strain ( )
1
0.8
LTV=40
0.6
0.4
LTV=20
0.2
LTV=60
0
1690
1650
1610
1570
Temperature (K)
Temperature (K)
1530
The increment of local strain in the condition of laser traveling velocity of 40mm/s is larger than the
strain in other conditions. That is, in this case, not only the laser traveling velocity but also the dendrite
growth direction affects the local strain at dendrite boundaries.