AGW 615/3

ADVANCED BUSINESS STATISTICS

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS REPORT

PRESENTED BY BB GROUP:

NOOR ASNIDA BINTI AMRI P-GSM 0145/15

NOR ASMA WARNEE BINTI HABIB P-GSM
0245/15
GOWRI A/P KRISHNAN S-GSM 0156/14
ABD BASIR BIN HASHIM P-GSM 0043/14

SEMESTER 2: SESSION 2015/2016

Industrial 17.6%
Electric & Male 41.2%
Electronics 21.2 Female - Below 26
% 58.8% 16.5%
Telecommunication 26-30 23.5%
1.2 % 31-35 30.6%
Military sector 1.2 Sector 36-40 15.3%
% Gender 41-45 7.1%
of
Service sector organiza Over 45 7.1%
44.7% tion Age
< 100 employees
Others 14.1 %
25.9% Single
101-500 30.6%
Profiling Married
employees
of 68.2%
28.2% Size of Responde Marital Other
501-1000 organiz nts status 1.2%
employees ation
5.9%
> 1000 High school 10.6%
employees 40% Certificate / Diploma
< 5 years 43.5% Highes 35.3%
5-10 years No. of
t level Bachelor's Degree
years in
31.8% of 47.1%
organizati
11-15 years educati Master's Degree
on
15.3 % on 4.7%
16-20 years - PhD / Doctorate
3.5% 1.2%
>20 years 5.9% Others 1.2%
 Descriptive Statistics

Variable N 1. Mean Standard Variance

Deviation

Ethical Leadership 85 3.788 0.620 0.384

Organizational 85 3.833 0.634 0.402

Citizenship
Behaviour
Job Satisfaction 85 4.094 0.718 0.515

Turnover Intention 85 3.294 0.907 0.823

 Independent Sample T-Test

Levene's Test Interpretatio T-test for Interpretation

Variables
for Equality n Equality of
of Variances Means
(sig) (sig)

Ethical .564 variance are .342 No significant

Leadership roughly difference
equal
Organization .585 variance are .438 No significant
al Citizenship roughly difference
equal
Behaviour

Job .026 unequal .257 No significant

Satisfaction variance difference

Turnover .355 variance are .944 No significant

Intention roughly difference
equal

Comparing the variables with Gender (male / female)

Alpha level = 0.05
 One way ANOVA

Age Interpretation
Variables
(sig)

Ethical Leadership .494 No significant difference

in mean
Organizational .977 No significant difference
Citizenship Behaviour in mean

Job Satisfaction .600 No significant difference

in mean

Turnover Intention .803 No significant difference

in mean

Comparing the variables with age (range of age; <26, 26-

30,31-35, 36-
40,41-45, > 45 years old).
Alpha level = 0.05
 One way ANOVA

SIG. VALUE Interpretation

ANOVA

Turnover intention .007 Significant difference in

vs. Size of mean
organization
Multiple Comparisons - Tukey HCD

Size of organization Turnover intention Interpretation

(sig)

< 100 employees vs. .021 Significant difference in

> 1000 employees
mean
101-500 employees 0.014 Significant difference in
vs.
> 1000 employees mean

Comparing Turnover Intention with size the organization

Alpha level = 0.05
 PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS)

Graph above shows the relationship between the variables of

Ethical Leadership (EL), Job Satisfaction (JS), Organizational
Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) and Turnover Intention (IT) to the
questions given and also the relationship between four variables
are each other.
1 Bootstrapping can refer to
any test or metric that relies
on random sampling with
replacement. Bootstrapping
allow assigning measure of
accuracy to sample
estimates. This step also will
increase the result of the
variable that we are test.
Here the result had shown
tremendously increased from
some variables.

2
 Cont..
1
H4: the
relationship between EL
and OCB which are the
score is 0.308.
In this test result we
also reject the two
relationship variables:
These two relationships
were not significant and
we will not calculate
2 Hypothesis into our test
As a result , three variables that positively connected H2: the relationship
which is EL, JS and OCB are supported the hypothesis between JS and TI give
and significant. the result -0.123
H5 : the
H1 : the relationship between JS and OCB give a relationship between
score of 0.308. OCB and TI give the
H3: result 0.074
the relationship between EL and JS have score
0.494
 What we learn from this project?

Learn new skills is Smart PLS analysis data and

become more challenges to study it.
We realize, Smart PLS analysis data are more
accurate than SPSS analysis.