Compressive strength :an important parameter for the
analysis of mechanical response Early attempt to develop theory for rock failue Griffith theory Mohr Coloumb theory and failure criteria and so on. Each theory consider some parameter to explain observed behaviour.
Here we consider two such models taking porosity and
crack density as two important micromechanical parameter in determining compressive strength Pore-emanated crack model The representative element volume is idealized as a pore or crack embedded in elastic continuum as shown in fig.1 Localized stress concentration at pore which propagate parallel to the maximum compression direction. Fig 1 Leads to dilatancy and further propagation leads to uncontrolled crack propagation and hence fracture is observed at macro level. Analytical approximation equation for unconfined compressive strength
UCS predicted to decrease with increasing porosity and
inverse square root of pore radius
This model predicts compressive strength s controlled by two microstructural attributes:
porosity and pore radius Discrete element method When the bonding at grain contact ruptured and neighbouring grains move ,this micromechanical model takes into account for this motion. The contact point of grain has some tensile and shear strength and if either thresholds is reached leads to slip at contact points Useful to model the micromechanics of failure of both compact and porous rocks. This model can simulate the progressive development of strain hardening /softening and shear localization as observed in labrotatry. Sliding wing crack model Considers tensile stress concentration at the tip of pre- existing crack Key microstructural attribute is crack density Tensile stress concentration at the tip propagate wing crack in 1 direction These crack coalesce to form a macroscopic shear band . The principal stress at the onset of dilatancy is given by
As the density of wing cracks increases , they coalesce to form a
macroscopic shear band in the strain. Test method for pore structure characterization:
Scanning electron microscope(SEM)
Nuclear magnetic resonance Mercury intrusion porosimetry Gas adsorption method Micro-CT analysis Scanning electron microscope It produces image of a sample by scanning it with a focussed beam of electrons.It produces high resolution images of mineral and connectivity of pore throat system. However it only gives qualitative pore images and we cannot obtain quantative data of pore size distribution It destroys internal structure and external morphology of the pores. Nuclear magnetic Resonance It produces response signal of fluid hydrogen nuclei in the rock pore that being measured using NMR scan. Applies to sedimentary rocks such as sandstone and carbonate. This method only measures open pores in rock. Mercury intrusion porosimetry Mercury a non-wetting liguid , will enter pore space when pressure exceeds capillary pressure. The pore size invaded by mercury is related to the applied pressure by Washburn Equation:
It is the most commonly used method for pore structure
characterization. Fast determination speed and measuring range of pore diameter is relatively large. Comparison of pore structure characterize methods