Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Yanjie Li
Harbin Institute of Technology
Shenzhen Graduate School
Outline
Downwash and Induced Drag
Vortex filament, Biot-Savart Law and
Helmholtzs Theorems
Prandtls Classical Lifting-Line Theory
A Numerical Nonlinear Lifting-Line Method
A Question
Are the aerodynamic coefficients of finite
wings the same as those for the airfoil
shape from which the wing is made??
No!!
Why?
Downwash and Induced Drag(1)
The flow over an airfoil is
two-dimensional
Biot-Savart Law:
Biot-Savart Law
The direction is
downward
+
For the semi-infinite vortex filament in Figure 5.10
Helmholtzs Vortex Theorem:
Lift distribution
L( y1 )
L( y2 )
L( y1 ) L( y2 )
y1 y2
d (d / dy )dy
The velocity dw at y0 induced by the entire semi-infinite trailing vortex
located at y is
Our central problem is to calculate ( y ) for a given finite wing
Thin airfoil
theoretical
value
1
L' q Scl V2 c( y0 )cl V ( y0 )
2
Lift slope
Fundament
al equation
of Prandtls
theory
( y0 )
Special Case:
Elliptical Lift Distribution
Circulation distribution given by
2
( y ) y
2
1
0 b / 2
Eq. 4.26
Constant
A more useful expression for i
Aspect ratio
The induced drag coefficient
+
1. Drag due to lift
2. The Induced drag coefficient is inversely
proportional to aspect ratio
Constant Constant
+
The induced drag coefficient
The induced angle of attack
Defining
CL2
The elliptical lift distribution yields
AR the minimum induced drag
The minimum induced drag
but expensive to manufacture
Trade-off
design a taper ratio
A Numerical Nonlinear Lifting-Line Method
The classical Prandtl lifting line theory assumes that a linear variation of
versus .
In fact, It is nonlinear.
Consider the most general case of a finite wing of given platform and geometric
twist, with different airfoil at different spanwise stations. Assume that we have all
the experiment data for the lift curve of the airfoil sections.
A numerical method:
f ( x h1 ) f ( x h2 )
df / dx
h1 h2
Simpsons
Rule Three-point
estimation of
the derivative
Singularity
Compare the classical solution of Prandtls with the
numerical method. The latter has an excellent
agreement
Compare the numerical solution with exiting
experimental data obtained by Univ. of Maryland.
The numerical lift-line solution at high angle of attack
agrees with experiment within 20 percent or much
closer. Therefore the numerical solution gives
reasonable preliminary engineering results for the
high-angle-of-attack region.
However, the flow is three dimensional. The basic
assumptions of lifting-line theory, classical and
numerical cannot properly account for such three
dimensional flow.
To be continued